Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Racing Boards > Theoretical and Street Racing
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-14-2009, 09:14 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2

Classifieds Rating: (0)
How does the Camaro stack up to a Foxbody? (Serious Post)

Serious Questions... PLEASE be Unbiased. ( I didnt know where to put this I really didnt want a comparison but didnt see a "General Question" section)

Hey all hows it going, First post! Anyways My name is kacy, im from Wilmington NC, I search local forums alot and I came across this Camaro and I fell in love now im interested in getting 1.

Screamin85Z is his name on the local forums :P But I love his car!

Now lemme get to it!

How well does the 350 3rd gen stack up to a foxbody mod for mod? I am trying to do my homework so I dont jump on the wrong car and kick myself in the *** yet again.... I know NOTHING about 3rd gens. Im a mustang guy sorry lol.

What is the most power the stock bottom end can hold?

Was the 700r4 the only transmission available? What is its power cap?

I know mustangs have the most after market for them but are Third gens the same? can I find multiple different superchargers or turbo kits with tested and proven review?

I know there is a million different ways this could turn out... but please let me know some unbiased opinions... I really want to get an Iroc and give this a shot but might just get another foxbody because I know they are proven.

My cousin owns a foxbody that has my old engine lol, and I really wanna bust his *** with a Camaro so help me out with as much info as you can.

Heres my fox I sold. and regret .





306 4:10's Stalled c4 seen some spray lol.
Shags is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2009, 09:47 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Madison, SD
Posts: 569
Car: '82 Camaro
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 31 spline 9" with 4.56:1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: How does the Camaro stack up to a Foxbody? (Serious Post)

Unbiased opinions here??? Now that's funny!!! But I will give mine...

I've built both, a few Fox bodies and a few less Camaro's... Both have their good and bad points...

Similarities:
1. Excellent parts availability for either, prices are close to the same, too.
2. Project cars and used parts are plentiful and reasonably priced.\
3. Resale is about the same for both.

Mustang "good"
1. Probably a bit more rigid structure, will handle horsepower increases without a lot of chassis mods.
2. Much lighter in the front, mainly because of the rack and pinion steering and less frontal overhang.
3. A bit better on the front to rear weight distribution then the Camaro's.

Camaro "good"
1. Much smoother ride
2. Some really first rate interior upgrade options came right out of the factory.
3. Smoother and cleaner lines lend themselves better to styling changes and mods.
4. Roomier engine compartment, more room for "extras".


No real preference for me on the Camaro v. Mustang thing... I've had both and gone quite fast in both... IMO the Camaro is a bit more widely accepted, but the Mustang's have a huge following, too. As to which is better...too many variables, comes down to personal preference. Heck, I like them both! Both were put on the market when I was in my teens, and I instantly loved them both!!! The wars between Chevy and Ford will probably keep going on forever, and I'll probably keep building both!!!!
__________________
Of course it's for sale!!! Everything is for sale!!!!

Camaro and other projects pictures can be seen at:

http://s534.photobucket.com/albums/e...1982%20Camaro/
radical82 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 11:16 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
chas0218's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Corning NY
Posts: 601
Car: 86' IROC
Engine: 388
Transmission: Built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.08 non-posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to chas0218
Re: How does the Camaro stack up to a Foxbody? (Serious Post)

I have a buddy that is in love with mustangs. He built 2 foxbodies in the last few years and for the money he invested the cars should've been a lot faster. Nice foxbody it looks just like the second one he had.

One was stock short block with trick flow heads and cobra intake, ran 14's.

Second one he dumped about 5k into the motor alone and ran low 13's all had aftermarket suspension and the second car was on 10" slicks. From my experience a camaro with 3k into the motor (my car) nothing done to the rest of the car lowered stock open diff (one wheel peel) i ran high 13 with a t-5 (broke on the way home opps) I feel the camaros can be faster with the same amount of work. which gets to my thrid point...

5.7 350 > 5.0 302

I mean if you threw in a 351 then i think it could be just as fast maybe faster i dont know about that because i havent ever seen one run.

He now has a 4.6L modular mustang 99 maybe? but he is claiming to be fast with lots of upgrades but i think he is B.S.ing me hardcore either way he wants to run me so it will be fun now that I have a built 700r4 behind a fully forged 388 WATCH OUT!

