Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI

TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-28-2007, 04:22 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
89Nighthawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 266
Car: 89 GTA Nighthawk
Engine: 389 CID Vortec TPI
Transmission: TCI 700R4 w/Vigilante

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Anyone running Crane Cam HR-284-2S-12-1G

After a lot of computer testing with DYNO SIM this looks to be the best cam for my planned buildup. Is anyone running this cam? I ask because Crane says it isn't computer compatible. But looking at the specs it should work with some computer tuning.

Thanks!

Brand: Crane Cams
Product Line: Crane PowerMax Camshafts
Cam Style: Hydraulic roller tappet
Basic Operating RPM Range: 2,500-6,000 RPM
Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift: 222
Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift: 230
Duration at 050 inch Lift: 222 int./230 exh.
Advertised Intake Duration: 284
Advertised Exhaust Duration: 292
Advertised Duration: 284 int./292 exh.
Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.509 in.
Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.528 in.
Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.509 int./0.528 exh. lift
Lobe Separation (degrees): 112
Intake Valve Lash: 0.000 in.
Exhaust Valve Lash: 0.000 in.
Computer Controlled Compatible: No
Grind Number: HR-284-2S-12 IG
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
__________________
389 CID Vortec TPI Engine, 428 HP, 507 TQ. Wheeler Vortec Heads, KB, Comp Cams, Crane, Eagle, SLP, Accel, Fluidamper, Vigilante, TCI, Spohn, Lakewood, Hedman, Flowmaster, Random Technologies, Be-Cool, Granatelli, Goodyear, Bosch, SDPC Intake, Texas Speed, Custom Chip and Ford Motorsport (30 lb Fuel Injectors).
11.894@114.3 mph.
Sacrificed to the God of Speed: (2) 700R4's, 3 TC's, 3 sets u-joints, one driveshaft, one camshaft, one bent rod, 3 blown head gaskets and two blown motors.

Last edited by 89Nighthawk; 03-28-2007 at 01:23 PM.
89Nighthawk is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 03-28-2007, 11:10 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
RednGold86Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: All over China, Iowa, and San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 1,659
Car: 1989 GTA, 1986 Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI, LG4
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27, 2.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via Yahoo to RednGold86Z
Re: Anyone running Crane Cam HR-284-2S-12-1G

Don't think it'll be getting you 550hp. 480-510 ish. Just not enough duration.

Something around 236 degrees of .050" intake duration might get you there, if the heads are darn good.
RednGold86Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2007, 01:31 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
89Nighthawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 266
Car: 89 GTA Nighthawk
Engine: 389 CID Vortec TPI
Transmission: TCI 700R4 w/Vigilante

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Anyone running Crane Cam HR-284-2S-12-1G

Quote:
Originally Posted by RednGold86Z View Post
Don't think it'll be getting you 550hp. 480-510 ish. Just not enough duration.

Something around 236 degrees of .050" intake duration might get you there, if the heads are darn good.
Hmm....your wrong. I've made 600 hp on the dyno with close to the same cam on a Ford 400.
__________________
389 CID Vortec TPI Engine, 428 HP, 507 TQ. Wheeler Vortec Heads, KB, Comp Cams, Crane, Eagle, SLP, Accel, Fluidamper, Vigilante, TCI, Spohn, Lakewood, Hedman, Flowmaster, Random Technologies, Be-Cool, Granatelli, Goodyear, Bosch, SDPC Intake, Texas Speed, Custom Chip and Ford Motorsport (30 lb Fuel Injectors).
11.894@114.3 mph.
Sacrificed to the God of Speed: (2) 700R4's, 3 TC's, 3 sets u-joints, one driveshaft, one camshaft, one bent rod, 3 blown head gaskets and two blown motors.

Last edited by 89Nighthawk; 03-28-2007 at 01:34 PM.
89Nighthawk is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2007, 09:14 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
RednGold86Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: All over China, Iowa, and San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 1,659
Car: 1989 GTA, 1986 Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI, LG4
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27, 2.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via Yahoo to RednGold86Z
Re: Anyone running Crane Cam HR-284-2S-12-1G

I've revised my thoughts, now I think about 450hp. Probably less through long runners. And I'm not trying to be a di*k either, honestly.
RednGold86Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2007, 09:58 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 4,823
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Anyone running Crane Cam HR-284-2S-12-1G

IMHO that is a lazy cam. It has slow ramp rates. I think the Comp Cams XFI280 is a much better cam in that duration range if your heads can take the added lift.

It has more 8 degrees more duration at .050" and about the same or less seat to seat. Crane and Comp Cams measure the seat to seat differently so that is not apples to apples.
1989GTATransAm is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2007, 02:14 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
89Nighthawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 266
Car: 89 GTA Nighthawk
Engine: 389 CID Vortec TPI
Transmission: TCI 700R4 w/Vigilante

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Anyone running Crane Cam HR-284-2S-12-1G

Quote:
Originally Posted by RednGold86Z View Post
I've revised my thoughts, now I think about 450hp. Probably less through long runners. And I'm not trying to be a di*k either, honestly.
I appreciate your thoughts but I really did build a Ford 400 that made 608HP at 6500 RPM with a Sig Erson cam with the same duration and just slightly more lift .517/.517. It was a single pattern cam not a dual pattern cam, which theoretically should make the Crane a better cam. DYNO SIM says I can crack close to 550 with a HSR. So, probably I can get to 500 without question and the rest is debatable.
----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1989GTATransAm View Post
IMHO that is a lazy cam. It has slow ramp rates. I think the Comp Cams XFI280 is a much better cam in that duration range if your heads can take the added lift.

It has more 8 degrees more duration at .050" and about the same or less seat to seat. Crane and Comp Cams measure the seat to seat differently so that is not apples to apples.
I'll look at that cam and see how it comes out. One reason I like the Crane Cam is because it's got a bit of a nasty idle to it. I want a cam that will talk, that comes from my drag racing days, big heads, big cam, big carb! Nothing like a loping cam to announce your arrival.
__________________
389 CID Vortec TPI Engine, 428 HP, 507 TQ. Wheeler Vortec Heads, KB, Comp Cams, Crane, Eagle, SLP, Accel, Fluidamper, Vigilante, TCI, Spohn, Lakewood, Hedman, Flowmaster, Random Technologies, Be-Cool, Granatelli, Goodyear, Bosch, SDPC Intake, Texas Speed, Custom Chip and Ford Motorsport (30 lb Fuel Injectors).
11.894@114.3 mph.
Sacrificed to the God of Speed: (2) 700R4's, 3 TC's, 3 sets u-joints, one driveshaft, one camshaft, one bent rod, 3 blown head gaskets and two blown motors.

Last edited by 89Nighthawk; 03-30-2007 at 02:18 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
89Nighthawk is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2007, 04:53 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
RednGold86Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: All over China, Iowa, and San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 1,659
Car: 1989 GTA, 1986 Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI, LG4
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27, 2.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via Yahoo to RednGold86Z
Re: Anyone running Crane Cam HR-284-2S-12-1G

Yeah, the HSR will help. Didn't see that in your post or sig (still don't). But, still not much cam for the power you're aiming for, and the lazy advertised to .050" ratio will not be computer friendly, until you dig into the prom a bit. Dual pattern typically is for exhaust flow problems. Do you have any restrictions (like possibly the exhuast port on those heads)?

What cam are you running now?
RednGold86Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI

Tags
1989, 284, 292, 400, 480, cam, camshaft, camshafts, compatible, computer, controlled, crane, erson, ford, gta, hr, thirdgen
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.