Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-27-2009, 01:13 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 48
Car: 89 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Who has a Hi-flo TPI setup.

Has anyone on here fitted the hi-flo TPI setups
(namely the edelbrock base and runners)
to a Stock 350? ie, standard heads/cam.
Was wondering if it made a noticable difference,
or if its a waste of time and money upgrading
unless you change your heads and cam too.
THE HOFFMEISTER is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2009, 04:19 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,042
Car: 88' IROCZ
Engine: 388 TPI Motown 350 Race block
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to rgarcia63 Send a message via Yahoo to rgarcia63
Re: Who has a Hi-flo TPI setup.

The TPI setup was designed for the 305, and from what i've read GM made no modifications for higher flow required by the 350 (or, does it?). I'm sure they had a reason for not doing so that is beyond our understanding because I sure as **ll would've increased the flow.

I use the SLP base with the stock plenum/runners, and modified stock TB to 52mm, but nothing else is stock not even the block.

Let me say this - if the engine doesn't need anymore air a highflow system won't make a diffience.

Correction that's a Scroggins Dickey intake.
__________________
88' IROCZ 388/6.4L TPI Motown 350/4-bolt main stoker, and then some.

Last edited by rgarcia63; 03-28-2009 at 04:37 AM.
rgarcia63 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2009, 05:58 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
navyCM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MS
Posts: 757
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Who has a Hi-flo TPI setup.

arent all the hi-flow base's the same, i.e. edelbrock, accel, tpis?
__________________

87 IROC L98, 700R4, 3.27 gears, 3" Hooker CAT-back, UMI panhard bar, UMI rear lower control arms, Energy Suspesion bushings, K&N, Walboro fuel pump, KYB rear shocks.
navyCM is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2009, 06:44 AM   #4
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,481
Car: 1987 Black IROC-Z (original owner)
Engine: 350 Crate with TPI
Transmission: 700R4 with 2400 SLP Stall

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Who has a Hi-flo TPI setup.

The restriction is the MAF sensor.
DJP87Z28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2009, 09:14 AM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 48
Car: 89 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Who has a Hi-flo TPI setup.

But, if the standard TPI set up was for a 305 then it must be
restrictive on a 350,
everything says it is (books etc)
they claim 20 hp on stock engine, with the edelbrock set up.

reason for not changing it for the 350 is money.
I read that when it was designed, they only planned on using
the 305, but then decided to have the 350 too,
but in true GM fashion, would not spend money to redesign the manifold.

The MAF is not too bad at lower power levels, descreened helps.

someone must have done this swap and felt a difference.. or not,?
THE HOFFMEISTER is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2009, 11:12 AM   #6
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,481
Car: 1987 Black IROC-Z (original owner)
Engine: 350 Crate with TPI
Transmission: 700R4 with 2400 SLP Stall

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Who has a Hi-flo TPI setup.

I installed a 350 crate motor and used the TPI system from my original 305 except for the SLP runners and the usual for a 350 (FI, knck sensor, prom etc). I did change from the stock Maf (450 airflow) to a Wells (750 airflow) and the difference from a stock L98 TPI 240 HP (highest rated) to mine was increase to 288 HP (dyno'd).
__________________
1987 Black IROC-Z (original owner)
New 350 Crate Engine with TPI(from 305)
Balanced & Blueprinted
SLP Intake Runners
Hotchkis STB
SLP 1 3/4" Headers
SLP 3" Catback exhaust & Catco cat
SLP Torque Conv. (2400 stall)
Ile Alum dr shaft, (1989) BW 9-bolt Limited Slip with Four Wheel Disc Brakes (rear PBR 11.655 Rotors)
Spohn-SFC, Rear LCA & Pandhard bar.
17x8.5 ATI RAZZE 5 Wheels & 245/45/17 Tires
DYNO RESULTS:
225 RWHP & 296 RWTQ
288 HP & 380 TQ @ Flywheel.
All Emission controls installed.
A DAILY DRIVER

Last edited by DJP87Z28; 04-10-2009 at 05:28 PM.
DJP87Z28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2009, 01:26 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 48
Car: 89 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Who has a Hi-flo TPI setup.

