Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > V6

V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-25-2004, 02:21 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,668
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350

Classifieds Rating: (0)
MODS VS. GAINS (info for 60* owners)

Well, I thought this up while replying to another post. I think it would be nice for the 60* community to have a cut and dried database for potential modifications and their gains. Using the search feature is extremely troublesome, and takes many hours to find pertinent data. So, for those who have done ENGINE, DRIVETRAIN and SUSPENSION mods, this would be a nice place to elaborate on their performance benifits for our brethren. Feel free to get as technical as you like (I dunno why there hasn't been a post like this yet...or has there..?) Techsmurf, if this header starts to accumulate good data, I vote for a sticky .

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
__________________
-----Sporting the 50th (?) 3.4 powered thirdgen---- "I don't hate imports, I hate Honda for making the civic out to be a "sport" car...."

Pics here
FbodTrek is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 06-25-2004, 02:29 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,668
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Me replying to myself...

OK! Now, for a semi-decent answer to a common question on a few minds: What effects will hedders have on my times/speed?

I installed a set of longtube hedders (that aren't made anymore), I gained a tenth in the 1/8th mile and almost 3 mph. The difference was under 2 COMPLETELY different weather conditions. The previous 1/8 mile of 10.75 was with 45 degree weather (70% humidity) the Post-Hedder time was 10.65 with 90+degree weather and 90% humidity. Note that the second set of runs was under poor traction as well (out of 3 runs). First set of runs consisted of 9 runs.
FbodTrek is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 04:49 AM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Saint Peters, Missouri
Posts: 77
Car: 1987 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 Fuel Injected Stock
Transmission: 700r4 Stock

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to HULK Send a message via Yahoo to HULK
Alrightq

Alright well you asked for it Just jokin havn't done alot to my 87 bird but i'm only 17 so.........

I've got A Custom CAI as do most and I could deffintly tell a diffrence in pick up, at first I used a cheap AZ filter but still could tell a diffrence compared to stock then I purchased a K&N and again felt a diffrence. I strongly recommend the CAI. I do tho recommend just buying a K&N right away and not wasting the money on a no name brand.

I did remove my screen as some say not to do and some say it doesn't matter. The only diffrence I could tell was a louder sucking sound (turbo sound) if that helps any. I wouldn't recommend the screen removel. But again I didn't notice any disadvantage.

Not sure if either of these are correct for this topic but I'll try it.

I installed diffrent Speedo on my car I'm not sure which year it's from I've asked and people still dont know I'll post a pic below, but It was relativly easy with the help here from the site and the great all mighty SEARCH button. I dont have a tripometer on my car and this Speedo was made for one so I just used some White CLoth tape and taped the back side the diffrence in lighting is amazing the new speedo shines so much brighter it's made out of some type of plastic it's not metal or whatever like my stock one. Also the holes were a lil off so I just drilled new ones and taped off the old ones with black electrical tape. Look close you can see

Also am in the progress of Installing a 1996 Auto Console. I dont recommend this type to anyone unless your wanting a challenge. I've read many times that a manual console is easier toinstall but that was after I had bought the Auto one, my fault on that but if you plan on doing this mod I would deffintly get a manual one and not even consider a Auto one.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg new speedo.jpg (16.7 KB, 497 views)
__________________
HULK is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 04:53 AM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Saint Peters, Missouri
Posts: 77
Car: 1987 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 Fuel Injected Stock
Transmission: 700r4 Stock

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to HULK Send a message via Yahoo to HULK
Old

Stock Speedo
Attached Images
File Type: jpg old speedo.jpg (17.2 KB, 489 views)
__________________
HULK is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 06:59 AM   #5
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,679
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65

Classifieds Rating: (10)
I installed aluminum drums, tires like to spin more on wet payvment

installed 3.4 block over knocking 3.1, noticed improvment.

my car never came with an intake system, so the LB8 intake I cant compare to stock.

