Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI

TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-06-2004, 12:35 AM   #151
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 482
Car: 88 Trans Am
Engine: lt1 intaked 355 makin 277 on 25 psi of fuel pressure and stock timing :)
Transmission: A4 stock... that moved a mobile dyno a foot shifting into 2nd :)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 86IROCTHD Send a message via Yahoo to 86IROCTHD
its going into a 355 with 10-10.5 compression.... and i am not really worried about tuning.. will have a prom burner when its all said and done
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
86IROCTHD is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 11-06-2004, 12:40 AM   #152
Senior Member
 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: E.B.F. TN
Posts: 3,168
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Abubaca, that looks surprisingly familiar. I had a few posted up quite a few years ago, something very similar to that and another closer to a traditional tunnel ram design. Most agreed the traditional tunnel ram design would probably work better, though I never got around to actually building either. What else is new.

Now where did I miss the $200 jump? Their site still lists for $400 and I'm still waiting on pics here.
__________________
Infamous NE3G crew.

-= ICON MOTORSPORTS =-
Red Devil is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2004, 12:46 AM   #153
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: IL
Posts: 279

Classifieds Rating: (2)
MSRP $599 online $399 Mastercard, priceless etc...
BLOWN85/TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2004, 03:23 AM   #154
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 579

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by 86IROCTHD
hey i know yall have talked about the intake DIE off points of the hsr mini ram but what about the lt1 intake? whats the rpm limit on it?i have a xe292 cam and it says its good till 6500 but i dont know if i will need to go that high... but just wondering
The problem with miniram and LT1 isn't the die-off point, it's the torque you give up in the street-use range. I think either of those intakes would be good for 6500, if your bottom end and valvetrain can take it.
anondude13 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2004, 06:29 AM   #155
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chico/Antioch California
Posts: 765
Car: 1989 iroc Z Hardtop
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Argh... im drooling with anticipation... there arent even pics of the prototype or maybe even in the least the base manifold...?
rocluvr0013 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2004, 08:33 AM   #156
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Talked to BBK guy at sema, they did not have an intake with them... They said to expect something between Jan. and Spring time... No pics or design diagrams tho...
warrgame is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2004, 01:33 PM   #157
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 688
Car: '90 IROC-Z
Engine: twin-turbo L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42/posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Steven89Iroc Send a message via AIM to Steven89Iroc Send a message via Yahoo to Steven89Iroc
It's not coming out when they originally said, it's going to cost more (possibly), and from the sounds of it, it's going to be in Superram territory for revs.
I think I might end up getting an HSR soon afterall, unless some information changes soon. It may not end up like that, but I don't know if I want to wait until spring to find out. :shrug:
__________________

90 Camaro IROC-Z TT: Maybe it'll run right someday. "TWNTRBO"
96 Talon TSi AWD: 11.9 @ 117 & 31mpg- daily driver. "ALLTRBO"
87 Fiero GT: Old, stock, and slow- backup beater. "NOTRBO"
Steven89Iroc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2004, 04:29 PM   #158
Moderator
 
Abubaca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: GREENSBORO, NC
Posts: 4,288
Car: 1989 Iroc
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
This isn't Burger King, you don't get it your way.

Seriously guys, come on. If I were BBK, I'd be a little irratated with you guys. It's gotta be this price, it's gotta be this color, it's gotta have this RPM range, and we want pictures NOW!

"most" people want a mid range RPM intake. Those who want all the top end already have multiple choices.

"most" people would JUMP at a $600 manifold/kit.

"most" people can wait 'til it's ready.


Give 'em a break.
Abubaca is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2004, 04:56 PM   #159
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 688
Car: '90 IROC-Z
Engine: twin-turbo L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42/posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Steven89Iroc Send a message via AIM to Steven89Iroc Send a message via Yahoo to Steven89Iroc
LOL, I know, just stating that I don't think I'm gonna wait to find out, though I may have to anyway depending on what comes up.

I think most people (myself included) are disappointed in the fact that they stated that it would cost $399 and be ready at the beginning of the year, then the price went up and the release date got potentially pushed back, it makes it seem worse than it would have been otherwise I think.

I'm not too worried about it. :shrug:
Steven89Iroc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 01:16 AM   #160
Senior Member
 
RSFreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,043
Car: 1989 Camaro RS, 1986 Firebird T/A
Engine: 2.8L MPFI and 5.0L TPI
Transmission: T5 and TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 and 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Something similar to an LT5 would be sweet (this one happens to reside in a 3rdgen Camaro BTW!) The fuel rails could go under the runners, right?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg lt5z283.jpg (75.6 KB, 1240 views)
__________________
1989 Camaro RS 2.8L MPFI - T5 - 3.42s - weekend cruiser
1986 Firebird Trans Am 5.0L TPI - LT1 cam - 700R4 - WS6 - 3.27 posi - summer project
RSFreak is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 10:36 AM   #161
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,359
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer

Classifieds Rating: (1)
I agree that they are starting off on the wrong foot saying it will be this price, available this date and you can go see an example at SEMA next week. It's a classic example of the companies marketing division being ahead of actual design and production. Happens all the time.

