Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Transmissions and Drivetrain
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-04-2008, 08:56 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
5speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 87
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 350
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

I'm replacing the clutch in my IROC and am going with a Center Force.
Anyone have any opinion on the Center Force II vs their dual friction.
My car is street driven only with a bored, balanced and blue printed 350.
Stock gears, tires and T5 tranny.
5speed is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2008, 08:59 PM   #2
Moderator
 
Apeiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Rio Oro de Santa Ana, San Jose, Costa Rica
Posts: 19,819
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop / 1988 IROC T-top
Engine: 383 Carb / 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60 / T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44 / 3.08 10 bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

A single friction clutch is going to be able to deal more abuse than the T5 itself can handle.
Apeiron is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2008, 09:41 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 1,941
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to Saigon_Bob Send a message via MSN to Saigon_Bob Send a message via Yahoo to Saigon_Bob
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Apeiron View Post
A single friction clutch is going to be able to deal more abuse than the T5 itself can handle.
I have a dual friction... awesome clutch and takes all the abuse i give it ( drifting, racing, etc.) the tranny on the other hand is starting to not like to take 2nd gear.... lol
Saigon_Bob is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2008, 10:03 PM   #4
Junior Member
 
5speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 87
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 350
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

I don't abuse my car, no power shifting, etc. If I mash the go pedal..I shift using the clutch.
I'm more concerned with added performance, clutch longevity,etc.
Is the dual friction worth the extra $$.
5speed is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2008, 10:33 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
samiam91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 595
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: WC T5 (for now)
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt -3.45-

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5speed View Post
I don't abuse my car, no power shifting, etc. If I mash the go pedal..I shift using the clutch.
I'm more concerned with added performance, clutch longevity,etc.
Is the dual friction worth the extra $$.
may seem like a dum question, but whats the differ between power shifts and whatnot?

nice thread as im on the same page as you, im looking to replace my clutch as the motor is getting pulled out, so im going to yank it out and replace it then. i think ill go with a dual friction though...
samiam91RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2008, 02:41 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 1,941
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to Saigon_Bob Send a message via MSN to Saigon_Bob Send a message via Yahoo to Saigon_Bob
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5speed View Post
I don't abuse my car, no power shifting, etc. If I mash the go pedal..I shift using the clutch.
I'm more concerned with added performance, clutch longevity,etc.
Is the dual friction worth the extra $$.
i never could powershift... lol... then again my tranny is wore out...
Saigon_Bob is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2008, 10:11 AM   #7
Junior Member
 
Z28 MeTaL HeAd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 89
Car: 1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Engine: Carb'd LT1 w/ a Cam :)
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/ 3.75 gears

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Z28 MeTaL HeAd
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

DONT power shift with a T5. You will break the tranny so fast you have no idea!


As for what power shifting is...power shifting is when you're WOT and at redline when you go to shift to the next gear, you dont lift your foot off the gas.
Z28 MeTaL HeAd is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2008, 01:22 PM   #8
Moderator
 
Kevin91Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Disneyland, SoCal
Posts: 10,488
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350 L98 siamesed runners
Transmission: LT1 T56
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via ICQ to Kevin91Z Send a message via AIM to Kevin91Z
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

Yes, I have an opinion, Centerfarce is garbage. Their weight system usually ends up hanging up the clutch and causing problems.

Get a McLeod instead.
__________________
377 RWHP, 390 RWTQ (05-21-11)
12.803 @ 108.50 MPH (1.923 60') (04-11-01)
Work: Manley Performance Products
Founder: SoCal Thirdgenners
Founder: SoCal TPI Organization
Kevin91Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 06:50 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Roy,UT USA
Posts: 3,056

Classifieds Rating: (30)
Send a message via ICQ to Pat Hall
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

I'm kinda leery of the weight gimmickry on the Centerforces too. Some people love them, others have had nothing but trouble with them. Along with Kevin's suggestion of McLeod, also look into the Ram Powergrip or Spec's Stage I or Stage II clutches. The standard duty Ram Powergrip should be more than adequate for your needs. The HD version is over $300, and it's probably more clutch than you actually need. Here's a link for the Ram clutch at Summit Racing. http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku Btw, Zoom Performance also offers a multi-friction clutch that uses Kevlar on the flywheel side, and it's more affordable. http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
__________________
89RS w/350 TPI; 69RS/SS w/450 HP 350/Muncie 4-Speed "Too weird to live, too rare to die."

