Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-26-2001, 11:00 PM   #51
jms
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Gamaliel, KY USA
Posts: 589

Classifieds Rating: (1)
There was a discussion, some time ago, on these boards about the TPI top speed limiter which, if I remember correctly, was the fuel cut-off (perhaps it was a high rpm limit).

However, if memory serves, the L98 cut-off was factory pre-set at an extraordinarily high number, way past 120 mph, and nearer 200 mph.

The factory 16" wheel L98 cars came with Z-rated tires, way above the 120 mph limit spoke of.

I don't recall reading of any L98-equipped car not being able to exceed 120 mph, unless their transmission wouldn't allow them to have full throttle in overdrive.

Posts pop up periodically discussing top speeds and I don't recall ever seeing a 120 mph figure given on L98 cars.

Also, if I recall correctly, the throttle body and carb cars have a 116 mph limiter (or there-abouts).
jms
jms is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 12-26-2001, 11:19 PM   #52
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Springfield, MO, USA
Posts: 1,530
Car: 1986 Trans Am, 1991 Firebird
Engine: 355 TPI, 3.1L V6
Transmission: 700R4 in both

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Ok, I apologize.... I was confused. You did say L98 (350 TPI) and that may be true about the speed limiter on those. My '86 TA with Tuned Port has the 120mph speed limiter on it and that's what I was referring to. However, I just remembered that my TA wasn't an L98 but rather an LB9 with the 305 TPI. The LB9 and the LO3 (TBI) do indeed have the 120mph speed limiter.
__________________
__________________

1991 Firebird - 2nd Owner (The slow pretty car)
Stock engine setup with K&N Air Filter
T/A Hood
Pre-'91 T/A tail lights
'91-'92 Aero Spoiler waiting to be painted
GTA Emblems
Headlight Conversion Kit to non-sealed beam setup
Remote Start/Keyless Entry/Alarm
2 - 12" Rockford Fosgate P1 Subwoofers in a hatch/wheel well box with 300W Rockford Amp pushing the subs and 200W Rockford amp pushing the mids and highs - Kenwood head unit
__________________

1986 Trans AM (The fast ugly car)
355 TPI (Lots of mods and accessories)
4 Wheel Disc Brakes
86TpiTransAm is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 12-26-2001, 11:40 PM   #53
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Posts: 416
Car: 89 Turbo Trans Am and lots of non-3rd gens
Engine: 231 SFI Turbo's, LT4, LT1
Transmission: 2004r, 4L60E

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by jms
I'm still not sure on the TTA speed limiter. Maybe the GNs had the limiter at about 130. Anyone know?
jms
GN's stock limiter is 120mph due to the 15 inch rims/tires combo that came on them, I believe the GNX did not have a limiter because of the 16 inch ZR rated tires that came stock on them.
TTA has no limiter also because of the tires that came on them. Top speed is around 170mph, although some on the TTA board have seen them in the 180s.
*
Rev/speed limiter from the factory are almost always set to the top speed the factory tires can handle safely.
__________________
Rob - 89 TTA #426 20th Anniversary turbo 3.8 bone stock 99 TA30th Anniversary convertible 79 T/A 6.6 10th Anniv. - all original stock 94 Silverado LT4 powered 87 Grand National- lil' ole V6, 11.61 @ 119 w/1.66 60' 95 Trans Am Conv.- LT1
2QUIK6 is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 12-26-2001, 11:51 PM   #54
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Carrollton, TX, USA
Posts: 779
Car: 1992 Chevy Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T-56

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to mult68
Quote:
Originally posted by Raptor Pilot
Second, I hate how people always reply on boards or write articles in the major auto mags and always refer to the "Camaro" an not the Firebird models...example "what's the fastest 3rd Gen?" answer-" the 92 Z28 Camaro." Hello!!!!! How about saying "The 91/92 L98 3rd Gens" or "The 19XX Bird/Camaro" I understand that some have loyalties to one car or the other most of the time, hence they are your preference, but you can't always leave the other car out. this happens 9 out of 10 times, and it is a pet peeve of mine. I just want equal recognition.
Arent the thirdgen camaros lighter than the thirdgen firebirds? Thus making the camaro faster if you were to compare a 92 L98 Z and a 92 L98 Bird.