I believe they should have kept tight on info untill is was ready. This keeps rumors down and people won't have to wait a year before they can touch it.

I convert LT1 intakes and am working on something else but I of course won't say a word untill it's tested and ready to market.
John Millican is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 11:05 AM   #162
TA
Senior Member
 
TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Carson, CA
Posts: 1,056
Car: '88 GTA, 90 Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI, fed growth hormones
Transmission: 700r4 4u2?
Axle/Gears: 9bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Well, I hate to say I told you so, but the development is still in it's early stages. I have worked for several companies that operate like this. Engineers are slow and ponderous by nature. The marketing department uses this tactic to put pressure on the engineering people to put "hot" products on the fast track. Also, as it is still not developed, the attention and questions to BBK will filter through and either dramatically complicate or help focus the development on key things.

As there is no finished engineering prototype yet, I am highly skeptical that this product will see the light of day in the first half of 2005. This is not the only and not the most business significant product that they have in development, and anyone familar with product development and foundry pattern making will understand the time it will take to get this into production. If you've ever heard the old saw "it's too good to be true"? Well, the website blurb is exactly that. Bummer.

Troy
So Cal
TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 08:25 PM   #163
Senior Member
 
Tony89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Prince George, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,330
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 5.7L Supercharged
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Quote:
Originally posted by John Millican
I convert LT1 intakes and am working on something else but I of course won't say a word untill it's tested and ready to market.
Is this something else a new intake design maybe? If so can you at least tell us what RPM range your shooting for?
__________________
89 T-Top GTA 5.7L T-56
ATI procharger D1sc, AS&M SS runners, accel base, 58mm TB, 42Ibs injectors, full exhaust, McLeod Street twin, Moser ford 9" with 3.70, 18" Boyd Smoothie II wheels 8"/10", DIY prom with code59.

Parts to be installed: AFR 195 eliminator heads, zz9 cam, Stainless works LT 1 3/4 headers, Mufflex 4" catback


http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2480939
Tony89GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 11:28 PM   #164
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 3,081
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to DuronClocker
Quote:
Originally posted by Tony89GTA
Is this something else a new intake design maybe? If so can you at least tell us what RPM range your shooting for?
I think I know what he's working on if its what he and I discussed quite a while ago, but I'm keeping my mouth shut
DuronClocker is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2004, 08:48 AM   #165
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,359
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer

Classifieds Rating: (1)
The moment I say something it'll turn into a 3 page BBK style thread. All they said was $399 and TPI replacement and look what happened. They don't even have a product yet.
John Millican is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2004, 12:03 PM   #166
Senior Member
 
Tony89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Prince George, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,330
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 5.7L Supercharged
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Quote:
Originally posted by John Millican
The moment I say something it'll turn into a 3 page BBK style thread. All they said was $399 and TPI replacement and look what happened. They don't even have a product yet.
Ya but that's what happens when you B.S. people which I'am pretty sure you don't do so what do you have cooking there

Just two simple questions, is it a intake design and what RPM band on a 5.7L?
Tony89GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2004, 12:16 PM   #167
Moderator
 
Abubaca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: GREENSBORO, NC
Posts: 4,288
Car: 1989 Iroc
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I don't think BBK was BSing. It's just business. It happens.

They know we pay attention, there's no way they would've done it on purpose.

....and I agree with John. After reading this thead, there's no way I'd post anything "early".

Last edited by Abubaca; 11-08-2004 at 06:40 PM.
Abubaca is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2004, 12:36 PM   #168
Senior Member
 
JP86SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Browns Town
Posts: 2,574
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: Treefitty Roller
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.2K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by TA
Engineers are slow and ponderous by nature.
Hey...
I resemble that remark! LOL
So true...
And yes, they should just keep it under wraps until they know what it is.
Management should be shot, they'll need the Engineers if we will ever have a chance at actually getting a product.
Jp
JP86SS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2004, 08:08 PM   #169
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 279

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Companys do these things to generate hype which could keep potential customers from going elsewhere...it may not be ready till next year sometime,but if no one knows about it they may make up there mind and purshase another competitors setup before BBK's is even announced ..now people have some tidbits on a new TPI setup..and may hold-off on a setup they were previously commited too...thats smart buisness really.
DON 88T/A is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2004, 08:15 PM   #170
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chico/Antioch California
Posts: 765
Car: 1989 iroc Z Hardtop
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Thats how business works, because if no one gets excited about there product b4 its out then theyr not going to continue to dump money into a lost cause in developement which i agree sucks but it makes sense
rocluvr0013 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2004, 08:41 PM   #171
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 414
Car: '91 Camaro Z28
Engine: 383 Vortec HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700-R4;Vig 3500 stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt / 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I've def. got to keep an eye out for this thing....sounds like what I need for my current setup. A $600 price tag isn't so bad either.
__________________


VB Garage
RevItUpZ28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2004, 08:41 AM   #172
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,359
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer

Classifieds Rating: (1)
A year in advance is too long. Sure a few months to get people exicted is fine, I would do the same. After waiting a year people will forget about it.

