Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-22-2001, 05:05 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Where the Devil Dances, IL
Posts: 625
Car: 87Z
Engine: ?
Transmission: A4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to new87 Send a message via Yahoo to new87
Get rid of the peanut Cam.

Just to let you all know I did a cam change over the past few months. I also ported the plenum, intake, and runners; installed a true roller timing chain, and a AFPR. The cam is out of lt-1 motor, specs@.50 418/430, 194/199, lsa 111. O'man what a difference, the car pulls to about 5200 insteed of 4500, power you can feel. So if you are crused with the peanut cam, get rid of it. Track opens on March 31 let you know what happens.

------------------
87 Z28 305 TPI, Auto, LT-1 cam (peanut is history), roller timing set, 2.73, Gutted air boxes, K & N fillters, Dyno Max 3" cat back, 8.8 mm spirals, rapid fires, and 170* Stat.
Old Best 15.414 @ 87.47.
new87 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2001, 05:27 PM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Belleville, IL USA
Posts: 1,429

Classifieds Rating: (0)
As much as I love small duration camshafts I have to agree. The peanut is great for emissions and fuel mileage but terrible for power.

I mic'd mine at only .225" lift (intake)at the lobe which equates to only .337" lift at the valve (less than the advertised .350" intake lift).
I never even bothered checking duration with a degree wheel because it was being replaced anyway.
I still keep the camshaft in a box in case I ever have trouble passing an emissions test.
ODB
The ODB is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2001, 08:32 PM   #3
Moderator
 
Kevin91Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Disneyland, SoCal
Posts: 10,488
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350 L98 siamesed runners
Transmission: LT1 T56
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to Kevin91Z Send a message via AIM to Kevin91Z
What LT1 engine is that out of? A Caprice or Impala? Thats not a C/F or Corvette cam. Congrats on your swap!

------------------
West Coast GM Shootout 2001!
1991 Camaro Z28
5.7L 5-Speed (originally 305)
13.25 @ 107.18 MPH
Southern California
Member: SoCal 3rd Gen F-Bodies
Webmaster: SoCal F-Bodies
-=ICON Motorsports=-
Kevin91Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2001, 05:51 AM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: VA
Posts: 212

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to TorchTA
I've been wondering about that myself...
Anything to keep the guys from calling the 86 the peanutmobile.

-JT
TorchTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2001, 07:39 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Where the Devil Dances, IL
Posts: 625
Car: 87Z
Engine: ?
Transmission: A4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to new87 Send a message via Yahoo to new87
Its out on an Impala SS I belive.
new87 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2001, 07:50 AM   #6
Moderator
 
Grim Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: The Bone Yard
Posts: 10,907
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Those specs look like an aftermarket L98 replacement cam from Crane or someone like that. Those specs (durateion) in fact are smaller than the L98 SD cam. Lift is about the same but it has a narrow LSA.

I do not believe it is a GM cam as GM tends to use a wider LSA (114-117) on its cams.
Grim Reaper is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2001, 01:29 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
kdrolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: MA
Posts: 849
Car: 93 GM300 platforms
Engine: LO3, LO5
Transmission: MD8 x2

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Glenn91L98GTA:
Those specs look like an aftermarket L98 replacement cam from Crane or someone like that. Those specs (durateion) in fact are smaller than the L98 SD cam. Lift is about the same but it has a narrow LSA.

I do not believe it is a GM cam as GM tends to use a wider LSA (114-117) on its cams.
</font>
It's a stock GM hyd roller cam. I know.... I have one in my '94 Caprice LT1 9C1.

The cam specs are .418"/.430" 191d/196d i/e at the valve with (stock ratio) 1.5 rockers. The LSA is 111.5 d.

The cam was used in ALL B (Caprice, Roadmaster, Impala SS) and D (Fleetwood) body LT1 engines, 1994-1996 model years. The 1996 cam specs are a little different (.414"/.428" lift) but essentially the same.

I think the same cam is, or was, used on some of the L31 Vortecs 1996-1999 and perhaps on some of the present crate engines. A quick look at GM Powertrain website and/or SDPC will confirm this.

The F/Y car cams LT1 and LT4 are different in that they have more lift and duration, but larger LSA.

I have suggested the use of the Bcar 94-96 LT1 cam as a replacement for LO3 and LO5 pre-1994 Caprice owners, and I'm glad to see it being used as a modest & inexpensive Fcar replacement cam here. FYI.

Now can anyone help ME find the thread that showed the photos of the Vortec to TPI base manifold mismatch? I thought they used to be here, but I've searched to infinity and beyond with no luck. TIA.

- Ken... Fcar lurker, a Bcar owner
'94 LT1 9C1, 4400# and 14.96 @ 92.5 mph corrected for MSL, basically stock, dual kid seats, cooler, trunk gear, 7X6 spotlamp, TU6 Caddy flash-to-pass, 6J6 deck lights, and this spring, the Astrovan overhead console.

kdrolt is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2001, 04:36 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Posts: 1,196

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Then what are the specs of the LT1 Cams in the Y/F bodies?

------------------
1987 Chevy Camaro IROC-Z
L98 TPI 350 (5.7L)
TH 700R-4 Transmission
Borg Warner 7.75" 9 Bolt Rear End

Current Mods: LT4 HOT Cam, Comp Cams 1.52:1 Roller Rocker Arms, Edelbrock TES 1 5/8" Headers, Hooker 3" Aerochamber Cat-Back System, Performance Resource Chip, Accel Ignition Coil, Cap, Rotor, 8.8mm Wires, K&N Filters, JET TPI Air Foil, All Free Mods, Falken ZIEX Z-Rated Tires.

Best ET (w/o LT4 cam): 14.32 @ 97.7mph
(corrected for elevation)

Soon to Come: 7.625" 10 Bolt with 3.42s and Accel TPI Intake Base
Dan87IROC-Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2001, 09:54 PM   #9
Moderator
 
Kevin91Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Disneyland, SoCal
Posts: 10,488
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350 L98 siamesed runners
Transmission: LT1 T56
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to Kevin91Z Send a message via AIM to Kevin91Z
Kevin91Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2001, 09:54 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI

Tags
1991, 1994, 305, 337, 86, body, cam, chevy, fleetwood, history, l98, lift, peanut, roadmaster, specs, tpi
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details