 |
07-21-2003, 03:53 PM
|
#1 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 3
| Lt1 vs. 350 tpi | which is better , could i hear some pros and cons? | | | |
| |
07-21-2003, 04:37 PM
|
#2 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Nebraska
Posts: 821
Car: '89 Formula Engine: HSR/355cid Transmission: Modded 700R4 Axle/Gears: 9 bolt/3.45:1 | If the LT1 design wasnt superior to the TPI, it wouldnt exist. LT1s do have drawbacks, however...
LT1 pros- Aluminum heads, more accurate sequential injection, 10.5:1 CR, 275-305hp stock, short runner intake good to ~10sec ETs, available w/ 6spd
LT1 cons- Opti-spark distributor sucks, engine halfway under dash, some parts more expensive
TPI 5.7 pros- Cheap, cheap/plentiful aftermarket parts, can use std. smallblock parts, engine easily accessible
TPI 5.7 cons- Max hp stock is 245hp, LTR intake restrictive, only available with auto
If you want my honest opinion, get an LT1.
__________________ '89 Formula WS6
355/Toplines/HSR, '730, stall, gears, etc... |
| |
07-21-2003, 05:21 PM
|
#3 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 1,886
Car: Guess Engine: Crazy 8 Transmission: So close to being a manual I can taste it | When it comes down to which engine design is "better", then the answer is going to be the LT1 for many reasons. It has more technology in it and a better design for moving air and making power. It put the Camaro/Firebird back in the game, in my opinion, to potential performance car buyers...
If you are considering installing an LT1 engine into a 3rd gen then maybe it is a good decision. The LT1 would perform very well, it would work with your exsisting transmission, and it would install fairly easily. As for specifics you would need to search the Motor Swap forum. If you already have a TPI you would also have the option of keeping it and building it up. Cost wise would probably be more than a good condition, used LT1. However if your TPI is in good order, provided you even have one, than a cam/head/intake swap would really change the attitude of the car. Like I said, it may be more cost effective to do the other, but there is the other side of that coin. You would need a new computer, wiring harness, possible trans, and need to be prepared for the installation and tuning.
Its really a question of personal preference I think. Sure the LT1 is a better engine than a TPI. And it holds true that the LS1 is a better engine than the LT1. And the LS6 is better than the LS1. ANd so on and so forth... |
| |
07-21-2003, 06:30 PM
|
#4 | | Member
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 104
Car: GM products! Engine: LM7, LS1, L?? Transmission: 4L60E, 700R4, T-56 Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.23 (soon to be 3.73), 3.42 | Yeah LT1s are Aweome! Hando down. I loved my L98 car alot but the LT1 powerwise was like a whole different animal. Especially when i got my habds on mine(in sig) But as far as the LS1 being "better" than the LT1, I'd have to say that maybe stock vs. stock the LS1 is quicker, BUT for long term racing and rebuilding the LS1 is the last motor u'd want. The L98 or LT1 will hold up many times better, mainly because it an Iron block engine. I don't mean to sound disrespectful to LS1 owners, some of my friends have LS1 cars, I love'em if i could afford it i have one right along my LT1 car (i'd also have another 3rd gen car, which i do plan onn getting another one in the future) anyways just my $.02 |
| |
07-21-2003, 08:46 PM
|
#5 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 1,886
Car: Guess Engine: Crazy 8 Transmission: So close to being a manual I can taste it | About the only thing I meant by "better" with respect to the LS1/LS6 engines is the fact that they are technologically more advanced. That's about it from my stand point in the "better" department. I have driven my share of LT1 cars, awesome, and have driven in many a LS1 Camaro/TA, awesome. Then I got to drive a Z06, wow!!! This is stock!!
For me, I prefer my stroker motor. Fun on the street, once I finish my rebuild  , and plants my *** in the seat with no trouble...
