XFI280 Comps Cam
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z Miniram
Engine: 388cu 6.4 Liters
Transmission: G-Force T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Gears
XFI280 Comps Cam
Who has made good power with 355cu XFI280 and Super Ram?
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: XFI280 Comps Cam
i have been doing alot of cam research since i'll be doing one on my motor soon.
I've always was a fan of the XFI stuff and tended to recommend them. i wanted a 224/230 custom xfi, or the 280xfi 230/236 cam, but decided against it for the simple reason of valve control
its been said its VERY hard to control the valves at rpms over 6000 where that 280 cam will like to shine. its really aggressive ramp rate and aggressive over the nose. you'll need expensive lightweight titanium retainers/beehive springs for that cam or else you wont beable to rev much over 6000
now with superam, you'll want your peak power probly well below 6000. probly peak in the 5500-5800 range.
that 280 will work well and make power but you'll be leaving abit of performance on the table. i'd shoot for a slightly smaller cam like the 224/230 xfi, or even the smaller 218/224 xfi 268. that cam will be good for solid 350whp. i've seen an lt1 with good heads put down 370whp with the xfi268 but that doesnt seem to be the norm.
Else you could go custom grind.
I've always was a fan of the XFI stuff and tended to recommend them. i wanted a 224/230 custom xfi, or the 280xfi 230/236 cam, but decided against it for the simple reason of valve control
its been said its VERY hard to control the valves at rpms over 6000 where that 280 cam will like to shine. its really aggressive ramp rate and aggressive over the nose. you'll need expensive lightweight titanium retainers/beehive springs for that cam or else you wont beable to rev much over 6000
now with superam, you'll want your peak power probly well below 6000. probly peak in the 5500-5800 range.
that 280 will work well and make power but you'll be leaving abit of performance on the table. i'd shoot for a slightly smaller cam like the 224/230 xfi, or even the smaller 218/224 xfi 268. that cam will be good for solid 350whp. i've seen an lt1 with good heads put down 370whp with the xfi268 but that doesnt seem to be the norm.
Else you could go custom grind.
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 5,674
Likes: 0
Received 106 Likes
on
65 Posts
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73
Re: XFI280 Comps Cam
After the extensive dyno session yesterday and analyzing the results with Datamaster, I do feel Allen is definatly getting in to valve float with the XFI 268 and beehives.
The scans show that the map is fluxuating up and down all the way thru the rpms from 5000 to 6000.
It starts at 101 then bounces to 97 98 100 96 98 etc etc.. That would seem to indicate intake reversion. (ie. valve float)
The dyno shows power pulling to 5000 then flattening out to 6000 maintaining the same power or there abouts.
We might try some better beehives that Manley has. 150-360# but I'm sure we need to lighten the valve train.
The scans show that the map is fluxuating up and down all the way thru the rpms from 5000 to 6000.
It starts at 101 then bounces to 97 98 100 96 98 etc etc.. That would seem to indicate intake reversion. (ie. valve float)
The dyno shows power pulling to 5000 then flattening out to 6000 maintaining the same power or there abouts.
We might try some better beehives that Manley has. 150-360# but I'm sure we need to lighten the valve train.
#7
Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: amanda ,ohio,usa
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 camaro
Engine: 355 tpi
Transmission: 700r
Axle/Gears: 3.50
Re: XFI280 Comps Cam
Bringing back from dead
Vincent I changed my cam from lpe 211 to xfi280 and changed springs and ported my old edelbrock heads gained about 30 cfm peak still only 250s max
First time at track ran 12.28 @111 air da was 2200
I also changed headers from 1 5/8 to 1 3/4 dons
Now changed exhaust to 4" after dons headers but haven't been to the track since change to see results. Had 3" ultraflow before
Car leaves very lazy off the line, 1.72 60ft, I have 3200 stall but seems with this cam it's not enough.
Currently have 3.50 gear thinking of going to 4.10 to help car leave the line and stay in powerband.
Vincent I changed my cam from lpe 211 to xfi280 and changed springs and ported my old edelbrock heads gained about 30 cfm peak still only 250s max
First time at track ran 12.28 @111 air da was 2200
I also changed headers from 1 5/8 to 1 3/4 dons
Now changed exhaust to 4" after dons headers but haven't been to the track since change to see results. Had 3" ultraflow before
Car leaves very lazy off the line, 1.72 60ft, I have 3200 stall but seems with this cam it's not enough.
Currently have 3.50 gear thinking of going to 4.10 to help car leave the line and stay in powerband.
Trending Topics
#9
Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: amanda ,ohio,usa
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 camaro
Engine: 355 tpi
Transmission: 700r
Axle/Gears: 3.50
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: XFI280 Comps Cam
Gear can help but how much will your rpm change at the stripe? Dont over rev it
But more converter to me always seems like a better idea than gear, but again depends on what your rpms do at end of the track
My ls1 car only picked up .06 from a 3.73 gear swap from 2.73 with the same 3200 stall. I think my 60 ft would have improved same or better with more stall. But also didnt fully optimize shift point with the 3.73. May have been some gain there but doubt it was the 2-3 tenths I expected
But more converter to me always seems like a better idea than gear, but again depends on what your rpms do at end of the track
My ls1 car only picked up .06 from a 3.73 gear swap from 2.73 with the same 3200 stall. I think my 60 ft would have improved same or better with more stall. But also didnt fully optimize shift point with the 3.73. May have been some gain there but doubt it was the 2-3 tenths I expected
#11
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z Miniram
Engine: 388cu 6.4 Liters
Transmission: G-Force T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Gears
Re: XFI280 Comps Cam
Bringing back from dead
Vincent I changed my cam from lpe 211 to xfi280 and changed springs and ported my old edelbrock heads gained about 30 cfm peak still only 250s max
First time at track ran 12.28 @111 air da was 2200
I also changed headers from 1 5/8 to 1 3/4 dons
Now changed exhaust to 4" after dons headers but haven't been to the track since change to see results. Had 3" ultraflow before
Car leaves very lazy off the line, 1.72 60ft, I have 3200 stall but seems with this cam it's not enough.
