Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Transmissions and Drivetrain
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-12-2009, 06:13 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
cfz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Donna, TX
Posts: 10
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: One Wheelin'

Classifieds Rating: (0)
95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

Hello gentlemen I have a 1991 Camaro RS with the stock rearend and drum brakes. I also have a rearend from a 1995 Camaro Z28 with disc brakes. What do I have to know about swapping out the rearend in the RS for the 95 rearend? How will I have to hook up the brakes? Thanks for any input. Thanks.
cfz28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 09:52 AM   #2
Junior Member
 
cfz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Donna, TX
Posts: 10
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: One Wheelin'

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

Anyone?
cfz28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 09:57 AM   #3
Banned
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,214
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

Unbolt the old, bolt in the new. Really, its that simple! No changes NEEDED.
Stephen is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 10:14 AM   #4
Supreme Member
 
krisb410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,316
Car: 91 RS Camaro
Engine: LO3, 350 in the works
Transmission: 700R4 Probuilt Automatics Road Race
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.23 posi/LS1 discs

Classifieds Rating: (9)
Send a message via AIM to krisb410
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

You should consider getting the correct prop valve for rear disk brakes. And the proper gears for the speedometer.
__________________
20x,xxx miles

My vbgarage
My Cardomain Page
My Fquick Page

www.trapster.com Speed trap sharing. Check it out!
krisb410 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 10:29 AM   #5
Moderator
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 16,255
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

Info in the following link will be helpful, concerning what needs to be changed in the swap:

http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/tr...-10-bolts.html (FAQ About 10-Bolts)

JamesC
__________________
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, / Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet

"Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies." Nietzsche
JamesC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 10:30 AM   #6
Banned
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,214
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by krisb410 View Post
You should consider getting the correct prop valve for rear disk brakes. And the proper gears for the speedometer.
But PLENTY of people have swapped from drum to disc, without touching the prop valve & have been perfectly happy, and had no problems.

Like using the stock wheels. They SIT out farther, due to the wider rear end, but not stick out past the fenders & look bad. IMO, they sit NICE & give you a tougher look to the car.

I've posted pics of stock 3rd gen rear wheels on a 4th gen axle a hundred times showing that.
Stephen is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 10:34 AM   #7
Moderator
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 16,255
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
But PLENTY of people have swapped from drum to disc, without touching the prop valve & have been perfectly happy, and had no problems.
They may have been perfectly happy and had no problems, but they aren't experiencing the best brake performance. Swap the prop valve.

JamesC
__________________
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, / Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet

"Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies." Nietzsche
JamesC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 10:42 AM   #8
Banned
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,214
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesC View Post
They may have been perfectly happy and had no problems, but they aren't experiencing the best brake performance. Swap the prop valve.

JamesC
Funny how you post a link to a thread that shows a GM Broadcast that gives dealers directions to install a disc/drum prop valve assembly, on 4-wheel disc cars, yet you say "for best performance".

If GM says its perfectly acceptable to install a disc/drum prop valve on a 4-wheel disc car, and YOU say otherwise..........
Stephen is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 10:52 AM   #9
Moderator
 
AlkyIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 13,970
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 582 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

The 95 diff is no stronger than the 91 diff. It's slightly wider so your rims will stick out a little bit. All you're doing the swap for is to get disk brakes. There are plenty of aftermarket disk brakes available that are better than factory brakes.
__________________
Hardtail Racing
All engine, no power adders! Bests: 9.029@150.45 (at altitude)
Theoretical sea level performance 8.623@157.05
AlkyIROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 10:54 AM   #10
Moderator
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 16,255
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
Funny how you post a link to a thread that shows a GM Broadcast that gives dealers directions to install a disc/drum prop valve assembly, on 4-wheel disc cars, yet you say "for best performance".

If GM says its perfectly acceptable to install a disc/drum prop valve on a 4-wheel disc car, and YOU say otherwise..........
Perhaps you'd better revisit the link, then get back to us.

JamesC
__________________
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, / Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet

"Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies." Nietzsche
JamesC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 11:03 AM   #11
Banned
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,214
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesC View Post
Perhaps you'd better revisit the link, then get back to us.

