Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI

TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-11-2008, 11:02 AM   #1
Member
 
WhiteIrocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 155
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (3)
LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???

I know a lot of the TBI guys run LT1 cams, does anyone have an LT1 cam in an LB9?? I really don't want to dish out $300 for a roller cam when I have a stock 1993 LT1 cam laying around, and it is considerably bigger than the peanut cam that is in the car now. Also, will LT1 valve springs work with the LB9 heads? I also got a set of Crane .550 lift single springs for an LT1 which would go on when I did the cam swap. The lift on an LT1 cam is around .460, so are the springs going to be too much???

BTW, why do people say that the LT1 cam is just a step up from the LB9 cam? Here are the specs

Peanut Cam - Duration at .050: 179/194 Lift: .350/.384
LT1 Cam - Duration at .050: 202/207 Lift: .450/.460

That is a huge step in my opinion when it comes to cams.
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
__________________
'87 White Iroc Z - Totalled for minor cosmetic damage, rebuilding in process.

'99 NBM Camaro SS- Borla Catback, Hurst shifter, SLP lid, Centerforce DFX, Driver mod.

Last edited by WhiteIrocZ; 04-11-2008 at 11:33 AM.
WhiteIrocZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 04-11-2008, 11:31 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 782
Car: 1991 Z28 - 2000 Z28
Engine: L98 - LS4
Transmission: 700R4 - 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23's - 3.73's

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???

A few years back I put a 93' LT1 F-body cam in an 88' 5 speed car (single cat, non-G92). Small upgrade while the motor was out - but it seemed to like it. (And yes, I know the M5 cars had a bigger cam that the A4 cars).

The way I see it, you can get a used LT1 cam dirt cheap. And your car will idle/run fine on the stock tune with that cam. I would go with it. As for valvesprings, I think LT4 hot cam springs are pretty cheap. They fit the stock pockets and are good to .525" lift. The .550" lift springs would be a bit overkill.
86 IROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 11:43 AM   #3
Member
 
WhiteIrocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 155
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???

Yeah that is what I was thinking on the springs. I will probably just replace them with new LT1 valve springs which are the same part number as new replacements for the LB9. They are Sealed Power VS677. They are about $2.50 a piece.
WhiteIrocZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 02:34 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 782
Car: 1991 Z28 - 2000 Z28
Engine: L98 - LS4
Transmission: 700R4 - 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23's - 3.73's

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???

Being your car has a peanut cam, it will wake up more so than that 5 speed car did IMHO. What does your car run now with the current mods? I had an 89' IROC vert in the late 90's. It had: PI 2600 converter, rebuilt 700R4 w/ a Transgo, Borla CB, air foil, ported plenum, UD pullies, LCA's & PHB, K&N's, gutted air box, !smog pump, !cat, 3.23 gears.

I ran 14.3-14.4 @ 96+ on BFG drags. 14.60's on street radials. Still had stock manifolds and the wimpy peanut cam. I felt the car had 13.90's in it with a cam swap and a good set of headers, but never got around to it.
86 IROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 06:09 PM   #5
Moderator
 
Kevin91Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Disneyland, SoCal
Posts: 10,181
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350 L98 siamesed runners
Transmission: LT1 T56
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to Kevin91Z Send a message via AIM to Kevin91Z
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???

There's no telling if your engine actually has the peanut cam unless you check it with a dial indicator. I have seen people with '87 TPIs on this board claim both camshafts in their car.
__________________
364 RWHP, 387 RWTQ (08-08-09)
12.803 @ 108.50 MPH (1.923 60') (04-11-01)
Member: Southern California Thirdgenners
-=ICON Motorsports=-
Work: Manley Performance Products
Kevin91Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 12:05 AM   #6
Member
 
WhiteIrocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 155
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???

As the car sits right now it runs a 8.90's at 81 in the eighth mile. Cant spray until second though. That is with street tires and a 2.73 gear. Other plans are to complement the cam with a 3.42 gear and a afpr. What fuel pressure should I run with that setup and a set of 22 lb injectors???

