Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > V6
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-14-2003, 08:00 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 289
Car: 1986 Pontiac Firebird S/E
Engine: LG4 TPI Conversion
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 SLP Posi 10 Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 86BirdSE
Differences Fiero 2.8L and 3rd Gen 2.8L

Hey fellas, I've got a 1985 Fiero GT I'd like to build into my daily driver so I can park the Bird for some renovations. I'm planning a mostly stock refresher of the 2.8L Fiero motor I have.

All of the specs seem to be in good order when I checked em, and I'm looking for just a bit more power... Basically I'm asking what mods seem to work best on the 2.8L and are the things you guys are doing comatible with the Fiero motor?

Also, the fiero V6 seems prone to spinning bearings and I am also looking for a HV oil pump for the v6 and I haven't seen any out there... anyone know of where to find one?
__________________

1986 Firebird S/E
LG4 TPI Retrofit
3.42 rear with SLP Posi
Dynomax Cat-Back
Hollow Cat
SLP Firehawk Driveshaft and Torque Arm
Home-boxed lca's and panard rod
home-made STB and steering box brace
86BirdSE is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2003, 09:04 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Doward
Not sure about the Fiero, but the '85(6?) FBody V6s got a SUPER improvement to the oiling system - ours are good up to about 7k rpm, stock. Grooved bearings, and bigger bearings, I believe.

Your Fiero 2.8 has a bigger TB than us, built by Holley. A lot of people like the Holley name, I say it's just a name - polish the intake, and throttle body, and gasket match everything. That'll help some.

Do you have a 5 speed? Massive improvement there. The auto is literally a slush box in those things!

Since you have a 2.8, you can stuff a 3.4 block under there, with 3.4 injectors, and no other changes. The block is the same external size - nifty, eh?
Doward is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2003, 10:43 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ****SoCal, USA****
Posts: 7,606

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Your Fiero 2.8 has a bigger TB than us, built by Holley.

NOT TOTALLY TRUE
THE TB BLADE of a Fiero & F Body ARE VIRTUALLY IDENTICAL IN SIZE.
The TB used on a Fiero was farmed out to be made by Holley.
The Fiero does have a larger aftermarket that does produce aftermarket larger TB for Fieros
FROM THE MIDDLE INTAKE, UP, the Fiero is different than F Body.
A Fiero intake on a F Body, the opening exits at the alternator.
Seek out a 3.4 mill & insert for instant fun.
Use 3.4 injects, balancers, flywheel (IF automatic)
Lucky
I Love Fieros
__________________
Chat Soon,
KED85
Karl
1985 Firebird 2.8->3.4 swap project
1985 S-10 Blazer 2.8->3.4 swap project
KED85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 01:02 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Doward
So the blade's are the same size? Then what is it that's so special about the Fiero TB? Is teh opening bigger, or what?
Doward is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 03:35 AM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 564
Car: 88 BMW 535i
Engine: 3.5L M30
Transmission: 4HP22E

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Now why doesnt this place have TB's that work with Fiero's?

Whats so different between the two?

http://www3.sympatico.ca/fjpeters/throttlebodies.htm
Lee7 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 03:40 AM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 564
Car: 88 BMW 535i
Engine: 3.5L M30
Transmission: 4HP22E

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Doward
Not sure about the Fiero, but the '85(6?) FBody V6s got a SUPER improvement to the oiling system - ours are good up to about 7k rpm, stock. Grooved bearings, and bigger bearings, I believe.

Your Fiero 2.8 has a bigger TB than us, built by Holley. A lot of people like the Holley name, I say it's just a name - polish the intake, and throttle body, and gasket match everything. That'll help some.

Do you have a 5 speed? Massive improvement there. The auto is literally a slush box in those things!