I agree with you about buying one if I could afford it though. I think my biggest problem would be affording the car, but being able to afford my addiction for speed. I don't think a 427 would fall into the budget catagory would it.... |
| |
07-21-2003, 09:24 PM
|
#6 | | Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: In a mint Third Gen!
Posts: 7,232
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection Transmission: 700R4 Auto Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27 | I'd take TPI. Modify it and you have 1 great street setup. |
| |
07-22-2003, 08:08 AM
|
#7 | | Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,173
| In stock trim, yes the LT1 is the better engine. But as soon as you say "modified", all bets are off. Then anything is possible. The only difference then would be in the reverse flow cooling of the LT1 which nets higher streetable compression. One could argue about the advantages of sequential fuel injection, but other than that, it's just two plain ol' small block Chevys going head to head. |
| |
07-22-2003, 08:53 AM
|
#8 | | Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Quakertown, PA
Posts: 2,010
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28 Convertible Engine: 5.0 Transmission: 700R4 | down but not out. the L98 isnt completely out of the game, with complete exhaust headers back, and tuned good, good driver/traction, they are in LT1 Territory.
Hell they even hang with LS1s up till about 80-85 before they get walked.
I love the fact that its got so much torque to have fun with all day. |
| |
07-22-2003, 11:47 AM
|
#9 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,823
Car: 1988 IROC-Z Engine: L98 (350 TPI) Transmission: MD8 (700 R4) + 3.42 LS1 Rear | it's is cheaper mainly to maintain a tpi setup than the LT1's. ask me how i know. to rebuild the L98 it would have cost alot less than it did when i rebuilt the LT1.  it fairly easy to get L98 to perform well. mainly get rid of the TPI intake and go with one of the aftermarket ones. LT1's are harder to work on just doing simple, routine maintanace. believe me no more fourthgens for me. besides the damn car is built like a hotwheels car. almost the entire car is made plastic body panels or fiberglass.
i should have rebuilt the L98 instead.
Last edited by mystikkal_69; 07-22-2003 at 11:51 AM.
|
| |
07-22-2003, 01:32 PM
|
#10 | | Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Brentwood, CA
Posts: 1,878
Car: 1989 Camaro IROC-Z Engine: ZZZ# 0607 of 1200 produced Transmission: Pro-Built 700R4/Vig.2400 Axle/Gears: 3.27 BW 9 Bolt PBR Disc | Does anyone know whats involved to possibly swap a LT1 intake onto a TPI car??? I have heard some talk of this being done and some people very pleased with this. Would that also incorporate the reverse cooling and higher CR? Thanks fellas
Will
__________________ 89 IROC-Z As seen on TechTV August 2003
ZZZ Short Block/AFR180's/XFI268 Smog Legal!
Best Run of 13.8 @ 98mph w/ 1.9 60' Short Idle Clip |
| |
07-24-2003, 05:02 PM
|
#11 | | Member
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Hartland, WI
Posts: 494
Car: 1991 Camaro Engine: 2000 LS1 Transmission: 4L60E SS3600 | How different is the LT1 to the LS1? I mean are there parts such as the intake from the LS1 that would bolt up to the LT1? |
| |
07-24-2003, 05:11 PM
|
#12 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Dale City, VA
Posts: 1,668
Car: 91 GTA and 85 IROC Engine: 355 Transmission: gear jammer Axle/Gears: 4.11 | Quote: Originally posted by Knyghtmare How different is the LT1 to the LS1? I mean are there parts such as the intake from the LS1 that would bolt up to the LT1? | You'd have better luck trying to put a SBC head on a B16 honda block.