A guy told me that a 80 mph trap in the 1/8th will get me mid to low 13's in the 1/4, but theres only one way to find out and there are no 1/4 mile tracks within about 1.5 hours from here.

Last edited by WhiteIrocZ; 04-12-2008 at 12:24 AM.
WhiteIrocZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 02:31 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
maroon88iroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: mid GA
Posts: 1,890
Car: 3 camaro's, 2 vettes, & a firebir
Engine: 2 tpi's, 2 lt1's, & 455
Transmission: T5, T56, 700r4, 4l60, & th400
Axle/Gears: alot of different ones

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Send a message via AIM to maroon88iroc
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???

i have an 88 iroc 305 tpi auto. i have since converted it to a t5 and i put in a l98 tpi cam, so i had the peanut cam and i am going to the biggest cam made in thirdgens, it is still a small cam but i am building this car as an everyday driver so i didnt want anything aggresive and i didnt wanna spend $300 for an aftermarket, i wanted the lt1 cam but a mw66nova had a l98 cam and he lives just up the road from me. so i bought that and put it in. the motor is assembled but not in the car, i am shooting to have the motor ready to go in the car before work tomorrow and then stick it in tomorrow night, i am shooting to have it running monday afternoon (have to work all day sunday too..) i am going to keep the motor completely stock with the exception of the l98 cam, but i am going to add on pieces later on to see how they helped, i am eventually going to go with 1.6 rr's, afpr, slp runners and diy port upper and lower intake that is probly all i will do to this engine b/c i am going to be driving it everyday but i want to do those mods individually and see how much i gained from them. but i will update yall once its running and i also am going to be racing it on the 20th so ill post some times.

the car ran a 15.4 completely stock that is with the 305 tpi auto and 2.73 gears but that is when i had just bought the car and it sat for 2 years, it needed a tune up something terrible trap speed was 88 mph. here is my new setup what do you guys think it will run?

305 tpi with l98 cam, t5 and 3.45 gears, with a 100 hp shot and a set of worn out 26" slicks, edit: i am also going to have an msd 6al and a two step for launching, and probably a set of underdrive pulleys

i am hoping for 14.80's or better on motor and 13.9's or better on the 100 shot. what do you guys think?
__________________
1988 iroc, 67 RS camaro, 69 firebird, 73 Z28, 88 vette, 94 integra, 04 raptor 660r, 97 950 jet ski, 00 GSXR-1000. sold: 86 Z28, 95 z28, 98 & 00 S10, 86 & 94 vette, 01 raptor 660r, 03 rancher, lifted 85 K10, 72 chevelle

Last edited by maroon88iroc; 04-12-2008 at 02:36 AM.
maroon88iroc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 06:17 PM   #8
Member
 
WhiteIrocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 155
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???

Definitely budget headers in. I bought Hedman shorties with a Y for $250 and the gains were well worth it. I am not sure what it actually gained, but the car sounds better and is much better to drive. It improved low end torque as well as high end power. It doesn't seem to drop off as much at 4500 after the headers and Y. That car should be much faster than mine considering bigger cam, 5 speed, gear, bigger shot, and slicks. It should run low 13's if you can drive it.
WhiteIrocZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 11:02 AM   #9
Member
 
billybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: ny
Posts: 197
Car: 89 Formula
Engine: LB9 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73(coming soon)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???

so the best cam replacment for the 305 tpi auto cars is the lt1 cam correct?....with out having to mod anything else? or having to stall the tranny

Last edited by billybird; 04-13-2008 at 11:07 AM.
billybird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 05:22 AM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 42
Car: 92 RS, 87 Formula
Engine: 5.0 TBI, 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4 x2
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 3.42 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???

I had to come up with something different seeing as my 86 was a non roller, but I've found the Melling RV cam works really well with the TPI setup, and coincidentally, it's almost identical to the 350 cam in the 92 Z28. just a thought.
PoorBoyRS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2008, 08:44 PM   #11
Member
 
WhiteIrocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 155
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???