Never drove the car w/ stock coil, cant compare

Never drove car w/ stock crank pully, cant compare

Most of my stuff was modified before the car was even put on the road
__________________
99 Grand Prix GTP Sedan
91 Camaro RS Vert, 660ft in 9.011@74.13
old car 91 Camaro RS HDTP 3.4/t5
Dale is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 11:26 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 1,965
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: Pos 2.8 pulled and replaced with a 350 tpi motor converted to carb.
Transmission: 700r4, vette servo,shift kit, hayden 15"x8" trans cooler.

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I pulled the pos v6 and dropped in a v8 Gained weight, hp and tq and dropped seconds!

Sorry had to say it

Seriously, When i had my v6 I did a few things that seemed to help a little, Syth oil,trans fluid. took out the stock air filter can and put a cone type air filter on the end of the mas. Cat was already gutted. Old coil died fast, i replaced it with a 88 mustang 5.0 coil (just because i had it laying around) . blocked off the egr. Port and polished the plenums and manifold during the head gasket replacemnt. removed the evap can, (although i dont think removing it gained anything).
br()bert is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 01:06 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Doward
Well, here's what I've noticed...

TomPs TuneUp + Timing Chain - went from a 17.8 to a 17.4 - Great Improvement

Gutted the cat - a little improvement
Straightpiped the cat - decent improvement
16x8" with 245/50/16s vs 15" 215/65/15s - MAJOR FUN IMPROVEMENT!
MSD Coil - Actually felt smoother in the upper RPM range!
2.8 to a 3.1 + cam + light P&P on the heads - very nice improvement - massive torque improvement, below 3000 rpm.

16G Turbo system... um... MASSIVE torque improvement, above 2000 rpm
Doward is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 02:33 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 1,958
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
3.1 bored +.030" with big cam, p&p work, high compression, headers... NIGHT AND DAY difference over stock 3.1

rear end gears and posi, huge difference

TPI intake, didn't notice a difference over homemade CAI but i like it better anyways

boxed lcas, traction problems, bad, at the track

mod your car and have fun with it
__________________
highly modded 3.1.....

best 1/8 mile time...9.51@74 mph
2.04 60' on street tires

best 1/4 14.97@89.95mph

AM91Camaro_RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 03:29 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
camaro_junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,110
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '02 Audi A4
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 1.8L Turbo
Transmission: T-5, 5-Speed Tiptronic

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Alrightq

Quote:
Originally posted by HULK
...I did remove my screen as some say not to do and some say it doesn't matter. The only diffrence I could tell was a louder sucking sound (turbo sound) if that helps any. I wouldn't recommend the screen removel. But again I didn't notice any disadvantage...
If this is referring to MAF screen, I would recommend leaving it there. It doesn't really restrict airflow, and it's meant to straighten the air. If you remove it, the MAF my read incorrectly.
camaro_junkie is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 04:36 PM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Saint Peters, Missouri
Posts: 77
Car: 1987 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 Fuel Injected Stock
Transmission: 700r4 Stock

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to HULK Send a message via Yahoo to HULK
Yes I was reffering to the MAF screen, I dont recommend doing it but again didn't notice any diffrence and still havn't even after 5 months, so if you want to try it go for it I just think it's pointless unless you want a more sucking sound out of your intake.
__________________
HULK is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 11:50 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,668
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350

Classifieds Rating: (0)
...

BUMP....had to do it....
FbodTrek is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2004, 08:38 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 572
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 191ci 6cyl
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Nocturnall
I've done:

High Flow Cat - Noticed Nothing

Cat back Flowmaster exhaust - No real performance increase

MSD Coil - Again, no real performance increase

Undercrank Pully - Makes Voltage gauge move more, and power steering is reeeeeally touchy when higher in rpms.

Poly Urathatine (Spelling?) bushings on sway bar links - Huge increase since those were missing.

Removed air filter Can/K&N air filter - Marginal increase in pickup, makes damn cool suckin sound.
Nocturnall is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2004, 09:39 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 2,251
Car: 1987 Trans Am

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Having taken Redraif's sick 2.8 from a painfully slow 20 second 1/4 mile (coding, exhaust leaks, and other issues) into the mid 16s (with a trans that wouldn't upshift to 3rd, and still haven't done a custom chip yet), I'll give my opinion on all the performance mods we've done.