Oh and as far as $600 being a good price, it WAS advertised for $399 remember? By the time a production castings released don't be surprised if they raise it another couple hundred to $799.
John Millican is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2004, 12:07 PM   #173
Senior Member
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 10,388
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: Twin Turbo 401
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10 bolt 3.42's

Classifieds Rating: (16)
Send a message via AIM to Orr89RocZ
Quote:
Oh and as far as $600 being a good price, it WAS advertised for $399 remember? By the time a production castings released don't be surprised if they raise it another couple hundred to $799.
very true, and i am concerned about this. I hope it dont go any higher than it is now but i dont see how they can say they will have a TPI intake for 400 and then come out saying, well its gonna be more expensive than we thought. Thats suppose to be under product development where once they get a prototype, and have a set price idea, thats the price they advertise. Dont understand what happened.
Orr89RocZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2004, 10:18 AM   #174
Member
 
Roads88's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 206
Car: 1988 Pontiac Trans-AM
Engine: TPI 350 (5.7L)
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Were did the $600.00 price tag come from? Web page still shows $399.00.
__________________
1988 T/A 350 TPI, purchased new.

Mods:
Suspension: Eibach pro kit springs, KYB struts, shocks, and TDS wonder bar, SFC's
Induction: K&N air filter, 52mm throttle body, port matched SLP runners and plenum. AFPR
Exhaust: Hooker headers with Jet-Hot, Catco cat, and Hooker Cat-back.
Tranny: built up 700r4 with Trans-go shift kit
cooling: Griffin radiator,185 Degree therm, 200 degree Fan switch
Future modes: New seats
Roads88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2004, 11:26 AM   #175
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orange City,Fl. USA
Posts: 682
Car: 1990 GTA
Engine: 5.7 T.P.I.
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Roads88
Were did the $600.00 price tag come from? Web page still shows $399.00.
Some info from the SEMA Show!!
My brother was able to talk to the Vice President of BBK, Ken Murphey, at the SEMA show today about the new intake that will be released by his company. He is a really nice guy and has some great ideas and great products. He seems excited about this new intake and it should be a killer setup for our cars. In this post I will list all the information we were able to obtain about the intake. It is important to note that this intake is still in the development stage and all this information is subject to change.

As stated above this intake is still in the prototype stage and only the intake base is complete. They did not have the prototype at SEMA so sorry no pictures available yet. Below are the questions from my previous post and their answers, I have also added and taken away a few questions. It is important to note that the answers are not the exact answers or wording we got from the guys at BBK, I have put them into my own words:

Q) What is the price range of this new intake setup?
A) The price is targeted around $600.

Q) When is this intake scheduled to be released?
A) They should have it out for summer 2005 sales.

Q) Will the stock throttle bodywork with this new intake?
A) Yes

Q) Will there be a vortec head version available?
A) As of the first release probably no, but it very possible there will be in the future.

Q) Will this intake be 50 state legal?
A) They are working on CARB legality but are running into problems with the cars that came stock with a 9’th injector. I am not exactly sure what problems are so I can’t say any more.

Q) What is the height of the manifold, for people who want to fit it under stock hood and strut tower braces?
A) This intake is going to be slightly taller then stock TPI but will still fit under a stock thirdgen and corvette hood.

Q) What comes with the manifold?
A) This intake will come with a setup for both camaro and corvette EGR, the bolts for the intake, and all gaskets minus the intake manifold gaskets.

Q) Will stock fuel rails work with this intake?
A) Yes, the stock fuel rail will work with this intake.

Q) What RPM range is this intake designed to make peak power?
A) This intake is designed for mid to upper RPM’s. It is not going to be a high RPM screamer like the Mini-ram and will not die up top like TPI so it will be in-between.

Q) How does the low-end power of this intake compare to TPI?
A) It is too early in the development to answer that exactly but it should still have low end grunt.

Q) What is the length of the intake runners?
A) It is too early to know.

Q) How many piece intake is this (for example TPI is 3 piece; a base, runners and plenum)?
A) The top end of this intake is not fully complete yet but as planed as of now it will be 10 pieces. A base, 8 individual runners, and a plenum.

They had a question for us. They want to know what color to powder coat the manifold. For example if you look at the mustang manifold it is flat black. I think it would look good silver, black, or no powder coat at all. I gave them the information about this site so hopefully they will come to this site and let us get involved in the design process.


__________________
1990GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2004, 11:49 AM   #176
Senior Member
 
89 Iroc Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Nothern VA
Posts: 2,116
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350, ZZ4 equivalent
Transmission: Pro-Built Road Race 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Dana 44

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 89 Iroc Z
Quote:
Originally posted by Roads88
Were did the $600.00 price tag come from? Web page still shows $399.00.
You need to look through the whole thread. What 1990GTA posted is a copy and paste from earlier in this thread.
89 Iroc Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2005, 03:41 PM   #177
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Shelbyville, IN
Posts: 379
Car: 92' RS Camaro
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Chrome Send a message via AIM to Chrome
See other BBK Post...

