Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Transmissions and Drivetrain
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-11-2002, 05:51 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 170

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to BP89IROC
Energy Suspension Trans mount

What will be changed with a new trans mount from Energy suspension? Will it make the car feel rougher? Thanks.
__________________
1989 Iroc-Z TPI 350 auto 4-spd Removed MAF screens K & N filters, Hedman smog shorties, accel 8mm wires, made for you wire looms, flowmaster american thunder cat back, gutted cat.
BP89IROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2002, 07:23 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Ricktpi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lower Salford, PA
Posts: 1,654
Car: 1987 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.3L Victor EFI
Transmission: Tremec TKO 600
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"/4.11 Trac-Lok

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to Ricktpi
I have both trans & engine mounts by Energy. I did experience some increased vibration, although not serious. If you are fussy & drive the car everyday, you may not like it.
Ricktpi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2002, 10:48 PM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 170

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to BP89IROC
I'm not too fussy. Right now i'm breaking the stock rubber ones pretty regularly. I'm thinking that they brand i'm getting is really cheap but it's got a lifetime warranty. Will it be ok to run the ES one with rubber motor mounts? Any possible vibs can't be as bad as the sound that comes from the driveshaft when it crunches the bottom of the tunnel! Thanks for the reply!!
BP89IROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2002, 02:27 AM   #4
TGO Supporter
 
Justins86bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Another world, some other time
Posts: 3,795
Car: 86 & 92 Firebirds
Engine: The Mighty 305!
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I'm running the ES tranny mount. I noticed no increase in vibs.
__________________
-Justin- out of my mind and I'll never know why

'86 Pontiac Firebird 305-4bbl / 700R4 T-Top WS6
'92 Pontiac Firebird 305-TBI / 700R4 T-Top
'76 Chevrolet Silverado C10 350-4bbl / TH350 longbed

click for my Homepage at CarDomain to see my mods
da computer: AMD A64 3400+ @ 2.6GHz in green Aspire SuperAlien case.click for a pic!
Teddy!

There can be only one!!
Justins86bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2002, 07:30 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Ricktpi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lower Salford, PA
Posts: 1,654
Car: 1987 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.3L Victor EFI
Transmission: Tremec TKO 600
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"/4.11 Trac-Lok

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to Ricktpi
Energy says to replace engine & trans mounts, together. The theory is that the extra flexing at one end would over stress the other. I would think that if you just replaced the engine mounts, the trans mount would go real quick, but the other way around would be okay, at least for a while..
__________________
1987 Camaro Z-28
383 Victor EFI, C950 ECM, AFR 195 heads, Lunati 54756 cam
Tremec TKO 600 5spd, Mcleod Clutch/Flywheel
Hooker longtubes, Full length 3" True dual exhaust
9" Moser/Strange 4.10 rear, Racecraft/Spohn suspension

Last edited by Ricktpi; 03-14-2002 at 03:07 PM.
Ricktpi is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2002, 08:24 AM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 170

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to BP89IROC
Cool, thanks!!
BP89IROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2002, 02:27 AM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: austin, TX. USA
Posts: 36

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Tranny mount screwed me

Just a comment guys. I neglected to change the tranny mount
immediately after it broke (2times) and it cracked my bellhousing
causing me to replaced with new 700R4 and I think torque arm had a lot to do with that also. Anyway, a painful lesson learned.
JOhn
89GTA
BigH is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2002, 08:16 AM   #8
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 170

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to BP89IROC
Ouch!! I guess i'm gonna get with it and replace mine pretty quick! Thanks for the insight!!
BP89IROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2002, 04:34 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Richmond, Yorkshire, U.K
Posts: 307

Classifieds Rating: (0)
The mount comes with what looks like a spacer and you are told this must be fitted. However it lifts the back of the tranny too high and causes a lot of vibration. I could be wrong but I think most guys get better results leaving it off.

