Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Transmissions and Drivetrain

Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-09-2009, 10:04 AM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 132

Classifieds Rating: (0)
early 700R4 question

I have been told that my 84s 700R4 won't hold up to my 383 stroker because the early 700s are weaker than the 86 and up trannies. My question is that if I have a "performance" build put on that early 700 will it hold together then? Or do I need to get a late 80s one from a junk yard? I did do a search but I didn't find an answer to my exact question. I'd appreciate any advise. Do we have any 700R4 profesional builders out there at 3rdgen.org?
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
blp226 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 01-09-2009, 12:22 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 3,901
Car: projects.......

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Shagwell
Re: early 700R4 question

as posted in your other thread, do a search.
You can upgrade the early trans by using the late internals, but at that point/cost you might as well just find a late trans and have it built.
Shagwell is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2009, 03:35 AM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dallas
Posts: 58
Car: 1983 Z28
Engine: 305 CFI
Transmission: built/updated 700r4
Axle/Gears: limited slip 2.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: early 700R4 question

My trans guy has been working on 700r4s since they came out. He told me that if you're going to make over 450 hp with a decent rear that you should start with the '91-92 base to most cost effective. A 4l60 would also be a good base to re-man.

Since I'm only aiming for around 300-350 hp we just rebuilt the my stock '83 tranny with several updates. He had most of the parts left over from 4l60e re-man kits that come with extra parts for 700r4's , so I got away for real cheap.
CamaroLover09 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2009, 11:22 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Calimesa, California, U.S.
Posts: 2,623

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: early 700R4 question

They are not necessarily weaker, just not the upgrades for longevity, neutral to drive engagement, neutral to reverse engagement, etc. I had early versions in the mid tens and elevens back in the early 1990's holding up fine. The Street/Strip rebuild kit that I carry for this will do just fine. I have never seen a 27 spline input shaft break. Remember 2004R's have the same spline count. I prefer the late 1987 and up to start with, but any can be built with the right parts. Dana
Pro Built Automatics is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009, 07:22 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 3,901
Car: projects.......

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Shagwell
Re: early 700R4 question

Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroLover09 View Post
My trans guy has been working on 700r4s since they came out. He told me that if you're going to make over 450 hp with a decent rear that you should start with the '91-92 base to most cost effective. A 4l60 would also be a good base to re-man.

Since I'm only aiming for around 300-350 hp we just rebuilt the my stock '83 tranny with several updates. He had most of the parts left over from 4l60e re-man kits that come with extra parts for 700r4's , so I got away for real cheap.
A 700R4 is a 4L60. Same thing, just different nomeclature. A 4l60e is the same hard parts and clutches, just a different case and valvebody due to the electronic controls.

Dana's answer sums it up.
Shagwell is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 02:03 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
ed o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: sacramento california
Posts: 348
Car: 64chevelle/smokey trans am
Engine: 350 p600 pro charger/350
Transmission: 350/700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.36

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: early 700R4 question

the street/strip kit is not a magic fix for the early 700r4-I don't care what he says.
to build an early one correct you need a good builder that will put the correct parts in for you.
I'd believe that a good kit could go a long way in a late core but not the early ones.
the early ones get loose fitting snaprings in the input drum that needs to be addressed during the build and that doesn't come with a kit. It requires the use of feeler gauges and proper apply and pressure plates. you won't get that in a kit! that is being pitched to you over the phone or internet.
ed o is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 08:11 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 3,901
Car: projects.......

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Shagwell
Re: early 700R4 question

Quote:
Originally Posted by ed o View Post
the street/strip kit is not a magic fix for the early 700r4-I don't care what he says.
to build an early one correct you need a good builder that will put the correct parts in for you.
I'd believe that a good kit could go a long way in a late core but not the early ones.
the early ones get loose fitting snaprings in the input drum that needs to be addressed during the build and that doesn't come with a kit. It requires the use of feeler gauges and proper apply and pressure plates. you won't get that in a kit! that is being pitched to you over the phone or internet.
have you looked at Dana's "kits"? He's not talking anything remotely close to a run-of-the-mill performance rebuild kit.
Shagwell is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2009, 12:39 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
ed o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: sacramento california
Posts: 348
Car: 64chevelle/smokey trans am
Engine: 350 p600 pro charger/350
Transmission: 350/700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.36

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: early 700R4 question

response of shagwell-the kits don't include the proper apply and pressure plates. the ones that fix the problem with those drums aren't even made for 700r4's-so they won't be in any 700r4 kit. The proper fix is to use the 4l60e forward pressure plate with no waved in the bottom of the pack to keep the forward clutches from coming off of the forward sprag assy. also the thick 4l60e snapring will be used(again not in the 700r4 kits). It takes a careful assembly to get it all right because the drums get too worn out. Why do you think the early's get such a bad rap-it's not because people don't know how to install the 700r4 kits, it's that the kits don't address the real problems. pitching a kit at one of these is a bad mistake-might make revenue for the seller but not make a good unit for the end user.
ed o is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2009, 02:30 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Calimesa, California, U.S.
Posts: 2,623

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: early 700R4 question

I do not know which early 700R4's you have been looking at, but I have torn down and built many of the early units, a couple of them running in the mid tens many many years ago. There wasn't any problems with the snap rings, or the waved steel. All early and late units used waved steels in the forward clutch pack, this is to cushion the forward clutch apply. DO NOT remove them. They have nothing to do with the forward sprag assembly. The overrun clutches are the ones that hold the overrun sprag in the "1"-"2"-"3" shift lever positions. In the "OD" shift lever position, the overrun clutches are off. The early input aluminum drums rarely had problems, and neither were the 27 spline input shafts a problem. The forward clutch snap ring .125" has never changed thickness. The 3-4 clutch snap ring on the early units was .128", the later units used a .093". Some 3-4 clutch setups use the .062" snap ring. In all of my kits I supply the 3-4 clutch pressure plates, and sometimes the forward pressure plate.
Pro Built Automatics is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2009, 11:45 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
ed o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: sacramento california
Posts: 348
Car: 64chevelle/smokey trans am
Engine: 350 p600 pro charger/350
Transmission: 350/700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.36

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: early 700R4 question

i've been looking at the same ones you have-i've just seen the light.
true both use a wave but you know that a early one uses the wave next to a clutch. for forwards where the forward clutch is applied in all four gears at all times it's irrelevant. what isn't is the fact that when they get rebuilt the pressure plate is too loose. so just use the flat at the bottom and fix the loose fitting clutch packs.-use a feeler gauge and get it right
by the way I said nothing of the O.R. clutches why ramble on.
said nothing of the shafts why ramble on.
ed o is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Transmissions and Drivetrain
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2010 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.