 | |
11-06-2004, 12:35 AM
|
#151 | | Member
Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 482
Car: 88 Trans Am Engine: lt1 intaked 355 makin 277 on 25 psi of fuel pressure and stock timing :) Transmission: A4 stock... that moved a mobile dyno a foot shifting into 2nd :) | its going into a 355 with 10-10.5 compression.... and i am not really worried about tuning.. will have a prom burner when its all said and done |
| |
11-06-2004, 12:40 AM
|
#152 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2000 Location: E.B.F. TN
Posts: 3,168
Car: Tree Huggers Engine: Do Not Transmission: Appreciate Me. | Abubaca, that looks surprisingly familiar. I had a few posted up quite a few years ago, something very similar to that and another closer to a traditional tunnel ram design. Most agreed the traditional tunnel ram design would probably work better, though I never got around to actually building either.  What else is new.
Now where did I miss the $200 jump? Their site still lists for $400 and I'm still waiting on pics here. 
__________________ Infamous NE3G crew. -= ICON MOTORSPORTS =- |
| |
11-06-2004, 12:46 AM
|
#153 | | Member
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: IL
Posts: 279
| MSRP $599 online $399  Mastercard, priceless etc... |
| |
11-06-2004, 03:23 AM
|
#154 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: VA
Posts: 579
Car: 1997 Acura Integra 4dr Engine: B18b Transmission: 5 speed manual | Quote: Originally posted by 86IROCTHD hey i know yall have talked about the intake DIE off points of the hsr mini ram but what about the lt1 intake? whats the rpm limit on it?i have a xe292 cam and it says its good till 6500 but i dont know if i will need to go that high... but just wondering | The problem with miniram and LT1 isn't the die-off point, it's the torque you give up in the street-use range. I think either of those intakes would be good for 6500, if your bottom end and valvetrain can take it.
__________________ UVA Car Club President and former thirdgen owner |
| |
11-06-2004, 06:29 AM
|
#155 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Chico/Antioch California
Posts: 764
Car: 1989 iroc Z Hardtop Engine: 350 tpi Transmission: 700r4 | Argh... im drooling with anticipation... there arent even pics of the prototype or maybe even in the least the base manifold...? |
| |
11-06-2004, 08:33 AM
|
#156 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2
| Talked to BBK guy at sema, they did not have an intake with them... They said to expect something between Jan. and Spring time... No pics or design diagrams tho... |
| |
11-06-2004, 01:33 PM
|
#157 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 1999 Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 689
Car: '90 IROC-Z Engine: twin-turbo L98 Transmission: T56 Axle/Gears: 3.42/posi | It's not coming out when they originally said, it's going to cost more (possibly), and from the sounds of it, it's going to be in Superram territory for revs.
I think I might end up getting an HSR soon afterall, unless some information changes soon. It may not end up like that, but I don't know if I want to wait until spring to find out. :shrug:
__________________ 90 Camaro IROC-Z TT: Maybe it'll run right someday.  "TWNTRBO" 96 Talon TSi AWD: 11.9 @ 117 & 31mpg- daily driver. "ALLTRBO" 87 Fiero GT: Old, stock, and slow- backup beater. "NOTRBO" |
| |
11-06-2004, 04:29 PM
|
#158 | | Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: RALEIGH, NC
Posts: 4,129
Car: Sweet 89 Iroc Engine: L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: 3.27 | This isn't Burger King, you don't get it your way.
Seriously guys, come on. If I were BBK, I'd be a little irratated with you guys. It's gotta be this price, it's gotta be this color, it's gotta have this RPM range, and we want pictures NOW!
"most" people want a mid range RPM intake. Those who want all the top end already have multiple choices.
"most" people would JUMP at a $600 manifold/kit.
"most" people can wait 'til it's ready.
Give 'em a break.  |
| |
11-06-2004, 04:56 PM
|
#159 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 1999 Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 689
Car: '90 IROC-Z Engine: twin-turbo L98 Transmission: T56 Axle/Gears: 3.42/posi | LOL, I know, just stating that I don't think I'm gonna wait to find out, though I may have to anyway depending on what comes up.