1)3.4 swap...by far the best money spent (about $600)

2) cam (about 220 duration, .470 lift)/mild porting of the heads... definite improvement, worth doing

3) Ram air (was done more for appearance with RA hood)..probably not as good as the homebuilt CAI she had on before, worth nothing

4) headers...she has the PF&E ones, without EGR or AIR...hate to say, no gain, but this might be due in part to the larger 3.4 and the greater volume of exhaust from the cam

5) distributor rebuild/shimming...very good improvement for little cash

6) 2800 stall...great upgrade

7) Trans Go shift kit...makes car feel far more responsive

8) 3.73 gears...work well with our combo

9) exhaust cutout...12hp gain at the wheels! this is partly due to the horrible crimp-bent system on the car, but I wasn't expecting any gain

10) cat back exhaust...a good mandrel bent system is critical, esp considering this engines lousy exhaust flow

I'll add more later if I think of any...
__________________
1981 Corvette LSX/T56 Project
1987 Trans Am
1985 Trans Am
1997 Camaro SS #359 383 LT1 - Sold 8/12/09
LT1guy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2004, 09:52 PM   #14
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: great lakes
Posts: 1,780

Classifieds Rating: (0)
the reason you didnt pick up anything with the headers was most likely due to the fact that the car is not tunned properly. id bet with tunning and the headers it would fly. if you guys wheel that thing to detriot ill take care of you on a chip.

Sean out. you know how to get ahold of greg.
funstick is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2004, 11:30 PM   #15
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 242

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Took out my scissor jack, noticed .0000005 faster 1/4 mile.

JK.. in all seriousness, one of the best things you can do is get some stickier tires out back. Best bang for your buck.
92RSSlowmaro is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2004, 11:37 PM   #16
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I'll tell you what I really notice that HURTS performance- Is when I drive this car with someone else in it. I myself weight 230lbs. I get my wife in it with me (shhhhh, but shes aprox 165lbs-shes 6ft) and I get my 12yr old daughter in the back seat (aprox 100lbs-she's already 5ft+) and the car will loose aprox what feels like 2 seconds 0-60 with the extra 250 or so lbs from the passengers. Major difference.
vsixtoy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2004, 11:41 PM   #17
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Since I can't edit- all add this to the above;

Its probably more like 300 to 350lb extra with the two of them in it- I'm forgetting about all the crap they tote around in the rear storage area when we take this car for a family outing.
vsixtoy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2004, 02:26 AM   #18
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Saint Peters, Missouri
Posts: 77
Car: 1987 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 Fuel Injected Stock
Transmission: 700r4 Stock

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to HULK Send a message via Yahoo to HULK
Oh yes I forgot about taking out my Spare Tire and Jack, the "forgot" should explain the gains I experencied
__________________
HULK is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2004, 11:28 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,287
Car: a car being parted out
Engine: blown up
Transmission: in peices

Classifieds Rating: (0)
as far as suspension, the HD V8 sway bars and wonder bar did wonders... to bad I am parting out my camaro. I did on/off ramps at well over 70!




(They are still for sale)
V6sucker is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2004, 02:56 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
kretos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: surrey b.c. canada
Posts: 3,384
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
what dimentions where the swaybars?
kretos is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2004, 03:09 AM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 602
Car: 1999 Lumina LTZ
Engine: 3800 Series II
Transmission: Auto

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Damien00677
Powermax 2030 cam with 1.52 rockers...sadly I didn't notice much of a difference (SOTP), and that was compared to an engine that had 6 different compression readings with the lowest one being 12psi

Underdrive pulley: I felt like I had a quicker throttle response, but pretty much in my experience, it is more trouble than its worth
Damien00677 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2004, 02:59 PM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,287
Car: a car being parted out
Engine: blown up
Transmission: in peices

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by kretos
what dimentions where the swaybars?
I don't have a dial caliper but the fronts look like around 1 1/2" and 1" rear.
V6sucker is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2004, 07:00 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,668
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Damien00677
Powermax 2030 cam with 1.52 rockers...sadly I didn't notice much of a difference (SOTP), and that was compared to an engine that had 6 different compression readings with the lowest one being 12psi