Last edited by chas0218; 11-16-2009 at 11:22 PM.
chas0218 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 08:53 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Convoy25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somerset, New Jersey
Posts: 795
Car: 2000 SS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: How does the Camaro stack up to a Foxbody? (Serious Post)

IIRC all throughout the 80s, articles stated that mustangs outperformed camaros, yet the camaro handled better
from the factory that is
Convoy25 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 10:17 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
vette9190's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Park Forest,Il
Posts: 325
Car: 1991 Chevy Camaro RS
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4,
Axle/Gears: 3.73 w/SLP Zexel Torsen Limited Sli

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to vette9190 Send a message via Yahoo to vette9190
Re: How does the Camaro stack up to a Foxbody? (Serious Post)

Stock for stock it all depended on the driver and conditions. As for Modding. The SBC's are the most popular OHV engines ever made. You can get pretty much anything aftermarket for the chevy engine that you can for the ford. The 700r4 that was availoable behind the 350 can be built to handle good power but a built th350 can handle more. The only real areas were the mustang was better then the camaro are the rear end and the mpfi manifold design. You will need to get an aftermarket rear for any serious power. I have seen guys build the stock rear's to handle around 450 horse/lbs but thats pushing it. Strange and Moser both sell 12 bolt and ford 9 inch direct fit rears. For all out preformance and from the looks of your old horse I would pull the TPI in favor of carb. It would be the cheapest route otherwise you would want to change to a HSR/miniram style intake. The 350 chevy is a very stout piece to work with the stock bottom end can handle alot of power its the rpm's you need to watch, you don't rreally want to spin a stock bottom end much past 6000 or you start to risk catastorphic failure.
I say try a thirdgen if you liked foxbody's you should like thirdgens too.
__________________
91 RS 350 TPI, S_AUJPv4 chip, 24lbs, Ported L98 heads & intake, Accel 300+ ign., LT1 cam, BBK AFPR, Edelbrock true trak timing set, B&M trans cooler, vette servo, 2200 stall, March pulleys, Edelbrock TES into 3 in Catco cat in to Dynomax catback. 3.73 w/ SLP Zexel Limited Slip, UMI LCA's, SFC's, Coming soon Ported SLP runners and 1.6rr's
vette9190 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 10:25 AM   #6
Supreme Member
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Old Bridge "Raceway Park", N.J.
Posts: 5,342

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Re: How does the Camaro stack up to a Foxbody? (Serious Post)

Quote:
Originally Posted by chas0218
I mean if you threw in a 351 then i think it could be just as fast maybe faster i dont know about that because i havent ever seen one run....
.... I almost built a notchback w/351 windsor a few years back. Very good engines;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDybpBrozg8
Street Lethal is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 12:50 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: How does the Camaro stack up to a Foxbody? (Serious Post)

Quote:
Originally Posted by vette9190 View Post
Stock for stock it all depended on the driver and conditions. As for Modding. The SBC's are the most popular OHV engines ever made. You can get pretty much anything aftermarket for the chevy engine that you can for the ford. The 700r4 that was availoable behind the 350 can be built to handle good power but a built th350 can handle more. The only real areas were the mustang was better then the camaro are the rear end and the mpfi manifold design. You will need to get an aftermarket rear for any serious power. I have seen guys build the stock rear's to handle around 450 horse/lbs but thats pushing it. Strange and Moser both sell 12 bolt and ford 9 inch direct fit rears. For all out preformance and from the looks of your old horse I would pull the TPI in favor of carb. It would be the cheapest route otherwise you would want to change to a HSR/miniram style intake. The 350 chevy is a very stout piece to work with the stock bottom end can handle alot of power its the rpm's you need to watch, you don't rreally want to spin a stock bottom end much past 6000 or you start to risk catastorphic failure.
I say try a thirdgen if you liked foxbody's you should like thirdgens too.
Good information.
Shags is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2009, 12:56 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bloomington Indiana
Posts: 1,827
Car: 1991 L03 700r4 RS
Engine: 1987 WS6 Trans AM Lb2
Transmission: Th350 red neck Performance 3k stall
Axle/Gears: 95 Mustang 8.8 built with 3.73s

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Send a message via Yahoo to 1991CamaroRslow
Re: How does the Camaro stack up to a Foxbody? (Serious Post)

I've got a ton of mods on my Camaro mostly for weight reduction, it does 13.4's at 100 on Et Street's. I built a Mustang for a friend of mine from JUNK, that is no exaggeration the car he bought had been bought and stripped for parts, we picked up spares from a bunch of other peoples fox cars build (you know the parts people throw away when they put better ones on). His car did 13.7's at 100 on street tires and weighed basically nothing, he was sub 3000. His car was also brutally uncomfortable and noisy but for what it was it was real fun. The biggest motivator in that car was a set of 4.11 gears. The foxes have a TON of potential and a lot of people mismatch parts and actually slow the cars down from what they can run. They also have a decent rear end, and forged internals so you can put stupid amounts of nitrous to them if you're careful.
1991CamaroRslow is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2009, 12:56 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Racing Boards > Theoretical and Street Racing

Tags
12s, 350, 3rd, 92, body, camaro, change, fox, foxbody, gears, gen, mods, motor, overhang, run, stock
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details