The LS1 is extremely different. |
| |
07-24-2003, 05:28 PM
|
#13 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 1,886
Car: Guess Engine: Crazy 8 Transmission: So close to being a manual I can taste it | The LS1 is a III Generation small block. When the engineers at GM sat down to design it, they started with a clean slate. It is new work from the block up. |
| |
07-25-2003, 08:25 AM
|
#14 | | Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,173
| Quote: Originally posted by mystikkal_69 it's is cheaper mainly to maintain a tpi setup than the LT1's. ask me how i know. to rebuild the L98 it would have cost alot less than it did when i rebuilt the LT1. it fairly easy to get L98 to perform well. mainly get rid of the TPI intake and go with one of the aftermarket ones. LT1's are harder to work on just doing simple, routine maintanace. believe me no more fourthgens for me. besides the damn car is built like a hotwheels car. almost the entire car is made plastic body panels or fiberglass.
i should have rebuilt the L98 instead. | That's not really the engine's fault, but rather the cars. Considering that half the engine is under the front of the windshield area, it's a tight squeeze to do anything. But put an LT-1 into an older Camaro, and it's just as easy to work on as any other small block Chevy. |
| |
07-25-2003, 10:45 AM
|
#15 | | Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2000 Location: Norfolk, VA. USA
Posts: 7,964
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI Transmission: T56, T5 | Modded LT1's still get great gas milage vs a TPI 350.
__________________ 1988 Firebird Formula WS6 305HSR T5 195RWHP/273RWTQ Mods: Eibach Sportlines, ASCD RA1 Hood, 01 LS1 rear with LS1 brakes, Moser Axles, Torsen Posi, 3.42 gears, TA Diff Cover,
ES Tranny & Tq Arm Mount, 160* Stat, K&N Cone Filter, TB Coolant Bypass, Holley Stealth Ram, MSD Billet Dist. Pro 5.0 Shifter,
Hooker Headers, Borla Catback, Lakewood LCA's, BMR Adj. Panhard, 2" Skulte Adaptors, 17" ZR1's w/ Nitto 555RII's,
Craig Moates Adaptors and Chips WWW.TransAmWS6.Com http://youtube.com/watch?v=BQ54A0NY2l0 |
| |
07-25-2003, 11:55 AM
|
#16 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Nebraska
Posts: 821
Car: '89 Formula Engine: HSR/355cid Transmission: Modded 700R4 Axle/Gears: 9 bolt/3.45:1 | Quote: |
Does anyone know whats involved to possibly swap a LT1 intake onto a TPI car??? I have heard some talk of this being done and some people very pleased with this. Would that also incorporate the reverse cooling and higher CR? Thanks fellas
| The LT1 intake swap has been discussed a million times, it is not that hard of a swap and it is pretty cheap. lt1intake.com sells pre-modified LT1 intakes that bolt right on. Do a search, youll find everything you want to know. Compression ratio is determined by heads, pistons, and cam: For the most part the intake has nothing to do with compression ratio. The entire LT1 engine is designed around reverse cooling, simply swapping the intake wont make the coolant circulate backwards, anyway, it really isnt worth the effort to swap to reverse cooling; there are plenty of 10.5:1 standard smallblocks on the street. Hope this helps. |
| |
10-31-2003, 03:30 PM
|
#17 | | Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 318
Car: '88 IROCZ Engine: 363 Vortec w/Miniram Transmission: built 700r4 | Re: down but not out. Quote: Originally posted by 86FyrBrd the L98 isnt completely out of the game, with complete exhaust headers back, and tuned good, good driver/traction, they are in LT1 Territory.
Hell they even hang with LS1s up till about 80-85 before they get walked.
I love the fact that its got so much torque to have fun with all day. | I was well beyond stock LT1 territory with just full exhaust and a stall. I enjoyed picking on them cause they thought they were fast when they really weren't. the LS1 is based on the SB2 engine design, particularly the heads and intake. |
| |
10-31-2003, 03:30 PM
| | ThirdGen 1992 Camaro
Paid Advertisement | |  | | Tags | 1989, 350, 3rd, cons, firebird, formula, gen, lt1, lt1vs350, motor, pro, pros, tpi, ttop, ws6  | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | | | |