Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI

TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-17-2004, 07:05 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 19
Car: 91 firebird formula 350 or 94 grand am se
Engine: 350 or 3.1
Transmission: 700r4 or what ever a grand am has

Classifieds Rating: (0)
406 with stock tpi???

I thought the people of this board came to the idea that you couldn't run a 400 with the stock tpi this (http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...mhtp_warriors/) articles say "A .030-over 400 that was originally meant for his 1980 Camaro street car provides the thrust. Once the boys at Custom Design Performance in Columbia, Conn. were done with the short-block, Rob bolted up a stock TPI unit, which sits atop the 406 and breathes for aluminum Trick Flow heads. Thanks to the torquey mill under the Harwood hood, this Z has run 12.7s in the quarter with the factory chip still in the ECM."

I thought someone said that you couldn't run a 400 with stock tpi??
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
350f_bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 08-17-2004, 07:25 PM   #2
Member
 
88fbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Savannah G.A.
Posts: 219
Car: 84 S-10:(

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I think with enough drive or money, whichever you have more of, anything is possible!
88fbird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2004, 09:42 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lima, OH
Posts: 1,096
Car: '89 Formula 350 & '86 Z28
Engine: L98 & 355ci
Transmission: 700r4 in both

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to SweetS10v8
Its not that you cant, a 400ci is still a SBC. So yes, it will work. But most with 400s want to see some more HP from there ci's

TPI on a 400 would make great torquey... cruize around town motor. You just couldnt rev it past 4000rpms
__________________
SweetS10v8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2004, 01:10 AM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 56
Car: 1987 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: 406 TPI
Transmission: T56 6-speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
My 87 Monte Carlo SS is running the same as you mentioned. I built a 406 with Trick Flow Twisted Wedge heads, flatop pistons, roller cam and a TPI off of a 1989 Fbody I converted to Speed Density. I am stock on the TPI other than some mild porting. I couldn't use the 350 injectors due to bogging, I installed 30lb units and it runs great. I shift at about 5400 RPMs and with a torque monster like this that is enough!! With my 3:73 gears and T-56 6-speed it's a blast!! Sure I could go with a mini-ram and make more hp in a higher RPM range but I drive it on the street and torque is what I want for the daily drive.
Not to disagree with anyone but most people that says 406's and stock-style TPI's don't work have never owned one.
Even with my heavy 36 lb CenterForce flywheel my 406 revs quickly and I have my rev limiter set for 5700 RPM.

Last edited by wulff; 08-27-2004 at 01:49 AM.
wulff is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2004, 11:08 AM   #5
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Eastside
Posts: 202
Car: 1985 Buick Regal T
Engine: 87 3.8 turbo/lc2 drive train
Transmission: 200r4brf

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Could you mate a t56 lt1 tranny(6spd) to a tpi 350? What would I need?
Calico is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2004, 12:44 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 40
Car: 87IROC
Engine: L98
Transmission: MAD DOG 700R4 w/3:73 posirear

Classifieds Rating: (0)
That's exactly the combo that I want to build. I was going to use the Eldelbrock L98 corvette heads though. I belive their flow is 175 cfm for the intake.

Regards,
G
NYIROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2004, 08:00 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,361
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Quote:
Originally posted by wulff
.......Not to disagree with anyone but most people that says 406's and stock-style TPI's don't work have never owned one.
Even with my heavy 36 lb CenterForce flywheel my 406 revs quickly and I have my rev limiter set for 5700 RPM.
Your engine will run, that's agreed. Shifting at 5700 rpm isn't your best option. You are way past peak and are loosing time. Get byour combo dynoed and you will see what everyone is talking about.
I had a 383 and stock TPI, the engine was begging for more air but the TPI couldn't feed it. I then converted to LT1 intake and WOW, big improvement. I gained 6 mph at the track (1/4) with only the intake swap.
__________________
  • 1997 Jeep Wrangler
  • 1991 Honda TRX300
John Millican is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2004, 03:35 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
JakeJr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lancaster,TX, (Dallas)
Posts: 795
Car: 1996 Vette / 1992 GSX1100F Suzuki
Engine: 1996 Corvette Coupe 388 LT1 (+.060)
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.07

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to JakeJr
Another option is to resort to mods MadMax pioneered, as I did, to improve the breathing.