The springs I was considering are only good to .450 lift, so that is out. I already have .550 lift springs, would it really be bad to run that big of a spring? They are just a single spring with a damper. What would be the downfalls of running that spring???
WhiteIrocZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2008, 07:50 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 782
Car: 1991 Z28 - 2000 Z28
Engine: L98 - LS4
Transmission: 700R4 - 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23's - 3.73's

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???

Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteIrocZ View Post
The springs I was considering are only good to .450 lift, so that is out. I already have .550 lift springs, would it really be bad to run that big of a spring? They are just a single spring with a damper. What would be the downfalls of running that spring???
They're just overkill, but if you already have them - use them. In rare cases, you might collapse a lifter if they are high mileage with the added spring pressure. What are the specs? Seat pressure, and open? More than likely you'll be fine, but I would replace the lifters during the swap for good measure.
86 IROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2008, 09:35 AM   #13
Member
 
WhiteIrocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 155
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???

I would rather buy springs than lifters, but then again I may have a lifter going bad because I recently changed to 5W-30 oil after I replaced my valve stem seals and now I have a ticking in the motor. I am pretty sure it is a lifter because there are no exhaust leaks, and it increases with RPM. I am going to switch back to 10W-40 and see how that does.
WhiteIrocZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2008, 10:25 AM   #14
Moderator
 
Kevin91Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Disneyland, SoCal
Posts: 10,181
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350 L98 siamesed runners
Transmission: LT1 T56
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to Kevin91Z Send a message via AIM to Kevin91Z
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???

Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteIrocZ View Post
The springs I was considering are only good to .450 lift, so that is out. I already have .550 lift springs, would it really be bad to run that big of a spring? They are just a single spring with a damper. What would be the downfalls of running that spring???
Spring lift isnt critical when using a stock cam, its the spring pressure when closed and when open that will matter. If they're stock size 1.25" springs I dont think you can get too much pressure to mess something up. They should be in the 110-130 range when closed and 300 when open.
Kevin91Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2008, 12:39 PM   #15
Member
 
WhiteIrocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 155
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???

Recommended Camshaft Style Roller hydraulic Installed Height (in) 1.750 in. Seat Pressure at Installed Height (lbs) 108 lbs. Open Height (in) 1.250 in. Open Pressure (lbs) 339 lbs.
I believe they are these Lunati springs. Take a look and see what you think.
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
I may end up with these Sealed Power springs from advance. They seem like a better choice. Here are the specs. Check em out.
http://www.northernautoparts.com/Pro...ctModelId=2297

Last edited by WhiteIrocZ; 04-17-2008 at 12:45 PM.
WhiteIrocZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 04:41 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
Chevy86 IROC-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Holtville, CA.
Posts: 315
Car: 86 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: Dropping in a 350 baby!
Transmission: 700-R4 Automatic
Axle/Gears: I dont know

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???

So back to the original question. Does anybody have a straight answer for this? I have a 1987 350 TPI (IROC-Z) with roller lifters, non roller rockers, EDL-5894 SPRING KIT. Now with that said, can a LT1 cam from a 1994 Z-28 be installed into the factory ECM without any tuning? Does anybody have an answer to this question?
Chevy86 IROC-Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 11:26 PM   #17
Moderator
 
Kevin91Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Disneyland, SoCal
Posts: 10,181
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350 L98 siamesed runners
Transmission: LT1 T56
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to Kevin91Z Send a message via AIM to Kevin91Z
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???

Yes, installing an LT1 camshaft is like putting 1.6 rockers on a TPI cam. You'll be fine with the stock computer tuning.
Kevin91Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 11:48 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Chevy86 IROC-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Holtville, CA.
Posts: 315
Car: 86 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: Dropping in a 350 baby!
Transmission: 700-R4 Automatic
Axle/Gears: I dont know

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???

Thanks Kevin91Z. Now I feel comfortable.
Chevy86 IROC-Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI

Tags
305, 87, cam, lb9, lt1, performance, power, pressure, roller, sealed, specs, tpi, upgrade, upgrades, vs677
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.