288 hp,
i suppose a stock L98 with headers and a decent exhaust would make
a fair amount more than the factory 240 odd
but how much were the runners doing i wonder.
THE HOFFMEISTER is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2009, 02:05 PM   #8
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,481
Car: 1987 Black IROC-Z (original owner)
Engine: 350 Crate with TPI
Transmission: 700R4 with 2400 SLP Stall

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Who has a Hi-flo TPI setup.

Quote:
Originally Posted by THE HOFFMEISTER View Post
288 hp,
i suppose a stock L98 with headers and a decent exhaust would make
a fair amount more than the factory 240 odd
but how much were the runners doing i wonder.
SLP been selling those runners since 1986 and that is a long time for aftermarket part. I remember the original ads and the quoted 20 HP which I don't belive now.
DJP87Z28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2009, 02:26 PM   #9
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 48
Car: 89 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Who has a Hi-flo TPI setup.

maybe more like 10 and maybe another 10 from a base manifold, maybe.
THE HOFFMEISTER is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2009, 09:51 AM   #10
Junior Member
 
severedsanity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Simcoe, Ontario
Posts: 11

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Who has a Hi-flo TPI setup.

I did the scoggin dickey base plate, slp runners but also did the vortech heads and lt4 hot cam. You can get those heads dirt cheap and I recomend the set up. You won't be disappointed or feel as if you wasted money. For the seat of the pants feel, Mine feels like it's doubled.
severedsanity is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2009, 12:25 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 1,791
Car: 98 ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Who has a Hi-flo TPI setup.

Quote:
Originally Posted by THE HOFFMEISTER View Post
Has anyone on here fitted the hi-flo TPI setups
(namely the edelbrock base and runners)
to a Stock 350? ie, standard heads/cam.
Was wondering if it made a noticable difference,
or if its a waste of time and money upgrading
unless you change your heads and cam too.
There are a few articles on this subject in the mag section. I have an edelbrock high flow intake manifold w/ high flow runners port/matched. Id say together they are good for 20-25 hp but I also had them ported by TPIS.
89IrocZ350TPI is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2009, 01:52 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Victoria, British Columbia
Posts: 388
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T-5 WC
Axle/Gears: Yukon 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Who has a Hi-flo TPI setup.

Read the following article for what is the best flowing TPI intake manifold base and runners.

http://www.compcams.com/Community/Ar...?ID=1737510521

Now this article indicates what flowed best for a 383 cubic inch engine, which pulls in more air than a 350 cubic inch engine and certainly a 305 cubic inch engine.

If you prioritizing what to upgrade on the intake side of a 350 TPI engine to produce the best horsepower and torque results I would suggest the cam and heads first then the intake base manifold and runners. The cam is the easiest and probably cheapest item to install to reduce air restrictions. The heads would be the most expensive to replace. If you were doing the heads and it was in your budget you would do the base manifold and runners at the same time. Of course you would need to select a cam, heads and intake base that all worked together and which worked with the exhaust side of your engine as well.
BC GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2009, 01:57 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Victoria, British Columbia
Posts: 388
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T-5 WC
Axle/Gears: Yukon 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Who has a Hi-flo TPI setup.

Sorry this is the link to that article.

http://www.compcams.com/Community/Ar...?ID=1737510521
BC GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2009, 02:01 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 1,791
Car: 98 ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Who has a Hi-flo TPI setup.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BC GTA View Post
Read the following article for what is the best flowing TPI intake manifold base and runners.

http://www.compcams.com/Community/Ar...?ID=1737510521

Now this article indicates what flowed best for a 383 cubic inch engine, which pulls in more air than a 350 cubic inch engine and certainly a 305 cubic inch engine.

