Wheels and TiresNeed help with wheels or tires? Need to know if those new wheels you're looking at will even fit a Third Gen? Have questions about tire performance and handling? Ask all those questions here!
Sponsored by Tire Rack
Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!
Hi,
I was planning on running 275/40-17s on the front (17x9.5 wheels) and 295/35-18s on the rear (18x10.5 wheels), but wanted to know if running 275/40-18s on the rear wheels would look funny (stretched)? I know they are about an inch taller than stock, but that doesn't bother me. The 275/40-18s are significantly cheaper than the 295/35-18s.
This ad is not displayed to registered members. Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad. Click here to register for free!
uhhhhhhhhhhh... bad advice..... this would give the front tires more sidewall than the rears, the car will look bad with more tire on the front than rear, not to mention that it would upset handling and cause massive oversteer, with the rear tires being more responsive than the front, plenty of rear steer, but the 275 would be to stretched to look good on a 10.5" wheel
__________________ THE MODS Suspension: 18X9.5" hyper black c6 wheels with 265/40/18, 275/40/18 michelin PS2, AGR 12.7 to 1 steering box .225 valve, J&M strut mounts KONI Yellow sport/ Ground Control Weight Jacks#1,000/200, double adjustable lower control arms+ UMI LCA relocation brackets, UMI Panhard relocation "chassis side" with single adjustable UMI panhard, JEGS Panhard relocation "axle side". UMI SFC's. UMI tunnel mounted torque arm, 36/ 23 mm swaybars, Iroc wonderbar, Edelbrock 3 pt STB, Moog front end steering componets, Spohn bumpsteer kit. Intake: Ultimate T.B. + spacer, 14 X 3" open element 1.6 Comp Cams Roller rockers Exhaust: 1 5/8" Edelbrock shorty headers through 3" Flowmaster, carsound 3" converter.
uhhhhhhhhhhh... bad advice..... this would give the front tires more sidewall than the rears, the car will look bad with more tire on the front than rear, not to mention that it would upset handling and cause massive oversteer, with the rear tires being more responsive than the front, plenty of rear steer, but the 275 would be to stretched to look good on a 10.5" wheel
UHhhhHHh... try to know what your talking about before you make yourself look like an idiot. i have the 17/18 staggered set up, with 40 front and 35 rear sidewalls, it looks GREAT - really completes the staggered look. oversteer? are you serious? from 5mm of sidewall difference? the fact that teh fronts are narrower by 10mm should offset that anyways. and, my car(with dang near the same set up) under-steers like no other, it NEVER oversteers, sooo...
to the OP, yeah everyone is correct that the 275's are too small for the 10.5" wheels
UHhhhHHh... try to know what your talking about before you make yourself look like an idiot. i have the 17/18 staggered set up, with 40 front and 35 rear sidewalls, it looks GREAT - really completes the staggered look. oversteer? are you serious? from 5mm of sidewall difference? the fact that teh fronts are narrower by 10mm should offset that anyways. and, my car(with dang near the same set up) under-steers like no other, it NEVER oversteers, sooo...
to the OP, yeah everyone is correct that the 275's are too small for the 10.5" wheels
the fact that you think it looks good and hanldes great is all i need to know, to never read another of ur post
Last edited by 1988-305-tbi; 05-29-2009 at 08:02 PM.
uhhhhhhhhhhh... bad advice..... this would give the front tires more sidewall than the rears, the car will look bad with more tire on the front than rear, not to mention that it would upset handling and cause massive oversteer, with the rear tires being more responsive than the front, plenty of rear steer, but the 275 would be to stretched to look good on a 10.5" wheel
i didnt take notice of the front setup the OP wanted, just the rear.
I will have to agree with you that running more sidewall on the front will look a little weird.
not sure what other options there are going here, unless you change the front to a 245/40/17, 1" smaller than stock, but the sidewall will match and the cost of width.
the fact that you think it looks good and hanldes great is all i need to know, to never read another of ur post
hey STUPID, i dont know if you can read, but when i say "it under steers like no other", means it DOENST handle well, jeezus. plus your still wrong about it "oversteering" lol, and if you can honestly say a 1cm overall diameter difference in tire diameter is a HUGE OMG terrible look, why dont you look at some car's with the set up, like mine, and then rethink what your saying.
to the OP, im sorry to clutter the thread with this crap... but heres a pic of a 35 rear sidewall on an 18"rim and a 40 front sidewall on a 17" front rim, stock ride height (sagging maaybe.. lol)
hey smart guy...
what size tires are on your car??? you only gave the aspect ratio
if the less sidewall on the rear tires looks so good and doen't hurt performance i wonder why auto makers never put a shorter sidewall tire on the rear/ lighter end of the vehicle.
wait i think i maybe wrong, nissan offers a couple nice little coupes, NISSMO tunned, i believe that have a shorter rear sidewall tire, they do it for a reason though, whats that silly little thing that all the kids like to do with rear will drive cars..... oh yeah it's tunned for DRIFT, the rear end breaks loose before the front
__________________ THE MODS Suspension: 18X9.5" hyper black c6 wheels with 265/40/18, 275/40/18 michelin PS2, AGR 12.7 to 1 steering box .225 valve, J&M strut mounts KONI Yellow sport/ Ground Control Weight Jacks#1,000/200, double adjustable lower control arms+ UMI LCA relocation brackets, UMI Panhard relocation "chassis side" with single adjustable UMI panhard, JEGS Panhard relocation "axle side". UMI SFC's. UMI tunnel mounted torque arm, 36/ 23 mm swaybars, Iroc wonderbar, Edelbrock 3 pt STB, Moog front end steering componets, Spohn bumpsteer kit. Intake: Ultimate T.B. + spacer, 14 X 3" open element 1.6 Comp Cams Roller rockers Exhaust: 1 5/8" Edelbrock shorty headers through 3" Flowmaster, carsound 3" converter.