Since you have a 2.8, you can stuff a 3.4 block under there, with 3.4 injectors, and no other changes. The block is the same external size - nifty, eh?
I have seen 350's in Fiero's.
Lee7 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 10:45 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ****SoCal, USA****
Posts: 7,606

Classifieds Rating: (0)
What one will eventually notice is that
A Fiero TB
IS A
F Body TB
With these differences:
It is "upside down", with all attachment fittings "slightly off" what "F body owners" can use.
Yep, a casting part that says Holley is "built in"!
Why "F Body" owners not the "same Privlidge" as aftermarket following?
Have to realize back then
the Horsepower Wars were on & the Hi Po Lineup
DID NOT include a V6 Firebird!
A V6 FIERO was a HOT ROD back then.
The Holley name was "fitting" for performance image in a Hot Rod Fiero.
All F Body V8 wanna be buyers were waiting for factory 350 installations.
Why aftermarke shun us?
Write them, let them know.
Honest, V6 3rd gen F Bodies is considered a "growing market".
Who has Pacesetter header link?
__________________
Chat Soon,
KED85
Karl
1985 Firebird 2.8->3.4 swap project
1985 S-10 Blazer 2.8->3.4 swap project
KED85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 02:31 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Doward
Quote:
Originally posted by Lee7
I have seen 350's in Fiero's.
That's nothing.... add another 105ci. Look for the 'Fear Arrow'

Now THAT's a Poncho!
Doward is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 03:46 PM   #9
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: minnesota
Posts: 299
Car: '86 TA wrapped in '84 skin
Engine: 305 carbed
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: unknown

Classifieds Rating: (0)
will the Camaro 2.8 drop right into the Fieros?

I was goin to post this thread but you beat me to it lol
Cold Dark Shado is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 04:09 PM   #10
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 564
Car: 88 BMW 535i
Engine: 3.5L M30
Transmission: 4HP22E

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Cold Dark Shado
will the Camaro 2.8 drop right into the Fieros?

I was goin to post this thread but you beat me to it lol
well, they use the same engine mounts and stuff like that. But im pretty sure some of the part would be different. You would more than likely need to reuse some of the Fiero parts.
Lee7 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 04:12 PM   #11
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: minnesota
Posts: 299
Car: '86 TA wrapped in '84 skin
Engine: 305 carbed
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: unknown

Classifieds Rating: (0)
well thats spicefic,lol

like what parts
Cold Dark Shado is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 04:23 PM   #12
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Posts: 1,455
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by KED85
What one will eventually notice is that
A Fiero TB
IS A
F Body TB
With these differences:
It is "upside down", with all attachment fittings "slightly off" what "F body owners" can use.
Yep, a casting part that says Holley is "built in"!
Why "F Body" owners not the "same Privlidge" as aftermarket following?
Have to realize back then
the Horsepower Wars were on & the Hi Po Lineup
DID NOT include a V6 Firebird!
A V6 FIERO was a HOT ROD back then.
The Holley name was "fitting" for performance image in a Hot Rod Fiero.
All F Body V8 wanna be buyers were waiting for factory 350 installations.
Why aftermarke shun us?
Write them, let them know.
Honest, V6 3rd gen F Bodies is considered a "growing market".
Who has Pacesetter header link?
Try the J.C.Whitney Catalog- They sell Pacesetters
AGood2.8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2003, 04:28 PM   #13
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Posts: 1,455
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Lee7
Now why doesnt this place have TB's that work with Fiero's?

Whats so different between the two?

http://www3.sympatico.ca/fjpeters/throttlebodies.htm
A Fiero plenium and TB on our F-body cars would face the firewall- would not work-

also the stock Fiero Holley TB is 52mm- same cfm as ours, only made by Holley with a different linkage that will not work on RWD motors, works only on Transverse motors.
AGood2.8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2003, 12:19 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 830
Car: 00 T/A Firehawk
Engine: 346ci LS1
Transmission: MN6
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LSD

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to Y2KFirehawk
Quote:
Originally posted by AGood2.8
Try the J.C.Whitney Catalog- They sell Pacesetters
Are these Pacesetters direct bolt-ons for our cars or what? Or are we talkin' for the Fiero's here.....?
Y2KFirehawk is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2003, 10:34 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ****SoCal, USA****
Posts: 7,606

Classifieds Rating: (0)
The pacesetters are for a 93-95 F Body.
Not smog legal for our 3rd gen.
The Fiero manifolds are great as they have no EGR on them.
The EGR is attached elsewhere on the exhaust system.
I've sent JC Whitney an email
Haven't ordered anything from them since 1972 or so.
__________________
Chat Soon,
KED85
Karl
1985 Firebird 2.8->3.4 swap project
1985 S-10 Blazer 2.8->3.4 swap project
KED85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2003, 10:18 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 289
Car: 1986 Pontiac Firebird S/E
Engine: LG4 TPI Conversion
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 SLP Posi 10 Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 86BirdSE
Quote:
Originally posted by KED85
The pacesetters are for a 93-95 F Body.
Not smog legal for our 3rd gen.
The Fiero manifolds are great as they have no EGR on them.
The EGR is attached elsewhere on the exhaust system.
I've sent JC Whitney an email
Haven't ordered anything from them since 1972 or so.
it's on the y-pipe. The 2.8L Blocks in the f-body have a better oiling system? Does anyone else have more concrete info on this?


