Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-30-2008, 06:14 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 17

Classifieds Rating: (0)
LB9 vs LG4 heads

I am looking into converting an LG4 performance motor into a TPI motor in my race car.

First thing I need to figure out is what heads to use.

The LG4 is from a 82 or 83 Z28. I am assuming the heads are 58cc, right?

And valve sizes are 1.84/1.50.

Also I have heard these are close to 167cc intake ports.

Which all sounds pretty much identical to the 081 centerbolt LB9 TPI heads.

So - question is, any advantage to switch to the TPI heads, or will the LG4 heads work just as well?

I am limited to stock heads, so I can't port them or go to any aftermarket head.
c4racers is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2008, 03:18 AM   #2
Moderator
 
Kevin91Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Disneyland, SoCal
Posts: 10,488
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350 L98 siamesed runners
Transmission: LT1 T56
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to Kevin91Z Send a message via AIM to Kevin91Z
Re: LB9 vs LG4 heads

Yeah they're pretty much the same except the change from perimeter bolt valve covers to center bolt valve covers.
__________________
377 RWHP, 390 RWTQ (05-21-11)
12.803 @ 108.50 MPH (1.923 60') (04-11-01)
Work: Manley Performance Products
Founder: SoCal Thirdgenners
Founder: SoCal TPI Organization
Kevin91Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2008, 02:29 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 17

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: LB9 vs LG4 heads

not quite true - I found some flow data for both that suggests that the 081 heads flow 20cfm better on the intake side.

Also - I have empirical data from somebody who dyno'ed with the 187 heads and the smaller 305 cam and made 197hp, then switched to the 081 heads and larger cam and retested - pulled 232hp, so it was worth 35hp. Also the power curve died after 3500rpm with the smaller cam / heads and had a good 1000-1500 more useable RPM with the bigger cam / 081 heads. Hard to say how much was heads vs. the cam, but I am not taking any chances and will just go with the 081 heads to be sure. The port design is also a bit different and optimized for TPI, so that should work better as a system.
c4racers is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2008, 11:43 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Concordia, MO, USA
Posts: 456
Car: 89 Formula, WS6
Engine: LB9/peanut cam :(
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to black89ws6 Send a message via AIM to black89ws6 Send a message via Yahoo to black89ws6
Re: LB9 vs LG4 heads

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin91Z View Post
Yeah they're pretty much the same except the change from perimeter bolt valve covers to center bolt valve covers.
That's not specific to LB9/LG4. I had an 87 LG4 with the centerbolt valve covers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by c4racers View Post
Also - I have empirical data from somebody who dyno'ed with the 187 heads and the smaller 305 cam and made 197hp, then switched to the 081 heads and larger cam and retested - pulled 232hp, so it was worth 35hp.
IIRC, the 187's were the TBI swirl-port heads, which is yet another different head from the two previously mentioned.

LB9's and LG4's should have the same head. The only difference should be the valve covers/manifold bolts, which changed from 86->87, not from LG4<->LB9
black89ws6 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 01:36 PM   #5
Moderator
 
Kevin91Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Disneyland, SoCal
Posts: 10,488
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350 L98 siamesed runners
Transmission: LT1 T56
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to Kevin91Z Send a message via AIM to Kevin91Z
Re: LB9 vs LG4 heads

Only '87 LG4's have the 14101081 305 TPI heads.
Kevin91Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2008, 09:15 PM   #6
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 5,958
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: LB9 vs LG4 heads

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin91Z View Post
Only '87 LG4's have the 14101081 305 TPI heads.
I have taken apart stock LG4s from 1987-1988 Caprices that had 187s heads. I have also seen 1987-1988 Monte Carlos with 081s on the L69 and 187s on the LG4.

416s were used on the following

1982-1986 305 LG4
1982-1986 305 L69
1985-1986 305 Lb9
1982-1986 305 LF3 Truck

601s were used on the following
1982-1984 305 LU3 Crossfire
1981-1986 305 LE9 Truck
1979-1981 267

I have also seen alot of 1992 era trucks that had 081/083 heads on them stock. GM using up excess stock?
Fast355 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 10:13 AM   #7
Supreme Member
 
jamon8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southern IL
Posts: 1,793
Car: 91 firebird, 81 toy pic
Engine: 361 tpi, 2.2 diesel
Transmission: 700r4, 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.56, ?

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: LB9 vs LG4 heads

blah blah blah

race car

stock heads

no porting

who are you gonna race?
jamon8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 05:00 PM   #8
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 17

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: LB9 vs LG4 heads

It is a spec class with stock motors in NASA called CMC - Camaro Mustang Challenge. Road racing. We get about 15-20 cars per event in CA, so there are plenty of people to race!! Very popular series with great driving and competition.
c4racers is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 05:11 PM   #9
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 5,958
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: LB9 vs LG4 heads

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamon8 View Post
blah blah blah

race car

stock heads

no porting

who are you gonna race?
I have seen stock 416s, 601s, and 081s, support over 400 FWHP.
Fast355 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 09:47 AM   #10
Moderator
 
Kevin91Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Disneyland, SoCal
Posts: 10,488
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350 L98 siamesed runners
Transmission: LT1 T56
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to Kevin91Z Send a message via AIM to Kevin91Z
Re: LB9 vs LG4 heads

You're probably correct, but since this is a thirdgen website, so what came on Caprices and Monte Carlo's isnt relevant. I would agree GM used up whatever stock they had left, using the good stuff on better cars and the rest on other cars.

The Camaro-Mustang Challenge is a lot of fun! I've been out to their races several times helping my friend Nick Steel. They're limited to 230 RWHP and 300 RWTQ, but there's no limit on area under the curve. I still wouldnt know which heads are better, but the new-tech guy in me would say to use the newer heads.
Kevin91Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 09:33 PM   #11
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 5,958
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: LB9 vs LG4 heads

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin91Z View Post
You're probably correct, but since this is a thirdgen website, so what came on Caprices and Monte Carlo's isnt relevant. I would agree GM used up whatever stock they had left, using the good stuff on better cars and the rest on other cars.

The Camaro-Mustang Challenge is a lot of fun! I've been out to their races several times helping my friend Nick Steel. They're limited to 230 RWHP and 300 RWTQ, but there's no limit on area under the curve. I still wouldnt know which heads are better, but the new-tech guy in me would say to use the newer heads.
Yes it is a Camaro/Firebird website, BUT I feel the fact that LG4s came with 187s is VERY RELEVANT. It has been 20 years since the general built the last of the LG4s and MANY of the engines have been rebuilt and swapped around. Unless it is a documented stock car, it very well could have 187s on it. I've even seen 193 and 083 350 heads on rebuilt 305 engines.
Fast355 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 09:33 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI

Tags
1986, 305, 350, chevy, data, engine, flow, head, heads, install, intake, lb9, lg4, performance, tpi
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details