Last edited by mult68; 12-27-2001 at 12:34 AM.
mult68 is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 12-26-2001, 11:53 PM   #55
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 46

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I got arrested one night for going 137 in a 40 in my stock 91 z-28, So I don't think they were speed limited to 120
__________________
91 Z-28 Bright red
Hypertech stage II
K&N filters
March underdrive pullies
Flow Master muffler
Hypertech power coil
MCMLXI is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 12-27-2001, 12:12 AM   #56
Senior Member
 
Drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,318

Classifieds Rating: (14)
WOW! look at all the imaginitive posts in here.

take a look at the question...

"what is the fastest stock 3rd gen you can get your hands on?? and i mean totally stock, im thinking a 92 L98 Z28, well not counting the 89 turbo trans am, i wuz just wondering are there any special edition thirdgens that had more hp than others???"

Fastest STOCK thirdgen... no TTA's... That you can actually find and get your hands on... Well lets take a look. Considering the TTA is out, might as well forget the Firehawks, and the GM performance part test mules (86 5.7L Irocs, 92 Heritage Z's with the ZF 6 spd, the LT5, 454, LT1, Ramjet, Firefox, etc.) Forget about all of them cause you aren't going to find them on a carlot for any reasonable sum of money if at all (GM crushes these or stores them when they finish with them). So what does that leave? Next dreaming answer would be the 1LE's and B4C's... Well, no offense but shopping carlots they aren't going to show up. And since the question is about stock cars, and these cars were mostly sold to racers and gov't agencies, how do we know they're still stock? Besides that the B4C and 1LE numbers I've seen haven't been any better then typical L98 Z28 numbers. So then we move on to the next unrealistic suggestion... the cars that sold with the SLP option packages. Well these option packages did not ship to the dealer installed on the car. They were installed by the service dept at the dealership or by the owner and were also available over the counter at any Gm dealership thru GM performance parts. If you're going to consider them stock you might as well consider the ZZ4 conversion kit to be a stock option. So now that we have all the crap out of the way that doesn't matter to anyone except people enjoying pipe dreams...

90-92 L98 cars. Z28's, Formula's, GTA's, Trans Am's. All these cars share effectively the same power ratings (230-245hp depending where you look them up). They have the best setup GM offered in STOCK form. Typical times for these cars in stock trim are 14.0-14.4. I've run 14.3@98 with my bone stock 91 Formula with 110,000 miles on the odometer, clogged cats, and bald tires. I've seen and heard other people run 14.2-14.4 with the same cars. These cars do show up on carlots and can be had for very little $$$ and if they're mechanically sound they'll leave most other thirdgens behind them.

90-92 LB9 5spd cars. From what I've seen these cars are usually 3-5 tenths of a second slower in the 1/4 mile then the L98 cars.

90-92 LB9 Auto cars.

89 L98 cars. Iroc's, Formula's, Trans Am's, GTA's. Typically just behind the Speed Density cars.

89 LB9 5spd cars.

the rest goes about the same type of order, L98's first, LB9 5spds second... Newer is usually faster. Only exception is the 85 LB9 opposed to the 86-89 LB9's that got the crappy cam in most cases.
__________________
Drew
83 Camaro 5.0L *1995-98* RIP
84 Camaro 2.8L *2005-06* RIP
86 Trans Am WS6 5.7L Sold!
86 Mustang 2.3L Turbo
87 Iroc 5.7L
91 Formula 5.7L
91 Camaro RS convertible 5.0L
91 Firebird 3.1L *1999-06* Sold!
Drew is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 12-27-2001, 12:14 AM   #57
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,356