Last edited by Chrome; 02-09-2005 at 03:50 PM.
Chrome is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2006, 04:05 AM   #178
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: El Paso, Texas
Posts: 618
Car: 2000 Trans Am and a 85 Iroc-Z
Engine: The Mighty LS1& 305 just beat meTPI
Transmission: 4L60E and 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Bringing this back since I can't find it on the site. Whats going on???
__________________
1985 IROC-Z-Rebuilt 305 TPI w/a Comp .464/.464 cam, Hedmen Headers, A/C delete, hypertech airfoil,rebuilt 700R4 w/t TransGo shift kit & a 2200 stall TQ converter. SS Hood!!!
2000 Pontiac Trans Am-Stock.17x10 & 17x8 Boyd Smoothie 2's on Kumho MX's. Stock times 13.18@108.99mph 600 FT above sealevel@SAR! Added GMMG catback and TSP Lid.
1988 Firebird-no engine or tranny..3.8 GN block?
www.fbodyelpaso.org
ThirdGenFire is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2006, 05:38 AM   #179
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Windsor,Ontario
Posts: 218
Car: 1991 Firebird Formula WS6
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
BBK Performance Parts: The Latest BBK News

no new info yet....
jethawk is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2006, 07:44 PM   #180
Senior Member
 
Tibo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Moweaqua, Illinois
Posts: 1,400
Car: 1992 Camaro RS 25'th anniversary he
Engine: 355 TPI,
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt with 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (-1)
Looks to me like BBK found out that it wasn't worth the time or trouble to make something "new" that was based on a design that has already seen many provisions. And for $400? It has been "in pre-production stages" for years, I thought that it was too good to be true. The market for 5.0 mustang intakes is larger than for the camaro firebird, it is not a big wonder why they moved quickly on that intake and not ours.
Tibo is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2006, 02:49 PM   #181
TGO Supporter
 
B4Ctom1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 4,748
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: HSR on a ZZ4 clone
Transmission: built 700R4 Axle/Gears: stock w/later torsen posi ······································· Car: 91 Z28 street legal drag Engine: 352 dstrk 400 w/P1sc Transmission: TH350 w/brake
Axle/Gears: Currie 9+ w/4.11 limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to B4Ctom1 Send a message via Yahoo to B4Ctom1
Since ther are no pictures and a lot of hypothisizing, I will jump on the band wagon with Abubaca to say that this thing will likely utilize features of the semi-split plenum design like we see they have for 5.0's with a common plenum for the TB feeding cross over style runners.

The ford intake is packaged to match up to a stang lower. This places a lot of constraints that they wont face doing a TPI unit from top to bottom.

For instance it can be farther "depressed" allowing the runners a straighter shot into the heads from the plenums. The design on face value on the stang intake seems flawed because the plenum area seems too small, but the larger area required to fit a throttle body adds to that total plenum area.

The only fault I can see there is that in very high RPM applications or on larger motors (which should be using single plane intakes anyways) the air has a make a few too many high angle turns to get into the secondary plenums and then the runners. This could lower flow numbers a bit, but only in these aformentioned applications. At least the long runners can straighten it out when it flows there. from the intake port side, or as far as the motor care, as long as the air is coming in hard, fast, and straight that is all that matters.

I think Abubaca is right on with the idea of the plenom being a large common one like the Lingenfelter/Accel unit. I would like to mention that this doesnt sell it for me. I own a super ram, it is on the shelf, because it is too hard/time consuming to install. It actually has at least one of the tiny bolts cross threaded so that it tightens but isn't perfect. I reall hate the super ram because of that. I also have a stealth ram and couldn't be happier with it. I also own a Accel DFI singleplane which is going on the 412 soon.

On a second note. Maybe this new intake will look more like a LS1 intake. They have invested alot into that design and maybe they will utilize a SBC'ized version of a LS1 design. With the plenum below and within and the runners flip flopping across the top. GM and Ford have both done this for thier V6's in other applications. Look around for some of the 3.8 N/A applications intakes.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg bbkSSImanifold.jpg (26.1 KB, 96 views)

Last edited by B4Ctom1; 09-03-2006 at 03:09 PM.
B4Ctom1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2006, 03:19 PM   #182
Senior Member
 
LT1FUN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 393

Classifieds Rating: (0)
BBK have been promising new info on their TPI intake for as long as I can remember. It's vaporwhare. It doesn't exist and probably never will. I mean come on, seriously, how long does it take a multi-million-dollar company to get their **** together and release an intake for a 14-21 year old car.?? Seriously?

I've just about given up on these guys which is a shame really, as I was very excited at the thought of another TPI alternative when I first read the rumours, years ago, and I didn't even own a third gen back then.