And I've sen all sorts of stuff in the back end of fieros, from 4.9L caddies to blown big blocks. There is a big fiero show every year in Carslile PA in May.
86BirdSE is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2003, 11:13 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ****SoCal, USA****
Posts: 7,606

Classifieds Rating: (0)
The 2.8L Blocks in the f-body have a better oiling system? Does anyone else have more concrete info on this?

I WOULD THINK THAT
this may have gotten started regarding the four cylinder engine fires.

OR because the East West engine is not great oil set up compared to the North South engine oil set up F body.

THIS YEAR Carlise for the 50th Anniversay of Corvette!
Coming soon I believe as June 28th is 50th intro of Corvette
__________________
Chat Soon,
KED85
Karl
1985 Firebird 2.8->3.4 swap project
1985 S-10 Blazer 2.8->3.4 swap project
KED85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2003, 02:05 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
dennis6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 522
Car: 1991 Camaro RS

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Four banger oil fires came from bad connecting rods, it had nothing to do with the oil system, engine design, or pontiac. Thank the foundry and GM for forcing them down pontiacs throat.

As for differences, the starter is on the opposite side of the block in a fiero and it would require new holes to be drilled in the block. Rodney Dickman sells a jig to do this, but it is for putting a rwd block into a fiero not vice versa. I do not know if it would work for putting a fiero 2.8 in a camaro.

On a side note, a 2.8 Fiero is much faster than a 2.8 or a 3.1 fbody. I have owned both. The reason for this is the Fiero is lighter and it doesn't have as much driveline loss do to the lack of a driveshaft.
dennis6 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2003, 05:41 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ****SoCal, USA****
Posts: 7,606

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Add in a better flowing exhaust system, too!

I also heard the four bangers used more oil & then ran down low on oil, then o-heated & fire up the Winnies!

I used a rental Fiero for 10 days & 3,000 miles
Had one of the best times of my life!
I have Fiero seats in my Blazer.
I love headrest speakers!
I LOVE FIEROS!
__________________
Chat Soon,
KED85
Karl
1985 Firebird 2.8->3.4 swap project
1985 S-10 Blazer 2.8->3.4 swap project
KED85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2003, 05:56 PM   #20
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: minnesota
Posts: 299
Car: '86 TA wrapped in '84 skin
Engine: 305 carbed
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: unknown

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Yea fieros are great just sux theres none around me for under 5Gs
Cold Dark Shado is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2003, 02:29 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
dennis6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 522
Car: 1991 Camaro RS

Classifieds Rating: (0)
It was a connecting rod issue only, it was true the 4 bangers had oil issues, however the 85 got decent rods and the fires stopped.

Any Fiero you buy today has good connecting rods or it would have had a fire a long time ago.
dennis6 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2003, 11:52 AM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 289
Car: 1986 Pontiac Firebird S/E
Engine: LG4 TPI Conversion
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 SLP Posi 10 Bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 86BirdSE
SO does the camaro/firebird have a better oiling system than the fiero block? It would be nice to know since I see about 8,000 2.8L F-bodies in the local yards around here...
86BirdSE is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2003, 12:00 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ****SoCal, USA****
Posts: 7,606

Classifieds Rating: (0)
BOTH VEHICLES have an 80Lb oiling pressure system.
__________________
Chat Soon,
KED85
Karl
1985 Firebird 2.8->3.4 swap project
1985 S-10 Blazer 2.8->3.4 swap project
KED85 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2003, 12:00 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > V6

Tags
28, 28l, conecting, connecting, difference, differences, fiero, flywheel, good, hv, installing, oil, pump, rod, rods, s10
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details