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to BORLAZ06 Send a message via Yahoo to BORLAZ06
Quote:
Originally posted by Jasper89ROC
fastest stock 3rd gen
hmmm...lets see *looks into history book*
i raced my friends slightly modded celi gts 6spd (great driver). my car was absolutely untouched (125,000 miles). considering it still had original dirty ac delco air filter. took him by bout 3 car lengths on a strip. where would this put me considering his car does 14.9 stock. i wish i had timeslips.

yeah the TTA n' Firehawks were fastest but lets compare stock Z28's, Formula's, w/wo 1LE.
BORLAZ06 is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 12-27-2001, 12:44 AM   #58
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Morris, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 278
Car: Formula
Engine: 400 sbc
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Bird_of_Prey
camaro lighter then the firebird......? could you get a L98 into a NON iroc or Z28 camaro?
gfx add weight.. as do options.. go Formula!
neways..
fastest car u can realistically get u'r hands on? 92 trans am (not gta) with the L98.. same for the 91 year... 90 formula L98..
the newer, the better camed/engine combo gm put out.. usully a 10 HP increase in the years.. (more or less)....
Bird_of_Prey is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 12-27-2001, 01:15 AM   #59
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Justin, Texas, USA
Posts: 202
Car: 1988 Formula and 1995 LT4 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI and 361 LT4
Transmission: M5 and stalled A4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
What about 91-92 G92 305 5 Spd? That one extra gear is definetly good for top speed!

They must rank up there...(not at the top, most likely, but discounting all the SLP cars, and specialty cars, what else is there?)
__________________
1995 Camaro Z28 - 361CI Forged LT4 with CC306 and many other goodies

1988 Formula G92 WS6 305 TPI/5 speed BASE coupe - Silver GTA Rims

Old Cars:

1998 Firebird Formula
1995 Camaro Z28
1991 1LE Formula
HM Murdock is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 12-27-2001, 02:30 AM   #60
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Welland, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,067

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to nblanchard Send a message via AIM to nblanchard Send a message via Yahoo to nblanchard
I've had my GTA up to 135MPH... so the 120MPH speed limiter is out of the question.... And I would have to say the Formula350 would be the fastest STOCK F-body... maybe tieing with the Z28 350...
nblanchard is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 12-27-2001, 05:33 AM   #61
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,356

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to BORLAZ06 Send a message via Yahoo to BORLAZ06
Quote:
Originally posted by nblanchard
I've had my GTA up to 135MPH... so the 120MPH speed limiter is out of the question.... And I would have to say the Formula350 would be the fastest STOCK F-body... maybe tieing with the Z28 350...
i had mine up to 135 too...it tells you what my big block 305 can do. haa
BORLAZ06 is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 12-27-2001, 08:12 AM   #62
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Timrå, Sweden
Posts: 930
Car: 1984 Corvette
Engine: Turbo 350
Transmission: 4L80E with TCI T-Com

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I have heard that the camaro with targa roof had a lower 120 mph somehting speed limiter. It was because the targa locks could not take any more. At that speed the aerodynamics create big vaccum that tries to lift the roof.
JoBy is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 12-27-2001, 03:57 PM   #63
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 258

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Bird_of_Prey
camaro lighter then the firebird......? could you get a L98 into a NON iroc or Z28 camaro?
gfx add weight.. as do options.. go Formula!
neways..
Yes the B4C police package is a L98 in an RS but it had the same ground effects.
91-ZZ4-Z28 is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 12-28-2001, 03:11 AM   #64
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Yardley, PA.
Posts: 228

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Raptor Pilot
In my opinion this post as I read it asked what the quickest 3rd gen was, not the one with the highest top speed...how many times do yuo ever get to test that anyway vs. the straightline acceleration between point A and B, or in a race?