I still hope they release a new TPI intake eventually, either just a set of runnes, or a stand-alone unit like that from F.A.S.T. because doing so will (hopefully) revitalize the third gen market and more companies will follow and start building parts/accessories for us 3rd gen owners. There are still a few of us left who haven't swithced over to LS1's (Right now, everybody seems to be focusing only on the LS1 and nothing else. Booooooo!!! )
LT1FUN is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2006, 03:24 PM   #183
TGO Supporter
 
B4Ctom1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 4,748
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: HSR on a ZZ4 clone
Transmission: built 700R4 Axle/Gears: stock w/later torsen posi ······································· Car: 91 Z28 street legal drag Engine: 352 dstrk 400 w/P1sc Transmission: TH350 w/brake
Axle/Gears: Currie 9+ w/4.11 limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to B4Ctom1 Send a message via Yahoo to B4Ctom1
except for that they still are developing new parts for 5.0's and they are just as old. Besides who wants to ignore a performance segment where the cars are cheap and there are a few million of them?
__________________

WWW.OUTLAWPERFORMANCE.COM
B4Ctom1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2006, 03:48 PM   #184
Senior Member
 
LT1FUN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 393

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by B4Ctom1 View Post
except for that they still are developing new parts for 5.0's and they are just as old. Besides who wants to ignore a performance segment where the cars are cheap and there are a few million of them?
That's because the 5.0 Fox bodies are 10x more popular to build/modify then third gen TPI cars, I'm sorry to say. For every one IROC/GTA I see on the streets, I'll see ten 5.0's.

For every IROC/GTA I see running 12's, I'll see 25 Mustangs running 9's.....

The selection of performance parts on those Mustangs is leaps and bounds bigger than what's available on third gens. Hence, the reason why BBK still makes new parts for those older Mustangs.

There are many companies (like Holley for example) that sell complete head/came/intake packages for the 5L's and have a hard time keepin up with the demand. That's how popolar those cars are, even today. Who's doing that for the third gen Fbodies? No one. It's practically a forgotton market.

The only new piece that's come out for these cars in like 20 years is the Stealth Ram.( and a few new suspension pieces from UMI/Spohn) That really sucks.

BBK isn't the only company guilty of ignoring the 3rd gen market mind you, but since they're the topic of this thread, the point has to be brought up, that they too are guilty of all but ignoring GM's past motors, offering parts mainly to the newer LS1 cars. They have next to nothing for the LT1's and as far as I know, offer nothing for the old L98's. (Well, maybe an L98/LT1 throttlebody..big deal...)

Any idea's they may have had to release a TPI upgrade have almost certainly been squashed by now.

I hope I'm wrong though and they start offering runners and headers, pullies etc. etc. for third gens. We could use the publicity before we're fogotton about completely....
LT1FUN is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2006, 03:56 PM   #185
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,926
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to D's89IROCZ
Geese there is alot of whineing in this 4 page post . Like if you think 600 is too much . I would hate to see what you think of a rebuild ,etc. I would love to at least see a rendition of it . But as I know as well , the hype comes before the product. Heck some copmanies sell stuff still in testing regardless of if it's done .


No new news on it yet I guess. Their current page has nothing even remote about a new TPI intake.
__________________
PROJECT UGLY DUCKLING
1989 10:1 353 L98Edlebrock base and runners ( really ported)ZZ4cam ,1 3/4 SLP shorties 083 heads ...cleaned up andstuded w/1.52 rr , LT4 valve springs and retainers and a 3 angle valve job
suspension mods (Hotchkis LCA's PH bar, KYB shocks and struts)
T-5 3.73
T-62 turbo to be installed next ...Exhaust clip ...gota let it load....
http://media.putfile.com/My-exhaust-clip
D's89IROCZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2006, 05:49 PM   #186
Senior Member
 
3rdgenZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: south Louisiana
Posts: 557
Car: 1985 Z28
Engine: 85 L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock 10 bolt-3.73 eaten posi

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via Yahoo to 3rdgenZ
idea!!!!

why dont we just bombard the companies with e-mails asking to build, new parts for us tpi 3rdgens. i belive i speak for most when is say it must look stock, besides it looks cooler like that.
__________________
3rdgenZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2006, 08:57 PM   #187
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 688
Car: '90 IROC-Z
Engine: twin-turbo L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42/posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Steven89Iroc Send a message via AIM to Steven89Iroc Send a message via Yahoo to Steven89Iroc
Some of you guys sure do have high hopes for these cars. Large companies make parts that will bring money in, and thirdgens don't anymore and haven't for quite some time. It's unfortunately as simple as that.
Steven89Iroc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2006, 10:21 PM   #188
TGO Supporter
 
B4Ctom1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 4,748
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: HSR on a ZZ4 clone
Transmission: built 700R4 Axle/Gears: stock w/later torsen posi ······································· Car: 91 Z28 street legal drag Engine: 352 dstrk 400 w/P1sc Transmission: TH350 w/brake
Axle/Gears: Currie 9+ w/4.11 limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to B4Ctom1 Send a message via Yahoo to B4Ctom1
I can make a list of cars for you that have "didn't bring in money" for years. I think anyone with a 1LE, B4C, and expecially pace car turbo thirdgen will be happy in the future if they can afford to hang on to them.

