Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > V6
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


View Poll Results: What Cam should I use?
Crane CompuCam 2030 - .423 / .423 6 50.00%
Blue Racer - .420 / .442 1 8.33%
Crower Level 4 - .435 / .443 1 8.33%
Edelbrock Performer Plus - .420 / .442 1 8.33%
Lunati #06315 - .441 / .441 1 8.33%
ARI Pro Builder Phase 3 - .433 / .466 1 8.33%
Lazer Cams #2600122 - .447 / .456 0 0%
Other - Please specify 1 8.33%
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-30-2002, 07:26 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
loomdog32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 533

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to loomdog32
chevy 60* v6 camshafts

i have been looking around for a cam to use in my engine build.. here is a list of 7 and some specs that i have for them.. please vote on which one u THINK i should use on 3.4 carbed w/ no comp.. if u have any suggestions for a cam that not listed please post the info u know about it.. thanx

http://www.geocities.com/valleyfbody/60cams.htm

- edit - i updated the specs on the link w/ the info TomP posted..

- edit - here are links for each individual cam..
1 - Crane CompuCam 2030
2 - Blue Racer
3 - Crower Ultra Performance Compu-Pro / Performance Level 4
4 - Edelbrock Performer-Plus #3790
5 - Lunati High Efficiency Grind #06315
6 - ARI Pro Builder Phase 3
7 - Lazer Hydraulic #2600122

Last edited by loomdog32; 05-01-2002 at 05:48 AM.
loomdog32 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2002, 12:54 PM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 830

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Camar_Hunter_c Send a message via Yahoo to Camar_Hunter_c
Crower all the way baby. I have had outstanding gains in performance with them in my other engines through the years.

Yes they cost more, but they IMO are a much HIGHER QUALITY cam.
Camar_Hunter_c is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2002, 01:41 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Central NJ, USA
Posts: 13,363
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Here's the price for the Crower, Summit wants $130. The "kit" that crower recommends, 84008, goes for $160 at Summit... I wonder what's in that kit? I couldn't find a description. Oh; wait, just did a search on the crower site, looks like it comes with lifters, valvesprings, pushrods, pushrod guide plates, and spring retainers. The lobe separation for that cam is 108 degrees.

The ARI ProBuilder 3 cam goes for $169.56, and comes with lifters... but I got the price thru http://www.engine-parts.com/GMV6/28strokergpl.html , not Summit Racing. They don't list an exact lobe center, just 107(I) 117(E), so I guess if you go in the middle, lobe sep is 112. That cam has good vacuum, though, 16-18" Hg.

I would suggest emailing each cam manufacturer to see what they think of their cams in your application. I voted on the CompuCam before I noticed you were running a carb; I wouldn't use the CompuCam 2030 on a carb'd motor. You can have increased lobe sep (lower vacuum) on a non computer controlled car, which translates into a more lopey idle.
__________________
-Tom P (Hot rodded 1986 Firebird 2.8l)
TomP is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2002, 09:53 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Project: 85 2.8 bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: BFE, MD
Posts: 4,403
Car: 06 CTS / 78 Formy / 87 T/A
Engine: 3.6 / 6.6 / 5.0
Transmission: 5L40E / TH350 / 700-4R
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi / TBD / TBD

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Project: 85 2.8 bird
before Karl answers " What's wrong w/the stock 3.4 cam?"

Voted for other: GM 3.4 crate motor cam kit . $120 or so fromGM
Duration @ .050........lift.....................lobe centerline
int.....exh.............int......exh
204....216...........427.....454...............112


TomP, you sure that more centerline increases lope?
__________________
1977 T/A - sold
1985 Firebird - sold
1994 Camaro - sold
1978 Formula - 400 --> 463 beast winter buildup
1987 T/A - LB9 former dd project, make an offer
Project: 85 2.8 bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2002, 10:40 PM   #5
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hockley, Texas
Posts: 204
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 3.4L
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to my91rs Send a message via Yahoo to my91rs
ok I know that the 3.4 and 3.1 are kinda a like here. What would you recommend for the 3.1L cam wise? A 3.1 is what I have in mine . I lookin into building another and putting heads and cam on it.
my91rs is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2002, 01:33 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
loomdog32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 533

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to loomdog32
Quote:
before Karl answers " What's wrong w/the stock 3.4 cam?"
i was waiting for him to ask that too..
1 = i may be getting a bare 3.4 block.. and there for no stock cam..
2 = im actually looking for something that will give me more power than the stock cam..

the 2030 sure is a popular choice here.. i thought that would happen tho..
loomdog32 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2002, 01:39 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
loomdog32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 533

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to loomdog32
Quote:
Originally posted by my91rs
ok I know that the 3.4 and 3.1 are kinda a like here. What would you recommend for the 3.1L cam wise? A 3.1 is what I have in mine . I lookin into building another and putting heads and cam on it.
u need a comp friendly cam.. the compucam 2030, blue racer and the corwer level 3 (level 4 maybe) should be.. i know the 2030 and blue racer are for sure.. if u want to be like MOST of the ppl on here go for the 2030.. the blue racer is a little cheaper (ive seen a price for it before, but cant remember exactly what it was) than the 2030 and is close to it..
loomdog32 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2002, 11:24 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Central NJ, USA
Posts: 13,363
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
They're probably choosing it for the same reason I did, we thought the car was computer controlled. Another thing I thought of last night; when you email the companies, make sure you tell them in the email what yo'ure doing as far as headwork, fuel, rear gears, etc... the crower website seemed to think a ton of work should be done to the motor in order to take full advantage of a level 4 cam. The higher lift you go, I think the higher pound valvesprings you need, etc... what kind of rockers will you run? Stock?
__________________
-Tom P (Hot rodded 1986 Firebird 2.8l)
TomP is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2002, 12:22 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
loomdog32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 533

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to loomdog32
im not sure what kind of rockers im gonna use.. comp cams roller tip 1.52 or 1.6.. probably use the 1.52.. w/ stock 3.4 heads (donno bout macine work yet)..

rite now im thinking.. stock bottom end, edelbrock 2bbl intake, holly 390 cfm 2bbl carb, stock 3.4 heads, 1.52 roller tip rocker, edelbrock performer-plus cam.. that seems to be the most cost efficent build at this time..

vortec makes sc for carbed engines.. ill probably get the carb enclosure to see if i can get it to work w/ my carb/intake setup
loomdog32 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2002, 07:08 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Project: 85 2.8 bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: BFE, MD
Posts: 4,403
Car: 06 CTS / 78 Formy / 87 T/A
Engine: 3.6 / 6.6 / 5.0
Transmission: 5L40E / TH350 / 700-4R
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi / TBD / TBD

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Project: 85 2.8 bird
if you're gonna sc, get forged pistons, thermal coating for piston & heads, & full roller rocker arms. May cost more $$$ than you planned, but will help utilize full benifits.
Project: 85 2.8 bird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2002, 07:08 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > V6

Tags
06315, 107, 117, 2600122, 34, bad, cam, camshaft, camshft, chevy, lazer, lobe, lopey, lunati, seperation
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details