Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-22-2000, 11:48 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 700

Classifieds Rating: (0)
what kind of performance will occur from removing the EGR?

by removing this what exactly happens , and what kinds of improvements occur?
do you just block off the area where the EGR was? any chances of a code 32?
ron rizzotti is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2000, 06:55 AM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 385

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to F22Raptor
can anyone answer this please?


------------------
'88 GTA 350
Headers, catback, free mods, Xtreme energy cam, and intake pieces
13.51@104.27, but can run better as it is.

I just put a new 2100-2300 RPM TQ Converter. I hope a 13.20 or better

RAPTOR, the baddest bird on the planet
AIM HIGH!
F22Raptor is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2000, 09:20 AM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: NortCentral NJ, USA-
Posts: 175

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Getting rid of the EGR will prevent extremely hot exhaust gases from heating the manifold and cylinder heads even further. Is there performance to be gained? Not a significant gain, if none at all.

If emmissions (inspections) is not an issue then getting rid of the EGR would reduce the threat of future problems, like EGR problems, excessive carbon tracking in the manifold- which will cause idle problems ect. The less gadgets the less the problems!

If emmissions (inspections) is a concern, then keeping the EGR is worth it, since the performance gain will be minimal or non existant.
blak92! is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2000, 12:45 PM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 235

Classifieds Rating: (0)
EGR actually cools combustion chamber temps and reduces detonation. Unhook your EGR vacuum line and see how bad it knocks. If you remove it, customize your eprom to get rid of the knock.
Aaron's 87 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2000, 03:46 AM   #5
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 385

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to F22Raptor
I unhooked my EGR long time ago and never had any pinging

------------------
'88 GTA 350
Headers, catback, free mods, Xtreme energy cam, and intake pieces
13.51@104.27, but can run better as it is.

I just put a new 2100-2300 RPM TQ Converter. I hope a 13.20 or better

RAPTOR, the baddest bird on the planet
AIM HIGH!
F22Raptor is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2000, 02:50 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 949

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I pretty much ditto blak92 here.

But,,, I can't stand it. I gotta say it. The combustion chambers are cooled due to the inability to "re-burn" the exhaust gasses added by the EGR. So, while the chamber temps are reduced, it's being reduced because there is air space being occupied by exhaust gasses. While the exhaust gasses are hot,, they are not as hot as compressed “clean” air and fuel igniting,, therefor reducing the chamber temps. At what cost? POWER. You may have read tech articles,, that say "you can add more timing due to the reduced chamber temps". That may be true,, but no way - repeat NONE can that produce more power than a clean intake charge with proper fuel and timing – PERIOD. Are we talking about a lot of power here? I would guess not a lot, but an improvement none the less.

I can say I have my EGR blocked off,, and while I haven't logged many miles on it yet,, I've gotten no codes. I also am experiencing no timing “problems” or spark knock (per scanner). I bought the car minus the EGR so I can’t give a before and after comparison. However, if I lived in a state where emission were checked closely I’d leave it on,, since under WOT the EGR in a sense "blocks" the exhaust gasses from circulating (if it’s working properly).

------------------
86 IROC - 9.8:1 - 355, TFS twisted wedge heads, 218/228-110, fully ported GM base and plenum, SLP runners, 52mm BBK, 24# SVO, 1 5/8" Headman headers, 3" Dyno-max, TH350, B&M Megashifter, 3.23 peg leg, 245/45ZR17s on 212 Eagles
BadSS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2000, 06:04 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 994

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Has anyone passed smog without their EGR, particularly in CA?

------------------
1989 IROC-Z 5.7L
Omar is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2000, 10:42 AM   #8
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: NortCentral NJ, USA-
Posts: 175

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Yes, the cobuston chambers are cooled but the actual temperature of the HEAD is increased as well as the intake manifolds heat- from the exhaust gases passing through. It is beleived GM did not drill an EGR passage in the 'vette aluminum heads because it would somewhat suppress a few horses (with the heating of the head- not the CC which is cooled to reduce NOx, more heat reduces hydros), because of the aluminums susceptibilty to draw more heat.

I beleive the egr could become a factor in the thousands of a second, for a strict racer nothing else. Again it becomes a conveniance matter (of having less gadgets) than a performance issue.
blak92! is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2000, 12:49 PM   #9
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 235

Classifieds Rating: (0)
EGR still runs through the intake setup on the Vette. The EGR is for emissions, definately, but it can help or hurt power output. Some race cars even run EGR. When my EGR valve died, my car knocked. Maybe Camaros are different. Don't expect performance gains and be prepared for possible drivability changes.
Aaron's 87 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2000, 04:45 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Central NJ, USA
Posts: 13,363
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Don't forget, the computer shuts off EGR at Wide Open Throttle. It won't engage unless your road speed is High, and your idle speed is Low - and that means just cruising down the freeway, not caring about horsepower.

A spacer of sorts could probably be made to distance the EGR's hot convuluted tube from the intake, as blak92 mentioned.


------------------
-Tom P (Hot rodded 1986 Firebird 2.8l) from http://www.f-body.net/mailbag/3rd/3rd_mailbag.html message boards
---Think your car could be pic of the week? Visit http://www.f-body.net for details!
TomP is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2000, 11:15 PM   #11
Supreme Member
 
MikeH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Fla
Posts: 1,780
Car: 90 IROC
Engine: 406
Transmission: GMPP 93/4L60
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (10)
My car passed smog check without the EGR. IM in Florida.. The off the shelf Performance Resource chip I installed comes stock with the EGR deleted. Ive verified this with my Scanner.

Like Tom said its turned off at WOT. It only comes into play at part throttle. The PR chip I have now has more part throttle and WOT timing than the stock chip. I have to run 93 though it pings without it at moderate/heavy throttle.

------------------
Black 90 IROC, L98, A4, 323 gear. SuperRamed 406 in the works!
MikeH is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2000, 10:05 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: E.B.F. TN
Posts: 3,176
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Just a quick note. The reintroduction of spent combustion gasses into the fresh combustion event is to reduce the combustion temps, not the chamber temp itself. It is to reduce NOx emissions, and usually does not adversly effect WOT power output. Just wanted to toss that out to clarify some points, hope it helped.
Red Devil is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2000, 07:21 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
irocz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Jackson, Miss., CSA
Posts: 345
Car: '87 IROC-Z
Engine: 406 Superram/DFI
Transmission: Auto BTE 3000 conv

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to irocz Send a message via AIM to irocz Send a message via Yahoo to irocz
I thought that the EGR was disabled at WOT anyway so it shouldn't matter if you lose a few hp around town.

------------------
87 IROC-Z, 5.7, auto, 3.27, leather, !cat, Holley fpr, K&N'S, SLP 1-3/4" Jet-Hot coated headers, SLP .218/.224 .495/.502 cam, Comp 1.5 roller tip rockers, $uperPITAram, Edelbrock lower intake, Holley 52mm tb, Dynomax\Flowmaster catback. Coming Soon(?)- Fasttrack/Accell DFI

1989 Pontiac 20th Anniversary Turbo Trans Am - 160,000 miles, K&N filter
irocz is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2000, 07:21 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI

Tags
2300, 90, add, egr, holley, iroc
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details