Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Transmissions and Drivetrain
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-26-2009, 04:38 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dumfries, Va
Posts: 125
Car: '89 Formula Firebird
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: built 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser Ford 9" with 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Strange 60 or Ford 9in?

Which one do you think is better and why? I going to order one or the other in the next week, but can't decide.

Eric
PURPLEFORMULA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 04:56 PM   #2
On Probation
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Logan, UT
Posts: 5,261
Car: '84 Trans Am WS6
Engine: LQ9 w/ Wegner LS6 heads
Transmission: 4L60E, seeking good used NV3550HD
Axle/Gears: 7.5" 3.23:1, posi, swapping to 8.5"

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Strange 60 or Ford 9in?

The S-60's tallest gear is 3.54:1, while the 9" has ratios down to 2.47:1. The 9" allows you to change ratios in just a couple of hours. a 3:1 gear for long distance cruising, then 4:1 for the weekend at the track. Both can go 40-spline. The 9" is lighter, and can be lightened even more with available aluminum centersections. More brakes choices for the 9". S-60 has less parasitic drag, but Strange offers an aluminum center to use 12-bolt chevy gears in the 9" housing, so gears down to 3.08:1. I know of one guy with 999 rwhp and just over 1000 rwtq, full street weight TransAm, manual trans, drag radials, not running an S-60 or a 9", but a 12-bolt, and he keeps killing transmissions but not the axle. 9" allows a rear brace, unlike the S-60, because of the 60's cover. Less unsprung weight helps handling. 9" offers choice of wheel bearings, road race style or drag race style. Both can be converted to full-floater. Currie even offers an aluminum housing to make the 9" even lighter.
Atilla the Fun is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 04:57 PM   #3
On Probation
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Logan, UT
Posts: 5,261
Car: '84 Trans Am WS6
Engine: LQ9 w/ Wegner LS6 heads
Transmission: 4L60E, seeking good used NV3550HD
Axle/Gears: 7.5" 3.23:1, posi, swapping to 8.5"

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Strange 60 or Ford 9in?

Oh, and by the way, easy gear changes means that 3:1 highway gear can be on a limited slip while the 4:1 track gear can be on a spool.
Atilla the Fun is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 05:51 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
DrummerDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tri-Cities
Posts: 409
Car: 1991 pontiac Firebird
Engine: 305 tbi, Lo3 (for now)
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: stock (for now)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Strange 60 or Ford 9in?

Ive had this argument in my head for years. Heres my .02.

If you plan on racing for points or a trophy, and there is a remote chance you will have to run on a 1/4mile and 1/8mile track, 9" all the way. If you want to run a myriad of challenges, like 1/4 mile, texas mile, salt flats, and ralley, 9". The changability is just too much to overlook.

Otherwise, S-60. I called strange, and they say the S-60 is just as strong an a 9". And it keeps the smug Ford guys from saying your chevy cant go fast without Ford parts.

When I buy a rearend, itll be the S-60, unless I hear some damning information about it between now and then.
DrummerDad is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 08:16 PM   #5
Moderator
 
AlkyIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 13,970
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 582 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Strange 60 or Ford 9in?

If you're setting up your own gears, the Dana 60 is a real pain to do.

I like my 9". I did a gear swap and installed a Moser bolt through aluminum center section this winter which took off a lot of weight. Not that a narrowed diff is very heavy to begin with. Also put in the larger bearing, aluminum Daytona pinion support and also used an aluminum spool. If I find the gears are not correct, I can simply swap back in the old set in an afternoon or overnight if I raced on a Saturday and wanted to change back for Sunday. Having the gears installed in another complete center section makes the swap take 1 to 1-1/2 hours. 2 hours if you're lazy.

The 9" also has the ability of only needing one series carrier. You invest in a good posi and everything from 2.xx to 6.xx or deeper gears will fit the same posi.

__________________
Hardtail Racing
All engine, no power adders! Bests: 9.029@150.45 (at altitude)
Theoretical sea level performance 8.623@157.05

Last edited by AlkyIROC; 03-26-2009 at 08:20 PM.
AlkyIROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 08:26 PM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dumfries, Va
Posts: 125
Car: '89 Formula Firebird
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: built 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser Ford 9" with 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Strange 60 or Ford 9in?

Wow thank you all for the info, now I'm 70-30 going with the 9 inch. Still like to more opinions.

Thanks,
Eric
PURPLEFORMULA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 09:04 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
big gear head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central City, KY.
Posts: 1,624

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Strange 60 or Ford 9in?

I have a 9 inch in my Camaro. A 9 inch is like a belly button. It seems like everybody has one. I'd like to be different and put a 60 in mine, but money won't allow it.
big gear head is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 11:14 PM   #8
Moderator
 
AlkyIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 13,970
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 582 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Strange 60 or Ford 9in?

Many times everyone wants an overkill. A Dana 60, properly built up like the aftermarket ones, can easily handle 800hp. Putting one into a car that puts 400 to the wheels is a huge waste of money. The larger ring gear and axles can actually decrease performance but some people just want the bragging rights of having a diff strong enough for a 1 ton pickup in an underpowered car.

