Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-11-2007, 04:39 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
BOSS 357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: RVA
Posts: 595
Car: 89RS,89TBI FB, 91Z28, 89TPI FORMULA
Engine: 357 SBC TPI
Transmission: World Class T-5 (for now)
Axle/Gears: Strange 12-bolt 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to BOSS 357
Help With My Cylinder Head Knowledge

While I wait for my replacement fuel injector to arrive, I've begun to research an upgrade for my measly 165 cylinder heads. I've spent hours upon hours looking over the info on the boards, but I still need some clarification.

The car is a weekend warrior, TPI 355cid sbc. It may or may not ever see a strip, but will definately see a dyno. My goal is stop light to stop light low end/mid range torque. The intake is an open element, 52mm TB, ported plenum, AS&M runners, and ported Accel manifold w/ 30lb injectors.

The current heads are Dart Iron Eagle SS 165's: http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
72cc combustion chamber, 165cc intake, 1.94 & 1.50 valves
intake flow is rated at 210cfm @ .500 lift
not sure which springs are in it (.520 max lift is minumum on 1.25 spring)
stock length pushrods
1.5 rocker ratio

The current (and future) cam is a Comp Cams 08-302-2: http://store.summitracing.com/partde...8&autoview=sku
210/210 @ .050
264/74 duration
max lift .480 in/out
112 LSA
I want to stay with the cam I have.

Using the (bore x bore x stroke x peak RPM x .00353)/614 calculation, I get 1.80 as the "minimum crosssection of head to maintain optimum power w/o hurting velocity. But I don't really know how to apply the end result...

My questions are more about specs than "My AFR is better than your TFS". I'll decide on which brand after I have all the data I need to make the decision. My questions are these:
1) will lower comb chamb cc or intake cc yield more torque in my power band?
2) will my 1.5 rockers affect the max lift of my cam? (the .480 listed in the cam spec is noted with "factory rocker arm ratio")
3) shouldn't I be able to use these rockers in my new heads?
4) I read that I may well need new pushrods, where would I look to determine the new size? head spec sheet?
5) which will yield the better result: a 195 & 64ish or 175 (or 180) & 54ish combo? which spec is more important to my goal?
6) as far as the valve spring set up, with TFS I have a choice of springs, do I need to match that to my cam exactly or should i get a bigger spring just to be safe?
7) when looking at head flow data, my max lift is .480, do I want the best flow there or somewhere else in the lift?
8) also for flow..is it better to have the peak flow number of the head be the same as, more or less than my intake flow? (which I also read to be around 240-260 cfm)

Thank to all who read and reply. This is also posted in the General Engine section.

Eric
__________________
SBC 357-4BM 357hp/507tq at the flywheel, CC 302 roller, Dart Iron Eagle SS 165 heads, FAST EZ-EFI MP-retro kit, ASM/Accel ported intake setup, Venom 30 lb injectors, MSD ignition, 170* thermo & manual fan switch, March polished UD pulleys, A/C & A.I.R. delete, Edelbrock headers, 2.5" true dual exh, WCT5, Strange 12-bolt/3.73 gear, wonderbar, tubular rr LCAs/trackbar/fr a-arms, Spohn fr coilovers & adj TqArm, 1LE fr brakes, Alston Racing SFCs, poly engine/trans mounts & Tq arm bushing.

Last edited by BOSS 357; 09-11-2007 at 04:42 PM.
BOSS 357 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2007, 09:18 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 897
Car: 1989 Firebird Formula
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 9 bolt Posi

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Help With My Cylinder Head Knowledge

Quote:
Originally Posted by BOSS 355 View Post
2) will my 1.5 rockers affect the max lift of my cam? (the .480 listed in the cam spec is noted with "factory rocker arm ratio")
Eric,
Most lift specs are measured using 1.5 ratio rockers. So if you increase the rocker ratio, you will get more valve lift which makes the cam "act" bigger than it is. For example if you currently have 1.5 ratio rockers and your cam lift is .480, you would do some quick math to see what your lift would be with 1.52 rockers...

.480 / 1.5 = 0.32

0.32 * 1.52 = 0.4864

So your valve lift would go from .480 to .487 with 1.52 ratio rockers. The same formula applies if you go with 1.6 ratio rockers, etc.

Hope this helps!
__________________
355, balanced rotating assembly, flat-top Speed Pro coated skirt pistons, ~10:1, Holley Stealth Ram, Dart Iron Eagle 180cc Heads, XFI268-13 cam, Hughes 2500 Stall, Hedman Headers, Ford 24# Injectors, CC 1.6 Roller Rockers, Cloyes Double-Roller Timing Chain, Kirban AFPR, Aluminum Underdrive pulleys, smog/egr delete
formula_novice is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2007, 09:25 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 897
Car: 1989 Firebird Formula
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 9 bolt Posi

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Help With My Cylinder Head Knowledge

Quote:
Originally Posted by BOSS 355 View Post
3) shouldn't I be able to use these rockers in my new heads?
On most SBC heads, 1.5 ratio rockers are standard so you should be able to use them on different heads. However, I would recommend upgrading to some form of roller rockers. I went with Comp Cams 1.52 Magnum roller-tip rockers in my setup. In general, roller rockers are better cause they reduce friction which frees up a little HP and helps extend the lift of your valve-train.

Hope this helps.
formula_novice is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2007, 09:25 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI

Tags
165, 165cc, cc, cylinder, dart, eagle, heads, iron, knowledge, l98, lift, max, replacement, ss, whats
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details