Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > V6

V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-10-2006, 10:36 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
JoshDT91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 569
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Pace Setter Headers

Anyone seen these Pace Setter Headers?

Pace Setter Headers: PSM-70-1206 - summitracing.com

I was not aware anyone even cared to make headers for the 2.8. I wonder how well these will run or if they will make the car run like crap. Anyone have any experience with these?
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
JoshDT91 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 07-10-2006, 10:56 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
daves12secV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sayreville NJ
Posts: 2,472

Classifieds Rating: (3)
a few guys here run those headers,i think the general thought about them is that they are pretty good
daves12secV6 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 11:22 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Firebreed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,532
Car: 2004 Nissan Frontier
Engine: 2.4L Inline 4
Transmission: 5speed baby!
Axle/Gears: C200 31 spline (bleh...)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Firebreed Send a message via Yahoo to Firebreed
if only i was able to put them on my 83...
Firebreed is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 11:26 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
JoshDT91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 569
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I am just curious if they kill any sort of torque my engine might have. I mean it's bad enough I have a 2.8 and I could possibly buy headers for it. I don't want to lower any sort of low end torque I might have.
JoshDT91 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 02:26 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NorCal
Posts: 514
Car: 91 Camaro RS(RealSlow)
Engine: 3.1L
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: unknown/mostlikelycrappy

Classifieds Rating: (0)
this header needs some emission components removed before installation.

i think EGR assembly and air pump needs to be removed.

only if i werent in stupid emission controlled Cali..
sogabe is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 05:50 AM   #6
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,680
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65

Classifieds Rating: (10)
AGAIN

The egr does NOT have to be removed.

Since I put them on a 91 model, I had to remove my smog pump because they are not designed for my year car.

Also, use the search feature.


Dale is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 07:34 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
drdave88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Troy, MI
Posts: 1,635
Car: Viper GTS Blue 88 Camaro SC
Engine: 3.4 Liter
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: SLP w/ 3.42s

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to drdave88 Send a message via Yahoo to drdave88
yeah, there was a huge thread on this a while back. they didnt seem to really affect torque, but mine are bolted to a modded 3.4 so i couldnt tell ya what theyll do on a stock 2.8. they will really open up your engines ability to breathe though w/ a catback. worth the buy IMO.
drdave88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 05:41 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NorCal
Posts: 514
Car: 91 Camaro RS(RealSlow)
Engine: 3.1L
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: unknown/mostlikelycrappy

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale
AGAIN

The egr does NOT have to be removed.

Since I put them on a 91 model, I had to remove my smog pump because they are not designed for my year car.

Also, use the search feature.


ru serious?
thats what my muffler shop told me.. WTF?

damn i already returned that thing..
sogabe is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 07:23 PM   #9
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,680
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65

Classifieds Rating: (10)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sogabe
ru serious?
thats what my muffler shop told me.. WTF?

damn i already returned that thing..
Your muffler shops are idiots then.
Dale is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 07:44 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
drdave88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Troy, MI
Posts: 1,635
Car: Viper GTS Blue 88 Camaro SC
Engine: 3.4 Liter
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: SLP w/ 3.42s

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to drdave88 Send a message via Yahoo to drdave88
if you got them already, you should have seen the EGR mount right on one of the headers man. its a big piece that sticks up on one of the headers on the middle primary.

btw, dont trust a shop w/ a vehicle that isnt well known around shops (ie: honda civic, etc.) or sometimes even then.

Last edited by drdave88; 07-11-2006 at 07:49 PM.
drdave88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 10:09 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tenino, Washington
Posts: 746
Car: 89 f-bird and some others
Engine: 3.4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)


By the way, did your center 'crossover' section pipe fit?
coolrimsatleast is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 01:40 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NorCal
Posts: 514
Car: 91 Camaro RS(RealSlow)
Engine: 3.1L
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: unknown/mostlikelycrappy

Classifieds Rating: (0)
oh well.. my car is a 91 and it wasnt meant to fit,
so I was gona be faced with some other problem anyways..(i think)

ill keep the headers in mind in the future though
sogabe is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 07:31 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
JoshDT91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 569
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Dale, did you ever get pictures of the Pace Setters installed? I was searching previous posts and never saw a final picture. I kept reading that people had problems with the oil filter fitting as well. I use a UPF52 on my car and that is definitely longer and could get in the way.
JoshDT91 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 08:53 AM   #14
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,680
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65

Classifieds Rating: (10)
I use to have pictures posted, but once I found people using my pictures in an un-authorized way, I pulled them. (I take pictures on the side for money)

Only 2 people had problems with the oil filter, 1st was me. I contacted them and informed them of the problem. They claimed to have fixed it, and they were to send me a new set. Never did.

