Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > V6
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-03-2007, 03:44 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
forkvoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 620
Car: '87 Camaro / '87 Chevy K10
Engine: 3.4L MPFI (soon) / 5.7L TBI
Transmission: 700R4 / 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to forkvoid
Rebuilding for reliability/economy

Starting my first engine rebuild. I've got a 2.8 out of an '88. Looking for suggestions for parts for ultimate reliability and economy.

1) Is the OE spec cam best for my application, or is there a better one that will not hurt mileage?
2) If the pistons appear fine, is there any need to replace them?
3) The typical wear parts will be replaced(ie, pushrods, rockers, springs, etc). Is there any reason to replace them with something other than OE spec that isn't going to hurt mileage?
4) Any specifics on the best gaskets?
5) If there is no damage, I'm only going to hone the block and heads. Is there a good reason to have a valve job done if the valves do not appear to be bad?

Any other things I should take a deeper look at?
__________________
I love me some big trucks and fast American muscle. Ain't nuthin' better.
forkvoid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 03:55 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
daves12secV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sayreville NJ
Posts: 2,472

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Rebuilding for reliability/economy

u could go with the towing cam for the s10 blazer application.

if the cyls do not need to be bored u can reuse the stock pistons assuming they arent cracked or damaged in anyway.

pushrods and rockers are questionable depending on how much wear they have.though if ur going to change rockers a set of roller/rollertip rockers wont hurt.valve springs and se3als should be replaced.

use a set of victor reinz or felpro gaskets

a valve job is deff a good idea. the valve seat is what makes the valve seal when it is closed,though depending on the condition of valves and seats u can lap tyhem in by hand, but a valve job is a better idea, and typically in exspensive.

on a side note if u look on ebay u can buy reman iron heads very cheap, cheaper then u can get the valve job.springs etc
daves12secV6 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 06:06 PM   #3
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,773
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Re: Rebuilding for reliability/economy

depending on how/what use you plan to use this motor for really depends on the cam.

If the car is mainly in-town, the truck/blazer cam wouldnt be to bad. More low end torque for stop light to stop light. Will do ok for some highway trips.

If your going to be doing a lot of highway trips, Id suggest staying with camaro cam.

roller rockers for sure.
3.1 crank for the extra torque? But then that would also require new 3.1 pistons.
have a better y-pipe made rather then the "t-pipe".
crank pulley
Main thing is going to be tweaking the prom chip to max efficiency.
msd or hypertech coil, good wires, delco plugs gapped right, brass cap/rotor.
Dale is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 06:13 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
forkvoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 620
Car: '87 Camaro / '87 Chevy K10
Engine: 3.4L MPFI (soon) / 5.7L TBI
Transmission: 700R4 / 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to forkvoid
Re: Rebuilding for reliability/economy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale View Post
depending on how/what use you plan to use this motor for really depends on the cam.

If the car is mainly in-town, the truck/blazer cam wouldnt be to bad. More low end torque for stop light to stop light. Will do ok for some highway trips.

If your going to be doing a lot of highway trips, Id suggest staying with camaro cam.
Mainly in town, with periodic long(200+ miles) highway trips.
forkvoid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 09:05 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
2.8RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 1,517
Car: 89 V6 Camaro
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 open diff

Classifieds Rating: (5)
Re: Rebuilding for reliability/economy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale View Post
have a better y-pipe made rather then the "t-pipe".
What would the Y-pipe look like? Would is give the passenger cyl a longer tube before it met with the driver exhaust?
2.8RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2007, 04:43 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
forkvoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 620
Car: '87 Camaro / '87 Chevy K10
Engine: 3.4L MPFI (soon) / 5.7L TBI
Transmission: 700R4 / 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to forkvoid
Re: Rebuilding for reliability/economy

Quote:
Originally Posted by daves12secV6 View Post
u could go with the towing cam for the s10 blazer application.
What are the specs on this cam? I can't seem to find much reference to it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by daves12secV6 View Post
valve springs and se3als should be replaced.
The standard OE spec will do fine?
forkvoid is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2007, 08:48 PM   #7
TGO Supporter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,773
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Re: Rebuilding for reliability/economy

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2.8RS View Post
What would the Y-pipe look like? Would is give the passenger cyl a longer tube before it met with the driver exhaust?
it would look more like the one that comes with the headers.
Dale is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2007, 08:48 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > V6

Tags
31, 87, camaro, rebuilding, reliability, reliabilty, v6
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details