That being said, my final opinon says that the quickest 3rd gen if put under a really big microscope here would have to be the 91/92 L98 Firebird Formula. The reasons I will list are hardly quantifiable on the track vs a car such as a 91/92 L98 Z28, but like I said, under the big magnifying glass, this would make them the 3rd gen to answer the posts' question. 1. No GFX 2. No GFX 3. Any with the Diamond Spoke wheels

My main consderation here is the weight argument, but it is almost impossible to see a huge difference or any at all in a Formula vs. a 91/92 TA/z28 that has GFX. They do weigh more with the GFX, but not considerably enough to skew the 0-60 and 1/4 times for test purposes. I did not include the 1LE b/c they are rare, just as many special edition or anniversary/tuner car are, and many of the 91/92 cars had many of the same options as them anyway. It is easy to find a 91/92 L98 with an aluminum driveshaft,baffled gas tank, and oil cooler. The only thing you wont see is A/C delete and 1LE brakes, neither of which really matter, except you save more weight again with the absence of the A/C.

For my .02, the 91/92 Formula L98
Raptor Pilot is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 12-30-2001, 01:41 AM   #65
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: fairmont WV USA
Posts: 164

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to Don_89Iroc
In response to the LT9, I did some research and you've been given an award for intelligence. ENJOY

edit...sorry but pics like that don;t belong here...

Last edited by Ed Maher; 01-10-2002 at 03:25 PM.
Don_89Iroc is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 12-30-2001, 02:03 AM   #66
Member
 
smnitWS6TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Keyport, WA
Posts: 187
Car: 98 Z28
Engine: 346 LS1
Transmission: 6 spd.
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to smnitWS6TA Send a message via Yahoo to smnitWS6TA
LMFAO at Don. That's a good one. A$$CLOWN LMFAO!!!
smnitWS6TA is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 12-30-2001, 04:14 AM   #67
Administrator
 
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In a mint Third Gen!
Posts: 7,130
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
I will say the fastest is the 92 Z28. Camaros are usually lighter, have less options, and tighter rougher riding suspension compared to WS6. There have been some 92 Z28's that have run 14.1 stock, even on this board. Also, some don't think the air intake of the Camaro is an advantage, but I definetly do. More the earlier Firebird TPI intake than their newer 1 compared to the Camaro.

Don't think the Formula is heavier?? Lots wouldn't by appearance, but take this into consideration. Would u think an IROC-Z is lighter than a Formula?? Not much difference ext. and int. between an IROC-Z and a 91-92 Z28, though their definetly is some. (The 92 Z could be a little heavier than an IROC and probably is) In 87 when an IROC 5.7, IROC 5.0 5-Speed, a 5.7 GTA, and a 5.0 Formula 5-Speed were all thoroughly tested, it was noted that the IROC 5.7 WAS faster than the GTA and that the Camaros were at least around 130lbs. lighter than Firebirds when both cars were base. The IROC 5.0 had 105lbs. of options and STILL weighed 28lbs. less than the base Formula 5.0.

Last edited by IROCZTWENTYGR8; 12-30-2001 at 08:34 AM.
IROCZTWENTYGR8 is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 12-30-2001, 12:56 PM   #68
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Welland, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,067

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to nblanchard Send a message via AIM to nblanchard Send a message via Yahoo to nblanchard
Tighter suspension on the Camaro vs the WS6 on Firebirds? I though WS6 was the suspension for both chevy and pontiac. If it isn't, then what does the camaro use instead of WS6?
nblanchard is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 12-30-2001, 07:17 PM   #69
Senior Member
 
PETE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: In the corner of my mind!
Posts: 1,100
Car: 1989 TTA #1240
Engine: 3.8 SFI turbo
Transmission: 2004r
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
since nobody has mentioned this i will add it.every one is talking about factory cars here,myself included.however the times that are listed for roadtests on these cars should be considered as non stock.when the press fleet is given a car to put through it's paces they are 99% of the time tweaked.there has been many an interview with gm brass in the past where they've said those cars usually were tuned for better performance to entice the public.it would be hard to say whch car would be fastest without quoting a magazine article(as i have previously).
PETE is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 12-30-2001, 08:49 PM   #70
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,356