I think most people (myself included) are disappointed in the fact that they stated that it would cost $399 and be ready at the beginning of the year, then the price went up and the release date got potentially pushed back, it makes it seem worse than it would have been otherwise I think.
I'm not too worried about it. :shrug: |
| |
11-07-2004, 01:16 AM
|
#160 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 2,024
Car: 1989 Camaro RS, 1986 Firebird T/A Engine: 2.8L MPFI and 5.7L TPI Transmission: T5 and TH700R4 Axle/Gears: 3.42 and 3.27 posi | Something similar to an LT5 would be sweet (this one happens to reside in a 3rdgen Camaro BTW!) The fuel rails could go under the runners, right? 
__________________ 1989 Camaro RS 2.8L MPFI - T5 - 3.42s - weekend cruiser 1986 Firebird Trans Am 5.7L TPI - 700R4 - WS6 - 3.27 posi - summer project |
| |
11-07-2004, 10:36 AM
|
#161 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2000 Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,356
Car: 2004 GTO (supercharged) Engine: 490RWHP LS1 Transmission: 4L60E | I agree that they are starting off on the wrong foot saying it will be this price, available this date and you can go see an example at SEMA next week. It's a classic example of the companies marketing division being ahead of actual design and production. Happens all the time.
I believe they should have kept tight on info untill is was ready. This keeps rumors down and people won't have to wait a year before they can touch it.
I convert LT1 intakes and am working on something else but I of course won't say a word untill it's tested and ready to market. |
| |
11-07-2004, 11:05 AM
|
#162 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: Carson, CA
Posts: 773
Car: '88 GTA Engine: 5.7 TPI, fed growth hormones Transmission: 700r4 4u2? | Well, I hate to say I told you so, but the development is still in it's early stages. I have worked for several companies that operate like this. Engineers are slow and ponderous by nature. The marketing department uses this tactic to put pressure on the engineering people to put "hot" products on the fast track. Also, as it is still not developed, the attention and questions to BBK will filter through and either dramatically complicate or help focus the development on key things.
As there is no finished engineering prototype yet, I am highly skeptical that this product will see the light of day in the first half of 2005. This is not the only and not the most business significant product that they have in development, and anyone familar with product development and foundry pattern making will understand the time it will take to get this into production. If you've ever heard the old saw "it's too good to be true"? Well, the website blurb is exactly that. Bummer.
Troy
So Cal |
| |
11-07-2004, 08:25 PM
|
#163 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: Prince George, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,301
Car: 89 GTA Engine: 5.7L Supercharged Transmission: T-56 Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70 | Quote: Originally posted by John Millican I convert LT1 intakes and am working on something else but I of course won't say a word untill it's tested and ready to market. | Is this something else a new intake design maybe? If so can you at least tell us what RPM range your shooting for?
__________________ 89 T-Top GTA 5.7L T-56
ATI procharger D1sc, AS&M SS runners, accel base, 58mm TB, 42Ibs injectors, full exhaust, McLeod Street twin, Moser ford 9" with 3.70, 18" Boyd Smoothie II wheels 8"/10", DIY prom with code59.
Items to be installed: AFR 195 eliminator heads, zz9 cam, Stainless works LT 1 3/4 headers, Mufflex 4" catback http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2480939 |
| |
11-07-2004, 11:28 PM
|
#164 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 3,037
Car: '98 Z28 Engine: LS1 :( Transmission: T-56 Axle/Gears: Ford 9" TrueTrac/3.89 | Quote: Originally posted by Tony89GTA Is this something else a new intake design maybe? If so can you at least tell us what RPM range your shooting for? | I think I know what he's working on if its what he and I discussed quite a while ago, but I'm keeping my mouth shut  |
| |
11-08-2004, 08:48 AM
|
#165 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2000 Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,356
Car: 2004 GTO (supercharged) Engine: 490RWHP LS1 Transmission: 4L60E | The moment I say something it'll turn into a 3 page BBK style thread. All they said was $399 and TPI replacement and look what happened. They don't even have a product yet. |
| |
11-08-2004, 12:03 PM
|
#166 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: Prince George, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,301
Car: 89 GTA Engine: 5.7L Supercharged Transmission: T-56 Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70 | Quote: Originally posted by John Millican The moment I say something it'll turn into a 3 page BBK style thread. All they said was $399 and TPI replacement and look what happened. They don't even have a product yet. | Ya but that's what happens when you B.S. people which I'am pretty sure you don't do so what do you have cooking there
Just two simple questions, is it a intake design and what RPM band on a 5.7L? |
| |
11-08-2004, 12:16 PM
|
#167 | | Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: RALEIGH, NC
Posts: 4,129
Car: Sweet 89 Iroc Engine: L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: 3.27 | I don't think BBK was BSing. It's just business. It happens.