Other cars such as the 78-87 A/G body cars never made money at all for the manufacturers are now cash cows for parts makers. They werent even made in that great of numbers!

I think the biggest deal is the idiot buying a $500 iroc with a check engine light on and the original 305 sucking fuel through the intank with a block mounted fuel pump and a carb. Running around with the TPI large coil distributor with no computer running it and trying to tell everyone "these cars are gutless".

These people when you ask them have high hopes but no money, not for $600 intakes thats for sure.
B4Ctom1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2006, 11:51 PM   #189
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 688
Car: '90 IROC-Z
Engine: twin-turbo L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42/posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Steven89Iroc Send a message via AIM to Steven89Iroc Send a message via Yahoo to Steven89Iroc
Certainly the performance market for these cars may change sometime in the future as they grow older, and they definitely had a good one in the increasingly distant past, but I was referring to the present. I also wasn't referring to the car-buying market, but rather the aftermarket performance market.

I agree with your example, but the problem is that most of the people who own thirdgens these days are like your example, or at least they have them as beaters to just get around in since they cost only $500. More and more younger teenagers are buying these to mod because they're dirt cheap (even decent ones for $2500), but they can't afford to do anything with them hence the whining about $600 intakes. Why would they go through all that trouble to make something if only a few people will buy it?

What I'm saying is that large performance companies notice where the markets are, and the truth is that money is being made with LS1's etc. right now, and even still foxbodies (they're easier to make quick, and they still have that "Mustang allure" that so many people are drawn to for some reason. Thirdgens don't have this for as many). As far as bolt-on parts specifically for thirdgens, not many people buy these anymore. The ones who do are getting them from the smaller thirdgen specific (mostly) companies like Spohn, Hawks, etc. because that's the only way these cars will bring in a decent profit, a small concentrated effort. Notice in the last couple Summit issues they changed the "TPI, LT1 and LS1" section to "LT1 and LS1"? (EDIT: nevermind that, it must have just been the mini-issue they sent me last time. Even still, there isn't much left for TPI's there). It's a dying performance breed when better technology is becoming cheaper.

The other main reason for this is that a lot of parts you can get for thirdgens don't need to be specifically for thirdgens. A LOT of our market goes toward unspecific areas like SBC's (carbs, heads, bottom ends and standalone EFI systems etc.), and a lot of the rest of it is custom made by many of us. You can get that stuff anywhere.

Aside from all that, the aftermarket really isn't all that bad still if you think about it. Even if there's only two or three places to get some things from, we still have everything from drag springs to lowering springs, aftermarket shocks to coilover setups, adjustable tubular suspension parts up the wazoo to wheels, tires, hoods, grills, TPI mods, iron heads, aluminum heads, cams, TPI replacement intakes, rear ends that range from upgraded axles to drop-in forged 9" units, replacement weatherstripping and fenders, big brake kits, tubular K-members, turbo headers, turbo kits, supercharger kits, factory ECU tuning equipment, subframe connectors, roll cages, catback exhausts, headers, new carpet and reproduction interior panels and a whole lot more. All of this can be bought right away, made specifically for us, usually right off the shelf.

As for the intake, I don't believe they'll ever come out with it judging by the info we have in this post. As was mentioned, the bases are fairly well covered for these cars. TPI mods for low end, Superrams for midrange, HSR's for higher revvers, and Minirams for screamin 8500rpm firebreathers. Don't forget the singleplane EFI mani's and carb's that many people buy too. BBK probably figured it would cost a lot to make these and they would have to charge more than the competition, all for a fairly minor market to begin with. *shrug*

(Disclaimer: most of this is the sole humble opinion of the author and can be taken with a small grain of salt so there's no need to get offended if you disagree. Have a nice day.)
__________________

90 Camaro IROC-Z TT: Maybe it'll run right someday. "TWNTRBO"
96 Talon TSi AWD: 11.9 @ 117 & 31mpg- daily driver. "ALLTRBO"
87 Fiero GT: Old, stock, and slow- backup beater. "NOTRBO"