Jake
JakeJr is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2004, 07:14 PM   #9
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Kenner, La
Posts: 256
Car: '86 iroc
Engine: lb9 305
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Sure it can be done and will be a decent motor, its just that so much more could be had with a better breathing intake. It just seems like kind of a waste. Unless of course if it is heavily modded but this thread is about a stock tpi unit.
123jon321 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2004, 10:16 PM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 56
Car: 1987 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: 406 TPI
Transmission: T56 6-speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Yes, you can mate the T56 to your 350 (what year is your blocks?) I had to use a Centerforce flywheel as I was using a pre-one piece oil seal but as for the bolts it will bolt right up. My block is a 400 out of my original 78 Chevy 3/4 ton 4X4. I used a smaller starter out of a 93 Fbody.

As for me shifting way past my peak, my 406 is still pulling well past 4000 rpm... you have to remember, I built a torque motor for the street and that is exactly what I got. Not every car has to be built for 1/4 mi pounding. Bottom line is you have to decide what you want the car for and build the RPM and power range for just that, with my gearing and the 6-speed my RPMs on the street is great for my 406 TPI.
Also, the 383 is a higher winding motor than the 406 and if you build 2 identical motors (other than the cubes) you will find the 383 having to climb a lot higher to make the same horsepower and torque.
I talked to one of the techs at AZ TPI SPecialties and he said that there is a lot of info floating around about the 'stock' TPI and larger cube motors that just isn't right and said he would put my SS on the dyno when I am finished to see what I am putting out. I will post the numbers here when I get them.
A friend of mine put in a Edlebrock manifold and LARGE runners and said on his 350 he didn't gain much but did lose a lot of low rpm torque.

If you guys (wanting to install a T56 in your cars) have any questions I'll be happy to help, I took a lot of photos and aquired a bunch of info. I really love the 6-speed with my 3:73 gears I can cruise at about 1600 RPM at highway speeds yet have all the grunt I need in the lower gears.

Hey Jake, what kinds of mods did you do? I ported my intake out a lot and took off the EGR "wall" in the plenum plus I smoothed out everything I could in the flow stopping short of taking off the area between the tubes.

Last edited by wulff; 08-31-2004 at 10:25 PM.
wulff is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2004, 12:34 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
JakeJr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lancaster,TX, (Dallas)
Posts: 795
Car: 1996 Vette / 1992 GSX1100F Suzuki
Engine: 1996 Corvette Coupe 388 LT1 (+.060)
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.07

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to JakeJr
Quote:
Originally posted by wulff

Hey Jake, what kinds of mods did you do? I ported my intake out a lot and took off the EGR "wall" in the plenum plus I smoothed out everything I could in the flow stopping short of taking off the area between the tubes.
Well, I went as far as I could.

Beginning with the plenum, I removed the obstruction just behind where the TB bolts. I opened the areas where the runners bolt, leaving just enough metal to allow for a good seal.

I'm using siamesed runners and I removed the dividing walls as far in as I could reach with my reciprocating blade. I attacked the dividing walls from both ends of the runners.

After cutting out as much of the walls as I could with the saw, I used a Mikita high-speed grinder reached in as far as I could to grind away all the burrs.

I did much the same thing with the intake manifold (base). I removed the diving walls as far in as I could reach and opened up the entries just as I did with the plenum.

I attached the gaskets (using bolts, washers and nuts to hold them in place) to the plenum and intake and used my grinder to open the gasket openings to match the plenum/intake.

If I recall correctly, I ended up with about 3-1/2" of wall remaining in the intake. I wrote down all the measurements I ended up with but I can't lay my hands on them right now.

Basically what I wanted to achieve was to allow each intake port more than one runner to draw from.

There are still a couple of inches of wall remaining in my runners that I couldn't reach. One guy on the Corvette Forum did the same thing, but went a step further and cut the runners open to be able to get at the remaining walls. He removed them then had the runners welded back up.

Jake
JakeJr is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI

Tags
406, block, build, chevy, dallas, flow, heads, injection, port, porting, sbc, small, stock, tpi, trick, tuned, twisted, wedge
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2010 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.