Underdrive pulley: I felt like I had a quicker throttle response, but pretty much in my experience, it is more trouble than its worth
OUCh! That's what I'd call a dead cylinder! 12 psi!!!
FbodTrek is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2004, 07:21 PM   #24
Member
 
LinuxGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 214
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L
Transmission: T5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I have to agree with statements regarding improvements from sway bars, bushings, and a steering brace. I just replaced my from 30mm and rear 18mm stock sway bars with 34mm front and 23mm rear bars with poly-graphite bushings and endlinks. When I installed the front bar, I also installed a TDS Steering Brace. The difference in handling was very noticeable.

Note that if you have a 2.8L V6 car, the steering brace will not simply bolt into place without crushing the radiator hose where it comes out of the radiator. I removed the two bolts holding the lower left radiator fan mount so that the cradle holding the radiator hose was free to move towards the radiator. (The cradle and the bottom fan mounts are all on piece.) This allowed the hose to move forward some and the steering brace to fit. I placed some rubber sections from an old hose between the radiator hose and the steering brace where they contact (there will still be some contact, but no crimping/crushing of the hose) to eliminate an chance of wear on the hose. I also had to use a zip tie to hold the section of hose near the water pump a little higher so it would not rub on arm coming out of the steering box. Eventually, I will disconnect the hose and trim off some of the water pump end so it will sit higher.

Other things that I have done to the car:
-MSD Blaster GM coil
-MSD Superconductor 8.5mm wires
-Holley Ignition Control Module (replaces stock module in distributor)
I had already done a full tune-up using the stock coil, ICM, and 7mm wires before I replaced the above components. After placing these on the car, the only thing that was really noticeable to me was that the throttle seemed a little more responsive, and the engine would rev faster. I do think the coil and wires are a good thing to do since most aftermarket 8mm wires have way less resistance than 7mm wires. Also aftermarket coils like the MSD and Hypertech output more voltage. Combine the low resistance wires and higher output coil, you should get a stronger spark.

-KYB GR-2 front struts
-KYB Gas-A-Just rear shocks
My car had the factory shocks and struts on it last summer and it was time for new ones. I searched around the forums and read a lot of recommendations. A set of Bilstien shocks and struts would have been nice, but I didn't feel like spending $500+ for all four. Koni also makes some top notch stuff, but once again, cost was high. I finally settled on (as have many others on the forums it seems) the KYB GR-2 struts and Gas-A-Just shocks after reading a lot of recommendations and results. I have been very happy with these, and they made a major improvement in handling. (Of course, any new shocks and struts would have helped...)
__________________

1989 Camaro RS, 2.8L V6, T5 5-speed, T-Tops, 34mm front/23mm rear sway bars (w/ ES poly bushings & end-links), TDS steering brace, KYB GR-2 struts, KYB Gas-A-Just shocks, Dynomax cat-back
LinuxGuy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2004, 11:06 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 2,251
Car: 1987 Trans Am

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Quote:
Originally posted by funstick
the reason you didnt pick up anything with the headers was most likely due to the fact that the car is not tunned properly. id bet with tunning and the headers it would fly. if you guys wheel that thing to detriot ill take care of you on a chip.

Sean out. you know how to get ahold of greg.
I agree, thats why I had the disclaimer. Redraif has been busy with other projects lately ,but hopefully soon we'll get it tuned. If Detroit was just a little closer we'd take you up on that! BTW, what kind of gain do you think we could get with tuning? Shoot me a PM, don't want to hijack the thread.
LT1guy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2004, 04:49 AM   #26
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Posts: 3,266
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Engine: 82 TA's 383 was indian given
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Engine swap: 1995 Camaro 3.4L V-6
SunCoast Ram Air Box
K & N Air Filter
MAF sensor screen removed
Throttle Body coolant bypass
EGR System eliminated
19lb Ford fuel injectors
Holley Adjustable Fuel Pressure Regulator
MSD Dual Connector Coil
Performance distributor cap and rotor button red with brass contacts
Distributor blueprinted (TomP rebuild and shimming)
Taylor Spiro Pro 8mm Wires
AC DELCO Rapid-fire plugs
Reed Cam: TM276/282H12A2 (223/228 w/ 471/480 lift on 112 int C/L is 108)
Comp Cams timing chain set, lifters, & springs
ASP Underdrive crank pulley
Sneaky Pete NOS system (**not used yet, want tuning right!**)
Gasket match ported & polished: Plenum, Runners, Lower intake, & heads.
PF&E 304 stainless headers & y-pipe
Car Sound 2.5 in. high capacity catalytic converter
Flowtech 2.5 in. cutout
2 ¼ in. pipe from the cat back
Flowmaster Muffler w/ dual 2 ¼ in. outlet pipes w/ 4 square tips
160 degree thermostat w/ Hypertech fan switch
TransGo shift kit
Neil Racing 2800 stall converter
3.73 1984 disc brake rear