Last edited by 1988-305-tbi; 05-29-2009 at 09:08 PM.
hey smart guy...
what size tires are on your car??? you only gave the aspect ratio
if the less sidewall on the rear tires looks so good and doen't hurt performance i wonder why auto makers never put a shorter sidewall tire on the rear/ lighter end of the vehicle.
wait i think i maybe wrong, nissan offers a couple nice little coupes, NISSMO tunned, i believe that have a shorter rear sidewall tire, they do it for a reason though, whats that silly little thing that all the kids like to do with rear will drive cars..... oh yeah it's tunned for DRIFT, the rear end breaks loose before the front
since we are talking about sidewall, and comparing a 40 on a 17" rim in the front with a 35 on an 18" rim in the rear, all that you need to know is aspect ratios, but since you apparently don't understand that:
245/40-17s on the front and 275/35-18s on the rear
same as the OP was asking about, but not as wide.
again i said that the handling is NOT GOOD, it UNDERSTEERS, READ.
and the drift comment, I NEVER SAID IT WAS GOOD FOR HANDLING, AND MY CAR, WITH MORE SIDEWALL UP FRONT IT UNDERSTEERS SEVERELY. i have auto crosed it 4 times now, i speak from testing on a clean, concrete "track" if you will. and now your comparing a 3rd gen to a 350z? i dont think they are as nose heavy, if at all, like a 3rd gen soooo... thats cool....
ONCE AGAIN, the handling is not good, it understeers, just like i said in my first post, and my second one... so i donno wtf you are saying i said it handles sooo great for
last time, READ.
oh, and appanently the stock 350z had understeer problems, like my car has... and the nissmo was designed to fix some of that... so the larger side wall up front does help correct understeer possibly, but, i WASNT arguing that with you anyways, i just said my car understeers.
If it were me, I would go 275-40-17 all the way around. If you want the same sidewall, but a little more rim (your eyes probably wont be able to tell), go 275-40-17 in front and 275-40-18 in the rear.
I bought these wheels a while back for my 1995 vette, 275 will buldge if you get one with enought sidewall to even fit. My 285/35 HTRZII look like balloons on them, they don't even sit flush with the outside of the rim.
295, or 315 for the 18x10.5 would be best, definitely not less lol
since we are talking about sidewall, and comparing a 40 on a 17" rim in the front with a 35 on an 18" rim in the rear, all that you need to know is aspect ratios, but since you apparently don't understand that:
245/40-17s on the front and 275/35-18s on the rear
same as the OP was asking about, but not as wide.
the funny part you missed is that 245/40/17 is a 24.7" tall tire on a 17" rim which = 7.7" of sidewall,
275/35 has a height of 25.7" on an 18" rim, so the sidewall on the rear is also 7.7".
so you have the same overall sidewall sized tires but the rear is just over 1" wider than the front, which by the way will cause UNDERSTEER, LIKE YOU HAVE!!!!!!!! "Smart Guy" so no you arent even runing a shorther rear tire sidewall than the front, and if you could do math you would have already know that
the funny part you missed is that 245/40/17 is a 24.7" tall tire on a 17" rim which = 7.7" of sidewall,
275/35 has a height of 25.7" on an 18" rim, so the sidewall on the rear is also 7.7".
so you have the same overall sidewall sized tires but the rear is just over 1" wider than the front, which by the way will cause UNDERSTEER, LIKE YOU HAVE!!!!!!!! "Smart Guy" so no you arent even runing a shorther rear tire sidewall than the front, and if you could do math you would have already know that
nice rounding, do the math without rounding, there is a sidewall difference of 3.5mm, the front having 3.5mm more sidewall, and if you refer to my previous post, i said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailtexas186548
from 5mm of sidewall difference
so yes there i have a larger sidewall in front, like i said, i was 1.5 mm off in my estimation, wow do two quick burnouts and its up to 5mm lol.
the funny part you missed is that 245/40/17 is a 24.7" tall tire on a 17" rim which = 7.7" of sidewall,
275/35 has a height of 25.7" on an 18" rim, so the sidewall on the rear is also 7.7".
so you have the same overall sidewall sized tires but the rear is just over 1" wider than the front, which by the way will cause UNDERSTEER, LIKE YOU HAVE!!!!!!!! "Smart Guy" so no you arent even runing a shorther rear tire sidewall than the front, and if you could do math you would have already know that
245-45-17 is the same overall diameter as stock, so is a 275-40-17, 245-40-18, and the 275-35-18... Pure math.
You know - you can tune understeer out with different spring rates and sway bars. You should always put as wide as a tire as you can and then tune it to have the balance you want...