Last edited by Steven89Iroc; 09-04-2006 at 11:46 AM. Reason: correction
Steven89Iroc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2006, 11:52 PM   #190
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 688
Car: '90 IROC-Z
Engine: twin-turbo L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42/posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Steven89Iroc Send a message via AIM to Steven89Iroc Send a message via Yahoo to Steven89Iroc
Jeez, I wrote a novel. Read that only if you're bored. Time for bed.
Steven89Iroc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2006, 01:40 PM   #191
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: El Paso, Texas
Posts: 618
Car: 2000 Trans Am and a 85 Iroc-Z
Engine: The Mighty LS1& 305 just beat meTPI
Transmission: 4L60E and 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I too don't think that BBK will bring out this intake. I think that most people will just complain about the cost being too high(just like the hoods)and BBK will never make any money on this "new" intake.
I see a million parts for my LS1 and not so much for my LB9. If you look in the Summit catalog you will see that combined LS1/LT1/L98 section has nothing on the Mustang section. The Stang unforuntly sells better. Most TPI owners just ditch the TPI for an LT1 or LS1 nowadays. People are not happy with the TPI performance at all and want results ASAP! An LS1 or LT1 provides that almost instantly. I for one will not be throwing another motor in my Iroc anytime soon, unless I find a engine cheap. It may not be the fastest, but I love the damn thing.
I for one would love to see the design on this thing and see how it measures up with the others, but I don't think it is happening. It has taken too long already. We'll see what happens next!
__________________
1985 IROC-Z-Rebuilt 305 TPI w/a Comp .464/.464 cam, Hedmen Headers, A/C delete, hypertech airfoil,rebuilt 700R4 w/t TransGo shift kit & a 2200 stall TQ converter. SS Hood!!!
2000 Pontiac Trans Am-Stock.17x10 & 17x8 Boyd Smoothie 2's on Kumho MX's. Stock times 13.18@108.99mph 600 FT above sealevel@SAR! Added GMMG catback and TSP Lid.
1988 Firebird-no engine or tranny..3.8 GN block?
www.fbodyelpaso.org
ThirdGenFire is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2006, 06:53 PM   #192
Senior Member
 
shaggy56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Armpit state
Posts: 1,115
Car: 71 Nova
Engine: Superramed 383, Topline heads
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 8.2 posi 3.08

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I think almost any hotrodder with older chevy cars will benefit from an aftermarket intake for a thirdgen. Its a shame but most aftermarket EFI intakes are geared more towards racers. Since the thirdgen cars are one of the last of the standard small block engine type car then they have exactly what alot of hotrodders are looking for. Lots of hotrodders want a fuel injected car that still does pretty good for regular street driving and its why the standard TPI is such a popular choice swap. Now you are starting to see that the Superram is getting to be something not so easy to get and not that cheap either there isnt much left to choose from.

Last edited by shaggy56; 09-04-2006 at 07:02 PM.
shaggy56 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2006, 09:12 PM   #193
TGO Supporter
 
B4Ctom1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 4,748
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: HSR on a ZZ4 clone
Transmission: built 700R4 Axle/Gears: stock w/later torsen posi ······································· Car: 91 Z28 street legal drag Engine: 352 dstrk 400 w/P1sc Transmission: TH350 w/brake
Axle/Gears: Currie 9+ w/4.11 limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to B4Ctom1 Send a message via Yahoo to B4Ctom1
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaggy56 View Post
and its why the standard TPI is such a popular choice swap.
you mean used to be right? I mean, tpi is nowhere near as popular a streetrod swap as it used to be. TPI used to go for like $500-$600 on ebay. I have helped friends buy them for $100 there complete with distributor.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shaggy56 View Post
Now you are starting to see that the Superram is getting to be something not so easy to get and not that cheap either there isnt much left to choose from.
I have been thinking about putting my old ASR on ebay, I'm not quite hard up for cash enough yet. Sounds like it is like having money in the bank though.
B4Ctom1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2006, 09:34 PM   #194
Senior Member
 
shaggy56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Armpit state
Posts: 1,115
Car: 71 Nova
Engine: Superramed 383, Topline heads
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 8.2 posi 3.08

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by B4Ctom1 View Post
you mean used to be right? I mean, tpi is nowhere near as popular a streetrod swap as it used to be. TPI used to go for like $500-$600 on ebay. I have helped friends buy them for $100 there complete with distributor.
I know quite a few TPI transplants on hotrods and they have no intention of changing. I mean face it its the best transplant since for most older engines its a cheap simple swap. Dont have to worry about custom engine mounts or a complete reverse cooled mess with more problems than anyone wants. The LS swap is nice but it still not all that cheap than just having to change an intake. You will be surprised because the attitude of old hotrodders want nothing to do with some new engine design but rather the old traditional.
shaggy56 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2006, 10:11 AM   #195
TGO Supporter
 
B4Ctom1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 4,748
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: HSR on a ZZ4 clone
Transmission: built 700R4 Axle/Gears: stock w/later torsen posi ······································· Car: 91 Z28 street legal drag Engine: 352 dstrk 400 w/P1sc Transmission: TH350 w/brake
Axle/Gears: Currie 9+ w/4.11 limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to B4Ctom1 Send a message via Yahoo to B4Ctom1
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaggy56 View Post
I know quite a few TPI transplants on hotrods and they have no intention of changing. I mean face it its the best transplant since for most older engines its a cheap simple swap. Dont have to worry about custom engine mounts or a complete reverse cooled mess with more problems than anyone wants. The LS swap is nice but it still not all that cheap than just having to change an intake. You will be surprised because the attitude of old hotrodders want nothing to do with some new engine design but rather the old traditional.

