Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > V6
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-23-2009, 03:45 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
marekdennhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Thunder Bay, On, Canada
Posts: 289
Car: 1985 Camaro
Engine: 2.8l
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Stock

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to marekdennhardt
How durable is the 2.8?

Hey I am restoring my 2.8 camaro and im wondering how careful I have to be with it.
marekdennhardt is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 01:00 AM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
Posts: 24
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Axle/Gears: 7.75" 3.70 gear 9 bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to zoocrewsr
Re: How durable is the 2.8?

well the block itself is cast iron along with the heads, but either way you still want to be careful because one screw up on those and you have to start all over from scratch
zoocrewsr is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 01:04 AM   #3
Supreme Member
 
project89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,665
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 w/ 60-1 Turbo/ 350 / 3.0 turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: How durable is the 2.8?

they can take alot, hell if i can make over 360 hp and 470ftlbs of tq on a stock bottom end motor id say its pretty dam durable
project89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 01:10 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
marekdennhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Thunder Bay, On, Canada
Posts: 289
Car: 1985 Camaro
Engine: 2.8l
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Stock

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to marekdennhardt
Re: How durable is the 2.8?

I'm asking because my friend bought a 2.8 camaro and i drove it around the block.. I floored it a few times then the next day it seized up.. so was this just random or should i stay away from flooring my 2.8

p.s he was changing the motor anyway
marekdennhardt is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 10:13 AM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
Posts: 24
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Axle/Gears: 7.75" 3.70 gear 9 bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to zoocrewsr
Re: How durable is the 2.8?

it sounds like the guy your friend bought it from messed it up already and that is why he sold it
zoocrewsr is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 01:04 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
marekdennhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Thunder Bay, On, Canada
Posts: 289
Car: 1985 Camaro
Engine: 2.8l
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Stock

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to marekdennhardt
Re: How durable is the 2.8?

Can anyone tell me what kind of stuff they do with their 2.8.. as in burnouts or flooring it often ect.
marekdennhardt is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 10:53 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Manchester,PA
Posts: 354
Car: 86 Firebird SE
Engine: 2.8L

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: How durable is the 2.8?

I have heard stories that the bottom ends like to go in the 2.8's. Over revving them will cause the rod bolts to stretch allowing the clearances to widen, then you get a drop in oil pressure then the rod knock, then lastly that rod decides to poke a hole in your block. Heard that from a Chevy mechanic. It's mostly 5 speeds that it happens to but autos can have it happen as well.
86ttopbird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2009, 07:05 PM   #8
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 7

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: How durable is the 2.8?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 86ttopbird View Post
I have heard stories that the bottom ends like to go in the 2.8's. Over revving them will cause the rod bolts to stretch allowing the clearances to widen, then you get a drop in oil pressure then the rod knock, then lastly that rod decides to poke a hole in your block. Heard that from a Chevy mechanic. It's mostly 5 speeds that it happens to but autos can have it happen as well.
The earlier 2.8's had smaller cranks and two piece seals and were suppose to be problematic,I ran the hell out of mine with no problems.The later model with the one piece seal are quite strong,most problems occur from lack of maintaince.
ezrollin is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 01:24 AM   #9
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chilliwack, B.C., Canada
Posts: 438
Car: '88 GTA, '89, '94 Firebird, '84 T/A
Engine: 5.0L TPI (GTA); '89 -2.8; '94 -3.4
Transmission: 5 speed (for all 3),auto for T/A
Axle/Gears: 3.45 (GTA only)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: How durable is the 2.8?

I had a rod go through the block on my 1983 Firebird (5-speed, 2.8L) but that was at about 400,000 km.

I rebuilt the 2.8 on my 1989 Firebird at 425,000 km as I had a slight coolant leak at the front cover and decided what the heck, let's have some fun. So, currently have 25,000 km on a bored and stroked, heavily modded 2.8L in the '89 Firebird and no problems (it's also my DD).

So, in my opinion, these motors are almost bullet-proof.
GTA50 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 02:25 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tenino, Washington
Posts: 771
Car: 89 f-bird and some others
Engine: 3.4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: How durable is the 2.8?

I had my 89 2.8 over in Germany driving in mostly hilly country, cities, and the autobahn from 100 to 130mph for 2 years.