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to BORLAZ06 Send a message via Yahoo to BORLAZ06
Quote:
Originally posted by IROCZTWENTYGR8
I will say the fastest is the 92 Z28. Camaros are usually lighter, have less options, and tighter rougher riding suspension compared to WS6. There have been some 92 Z28's that have run 14.1 stock, even on this board. Don't think the Formula is heavier?? Lots wouldn't by appearance, but take this into consideration. Would u think an IROC-Z is lighter than a Formula?? Not much difference ext. and int. between an IROC-Z and a 91-92 Z28, though their definetly is some. (The 92 Z could be a little heavier than an IROC and probably is) In 87 when an IROC 5.7, IROC 5.0 5-Speed, a 5.7 GTA, and a 5.0 Formula 5-Speed were all thoroughly tested, it was noted that the IROC 5.7 WAS faster than the GTA and that the Camaros were at least around 130lbs. lighter than Firebirds when both cars were base. The IROC 5.0 had 105lbs. of options and STILL weighed 28lbs. less than the base Formula 5.0.
i had the same theory as well...
BORLAZ06 is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 12-30-2001, 11:34 PM   #71
Administrator
 
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In a mint Third Gen!
Posts: 7,130
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
"Tighter suspension on the Camaro vs the WS6 on Firebirds? I though WS6 was the suspension for both chevy and pontiac. If it isn't, then what does the camaro use instead of WS6?"

People, WS6 is a just the Firebirds RPO for their top suspension. (Which Pontiac allowed to be ordered on lower model cars) When u get a Z28 u get the Camaros top suspension, (Which is the only way to get it) or Z28 suspension, which has been available on Camaros since 67. When u get an IROC-Z, u get IROC suspension which was better than the regular Z28 suspension. The Camaro suspension is tighter than WS6 suspension, allowing tighter turns, but a rougher ride than a WS6. I know having driven both, and the same was found on every single test I can find on these cars. I don't think both cars ever had the exact same suspension or feel in all gens.

"since nobody has mentioned this i will add it.every one is talking about factory cars here,myself included.however the times that are listed for roadtests on these cars should be considered as non stock.when the press fleet is given a car to put through it's paces they are 99% of the time tweaked.there has been many an interview with gm brass in the past where they've said those cars usually were tuned for better performance to entice the public.it would be hard to say whch car would be fastest without quoting a magazine article(as i have previously)."

It is unlikely considering how GM almost always doesn't even want the public to know what their cars can really do, and is known for underrating their cars constantly. It wouldn't matter though, if it were the case then both Chevy and Pontiac would equally fine tune their cars. Don't u think?? It might be F-Body vs. M*****g, but it has always been Chevrolet vs. Pontiac in GM over the F-Body in many ways since they 1st came out and were being designed, and until even now.

Last edited by IROCZTWENTYGR8; 01-01-2002 at 01:38 AM.
IROCZTWENTYGR8 is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 12-31-2001, 08:14 AM   #72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 258

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
[i]People, WS6 is a just the Firebirds RPO for their top suspension. (Which Pontiac allowed to be ordered on lower model cars) When u get a Z28 u get the Camaros top suspension, (Which is the only way to get it) or Z28 suspension, which has been available on Camaros since 67. When u get an IROC-Z, u get IROC suspension which was better than the regular Z28 suspension. [/b]
PRO 1LE is above and beyond the normal Z28 or WS6,
And if ordered with PRO B4C was available on an RS.
91-ZZ4-Z28 is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 01-08-2002, 11:36 PM   #73
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: fairmont WV USA
Posts: 164

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to Don_89Iroc
STOCK no special editions
Don_89Iroc is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 01-10-2002, 12:44 PM   #74
Supreme Member
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 4,258
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: Procharged L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to fly89gta Send a message via AIM to fly89gta Send a message via MSN to fly89gta Send a message via Yahoo to fly89gta
Quote:
Originally posted by Jasper89ROC
I didnt see ne thing about dealer addons not counting?? When I get the stuff I will make a new post incase this one isnt here any more. It will take me a few days, my buddy lives a while away from me. But you cant deny it soon. LT9 H.O.w/ 400 some odd hp
So where is this proof of the "LT9 H.O" engine???
fly89gta is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 01-11-2002, 01:37 AM   #75
Administrator
 