JamesC
Done (i knew you'd say that) ....... http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/su...fferences.html (Master Cylinder Differences)
Stephen is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 11:06 AM   #12
Banned
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,214
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen 87 IROC View Post
The 95 diff is no stronger than the 91 diff. It's slightly wider so your rims will stick out a little bit. All you're doing the swap for is to get disk brakes. There are plenty of aftermarket disk brakes available that are better than factory brakes.
PLEASE people!

STOP saying STICK OUT!!!! They DO NOT "stick out". That implies past the fender lips, which they DO NOT..DO NOT...DO NOT. They SIT out father, just like if you put front 16"s on the rear of the car.

They stay UNDER the fenders!

Really...This it getting OLD....
Stephen is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 11:12 AM   #13
Moderator
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 16,255
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
You'll note that the link has to do with master cylinders, not proportioning valves.

JamesC
__________________
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, / Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet

"Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies." Nietzsche
JamesC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 11:17 AM   #14
Banned
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,214
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesC View Post
You'll note that the link has to do with master cylinders, not proportioning valves.

JamesC
I'm willing to admit to my mistakes, but the fact remains. PLENTY of drum to disc rear swaps have been done & no complaints. Some have swapped the prop later "because its the correct way" & they said they didn't notice enough difference to have made it worth the effort to have done in the first place.
Stephen is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 02:03 PM   #15
Moderator
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 16,255
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

Reason would dictate that GM designed different proportioning valves to maximize specific braking systems, disc or drum; otherwise why not simply authorize a one-for-all fit and be done. Using a valve that lessens braking efficiency is not the best choice, IMO--though, of course, each hobbyist should do what he/she feels most comfortable with.

JamesC
__________________
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, / Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet

"Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies." Nietzsche
JamesC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 04:02 PM   #16
Junior Member
 
cfz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Donna, TX
Posts: 10
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: One Wheelin'

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

Damn, that's easy. You guys are awesome. Thanks.
cfz28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 04:07 PM   #17
Junior Member
 
cfz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Donna, TX
Posts: 10
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: One Wheelin'

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen 87 IROC View Post
The 95 diff is no stronger than the 91 diff. It's slightly wider so your rims will stick out a little bit. All you're doing the swap for is to get disk brakes. There are plenty of aftermarket disk brakes available that are better than factory brakes.
My RS has a 305 TBI so I would assume my rearend is not very great. (Don't know what rearend I have, actually.)
I would think that a rearend from a 95 Z28 with an auto and 350 LT1 would have better gears.

edit: I just read through the above link. I will find out when I get out of work what gears I have.

Last edited by cfz28; 05-14-2009 at 04:11 PM.
cfz28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 04:14 PM   #18
Banned
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,214
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cfz28 View Post
My RS has a 305 TBI so I would assume my rearend is not very great. (Don't know what rearend I have, actually.)
I would think that a rearend from a 95 Z28 with an auto and 350 LT1 would have better gears.
Most likely, your RS has an open diff, 3.08 gear. And, most likely, the 95 Z28 has a 3.42 Posi.

Same axles (except the length) but better center section, because of the posi (limited slip for the nitpickers!) & gear ratio.

Because of the ratio change, your speedometer will be off, but that can pretty easily be fixed. And until then, just find out how far off the speedometer is & keep that in mind while driving around.
Stephen is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 04:15 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
skiroulertx447's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: MN
Posts: 347
Car: 86 Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 93 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

I have a differential from a 95 z28 i just put on my 86, i didn't change the prop valve, but when i hit the brakes as hard as i can on a dirt road only the fronts lock. So it would be a good idea to just get an adjustable prop valve.
skiroulertx447 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 04:55 PM   #20
Moderator
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 16,255
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by skiroulertx447 View Post
I have a differential from a 95 z28 i just put on my 86, i didn't change the prop valve, but when i hit the brakes as hard as i can on a dirt road only the fronts lock. So it would be a good idea to just get an adjustable prop valve.
Is the design supposed to lock? The following from MurcoRS:

"Proportioning/Combo valve - Our cars use a 3-function combination valve (proportioning valve, metering valve, and brakelight warning switch) and are prone to many of the same problems as the master.
The prop valve is an umbrella-shaped seal that ONLY REACTS AT PEAK SYSTEM PRESSUREs! It is designed to keep the rear-end from locking-up and is designed to close off the rear brakes at a specific pressure, allowing no additional pressure. The excess pressure is fed to the fronts.
The metering valve is designed to pressurize the rear brakes FIRST, under light pedal application, to promote more even braking. On drum brake cars it can hold up to 125 psi before allowing any fluid to the fronts, simply to overcome the force of the return springs and engage both front and rear brakes simultaniously. Disc/disc metering valves operate at lower pressures as it only takes about 3-5 psi to move a piston.
If EITHER of these valve fail or the springs are weakened, you will have excessive brake wear on one end of the car. Drum to disc rear conversion? CHANGE THE COMBINATION VALVE DURING THE CONVERSION or you will tear up your new rear brakes!"