They know we pay attention, there's no way they would've done it on purpose.
....and I agree with John. After reading this thead, there's no way I'd post anything "early". 
Last edited by Abubaca : 11-08-2004 at 06:40 PM.
|
| |
11-08-2004, 12:36 PM
|
#168 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Browns Town
Posts: 2,349
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4) Engine: Treefitty Roller Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.2K stall Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break | Quote: Originally posted by TA Engineers are slow and ponderous by nature. | Hey...
I resemble that remark! LOL 
So true...
And yes, they should just keep it under wraps until they know what it is.
Management should be shot, they'll need the Engineers if we will ever have a chance at actually getting a product.
Jp |
| |
11-08-2004, 08:08 PM
|
#169 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 274
| Companys do these things to generate hype which could keep potential customers from going elsewhere...it may not be ready till next year sometime,but if no one knows about it they may make up there mind and purshase another competitors setup before BBK's is even announced ..now people have some tidbits on a new TPI setup..and may hold-off on a setup they were previously commited too...thats smart buisness really. |
| |
11-08-2004, 08:15 PM
|
#170 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Chico/Antioch California
Posts: 764
Car: 1989 iroc Z Hardtop Engine: 350 tpi Transmission: 700r4 | Thats how business works, because if no one gets excited about there product b4 its out then theyr not going to continue to dump money into a lost cause in developement which i agree sucks but it makes sense |
| |
11-14-2004, 08:41 PM
|
#171 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003 Location: NC
Posts: 263
Car: '91 Camaro Z28 Engine: 383 Vortec HSR Transmission: Pro-Built 700-R4;Vig 3500 stall Axle/Gears: 10 bolt / 3.73 | I've def. got to keep an eye out for this thing....sounds like what I need for my current setup.  A $600 price tag isn't so bad either.
__________________ |
| |
11-15-2004, 08:41 AM
|
#172 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2000 Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,356
Car: 2004 GTO (supercharged) Engine: 490RWHP LS1 Transmission: 4L60E | A year in advance is too long. Sure a few months to get people exicted is fine, I would do the same. After waiting a year people will forget about it.
Oh and as far as $600 being a good price, it WAS advertised for $399 remember? By the time a production castings released don't be surprised if they raise it another couple hundred to $799. |
| |
11-15-2004, 12:07 PM
|
#173 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 8,870
Car: 89 Iroc-z Engine: Stealth Ram 383 Transmission: Beefed 700R-4 Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10 bolt 3.42's | Quote: |
Oh and as far as $600 being a good price, it WAS advertised for $399 remember? By the time a production castings released don't be surprised if they raise it another couple hundred to $799.
| very true, and i am concerned about this. I hope it dont go any higher than it is now but i dont see how they can say they will have a TPI intake for 400 and then come out saying, well its gonna be more expensive than we thought. Thats suppose to be under product development where once they get a prototype, and have a set price idea, thats the price they advertise. Dont understand what happened. |
| |
11-16-2004, 10:18 AM
|
#174 | | Member
Join Date: May 2002 Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 206
Car: 1988 Pontiac Trans-AM Engine: TPI 350 (5.7L) Transmission: 700R4 | Were did the $600.00 price tag come from? Web page still shows $399.00. 