Currently have 3.50 gear thinking of going to 4.10 to help car leave the line and stay in powerband.
Vincent I changed my cam from lpe 211 to xfi280 and changed springs and ported my old edelbrock heads gained about 30 cfm peak still only 250s max
First time at track ran 12.28 @111 air da was 2200
I also changed headers from 1 5/8 to 1 3/4 dons
Now changed exhaust to 4" after dons headers but haven't been to the track since change to see results. Had 3" ultraflow before
Car leaves very lazy off the line, 1.72 60ft, I have 3200 stall but seems with this cam it's not enough.
Currently have 3.50 gear thinking of going to 4.10 to help car leave the line and stay in powerband.
#12
Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: amanda ,ohio,usa
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 camaro
Engine: 355 tpi
Transmission: 700r
Axle/Gears: 3.50
Re: XFI280 Comps Cam
I also expected more mph, heads cc'd only at 173 after port work and porter said speed was crazy on them. So probably just to small for big power. But it is a fun car to cruise in
Think if I change gear so it's in proper rpm at finish line, now crossing around 5100 need 6300 or so and a better stall it will get in 11s easy
#13
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: XFI280 Comps Cam
If 173 cc and velocity is high then likely are not getting everything out of that cam for the cubes. A 350 or so engine will want around 1.95-2.1 csa head port to get to mid 6500 ish rpm for that cam, and also an intake manifold with a relatively shorter runner. 10-14" or so roughly. Thats normally your 185-200 cc heads
#14
Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: amanda ,ohio,usa
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 camaro
Engine: 355 tpi
Transmission: 700r
Axle/Gears: 3.50
Re: XFI280 Comps Cam
If 173 cc and velocity is high then likely are not getting everything out of that cam for the cubes. A 350 or so engine will want around 1.95-2.1 csa head port to get to mid 6500 ish rpm for that cam, and also an intake manifold with a relatively shorter runner. 10-14" or so roughly. Thats normally your 185-200 cc heads
Last edited by bdiroc; 10-18-2017 at 06:29 AM. Reason: spelling
#15
Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: amanda ,ohio,usa
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 camaro
Engine: 355 tpi
Transmission: 700r
Axle/Gears: 3.50
Re: XFI280 Comps Cam
Porter told me they were the worst heads he ever tested, I have had them since the 90s. No ports or chambers were really consistant and flowed less than quoted ,a lot less. Flowed 213 at .6 and only 201 when tested thru head and hsr combo.
But his flow bench is stingy, my afr 210 competition ports only flowed 288 on his bench same day. These are for next build ,hopefully this winter.
But his flow bench is stingy, my afr 210 competition ports only flowed 288 on his bench same day. These are for next build ,hopefully this winter.
#16
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z Miniram
Engine: 388cu 6.4 Liters
Transmission: G-Force T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Gears
Re: XFI280 Comps Cam
Turn your fuel pressure up to min 47psi with the 30's injectors.
I bought my TrickFlow 195 Heads in 2002. The flow was 258/191. They were ported in 2013 to 303/217 with 2.05 intake valves.
I bought my TrickFlow 195 Heads in 2002. The flow was 258/191. They were ported in 2013 to 303/217 with 2.05 intake valves.
#17
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: XFI280 Comps Cam
Porter told me they were the worst heads he ever tested, I have had them since the 90s. No ports or chambers were really consistant and flowed less than quoted ,a lot less. Flowed 213 at .6 and only 201 when tested thru head and hsr combo.
But his flow bench is stingy, my afr 210 competition ports only flowed 288 on his bench same day. These are for next build ,hopefully this winter.
But his flow bench is stingy, my afr 210 competition ports only flowed 288 on his bench same day. These are for next build ,hopefully this winter.
#18
Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: amanda ,ohio,usa
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 camaro
Engine: 355 tpi
Transmission: 700r
Axle/Gears: 3.50
Re: XFI280 Comps Cam
Hopefully make it to the track this weekend to test new exhaust, then hopefully change rear gear next week and test that weekend. then local track is closed for the year.
I am going to dyno this winter to see what is really going on, cam might be a little to big for these heads. Heads want to make power down low and cam starts to make power up high.
#19
Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: amanda ,ohio,usa
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 camaro
Engine: 355 tpi
Transmission: 700r
Axle/Gears: 3.50
Re: XFI280 Comps Cam
Well da was a alittle better 1830, only change 4 inch exhaust, 60ft .03 better
60ft 1.718
7.74 1/8 @89.5
12.13 1/4 @112.48
Pretty happy with change, but 4" ultraflow is a little to loud cruising around town.
Hopefully do gears this week and test sunday
60ft 1.718
7.74 1/8 @89.5
12.13 1/4 @112.48
Pretty happy with change, but 4" ultraflow is a little to loud cruising around town.
Hopefully do gears this week and test sunday
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post