Last edited by Pat Hall; 08-06-2008 at 06:54 AM.
Pat Hall is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 09:01 AM   #10
Junior Member
 
5speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 87
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 350
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

thanks for the info and suggestions guys. I'll check into the other companies. I'd hate to be pulling the tranny again to fix a fubar clutch.
5speed is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 12:01 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
antman89iroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: huntsville, al
Posts: 456
Car: 89 iroc
Engine: 5.7 HSR N2O
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9 bolt posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

No experiance with Centerforce, but I strongly recommend the Ram Powergrip HD. It has a super heavy duty pressure plate, a 8 puck metallic disc with a beefy hub and is rated for 700 hp. Make sure you get the Powergrip "HD".

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku

(It's the "pretty" hot pink one!) I believe I paid around $325. I use it in my daily driver and occasionally race at the track. With a mild 350 and 250 hp on nitrous I guesstimate power at around 550 hp. The car dead hooks at my local strip and I have had zero clutch issues. There is a little chatter at times on the street but it's pretty easy to adjust driving habits to minimize it. Clutch feel is heavier than stock but fine for daily use IMO. I previously ran the Zoom multi friction with kevlar on one side and organic on the other and it lasted only 5 or 6 hard passes at the strip (without nitrous) and I don't recommend it.

And as far as the T5 goes, I haven't had any problems. I launch fairly hard but don't power shift it. Bear in mind that I'm using the nitrous off the line and only have a 3.27 rear gear. That's a lot of strain on the entire clutch/tranny/driveshaft system. (runs 7.98 @ 93 1/8 mi) I may be pushing my luck or just plain lucky cause a lot of people report having problems. Of course it'll probably blow the next time out!

Last edited by antman89iroc; 08-06-2008 at 12:19 PM.
antman89iroc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 12:41 PM   #12
Junior Member
 
5speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 87
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 350
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

tks antman. That looks like a little more clutch then I need on the street though.
Which was the big reason I was looking at the CF..more clamping pressure but not the change in clutch pedal pressure.
I do a lot of town and back road driving and shift a lot..I don't want to end up with a left leg like Arnies and a right leg like Mr Bean. lol
5speed is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 12:48 PM   #13
Moderator
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 16,250
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

I use the CenterForce II behind a 350/330 HO Deluxe. Zero problems, though I drive like the old fart I am. Based on my experience, I'd recommend it.

JamesC
__________________
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, / Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet

"Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies." Nietzsche
JamesC is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 12:59 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
1 DwnCam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Posts: 711
Car: 92 Z28 Camaro
Engine: Procharged 406.
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 4.11 Gears

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

Mcleod Super Street Pro is the equivilant to the Centerforce unit you were looking at without the counter weight business.
__________________
This will give you an Idea.

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2368130/1

Vrbancic Brothers Procharged 406
781.5 HP @ 6500
701 @ 5500
14 psi.
1 DwnCam is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 03:34 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
antman89iroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: huntsville, al
Posts: 456
Car: 89 iroc
Engine: 5.7 HSR N2O
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9 bolt posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5speed View Post
tks antman. That looks like a little more clutch then I need on the street though.
Which was the big reason I was looking at the CF..more clamping pressure but not the change in clutch pedal pressure.
I do a lot of town and back road driving and shift a lot..I don't want to end up with a left leg like Arnies and a right leg like Mr Bean. lol
Got a good laugh on that visual!

Naw man it's not like that, my wife drives this car! Really, the clutch pedal isn't that much stiffer. But suit yourself. It does chatter sometimes which can be annoying. My experiance with the "middle of the road" stuff is that it isn't durable enough for my driving style and a trip to the track now and then. I would either go stock or Ram HD.

If you aren't looking for something that will hold up to abuse then the Zoom MF may be good for you. The pedal was super easy and it held up OK for the daily commute. It's not for racing or serious street though. As for Centerforce, some have great experiances, others not so great. I'll defer to those who've used it. However, I chose not to.

Opinions are like belly buttons, right? Everyone has one. Good luck. You really can't go wrong with most the top brands if you don't drive it like you stole it!
antman89iroc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2008, 08:31 PM   #16
Junior Member
 
5speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 87
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 350
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

Thanks for the input. I don't race my car and considering I'm a Fed LEO..I don't street race either..
However I don't drive like a blue hair and my engine isn't stock so I want something that will stand up.
5speed is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 08:26 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Roy,UT USA
Posts: 3,056

Classifieds Rating: (30)
Send a message via ICQ to Pat Hall
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