Simon
SIMON HOLTBY is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2002, 01:32 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pitman, NJ
Posts: 1,974
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: Canfield 195 headed 358ci
Transmission: TH350, Art Carr 9.5"
Axle/Gears: 3.92 Dana 44

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I read on here like last year to leave the spacer off so I did. I really don't feel any difference over the stock tranny mount.
88IROC350TPI is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2002, 06:16 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Oakville, Ct
Posts: 1,383
Car: 1991Firebird T/A
Engine: 350
Transmission: Modified Viper t-56
Axle/Gears: dana 44, 3.55

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to fb305svs
Quote:
Originally posted by SIMON HOLTBY
The mount comes with what looks like a spacer and you are told this must be fitted. However it lifts the back of the tranny too high and causes a lot of vibration. I could be wrong but I think most guys get better results leaving it off.

Simon

I think that the next time i go under the car i will be pullin that spacer out... i have a wicked vibration problem at about 75-95... its not anything else int he driveline! new 3inch DS, new rear, and a new tranny!


Steve
fb305svs is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2002, 10:09 AM   #12
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ft Wayne IN.
Posts: 149

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Good luck story.

When i put in my ES tranny mount(to replace a broken rubber one) 3 things happened:

1- the car went into gear smoother, no more clunk.
2-It got rid of a vibration I had at about70-80
3- my tranny stopped leaking,must have been bad alignment with the shaft or something, but I haven't lost a drop of fluid since
__________________
`85 Iroc- 355 TPI/auto
Black w/ 2 1/2" Harwood cowl hood
Best E.T.= 12.58 @109
---------------------------------------------
front engine dragster in the works
DSaylor is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2002, 12:36 PM   #13
Moderator
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 16,248
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's

Classifieds Rating: (3)
No problems with mine, either before or after I replaced the motor mounts.

JamesC
__________________
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, / Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet

"Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies." Nietzsche
JamesC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2002, 03:57 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Richmond, Yorkshire, U.K
Posts: 307

Classifieds Rating: (0)
The ES mount with the spacer fitted in my opinion causes too much vibration for day to day driving.
With the spacer removed the mount is like stock up to 70 mph about 2000 rpm, above which vibrations become quite noticeable compared to stock. Kind of reminds me to slow down a bit.
Its not ideal but I'll put up with it as I'm fed up of changing stock mounts.
If you have not removed that spacer you wont believe the difference.

Simon
SIMON HOLTBY is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2002, 04:12 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Oakville, Ct
Posts: 1,383
Car: 1991Firebird T/A
Engine: 350
Transmission: Modified Viper t-56
Axle/Gears: dana 44, 3.55

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to fb305svs
Wow, that is def good news to my ears- i am tired of getting a back massage at 75/80 /2200 rpm... i have an entirely new driveline, and it still hasnt gone away and the tires have been balanced... must be just a harmonics thing.. its a light vibration, not harsh rel harsh, but an annoyance at that.
fb305svs is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2002, 05:53 PM   #16
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: West Jefferson, OH, USA
Posts: 176

Classifieds Rating: (0)
The instructions say that the spacer plate is there to pre-load the tranny mount. Whatever that means, anyway when I replaced mine I did feal a little more vibration. My car has other poly bushings and the WS6 package makes my car ride a little rougher anyway, so it was no big deal.
__________________
91 Formula WS6
LT1 305
LT1 Intake, LT1 Cam, S/R Torquer Heads, Home Made Ram Air, K&N Air Filter, Air Foil, Ported Plenum, Underdrive Crank Pulley, TB Bypass, Corvette Servo, 1 5/8 SLP Headers, SRP Y Pipe, 3" exhaust w\cutouts, SLP Muffler, Hotchkis STB, Spohn LCA's and Panhard Bar, Spohn SFC's and other polyurethane goodies, 2800 Raptor stall conv, Richmond 3.73.

Http://www.geocities.com/91formula
Ron Mullins is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2002, 05:53 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Transmissions and Drivetrain

Tags
50, 600, 97, energy, fbody, harsh, lt1, mount, suspension, t5, th350, tko, trans, tremec, vibration, yko
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details