Here's the link in its entirety:

http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/br...air-101-a.html (Brake diagnosis and repair 101)

JamesC
__________________
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, / Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet

"Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies." Nietzsche

Last edited by JamesC; 05-14-2009 at 05:15 PM.
JamesC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 05:05 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
Ca[maro]88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 990
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 5.0 305 Carb'd
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

treated.
Ca[maro]88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 08:37 PM   #22
Supreme Member
 
krisb410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,316
Car: 91 RS Camaro
Engine: LO3, 350 in the works
Transmission: 700R4 Probuilt Automatics Road Race
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.23 posi/LS1 discs

Classifieds Rating: (9)
Send a message via AIM to krisb410
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

You guys really are something. Drum brake use the pressure of the brake fluid, while disks use the volume of fluid, or viseversa. Either way, something as simple as changing the prop valve to the proper one is a pretty simple decision. It's not hard, time consuming, nor expensive, so why wouldn't you want the "right" prop valve for the disk brakes? If your gonna go through all of this, why not get the right valve to maximize the mod?
krisb410 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 08:56 PM   #23
Banned
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,214
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by krisb410 View Post
You guys really are something. Drum brake use the pressure of the brake fluid, while disks use the volume of fluid, or viseversa. Either way, something as simple as changing the prop valve to the proper one is a pretty simple decision. It's not hard, time consuming, nor expensive, so why wouldn't you want the "right" prop valve for the disk brakes? If your gonna go through all of this, why not get the right valve to maximize the mod?
I guess some of us agree with GM, that a disc/drum prop valve is good on a disc/disc car........And some of us don't.

I need said NOT to. I only said you don't HAVE to. But, personally? I wouldn't swap the prop on my car.
Stephen is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 09:37 PM   #24
Moderator
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 16,255
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
I guess some of us agree with GM, that a disc/drum prop valve is good on a disc/disc car...
Where in the world does GM say that?

JamesC
__________________
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, / Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet

"Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies." Nietzsche
JamesC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 09:44 PM   #25
Banned
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,214
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi

Classifieds Rating: (12)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesC View Post
Where in the world does GM say that?

JamesC
Master cylinder...WTF ever...You understood what I meant.

We can piss & moan about this BS technicality all year. Doesn't change a thing......

IT IS NOT REQUIRED THAT IT BE SWITCHED. Some do, most don't. Do whatever you (the OP) wants. It doesn't matter.
Stephen is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 09:50 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
Ca[maro]88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 990
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 5.0 305 Carb'd
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

glad im not the only one who argues on this site lol.
Ca[maro]88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 10:00 PM   #27
Moderator
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 16,255
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
Master cylinder...WTF ever...
Good grief! I'm too amused to discuss the issue more. I'm done.

JamesC
__________________
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, / Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet

"Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies." Nietzsche
JamesC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 10:02 PM   #28
Supreme Member
 
krisb410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,316
Car: 91 RS Camaro
Engine: LO3, 350 in the works
Transmission: 700R4 Probuilt Automatics Road Race
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.23 posi/LS1 discs

Classifieds Rating: (9)
Send a message via AIM to krisb410
Re: 95 Z28 Rearend Conversion.

See it does make a difference. The master cylinder is interchangeable, disk or drums. But the prop valves are different. One flows more pressure, the other flows a greater volume of fluid.

Yeah, disk brakes will work with a drum prop valve. But the prop valve is cheap and easy to replace. So why not do it and get the most from the disks, not just, they work.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesC View Post
Good grief! I'm too amused to discuss the issue more. I'm done.

JamesC
Agreed
krisb410 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2009, 10:02 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Transmissions and Drivetrain

Tags
4th, 95, aftermarket, body, camaro, conversion, disc, end, gear, gen, posi, proportioning, rear, speedometer, valves, z28
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details