Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Transmissions and Drivetrain
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-29-2005, 01:40 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 10

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Mechanical Linkage VS Hydraulics

Thanks for reading first of all. I have a 1989 camaro that we built over the course of two years. An original automatic car we pulled all that garbage out and replaced it with a T5 manual transmission. My dad has a 1982 camaro pace car edition with the t10 4 speed and mechanical linkage and we happened to have another mechanical setup availible so we put that in verses the hydraulics. The clutch set up has never worked exactly right and i was wondering if anyone had any experience with this. I have a 305 V8 from a 1985 camaro. The only cars that came with the mechanical linkage were 82 and 83 4 speed cars. I'm trying to use it with a 89 camaro with an 85 motor and a t5 5 speed. It has never worked right and i was curious if anyone had any tips or pointers. all of the linkage is right except the piece that goes to the clutch fork. we made that piece ourself and that could be the problem or it couuld be that the engine bays changed a little or anything like that. just wondering if anyone knows anything about this thanks! I would like to stay with mechanical if possible just because i think its a more manly clutch setup:P
conkid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2005, 01:45 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 287
Car: 1988 Monte SS
Engine: ZZ4-cammed TPI 355
Transmission: World-Class T5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Which bellhousing are you using? The '84-'92 V8 bellhousings were all set up for hydraulic linkage. '82 V8 bellhousings were for the T10 4-speed/mechanical linkage, and '83 bellhousings were T5 5-speed/mechanical linkage.

Your issues might be that the clutch fork is in the wrong place, or the pivot ball inside the bellhousing is either too short, or too long.

Let us know which bellhousing you're using, and we can figure it out.
__________________
Steve Ragusa - North Jersey
'88 SS - Budget ProTourer - ZZ4-cammed and Tuned Port Injected 355, WC T5, 1LE 12" front brakes, 17" SLP wheels, Eibachs/Bilsteins, and other stuff. Heart and Soul of a Thirdgen, swapped into a G-body.

'01 Cherokee Sport - Family/Parts Hauler - 4.0L, 4WD, 4-doors. Guzzling 87 octane!

Check out www.bowtiepower.com for all the info!
TPI Monte SS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2005, 10:14 AM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 10

Classifieds Rating: (0)
the bellhousing is for the 82-84 setup! thanks
conkid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2005, 10:26 PM   #4
jmd
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Aridzona
Posts: 3,163
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to jmd
The 82-83 systems were pretty queer as far as the kinked z-bar and while you can restore them to working right, I wouldn't keep the car mechanically clutched when the hydraulic setup works so well.

Double check your z-bar ballstud, block side ballstud, the slop that may exist there, all the other friction / pivot points, and especially the ballstud in the bellhousing.

There is an 82 bellhousing for a "straight up" trans., and there is an 83 bellhousing for "canted" 17 degrees to the left T5.

You'll likely have problems with the top and lower arms of the z-bar / cross shaft / whatever you call it needing rewelded every once in a while, wearing out the bushing in the clutch pedal, and other wear points. I don't know if anyone makes a rod-end upper & lower pushrod setup for the 82-83 F setup; I know it has been posted about.

Good luck.
jmd is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2005, 10:26 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Transmissions and Drivetrain

Tags
4speed, 82, 83, ball, body, camaro, gbody, install, linkage, manual, mechanical, pivot, speed, t10, zbar
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details