__________________ 1988 T/A 350 TPI, purchased new.
Mods:
Suspension: Eibach pro kit springs, KYB struts, shocks, and TDS wonder bar, SFC's
Induction: K&N air filter, 52mm throttle body, port matched SLP runners and plenum. AFPR
Exhaust: Hooker headers with Jet-Hot, Catco cat, and Hooker Cat-back.
Tranny: built up 700r4 with Trans-go shift kit
cooling: Griffin radiator,185 Degree therm, 200 degree Fan switch
Future modes: New seats |
| |
11-16-2004, 11:26 AM
|
#175 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Orange City,Fl. USA
Posts: 682
Car: 1990 GTA Engine: 5.7 T.P.I. Transmission: 700r4 | Quote: Originally posted by Roads88 Were did the $600.00 price tag come from? Web page still shows $399.00. | Some info from the SEMA Show!!
My brother was able to talk to the Vice President of BBK, Ken Murphey, at the SEMA show today about the new intake that will be released by his company. He is a really nice guy and has some great ideas and great products. He seems excited about this new intake and it should be a killer setup for our cars. In this post I will list all the information we were able to obtain about the intake. It is important to note that this intake is still in the development stage and all this information is subject to change.
As stated above this intake is still in the prototype stage and only the intake base is complete. They did not have the prototype at SEMA so sorry no pictures available yet. Below are the questions from my previous post and their answers, I have also added and taken away a few questions. It is important to note that the answers are not the exact answers or wording we got from the guys at BBK, I have put them into my own words:
Q) What is the price range of this new intake setup?
A) The price is targeted around $600.
Q) When is this intake scheduled to be released?
A) They should have it out for summer 2005 sales.
Q) Will the stock throttle bodywork with this new intake?
A) Yes
Q) Will there be a vortec head version available?
A) As of the first release probably no, but it very possible there will be in the future.
Q) Will this intake be 50 state legal?
A) They are working on CARB legality but are running into problems with the cars that came stock with a 9’th injector. I am not exactly sure what problems are so I can’t say any more.
Q) What is the height of the manifold, for people who want to fit it under stock hood and strut tower braces?
A) This intake is going to be slightly taller then stock TPI but will still fit under a stock thirdgen and corvette hood.
Q) What comes with the manifold?
A) This intake will come with a setup for both camaro and corvette EGR, the bolts for the intake, and all gaskets minus the intake manifold gaskets.
Q) Will stock fuel rails work with this intake?
A) Yes, the stock fuel rail will work with this intake.
Q) What RPM range is this intake designed to make peak power?
A) This intake is designed for mid to upper RPM’s. It is not going to be a high RPM screamer like the Mini-ram and will not die up top like TPI so it will be in-between.
Q) How does the low-end power of this intake compare to TPI?
A) It is too early in the development to answer that exactly but it should still have low end grunt.
Q) What is the length of the intake runners?
A) It is too early to know.
Q) How many piece intake is this (for example TPI is 3 piece; a base, runners and plenum)?
A) The top end of this intake is not fully complete yet but as planed as of now it will be 10 pieces. A base, 8 individual runners, and a plenum.
They had a question for us. They want to know what color to powder coat the manifold. For example if you look at the mustang manifold it is flat black. I think it would look good silver, black, or no powder coat at all. I gave them the information about this site so hopefully they will come to this site and let us get involved in the design process.
__________________ |
| |
11-16-2004, 11:49 AM
|
#176 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Fairfax, VA & Norfolk, VA (ODU)
Posts: 2,078
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z Engine: 350, ZZ4 equivalent Transmission: Pro-Built Road Race 700R4 Axle/Gears: 3.23 | Quote: Originally posted by Roads88 Were did the $600.00 price tag come from? Web page still shows $399.00. | You need to look through the whole thread. What 1990GTA posted is a copy and paste from earlier in this thread. |
| |
02-09-2005, 03:41 PM
|
#177 | | Member
Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Shelbyville, IN
Posts: 379
Car: 92' RS Camaro Engine: L98 Transmission: 700R4 | See other BBK Post... 
Last edited by Chrome : 02-09-2005 at 03:50 PM.
|
| | | | |