Other person sent theres back before install, got a new set. Nobody else I have heard has had problems.


EGR WILL MOUNT!
I had a 91 with smog pump, I had to remove it. They are designed for 85-90 IIRC.
Dale is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 04:14 PM   #15
Moderator
 
2_point8_boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Castaic, CA
Posts: 1,832
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 2_point8_boy
Yeah, they're "designed" for 85-89 camaros and 'birds with 2.8L and an AUTO trans.

Manual trans cars will need to remove the air injection stuff, which is illegal in CA. All we need to do is pick up where Karl left off and get a car to them that has a manual trans and air pump so they know where to weld the bungs for it and it'll be a done deal.
2_point8_boy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 05:47 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
drdave88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Troy, MI
Posts: 1,635
Car: Viper GTS Blue 88 Camaro SC
Engine: 3.4 Liter
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: SLP w/ 3.42s

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to drdave88 Send a message via Yahoo to drdave88
i also had problems w/ the longer filter fitting, so i went back to the shorter one for the time being. i contacted pacesetter and they said they will send out a new set as soon as they had more made, it never happened and i kinda forgot about it for a while.
drdave88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 07:23 PM   #17
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redding, Ca
Posts: 238
Car: 1988 Camaro, 1960 F-100
Engine: 2.8L V6, 223 inline 6
Transmission: TH-700R4, T98
Axle/Gears: 3.42/3.11 Posi Lock

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to madathlon Send a message via Yahoo to madathlon
Quote:
Originally Posted by drdave88
i also had problems w/ the longer filter fitting, so i went back to the shorter one for the time being. i contacted pacesetter and they said they will send out a new set as soon as they had more made, it never happened and i kinda forgot about it for a while.
I am planning on getting the pace setter headers.. sounds like a Oil filter relocator/cooler kit would be a good idea also if there clearence problem..
madathlon is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 08:27 PM   #18
Moderator
 
2_point8_boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Castaic, CA
Posts: 1,832
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 2_point8_boy
If you use the standard filter and change your oil every 3K miles like you're supposed to, then there isn't an issue.
2_point8_boy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 08:38 PM   #19
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redding, Ca
Posts: 238
Car: 1988 Camaro, 1960 F-100
Engine: 2.8L V6, 223 inline 6
Transmission: TH-700R4, T98
Axle/Gears: 3.42/3.11 Posi Lock

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to madathlon Send a message via Yahoo to madathlon
I was planning on the oil cooler anyway.. The Avg summer temp here is 115*F plus.. so I can use all the cooling I can get
__________________
Mark J Silva
Chaplain / US Army ( Retired )
Master Marine Tech
madathlon is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 08:47 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
JoshDT91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 569
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Sounds like more trouble than the performance you get. For example do you get more horsepower, torque or better fuel mileage? I can only imagine trying to pull out the 18 year old header bolts on my engine so definitely would see a shop doing it for me.
JoshDT91 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 12:24 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tenino, Washington
Posts: 746
Car: 89 f-bird and some others
Engine: 3.4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
When I get mine together in the next few weeks I'll post a picture. Right now they're just bolted to the 3.4 with nothing else. Everything to be bolted on now is still being used on the 2.8.
coolrimsatleast is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 02:34 PM   #22
Senior Member
 
Firebreed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,532
Car: 2004 Nissan Frontier
Engine: 2.4L Inline 4
Transmission: 5speed baby!
Axle/Gears: C200 31 spline (bleh...)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Firebreed Send a message via Yahoo to Firebreed
would these headers fit pre 85 camaro's and bird 2.8s? or do they have to have a early 2.8 block with accessory's to properly fit the headers for them?
Firebreed is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 03:00 PM   #23
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,680
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65

Classifieds Rating: (10)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebreed
would these headers fit pre 85 camaro's and bird 2.8s? or do they have to have a early 2.8 block with accessory's to properly fit the headers for them?
Now pre 85, why type of egr if any do they have? Pollution ports?