Considering your application, that's why I pointed you towards the standard duty, Ram Powergrip instead of the HD version. I'm running the standard duty Powergrip behind a pretty stout 350 in my 69 Camaro, and I've had zero problems with it. No chattering and pedal effort is moderate. Of course it has mechanical linkage. With the hydraulic linkage, it probably won't feel much different from a stock clutch. I actually do have to agree with Antman that either of the Ram clutches would probably be a better choice than the Zoom. Zoom is kinda on par with Mr. Gasket products as far as quality. Ram is definitely a better brand. I ran a Hays clutch years ago, which is made by Mr. Gasket, and it was a POS. The Ram has worked great in comparison. McLeod would sell a lot more clutches if they actually had more information available. Every time I look them up in Summit or Jegs, all you seem to be able to find listed is their mega-expensive Street Twin ($1000) and a bunch of odd, circle track applications. Whatever the case, I'd still recommend either Ram or Spec. Both are well known and widely used.
__________________
89RS w/350 TPI; 69RS/SS w/450 HP 350/Muncie 4-Speed "Too weird to live, too rare to die."
Pat Hall is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 12:33 PM   #18
Supreme Member
 
Dyno Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 4,361
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Send a message via AIM to Dyno Don
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

Here is the deal on the McLeod.

All of our manual setups call for a 10.4 pressure plate and disk.

McLeod makes a better setup but they don't list it as a GM replacement.

It is made for Chrysler products, but it has a 10 1/2" bolt pattern but uses a 11" plate.

The disk is an 11" trimmed to 10.95 and uses special bolts (round head instead of hex) at the contact point, but still uses a hex 1/2"socket.

If you try to use any other bolts you are screwed.(bolts are furnished)

Now for the part #'s the disk is dual friction and is a 26 splined unit #260871

The pressure plate is #360710

I have been using this combo for many years, like some other dual friction units, if you slide it, it will get sticky and chatter a little.

It is a great street and strip unit.

Why they don't list it for GM, I don't know.

HTH
Dyno Don is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 07:57 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
antman89iroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: huntsville, al
Posts: 456
Car: 89 iroc
Engine: 5.7 HSR N2O
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9 bolt posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Hall View Post
Considering your application, that's why I pointed you towards the standard duty, Ram Powergrip instead of the HD version.

Glad you chimed back in. I have a high opinion of the RAM products, but haven't used the one you recommended. I would probably try that one or even the "OE replacement" version before I'd go back to the Zoom.

And when I say serious street I'm not necessarily talking about illegal street racing. I'm just stating an opinion that a car set up for occasional track racing generally needs heavier duty parts than stock. My car is "serious" for a daily driven street car, to me anyway. When and if you get the urge to see what times it's capable of at the track, it's a real bummer babying it home cause the clutch couldn't take a half dozen blasts down the track when you finally get some traction!

Last edited by antman89iroc; 08-08-2008 at 08:01 AM.
antman89iroc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 09:24 AM   #20
86Z
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: CT
Posts: 1,641
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 TPI Procharged D1SC
Transmission: Tremec TKO-600
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt 3.73 posi

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

i have a dual friction, and i abuse the crap out of it, i've had no issues whats so ever it's fine behind my 305
86Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 10:25 AM   #21
Senior Member
 
calebzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 752
Car: '85 TA
Engine: 350 turbo
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70 posi 9bolt

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

I used the CF dual friction for over a year behind my turboed 350 & T5. It held up great (street car) and I have no complaints. It outlasted my first T5 and when I swapped in the T56, the clutch pp/disc were still able to be reused for the next guy.
__________________
'85 TA, 350 TPI w/ Forged Internals, Procomp 190cc, Crane 212/218 .446/.459 114lsa, 58mm TB, 60lb injectors, Holley Commander 950, LC-1, MSD 6A, Turbo, Intercooled

my cardomain
calebzman is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 02:11 PM   #22
Junior Member
 
5speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 87
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 350
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

Quote:
Originally Posted by antman89iroc View Post

And when I say serious street I'm not necessarily talking about illegal street racing. I'm just stating an opinion that a car set up for occasional track racing generally needs heavier duty parts than stock. My car is "serious" for a daily driven street car, to me anyway. When and if you get the urge to see what times it's capable of at the track, it's a real bummer babying it home cause the clutch couldn't take a half dozen blasts down the track when you finally get some traction!
Stop reading my mind...
5speed is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2008, 12:55 AM   #23
Junior Member
 
RyanKeepsitReal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 25

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saigon_Bob View Post
i never could powershift... lol... then again my tranny is wore out...

all u need to do in a power shift is let off the gas and shift it...? do you do that? or do you try to shift while your on the gas? stupid question but haha just thought i would ask
RyanKeepsitReal is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2008, 08:58 AM   #24
Senior Member
 