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In a mint Third Gen!
Posts: 7,130
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
I don't think there is 1.
IROCZTWENTYGR8 is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 01-11-2002, 07:38 AM   #76
Supreme Member
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 4,258
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: Procharged L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to fly89gta Send a message via AIM to fly89gta Send a message via MSN to fly89gta Send a message via Yahoo to fly89gta
Quote:
Originally posted by IROCZTWENTYGR8
I don't think there is 1.
haha, maybe there is one, really
fly89gta is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 01-11-2002, 10:57 AM   #77
Senior Member
 
67 Camaro 88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hliðskjálf / Pensacola, FL
Posts: 718
Car: Camaro
Engine: 3800
Transmission: T5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 67 Camaro 88
Look its an LT9

http://tech.firebirdv6.com/generalspecs.html

Quote:
LT9 ENGINE, GAS, 8 CYL, 5.7L, 488L, HD
Its a 1981-86 truck motor

More on it: http://www.chuckschevytruckpages.com/enginespecs.html

RPO Code: LT9
Size: 350 cid V8
HP: 160
Torque: 260
Years: 81-86
In truck models: K20, K30


....just thought Id throw that in


Sounds like a beast to me lol



-Bud
67 Camaro 88 is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 01-11-2002, 12:31 PM   #78
Supreme Member
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 4,258
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: Procharged L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to fly89gta Send a message via AIM to fly89gta Send a message via MSN to fly89gta Send a message via Yahoo to fly89gta
LOL!!!!
fly89gta is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 01-14-2002, 08:06 PM   #79
Supreme Member
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 4,258
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: Procharged L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to fly89gta Send a message via AIM to fly89gta Send a message via MSN to fly89gta Send a message via Yahoo to fly89gta
still no proof eh?
fly89gta is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 01-14-2002, 08:51 PM   #80
Administrator
 
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In a mint Third Gen!
Posts: 7,130
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
ROFL
IROCZTWENTYGR8 is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 01-14-2002, 10:17 PM   #81
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 143

Classifieds Rating: (0)
wait...so where do the G92 cars stand???
just curious
__________________
1989 G92 Iroc 305 5spd 3.45 posi
*53K miles*
mods: airfoil, MAF screens, flowmaster 80's, K&N's, TES headers, Catco hi flow cats (dual), Hurst Competition plus short throw, Taylor Spiro pro 8mm wires, MSD Blaster GM coil, Bosch Platinum's, Centerforce II clutch.

Other:
Tints, clear turn signals, Eclipse CD8051 HU, Nakamichi pa504 (50x4 watts), Polk 4x6's, Polk 6x9's, Xtant 1001x amp (1000 watts), 2 xtant X-series 12 inch subs= people know i'm comin' a block away

Soon= slp loudmouth, ram air, maybe blue bottle


14.6 @ 95.5 with a 2.36 60' --i'll see if the shifter helps any next week?
G92 IROC is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 01-14-2002, 11:05 PM   #82
Administrator
 
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In a mint Third Gen!
Posts: 7,130
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
350's with G92 are the fastest. It came standard on them some years.

Last edited by IROCZTWENTYGR8; 01-14-2002 at 11:07 PM.
IROCZTWENTYGR8 is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 01-17-2002, 02:50 PM   #83
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Panama City, FL, USA
Posts: 1,219

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 89Irocz23 Send a message via Yahoo to 89Irocz23
I think he found out his friend was full of it and wont reply back now.
89Irocz23 is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 01-17-2002, 07:05 PM   #84
Supreme Member
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 4,258
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: Procharged L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to fly89gta Send a message via AIM to fly89gta Send a message via MSN to fly89gta Send a message via Yahoo to fly89gta
Quote:
Originally posted by 89Irocz23
I think he found out his friend was full of it and wont reply back now.
hehe ya think?
fly89gta is offline vBGarage Page  
Old 01-17-2002, 07:05 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Closed Thread

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI

Tags
1985, 19995, 1le, 305, 350, 57, engine, fastest, formula, iroc, lo3, lt9, road, specs, stock, test
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details