Had it floored one day down a road trying to get some plane tickets for leave, went to shift from drive to overdrive, but it was already in OD.

8000rpm before i could blink. No problem.

Was still running great at 194k (some ticking/lifter type noise, and an exhaust manifold gasket leak) when I decided to stick in a new 3.4.

Kinda wish I'd just saved the money, or took my time building a 3.4 hybrid, and just drove the 2.8 till she blew.

Probably would have still been running decent now at 220k
__________________

various minor interior/engine mods 3.4 (I'll update the pic sooner or later, and maybe get it to run right)
coolrimsatleast is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 02:32 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
FireInMe17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bloomsburg, PA
Posts: 821
Car: 1990 Camaro RS/1989 S10 Blazer 4x4
Engine: LH0 3.1L 60* V6/LB4 4.3L 90* V6
Transmission: TH700-R4/TH700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23/3.42 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to FireInMe17 Send a message via MSN to FireInMe17
Re: How durable is the 2.8?

So how durable is the 3.1L? I floor mine all the time too, but Ive noticed a small bit of coolant making its way out the front of the engine right below the goose neck, is that bad?
FireInMe17 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2009, 08:59 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 448

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: How durable is the 2.8?

they are good motors if maintained of and not over revved


find and fix your leak before it costs you a motor

Last edited by regal301; 12-30-2009 at 07:16 PM.
regal301 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2009, 09:37 AM   #13
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hanson. MA
Posts: 17
Car: 86 Camaro Sport; 76 Monte Carlo
Engine: 2.8 V6; 327ci V8
Transmission: 700R4; auto

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to V6Beast
Re: How durable is the 2.8?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 86ttopbird View Post
I have heard stories that the bottom ends like to go in the 2.8's. Over revving them will cause the rod bolts to stretch allowing the clearances to widen, then you get a drop in oil pressure then the rod knock, then lastly that rod decides to poke a hole in your block. Heard that from a Chevy mechanic. It's mostly 5 speeds that it happens to but autos can have it happen as well.
i have an 86' sport coupe automatic and i had this happen. still havn't fixed it yet...
V6Beast is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2010, 04:16 PM   #14
Junior Member
 
Dodgeismo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 83
Car: 1985 Camaro Z-28
Engine: LG4 305 c.i.d. (5.0L); 4 BBL.
Transmission: 700 R4 ; 4-spd. Auto. O.D.
Axle/Gears: 3:23 posi (CODE: GU5)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: How durable is the 2.8?

Hey,...I have an '85 305 now,..but about 5 years ago...I had a 1987 Camaro, it had a 2.8L V-6 in it, w/5-speed manual trans. The problems I heard about/had was a leaking rear main seal. Besides regular upkeep,..the 2.8L is pretty reliable and has quite a bit of snot. I ended up rebuilding another 2.8L for it while it was my DD,..that's when I found out how much power/reliability it had. While building up the motor for 3-months,..I rotted it a bit pushing its limits...trust me keep the oil clean and the 2.8L is practically "BULLETPROOF"
__________________
.<>.<>..<>.<>..<>.<>..<>.<>. "1985CamaroZ28 ..<>.<>.<>.<>.<>.<>.<>.<>.<>.Dodge.Ismo@hotmail.com
http://www.Thirdgen.org/Techboard/member.php?u=96755
Dodgeismo is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 09:39 PM   #15
Junior Member
 
Coffee_Roaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Mount Vernon WA
Posts: 21
Car: dakota 4.7 4x4, camero rs
Engine: 4.7,2.8
Transmission: 5speed, auto, auto

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: How durable is the 2.8?

uMM, KEEP oil IN IT !!!!! and maybe it wouldn't have siezed...... mo .02
Coffee_Roaster is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2010, 09:42 AM   #16
Member
 
Skyset's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: T.DoT, Canada
Posts: 218
Car: 86 Iroc-Z
Engine: 305 (TPI)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: i dunno lolz

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: How durable is the 2.8?