I know on the s10 headers, part of the tranny linkage bolted to the block and cause problems with some headers. May run across that on yours?

they should bolt to the heads fine. It would be other accessorys under the hood.
Dale is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 05:35 PM   #24
Senior Member
 
Firebreed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,532
Car: 2004 Nissan Frontier
Engine: 2.4L Inline 4
Transmission: 5speed baby!
Axle/Gears: C200 31 spline (bleh...)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Firebreed Send a message via Yahoo to Firebreed
Its a vacumm controled EGR, The car has the AIR injection system.. when i get a chance, ill take some pics of the driverside/passnager side so you can see what(at least the 83 carbed 2.8l modles look like)
Firebreed is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 09:32 PM   #25
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,680
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65

Classifieds Rating: (10)
Alright, will look for them and let you know what I see. May try to duplicate your angles myself of my car.
Dale is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2006, 04:49 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
Firebreed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,532
Car: 2004 Nissan Frontier
Engine: 2.4L Inline 4
Transmission: 5speed baby!
Axle/Gears: C200 31 spline (bleh...)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Firebreed Send a message via Yahoo to Firebreed
camera died on me, thats why i havent taken any pictures, as soon as i can buy a new digi camara ill post up (hopefully soon)
__________________
1983 Camaro Berlinetta, 2.8L V6
MODS: TDS Wonderbar, 180 Degree theromstat

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2255086
NoDuesCruisers
83 camaro berlinetta: wrecked at 92k miles

[b] i say if they have to go, let it be in a stupendous ball of fire... -Angelis83LT
New ride:2004 Nissan Frontier 4x2, 1.5" lift, upgraded sterio system
Firebreed is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 02:04 AM   #27
Senior Member
 
JoshDT91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 569
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
So did anyone ever figure out if the revised design of the headers allows for clearance of the larger oil filter? I am using the UPF52.
JoshDT91 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 07:27 AM   #28
Senior Member
 
drdave88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Troy, MI
Posts: 1,635
Car: Viper GTS Blue 88 Camaro SC
Engine: 3.4 Liter
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: SLP w/ 3.42s

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to drdave88 Send a message via Yahoo to drdave88
dale will have to chime in on this one, but last i heard they were going to make them. i contacted them about that problem w/ mine and they said theyd get back to me, never did.
drdave88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 10:02 AM   #29
Senior Member
 
Leo_padakin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: somewheres is houston
Posts: 261
Car: 1985 reliant saloon
Engine: 2.2 pile of metal
Transmission: 3 on the tree
Axle/Gears: so tall theres no point

Classifieds Rating: (0)
killerbv6.com makes headers as well, but there a little more expensive. but nice
Leo_padakin is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2006, 07:18 PM   #30
Senior Member
 
JoshDT91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 569
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I had the headers installed today along with a cat back exhaust. I will tell you one thing, the UPF52 filter does NOT fit. The shop put on what looks like a PF47 type filter. I guess Pacesetter has not fixed the oil filter problem. There is maybe 1/8" space between the PF47 style filter that is on now and the header, not too much clearance. Also the shop found a small hole in my Y-pipe from Pacesetter. I'm not too impressed with the hole or the oil filter but I can deal with it. I guess I should not complain much because someone could have not made the headers at all.

By the way does anyone need stock 2.8L headers? I have two that I can send photos of if anyone is interested in them. I rather not throw them away since it is hard to find these parts. If anyone wants them or wants pictures just let me know.
JoshDT91 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2006, 09:03 PM   #31
Senior Member
 
JoshDT91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 569
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I finally had the Pacesetter headers installed about a month or so ago. I just recently went on a long trip and it seems like I lost top end torque. Also I think I lost some fuel mileage. Has anyone else noticed this? If anyone wants photos of the headers installed I can take some just let me know.
JoshDT91 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2006, 02:11 AM   #32
Junior Member
 
Kryppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ringwood NJ
Posts: 27
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: V-6 MPFI 2.8 liter
Transmission: 700 R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Just wanted to say I believe I lost a little torque from these headers also, but more H.P. & I noticed better fuel mileage though. ?!?
Kryppy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2006, 06:01 AM   #33
Member
 
DaSkinnyGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 227
Car: 1992 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3:23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to DaSkinnyGuy
I just put those headers on my 1992 3.1L with a high flowcat and flowmaster catback. It was worth the money and i even got a deal on everything. I noticed more torque and hp. The only problem is with the older motor parts break when removing the manifolds. Such as the manifold bolts can snap an get stuck in the head and have to be drilled out and tapped. But overall its not the hard of a job if you know what you are doing. Alot easier then putting headers on an $4th gen LT1 or LS1 LOL. Since I put the headers on I am having some minor problems but could just be small issue. The car doesnt like keeping the rpms up and the car stauls.
DaSkinnyGuy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2006, 06:03 PM   #34
Senior Member
 
JoshDT91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 569
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I had a shop put mine on for me since I lacked the time and skill to drill out any manifold bolts. Turns out when they did mine only one broke off. Only problem I had was the heads bolts backing out which my shop fixed at no charge. I had my entire exhaust system replaced when I did it. So I bought a DynoMax catback with mandrel bends. Maybe the 2.5" pipe i have from the cat back is too bid I do not know.
JoshDT91 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2006, 05:57 AM   #35
Member
 
DaSkinnyGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 227
Car: 1992 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3:23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to DaSkinnyGuy
The 2.5" pipe is not to big I have the same size
DaSkinnyGuy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2006, 06:34 PM   #36
Senior Member
 
JoshDT91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 569
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Well I found part of the problem. My #5 cylinder has a leak in the header gasket. How in the world does a gasket blow in under 2 months and 1500 miles? The place I had install it thinks it's the gasket's fault and not their installation. I am going to try putting the new gaskets on myself. Anyone have a suggestion for the type of wrenches I need to get into some of these really tight areas under the headers?
JoshDT91 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2006, 09:57 PM   #37
Member
 
DaSkinnyGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 227
Car: 1992 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3:23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to DaSkinnyGuy
Ok after the headers where put on did you have the header bolts re tightened after the car had been driven for like 2 days? If not then the bolts got loose and cause your head gaskets to go. The header bolts should be an 11MM wrench. To get the bolts on the bottom you need a stuby wrench its a short one and you just have to figure out which way you need to bring the wrench into to tighten. Ive put my headers on and had to retighten the bolts two times and should be doing my last time in a couple of days.
DaSkinnyGuy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2006, 10:01 PM   #38
Senior Member
 
drdave88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Troy, MI
Posts: 1,635
Car: Viper GTS Blue 88 Camaro SC
Engine: 3.4 Liter
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: SLP w/ 3.42s

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to drdave88 Send a message via Yahoo to drdave88
as an added insurance, you should also have the heads checked to make sure there is no warpage. that could cause a head gasket to blow that quickly. most places charge about $30 - $40, give or take, a head to pressure test a head, its well worth it in the long run. ive done it w/ every engine ive done, regardless of mileage.
drdave88 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2006, 07:21 AM   #39
Senior Member
 
JoshDT91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 569
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I had thought about head warpage which is a possibility. However, I did have to have the bolts retightened after about 2 weeks. The time I drove on the gaskets with loose bolts could have done it too. I am on my way to Sears tonight for some stubby 11mm wrenches. Thanks for the suggestions.

By the way is it true the stock headers did NOT use gaskets? That is what my mechanic said and in my GM parts diagrams it does not show them either.
JoshDT91 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 04:52 PM   #40
Junior Member
 
Kryppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ringwood NJ
Posts: 27
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: V-6 MPFI 2.8 liter
Transmission: 700 R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Stock exhaust manifolds do not use gaskets.
Kryppy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2006, 07:39 PM   #41
Senior Member
 
JoshDT91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 569
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Thanks Kryppy, I thought they didn't. If anyone needs to know a good set of gaskets to order so far these Fel-Pro ones have worked for me. I bought them at Summit, http://store.summitracing.com/partde...0&autoview=sku. I attached a picture of them. They are for an 80-86 2.8L motor but they are way better than the gaskets I have found so far.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1449.jpg (15.3 KB, 14 views)
JoshDT91 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2006, 08:38 AM   #42
Member
 
puntank4200's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 186
Car: '88 Camaro
Engine: v6-173-2.8L
Transmission: Automatic