These mods all took the car from its horrible state of:
***2002:***
1/4 time of:
20.88
and with some repairs
Dyno:
Max Power = 107.8 @ rear wheels (+20%) = 129.36hp @ the fly wheel
Max Torque = 136.6 @ rear wheels (+20%) = 163.92ft-lbs @ the fly wheel
Another track run late 02:
R/T: .922
60’: 2.867
330: 8.592
1/8: 13.268
MPH: 53.04
1000: 17.167
¼: 20.430
MPH: 68.68

***To the current state Spring 2004***
Max Power = 134.1 @ rear wheels (+20%) = 160.92hp @ the fly wheel
Max Torque = 207.4 @ rear wheels (+20%) = 248.88ft-lbs @ the fly wheel

R/T: .532
60’: 2.363
330: 6.894
1/8: 10.681
MPH: 64.92
1000: 13.976
¼: 16.812
MPH: 78.46

**had nasty traction issues and the car is way heavy
***this with the tranny not shifting into its top gear @ full throttle

Works fine now though!


***Plans for improvement:***
I still feel the cars HP numbers are down due to the lack of air flow. Mandel bent exhaust is a must! Planning for a heftier port on the heads, some milling for a smaller combustion chamber, and a valve job. Planning to go to roller rockers and valves without a dish if possible. Also trying to get a bigger TB and want to extrude-hone the plenum and runners!
And TUNING, TUNING, TUNING!

For the track...lighter rims and some tires with traction!
__________________
"I'm just a girl..." (No Doubt) "Love me or hate me, it's still an obsession. If you love me then Thank you, if you hate me then **** you!" (Lady Sovereign)
1987 Red & Black Firebird: "RAIF" WEBSITE: www.redraif.com (Yes... STILL in pieces from an engine bay paint makeover!)
OTHER CARS’ WEBSITES: 1982 Trans AM / 1990 Chevy Dually / 1976 Scout II / 1987 Nissan Pulsar / 1984 Indy Fiero
Tact- n . Acute sensitivity to what is proper and appropriate in dealing with others, including the ability to speak or act without offending.

Last edited by redraif; 07-14-2004 at 04:52 AM.
redraif is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2004, 05:27 PM   #27
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Central NJ, USA
Posts: 13,211
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Re: Alrightq

Quote:
Originally posted by HULK
I installed diffrent Speedo on my car I'm not sure which year it's from I've asked and people still dont know I'll post a pic below, but It was relativly easy with the help here from the site and the great all mighty SEARCH button.
:hail: I love people that use the search button!! It saves me from retyping stuff!

Quote:
Originally posted by camaro_junkie
If this is referring to MAF screen, I would recommend leaving it there. It doesn't really restrict airflow, and it's meant to straighten the air. If you remove it, the MAF my read incorrectly.
100% agreed; when I pulled my screen, I got a code 34 for "low airflow over MAF". I put the screen back in, and the code disappeared.
__________________
-Tom P (Hot rodded 1986 Firebird 2.8l)
TomP is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2004, 02:18 AM   #28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Posts: 3,266
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Engine: 82 TA's 383 was indian given
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
My MAF screen is out and I have had no problems. Go figure. Can't say it gave any real gain though.
redraif is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > V6

Tags
1995, 31, eliminate, lumina, maf, sensor
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.