Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-15-2010, 01:44 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 1,450
Car: 86 T/A, 83 Z/28
Engine: 5.0 TPI, 350 2 X 4 bbl
Transmission: 4 speed auto, 5 speed manual
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi, 3.73 std

Classifieds Rating: (0)
EGR valve

So long story short failed an emissions test with high NOX while everything else looks fine. Natrally the first thing i decided to check out was the EGR system. After determining vacuum was being applied to the EGR valve as it should the next thing i checked was the valve itself. Being that this car is also my means to get parts i decided to go ahead and buy an EGR valve ahead of time in case i needed it. However in comparing the new one to the old ive noticed a few interesting things.

1. New EGR valve dosnt hold vacuum as the old one does. Its a fairly slow leak but definitely leaks my guess is around the fitting where the vacuum port attaches (its like a swivel fitting designed to be able to twisted to point into any direction unlike the original which was fixed). The old one did not leak at all. I was not expecting any leaks but I'm wondering if it was designed with the idea in mind that this slow leak would not hinder its function.

2. When blowing into the exhaust port on the old EGR valve there was no flow unless you really blew into it relatively hard and then you could hear a slight whistling but flowed better to the point of free flow as you manually opened the valve which was as i expected. The new EGR valve however flows with little pressure applied when the valve's closed, definitely restricted, but flows. It flows more as the EGR valve opens but i was not expecting any flow when the valve should have been "close."


Does it sound like I managed to get lucky and bought a bran new defective EGR valve or is my old EGR valve bad and the new one is how it should act. Also both are negative type EGR valves. Thanks for your responses.
Rolling Thunder is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 09:33 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Tracy, CA
Posts: 976
Car: '87 IROC
Engine: 305 ci
Transmission: TH700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: EGR valve

There are two different kinds of EGR valves; negative and positive pressure.

IIRC, the negative pressure EGR will hold vacuum as your old valve. The positive pressure EGR will only hold vacuum if there is exhaust pressure at the valve pintle.

Check the stampings on the EGR valve cover. There should be either an "N" or a "P" stamped on it denoting which type of valve it is.

http://www.asashop.org/autoinc/dec97/egr.htm

Edit: My apologies. You already know all this. It does sound like the new valve is defective. It should hold vacuum.

BTW, I'm dealing with the same emissions failure as you are and have been for the past few years. I'm failing NOx at 15MPH test speed. The EGR vacuum system checks out as does the EGR valve. I installed a new cat and this helped a little, but still no dice.

I actually pulled off the upper intake to make sure nothing was plugged. Everything checks out. I did find a few injectors (originals) that had broken tip protectors, but I doubt this is an issue. I'm installing a set of FIC flow matched replacements, a new EGR valve (just because it's easy to get to now) and I'll button it up and re-test. We'll see what happens. I'm not too confident, though.

Last edited by paulo57509; 01-15-2010 at 09:44 AM.
paulo57509 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 12:04 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 1,450
Car: 86 T/A, 83 Z/28
Engine: 5.0 TPI, 350 2 X 4 bbl
Transmission: 4 speed auto, 5 speed manual
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi, 3.73 std

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: EGR valve

Yea same here except i failed the 15 and 25 for NOX by about 500 PPM in each. I cleaned the ports in the plenum and today im going to check the ports in the runners, intake, and head. Like yours i had replaced the cat with little effect as i had this problem last time. The only thing that really makes me wonder is that this new valve will flow exhaust gas while its "closed" should they normally flow some exhaust gasses when their closed? From everything i know about EGRs tell me they shouldn't and its kinda confirmed by the fact that my old one doesn't. However then again i did fail my NOX emissions so maybe its not such a great idea to compare a new part against a possibly bad one lol. It just seems like even though i dont think it should be flowing when it should be closed that would make sense if my EGR valve isnt flowing as it should that would make the NOX be a bit high consistently like that.
Rolling Thunder is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 01:25 PM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 35

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: EGR valve

I thought there were 3 kinds of EGR, at least according to books and other aritcles. Positive, negative, and then the one that just works off of ported vacuum. I thought the one on my TPI 5.7 for example was neither positive nor negative. I have a couple of AC Delco EGR's at home. I don't believe there is an "N" all by itself clearly stamped. There is an N stamped but it is inbetween other letters numbers if I remember correctly. I'll have to look again more closely when I get home.

I've battled high Nox eversince I opened up the exhaust with 1 3/4 SLP's, etc, etc. Always fail Nox at 15 and 25 mph. I have new cats with 1K miles on them. Everything else is new as well, sensors, etc. All the other smog numbers seemed to be fine. I found a Dyno Don recommendation to drill the EGR opening (where the vacuum line plugs in) .02 greater then what it is. The stock opening is already .02. So I drilled it as recommended to .041ish. Took it back to smog, failed the 15 mph but passed the 25 mph barely the knox did go way down almost more than half of what it was. The other numbers went up a quite a bit too, close enough to be almost failing, in my opinion.

Going to do more checks tonight. Cranked up the fuel pressure from 42 psi to 46 psi. I'm going to do another pre-test tomorrow morning to see what changes in the reading are if any.
Gonna check vacuum again I think.
aammcc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 01:32 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 1,450
Car: 86 T/A, 83 Z/28
Engine: 5.0 TPI, 350 2 X 4 bbl
Transmission: 4 speed auto, 5 speed manual
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi, 3.73 std

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: EGR valve

You are correct there are 3 types in my case there negative and they seem to work best. On factory EGRs they will have a N or a P stamp (factory TPIs are N type) but many aftermarket ones to not follow this convention. One thing i would mention is this if your unsure of which type you have (as it should not be the just strait ported type) that could be your problem. If its a negative type EGR it should work fine however positive type EGR valves work on back pressure in the exhaust and by adding a high flow exhaust your EGR will basically never open if there's not enough back pressure. Just a though.
Rolling Thunder is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 04:41 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Tracy, CA
Posts: 976
Car: '87 IROC
Engine: 305 ci
Transmission: TH700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
EGR valve - Type ID

paulo57509 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 04:41 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI

Tags
1983, 88, camaro, egr, gen, installing, negative, port, positive, problems, test, testing, vacuum, valve, valves
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details