Saigon_Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kissimmee, FL
Posts: 1,941
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 357cid
Transmission: T5 Swap
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 7.5" 3.23 soon to be 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via AIM to Saigon_Bob Send a message via MSN to Saigon_Bob Send a message via Yahoo to Saigon_Bob
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RyanKeepsitReal View Post
all u need to do in a power shift is let off the gas and shift it...? do you do that? or do you try to shift while your on the gas? stupid question but haha just thought i would ask
yea... i let off the gas... i cant do it at speed.. only druising around if im lazy but the stock T5 in my car has seen a harder life than the pants of a rodeo clown...

i beat the hell outta that tranny and im suprised i havent split the case
Saigon_Bob is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2008, 10:08 AM   #25
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 98
Car: '92 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: Richmond Gear street 5 speed

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Send a message via Yahoo to stroked_n_blown
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

A CF dual-friction was the first replacement clutch I ever put on my Camaro. I had no problems with it at all. I abused the snot out of that clutch with lots of hard down shifts to drop speed from 120mph down to around 40mph (with a stock T5..prolly why my T5 only lasted 80,000 miles). Only issue with the CF was getting used to the almost non-existent pedal pressure.
stroked_n_blown is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2008, 12:09 PM   #26
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cali
Posts: 243
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: World Class T-5 5speed manual Trans
Axle/Gears: STOCK G92 performance 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

go with the regular clutch. DF's are gonna be harsh engagement and shake the car if you like to engage at less than 1500 rpm. Hands down REGULAR.
The end
boldguy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2008, 02:52 PM   #27
Senior Member
 
samiam91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 595
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: WC T5 (for now)
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt -3.45-

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

nevermind
samiam91RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2008, 04:26 AM   #28
Senior Member
 
samiam91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 595
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: WC T5 (for now)
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt -3.45-

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyno Don View Post
Here is the deal on the McLeod.

All of our manual setups call for a 10.4 pressure plate and disk.

McLeod makes a better setup but they don't list it as a GM replacement.

It is made for Chrysler products, but it has a 10 1/2" bolt pattern but uses a 11" plate.

The disk is an 11" trimmed to 10.95 and uses special bolts (round head instead of hex) at the contact point, but still uses a hex 1/2"socket.

If you try to use any other bolts you are screwed.(bolts are furnished)

Now for the part #'s the disk is dual friction and is a 26 splined unit #260871

The pressure plate is #360710

I have been using this combo for many years, like some other dual friction units, if you slide it, it will get sticky and chatter a little.

It is a great street and strip unit.

Why they don't list it for GM, I don't know.

HTH
this is good, i saw it in my summit catalog and im gonna order it. i see the part # for the pressure plate, $201. but not the 260871 DF disk.

i pulled it up online though on summit, and its another $200

so all in all im looking at 400, which isnt bad i suppose, is there another better deal somewhere else?? any mods? or direct fit?

and lastly, what do you mean by "if you slide it, it will get sticky and chatter"
just wondering what that meant, i know it might sound dum but i dont know.

thanks guys.
__________________
samiam91RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2008, 12:03 PM   #29
Supreme Member
 
Dyno Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 4,361
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Send a message via AIM to Dyno Don
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

Quote:
Originally Posted by samiam91RS View Post
so all in all im looking at 400, which isnt bad i suppose, is there another better deal somewhere else?? any mods? or direct fit?

and lastly, what do you mean by "if you slide it, it will get sticky and chatter"
just wondering what that meant, i know it might sound dum but i dont know.

thanks guys.
It is a direct fit.

The best way to use a clutch is, get it all the way out as soon as possible.
If you slide or slip it, the friction will get it hot, then it gets sticky and chatters.
Dyno Don is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2008, 05:36 PM   #30
Senior Member
 
samiam91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 595
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: WC T5 (for now)
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt -3.45-

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Dual friction vs "regular" clutch?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyno Don View Post
It is a direct fit.

The best way to use a clutch is, get it all the way out as soon as possible.
If you slide or slip it, the friction will get it hot, then it gets sticky and chatters.
all the way out asap, you mean as in letting off the pedal and not holding it in? if so, i need to stop doing that so much

thanks again don ill look into this clutch and plate set up im about to pull the engine and replace the clutch

samiam91RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2008, 05:36 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Transmissions and Drivetrain

Tags
260871, 92705, centerforce, clutch, clutches, dual, duel, friction, lt1, mcleod, powergrip, ram, regular, single, vs, zoom
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details