If you prioritizing what to upgrade on the intake side of a 350 TPI engine to produce the best horsepower and torque results I would suggest the cam and heads first then the intake base manifold and runners. The cam is the easiest and probably cheapest item to install to reduce air restrictions. The heads would be the most expensive to replace. If you were doing the heads and it was in your budget you would do the base manifold and runners at the same time. Of course you would need to select a cam, heads and intake base that all worked together and which worked with the exhaust side of your engine as well.

You are getting into some expensive parts. The intake and runners are basic bolt on mods that really free up horsepower. Here are some cheaper mods that got this bird to 290 hp fairly easy. Awesome article you found there btw.

http://www.gtasourcepage.com/91GTASLPTest.html

Last edited by 89IrocZ350TPI; 03-31-2009 at 02:06 PM. Reason: cuZ
89IrocZ350TPI is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 03:28 PM   #15
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 48
Car: 89 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Who has a Hi-flo TPI setup.

Idealy i would of course change the heads, cam and intake all at the same
time, tho as already said, that gets expensive.
Something around the lines of the LT4 hot cam is probably a good idea tho,
or something very similar, dont wanna go too wild and need to change torque
convertor etc.

My thinking was possibly change the manifold/runners this year and
then maybe do heads/cam next year, when hopefully i have more money
(things a bit tight right now)
Tho not sure if it is worth the expense for 20hp ish, although it
would certainly split up the cost.

I was surprised by that compcams article tho,
it showed they managed to make 410hp with their engine with a
stock TPI setup,
a lot less than the engine was capable of, but still alot
more than i thought it could do.
THE HOFFMEISTER is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2009, 01:45 AM   #16
Junior Member
 
severedsanity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Simcoe, Ontario
Posts: 11

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Who has a Hi-flo TPI setup.

I don't think it's worth it either, the reason I stated how cheaply you can pick up those heads for is because if you do decide to get them later, like you said to split the cost, the intake base design is different.
I would wait or just pick up the parts here and there as money permits, and then swap it all at once so you can feel the impact of it all together. The first drive after the build (ear to ear smile)made me totally forget about the money I saved and spent.
severedsanity is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2009, 10:03 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
tenpin842's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 752
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Richmond 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to tenpin842
Re: Who has a Hi-flo TPI setup.

i put them on my 305 with a ported plenum.
My little 305 with the stock heads dynoed at 175rwhp on a mustang dyno.
211 tq My peak HP was around 4666 rpms and 4955 rpms.
Where it usually fell on its face at 4500rpms.
Of coarse I changed more then just the base and runners though.
__________________
tenpin842 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2009, 05:44 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Victoria, British Columbia
Posts: 388
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T-5 WC
Axle/Gears: Yukon 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Who has a Hi-flo TPI setup.

Do it all at once. This will save you your time and/or labour costs, gasket costs and other costs such as has been mentioned. Formulate a plan, save the money and do it all at once. Research this board and watch other board and stores for sales and do it all at once. Oh yes and did I mention do it all at once.
BC GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2009, 05:50 AM   #19
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 48
Car: 89 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Who has a Hi-flo TPI setup.

Yes, i think you are right, best of waiting and do it all in one go.
Makes sense.

Thanks for your input.

THE HOFFMEISTER is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2009, 06:27 PM   #20
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 10

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Who has a Hi-flo TPI setup.

I was not going to do it all at once either, but I only wanted to do this once so I have been saving here and there and bought all the parts. now i am slowly putting it back together!!!! before i started to take my car apart, I dynoed my 305 at 192hp and 260 ft. mostly stock. Now i am putting a set of pro comp heads 58cc and the edelbrock high flow base plate on it with hooker headers and 1.6 roller rockers. i can not wait to get it together and see how she does!!!
thirdgenbird89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2009, 06:27 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI

Tags
350, accel, at, balanced, base, blueprinted, engine, flo, hiflow, horsepower, intake, iroc, manifold, motown, produce, runner, runners, stock, tpi
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details