Im just saying most of the swaps to TPI were done years ago, and its becoming less popular than it used to be thats all. Im not saying people dont still do it. Of course they still do it.

I have boxes of magazines that are 12 years old, 10 years ago you couldnt have an issue of a car magazine without referring to a TPI swap or someone writting in about them, or a car in there with the swap completed. Today I just see people aiming higher. Some who aim higher misfire, I have been laughing at quite a few LT1 complete engine swaps lately.
B4Ctom1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2006, 02:14 PM   #196
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,926
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to D's89IROCZ
I was one of them who bought an IROC for 1000 bucks and with SES light on lol. It's been alot of cash since and well...it still looks like a piece of crap LOL. It's an ongoing thing, like most other project cars. regardless of what's in the car . Alot like to tinker and add a bit here and there. I just wish there was more effort to make emissions compatible stuff. Like I would realllly love a stealthram with an EGR port , etc . Instead of hacking into stufff to make it work . Or for the cali folks so they can run these aswell.

I disagree about everyone just wants to put an LS1 or an LT1 in to replace it . Most I see want to just add parts to an exsisting block in there ( hense all the 305 followers here). Most don't have the know how or place to do engine swaps or fabricate stuff to make there dream engine fit . So they bolt on stuff as they go. Hopefully BBS makes this intake .
__________________
PROJECT UGLY DUCKLING
1989 10:1 353 L98Edlebrock base and runners ( really ported)ZZ4cam ,1 3/4 SLP shorties 083 heads ...cleaned up andstuded w/1.52 rr , LT4 valve springs and retainers and a 3 angle valve job
suspension mods (Hotchkis LCA's PH bar, KYB shocks and struts)
T-5 3.73
T-62 turbo to be installed next ...Exhaust clip ...gota let it load....
http://media.putfile.com/My-exhaust-clip
D's89IROCZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2006, 07:00 PM   #197
TGO Supporter
 
B4Ctom1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 4,748
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: HSR on a ZZ4 clone
Transmission: built 700R4 Axle/Gears: stock w/later torsen posi ······································· Car: 91 Z28 street legal drag Engine: 352 dstrk 400 w/P1sc Transmission: TH350 w/brake
Axle/Gears: Currie 9+ w/4.11 limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to B4Ctom1 Send a message via Yahoo to B4Ctom1
why would you care about an EGR, I mean being from canada and all?
__________________

WWW.OUTLAWPERFORMANCE.COM
B4Ctom1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2006, 07:12 PM   #198
Senior Member
 
shaggy56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Armpit state
Posts: 1,115
Car: 71 Nova
Engine: Superramed 383, Topline heads
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 8.2 posi 3.08

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Well its disapointing when you look for solutions to alternative intakes and the response is this: Get the Stealth Ram or how about the Stealth Ram or you could also get the Stealth Ram.
shaggy56 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2006, 07:46 PM   #199
TGO Supporter
 
B4Ctom1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 4,748
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: HSR on a ZZ4 clone
Transmission: built 700R4 Axle/Gears: stock w/later torsen posi ······································· Car: 91 Z28 street legal drag Engine: 352 dstrk 400 w/P1sc Transmission: TH350 w/brake
Axle/Gears: Currie 9+ w/4.11 limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to B4Ctom1 Send a message via Yahoo to B4Ctom1
yeah it sucks when reallity smacks you right in the face doesnt it.

if it is any consolation. I have owned a singleplane, an SR, AND and HSR, and I must tell you for cleanlyness and ease + power the HSR is hard to beat.

If you live in an emissions area the HSR or single plane is out of the question.

If you dont have a pile of money or dont want to spend hours just trying to tighten a few bolts then the SR is out of the question.

With that said, we continue to look for ways to make a better TPI.

The only thing I havent tried is a LT1 conversion intake or a TPIS miniram.

I have always liked the hand ported plenum/siamese runner/large lower setup myself, but it isn't for max effort setups, but it is probably the best thing out there for an L31/hotcam on a stock 305/350 shortblock.

I hate to say it, but I am guessing that if some sort of chinese made intake with emissions ports made like a short HSR or miniram showed up, people would jump on the bandwagon so fast. Even if it were only 49 state.
__________________

WWW.OUTLAWPERFORMANCE.COM
B4Ctom1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2006, 08:12 PM   #200
Senior Member
 
shaggy56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Armpit state
Posts: 1,115
Car: 71 Nova
Engine: Superramed 383, Topline heads
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 8.2 posi 3.08

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Yeah but you know people like variety and they want to be different but not have to pay an arm and a leg. Their is just no variety in that. I mean you mentioned alot of good intakes but they are pretty much out of the average joes price range. I got the Superram because I did an incredible amount of convincing to my wife but it wasnt easy. Everyone is pretty much stuck with the Stealthram as far as price since even to get a good performing TPI its going to cost you.
shaggy56 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI

Tags
350, aftermarket, bbk, build, corvette, fist, fit, intake, intakes, ls1, lsp, setup, tpi, vehicles, year
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.