I spoke to a mechanic who has worked on thirdgens all his life, and he told me that the 2.8's were among some of the most reliable v6's GM ever produced. He did tell me about the infamous rod knock, but he said not to worry about that for another 200,000 KM lol . Right now my 2.8 is sitting at 120,000 KM (80,000 miles?) and it's my daily driver. Maybe some time in the future years from now it may die, but I think it has a long life ahead of it
Skyset is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2010, 03:02 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
pontiacguy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pulaski, TN
Posts: 472

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: How durable is the 2.8?

I have a 1992 3.1L firebird Automatic that has 212K miles on it. It used to have a 75 HP nitrous shot on it, and it never gave any trouble whatsoever. I quit using the nitrous on it about 2 years ago, then about 1 year later it blew a head gasket. That was the only problem was the head gasket.

I have been very pleased with how my 3.1 runs and drives. Before it had 200K miles on it, I could even get 30 to 31 MPG on the interstate with the cruise set on 78 MPH.

My dad has a 1991 GMC sonoma ST with a 2.8 and a 5 speed. It has 355k Miles on it and has never had the valve covers off of it. It is getting such that it leaks and is burning a little bit of oil. Hey, it's nearly 20 years old and has been rode hard for 355K miles. Still cranks easy, though.
__________________
F-bodies I own:
1992 Firebird 3.1 V6 (Used to have 75 HP nitrous shot)
1984 15th anniversary Trans Am (2 cars, future project to take both cars and make one good one)
1969 Firebird 400 4 speed. Actually has a 455 in it. Almost done with the complete restoration.
pontiacguy1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2010, 07:15 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,318

Classifieds Rating: (14)
Re: How durable is the 2.8?

The later 2.8 and the 3.1/3.4 are much more solid then the early 2.8's. When was the balance changed? 87? 88? Any of those earlier 2.8's probably shouldn't be beat on. They tend to let go if they're abused. The 3.1/3.4 however are kinda hard to kill. I tried to kill my 91 3.1 many times, 150,000 miles, 120hp shot of nitrous, and countless beatings and it still ran fine when I sold it. I hear it's still driving.

Now my 84 Camaro 2.8 didn't survive the first beating. All stock, all original, 129k miles.

My room mate for 4 years was into Fieros... He had at least 6 2.8 blocks sitting in the scrap pile with holes in the blocks. The trick fix/upgrade for those cars was a Camaro/Firebird or Lumina APV 3.1.
__________________
Drew
83 Camaro 5.0L *1995-98* RIP
84 Camaro 2.8L *2005-06* RIP
86 Trans Am WS6 5.7L Sold!
86 Mustang 2.3L Turbo
87 Iroc 5.7L
91 Formula 5.7L
91 Camaro RS convertible 5.0L
91 Firebird 3.1L *1999-06* Sold!
Drew is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2010, 02:52 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
marekdennhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Thunder Bay, On, Canada
Posts: 289
Car: 1985 Camaro
Engine: 2.8l
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Stock

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to marekdennhardt
Re: How durable is the 2.8?

Guess I wont be beating on it till i'm ready for a swap
marekdennhardt is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2010, 10:21 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
FireInMe17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bloomsburg, PA
Posts: 821
Car: 1990 Camaro RS/1989 S10 Blazer 4x4
Engine: LH0 3.1L 60* V6/LB4 4.3L 90* V6
Transmission: TH700-R4/TH700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23/3.42 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to FireInMe17 Send a message via MSN to FireInMe17
Re: How durable is the 2.8?

Yeah these 3.1 blocks have to be pretty damn indestructible, one time a Cobra mustang 4.6L Supercharged pulled up next to me, and i was like oh ****!!! but i gave him a run for his money and just stomped on it and well the tach went passed 7,000rpm and stayed there for a second in first until about 40 mph and then i let off of it, it was a short race, and he beat the hell out of me, but he thought i had a 350 tpi car when we pulled over and talked

and well that was almost 8 months ago and since then ive put another 4,000 miles on the car and have had no problems, cranks right up and on no matter what, runs great, and ive had no problems with it what so ever, well except 20 year old multec injectors, lol
__________________
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3200340


Street Machine: 90 Camaro RS 3.1L
Trail Machine: 89 S10 Blazer 2dr 4x4 4.3L
FireInMe17 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2010, 10:21 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > V6

Tags
28, 31, bay, burnout, camaro, chevy, durable, engine, gen, gm, knock, rod, speed, thunder, v6
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details