If you were building a high HP, twin turbo type car, I'd suggest a Dana 60. The average person only needs a 9" or a 12 bolt. Since you never stated what you intend to use the car for, asking which is better is difficult to make a decision.

For all out brute strength, a Dana 60 is hard to beat but then you also don't need 5/8" wheel studs on a 4 cylinder car making less than 100 hp. Just because they're better doesn't mean that's what you need.

Everyone has a 9" because they're easy and cheap to build with lots of aftermarket choices for upgrades.
AlkyIROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2009, 09:40 AM   #9
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 4,367
Car: projects.......

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Shagwell
Re: Strange 60 or Ford 9in?

A few mis-construed facts in this thread. First off, since any aftermarket housing that utilizes bearing retained axles(not c-clip) will have big bearing 9" style ends, either can use the same bolt-on braking systems. I can change gears in a dyna inside of an hour(inside of 30 min if you have previously set the gear set up and have left the pinion shimmed and have a note with the proper carrier shim specs), but a 9" can be done inside of 20 minutes if you have an extra center section already set-up. Either way you look at that, very few people will ever change gears in either unless they change something else in their drivetrain combination and need to change to make the new package work correctly. - IMO, it's easier to set-up a gear in a dana or 12-bolt than a 9". The BS pinion depth shimming of a 9" is not very easy, practically impossible w/o a pinion depth tool. There are gears available for a 60 at least down to 3.0, never looked for any lower myself.

A 12-bolt takes less power to pull than a dana, which takes less power to pull than a 9".
Shagwell is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2009, 09:44 AM   #10
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 4,367
Car: projects.......

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Shagwell
Re: Strange 60 or Ford 9in?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen 87 IROC View Post
Many times everyone wants an overkill. A Dana 60, properly built up like the aftermarket ones, can easily handle 800hp. Putting one into a car that puts 400 to the wheels is a huge waste of money. The larger ring gear and axles can actually decrease performance but some people just want the bragging rights of having a diff strong enough for a 1 ton pickup in an underpowered car.

If you were building a high HP, twin turbo type car, I'd suggest a Dana 60. The average person only needs a 9" or a 12 bolt. Since you never stated what you intend to use the car for, asking which is better is difficult to make a decision.

For all out brute strength, a Dana 60 is hard to beat but then you also don't need 5/8" wheel studs on a 4 cylinder car making less than 100 hp. Just because they're better doesn't mean that's what you need.

Everyone has a 9" because they're easy and cheap to build with lots of aftermarket choices for upgrades.
x1000 - very accurate. Personally, I'll take a 12-bolt in a street car and a 60 in a race car. I have no desire to loose the extra power a 9" takes to pull, for the reason of "easier" gear changes when it is very unlikley anyone will change w/o changing thier power combo. We're not talking pro-stock cars where the difference between a 3.89 and a 3.96 gear could be a win or a loss.
Shagwell is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2009, 02:27 PM   #11
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dumfries, Va
Posts: 125
Car: '89 Formula Firebird
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: built 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser Ford 9" with 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Strange 60 or Ford 9in?

I'm not planning on changes gears, planning on going with a 3.70 or 3.73, I still want to be able drive on the highway. As for the brake setup. I'm either going with Baer 6 setup or Wilwoods rear brakes. As for engine, right now I have a 383 stroker with about 80,000 miles on it and am planning to rebuild or replace in the near future. I've decide to do a complete drivetrain upgrade first. I have a thread showing my new Spohn front suspension which, I'm hoping to install it this weekend (depending on if the wife comes up with something I need to do). So next is the rear.

So thank you everyone for the info.

Eric
PURPLEFORMULA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2009, 07:27 PM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 59
Car: 85 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Strange 60 or Ford 9in?

Hubes is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2009, 09:25 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 379
Car: 85 Z28, 88IROC, 91Z28 + parts cars
Engine: 305, 355, 408soon
Transmission: stock T56 in 88 and 85 built in 91
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LS1, 9" w/ 4.56 and spool

Classifieds Rating: (10)
Send a message via AIM to WIll36
Re: Strange 60 or Ford 9in?

I have an 9" thats all done up that came with my 91 Z28. 4.56 gears, spool, aluminum center section, 35 spline....blah blah blah setup for PBR brakes. That being said I wish the previous owner bought an S60. The one thing nobody mentioned here is that a 9" with a torque arm has a tendancy to knock a hole in the rear pan by the rear seats. This isn't an issue for me since i'm not using rear seats and I'm definetly not going to change rear, but if I was going to go out and buy something new it would be an S60 from strange or an M9 from moser. On a downside I believe I read a thread a while ago about people saying they got bad gear sets from strange the had rediculously excessive while to the point where it was unbearable and strange basically told them tough luck.
WIll36 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2009, 09:25 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Transmissions and Drivetrain

Tags
3rd, 60, 9, 9in, aluminum, camro, dana, fbody, ford, gearing, gen, posi, spool, strange, tallest
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details