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to puntank4200
When I pulled my manifolds I cut the head off all the bolts, then pulled the manifolds straight off. Then used vice grips and pb blaster and got all the studs out without breakage. I used felpro gaskets because even pacesetter told me that the paper gaskets are junk. Also I used stage 8 locking header bolts. Can't wait to hear it when I get my injectors back in.
puntank4200 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2006, 09:16 AM   #43
Senior Member
 
JoshDT91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 569
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I second that, the paper gaskets are absolute junk. I still have the paper ones on my driver's side. I am just too lazy to replace them.
JoshDT91 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2006, 10:35 PM   #44
Senior Member
 
JoshDT91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 569
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Puntank, where did you get the locking header bolts from? Also which FelPro gaskets did you use? I just changed the gasket on my driver's side and it's still leaking on me.
JoshDT91 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2006, 09:15 PM   #45
Senior Member
 
JoshDT91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 569
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I replaced the header gaskets again. It looks like I had not matched the gaskets with the ports correctly the first time. So I bolted everything up and there still is a leak. The leak is from the catalytic converter to the y-pipe. Would a leak there still making a ticking sound? I am to the point of just throwing on the old stock headers and a stock y-pipe and calling it quits. Either I am having problems with the cheap gaskets Pacesetter included or leaks. If anyone has not bought these things I advise you not to get them. It's not worth the agony.
JoshDT91 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2006, 11:09 AM   #46
Member
 
puntank4200's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 186
Car: '88 Camaro
Engine: v6-173-2.8L
Transmission: Automatic

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to puntank4200
Yeah same deal here, the paper gaskets suck. I went through 2 of them already. I went on summit and bought the header gaskets listed for our car, they are 1.25" and the headers are 1.50", but i haven't had a leak yet. I bought the stage 8 locking header bolts listed for the 2.8, but the were the wrong size and started cross threading. I reinstalled the stock size bolts with a tiny amount of loctite, because my bolts love to back out.
----------
How do you tighten your bolts, i can't fit a stubby socket wrench on them so i doing all the tightening with a combo wrench.

Last edited by puntank4200; 12-03-2006 at 11:11 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
puntank4200 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2006, 02:20 PM   #47
Senior Member
 
firstfirebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South FL
Posts: 3,196
Car: 1990 Firebird
Engine: Building a boosted 3.4/3500 hybrid
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 (9bolt) 3.45:1

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Ther was a reply here before that got deleted, and was a good idea.
He used VW type 1 header gaskets for the pacesetters and said they worked phenominal.
__________________

Click here for a pictoral of the turbo install
3.4/3500 hybrid comming soon...
http://60inclusive.com/
firstfirebird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2006, 09:49 PM   #48
Senior Member
 
JoshDT91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 569
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Puntank, for some I juse used a small ratchet and 11mm socket. For the others that were a pain in the butt I bought a Craftsman socket wrench set, look at the picture I attached. I used an 11mm combo ratcheting wrench to get to the hard to reach ones. Using the 11mm socket wrench I put it in the open end of the wrench. It is kind of hard to explain but it worked for me. I have it down now so I can get both headers loose in about an hour or less.

I have one more ticking sound left and I used some baking soda to pour over the headers to see if there was a leak. If there was one I would have seen the baking soda fly all over. My last idea is my EGR to header connection. The lame paper gasket that PaceSetter gave me disentigrated and I had to fabricate a new one out of an old FelPro header gasket. Since GM never used a gasket here I am thinking I mind as well do the same.

As for those VW header gaskets, does anyone have a part number or a website where I can get them?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 00942062000.jpg (9.5 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg 00942648000.jpg (3.9 KB, 5 views)
JoshDT91 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2006, 10:14 PM   #49
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tenino, Washington
Posts: 746
Car: 89 f-bird and some others
Engine: 3.4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Anybody have a problem with their o2 sensor not staying hot enough? Couple people on another site said having the 02 moved back farther like on the pacesetter headers caused or could cause that problem.
coolrimsatleast is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 03:43 AM   #50
Senior Member
 
JoshDT91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 569
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 2.8L V6
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I don't have that problem with my O2 sensor.
JoshDT91 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > V6

Tags
hp, psm701206
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2010 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.