Painless VSS + 16197427 = no VSS reading.
#1
Painless VSS + 16197427 = no VSS reading.
I'm using a painless VSS (2 pulse older version of the 60115), I am using a 16197427 PCM to run a Crossfire equipped 305 and 4L60E, in a 1971 Chev pick up.
The only issue I have (other than the fuel pump dieing on me earlier today), is that the ECM does not read a VSS signal.
I have used this VSS with a 1227747, with one wire connected to ground, the other connected to the optical input, it worked fine then. I also had it connected to a 1227730 running S_AUJP for a short while before the owner of that vehicle got the 4ppr VSS, also a painless.
I am using $0D, and have the "VSS not from DRAC" bit selected, since that's what some threads on here indicate needs to be done when this PCM is swapped in place of a '7747.
I am using this VSS due to needing the cable drive for the trucks original speedo.
Now the only thing I haven't tried yet, that came to me after coming home and leaving the truck on the hoist until I get a new pump in the morning, is adding a pull up resistor.
Has anyone used this combination before? Any insight?
The only issue I have (other than the fuel pump dieing on me earlier today), is that the ECM does not read a VSS signal.
I have used this VSS with a 1227747, with one wire connected to ground, the other connected to the optical input, it worked fine then. I also had it connected to a 1227730 running S_AUJP for a short while before the owner of that vehicle got the 4ppr VSS, also a painless.
I am using $0D, and have the "VSS not from DRAC" bit selected, since that's what some threads on here indicate needs to be done when this PCM is swapped in place of a '7747.
I am using this VSS due to needing the cable drive for the trucks original speedo.
Now the only thing I haven't tried yet, that came to me after coming home and leaving the truck on the hoist until I get a new pump in the morning, is adding a pull up resistor.
Has anyone used this combination before? Any insight?
Last edited by Six_Shooter; 03-18-2011 at 07:30 PM.
#2
Re: Painless VSS + 16197427 = no VSS reading.
Upon more research (some information was already saved on my HDD :facepalm: ), it seems that the 40pulse per revolution signal is needed for tranny functions to work properly.
Arg, this means find a, by the sounds of it rare, VSS that has a cable drive as well, or adding a 40 tooth wheel and sensor to the diff.
Arg, this means find a, by the sounds of it rare, VSS that has a cable drive as well, or adding a 40 tooth wheel and sensor to the diff.
#4
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Painless VSS + 16197427 = no VSS reading.
#6
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: 7th circle of stop-n-go traffic hell
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Engine: X
Transmission: MT1
Re: Painless VSS + 16197427 = no VSS reading.
If labor time/cost isn't an object the cheapest fix would be speedo gut swap. Electronic speedo guts from a 90's old-body 4l80E van are fairly compact.
At $250 for a Cable-X I just think of it as a $250 shift kit that gives the same shift every time, eliminates the evil TV cable, and no more ATF baths for trans calibration changes.
At $250 for a Cable-X I just think of it as a $250 shift kit that gives the same shift every time, eliminates the evil TV cable, and no more ATF baths for trans calibration changes.
Trending Topics
#8
Re: Painless VSS + 16197427 = no VSS reading.
The 4l60e should have the VSS you're missing for tranny control, you don't need an aftermarket VSS.
I assume it's a 4x4 and that's where you're getting the mechanical speedo cable from for the 2 pulse optical sensor in back of your speedo. That will work just fine for the cruise input and ECM VSS input, I'm using that setup with a 700r4. On a 4l60e or 4l80e the tranny VSS signal comes from a sensor on the tranny, not the transfer case (or tranny output shaft).
I assume it's a 4x4 and that's where you're getting the mechanical speedo cable from for the 2 pulse optical sensor in back of your speedo. That will work just fine for the cruise input and ECM VSS input, I'm using that setup with a 700r4. On a 4l60e or 4l80e the tranny VSS signal comes from a sensor on the tranny, not the transfer case (or tranny output shaft).
#9
Re: Painless VSS + 16197427 = no VSS reading.
--==Update==--
I ended up putting the 40 PPR reluctor wheel back in the tranny on the output shaft. I added a DRAC as well.
I haven't driven it yet, but my Grandfather drove it home from the shop and said that it felt smoother now that the PCM is getting a VSS signal. I think it's a bit low in reading, since the highest I saw on my test drive around the building was 7 MPH, and I'm sure I was going much faster than that. Now I just need to calibrate the DRAC.
Now I just need to get an electronic speedo. I may have one kicking around.
This is a 2WD Pro Street (look) 1971 Chev truck. Here is an old picture of it behind my Jimmy:
I ended up putting the 40 PPR reluctor wheel back in the tranny on the output shaft. I added a DRAC as well.
I haven't driven it yet, but my Grandfather drove it home from the shop and said that it felt smoother now that the PCM is getting a VSS signal. I think it's a bit low in reading, since the highest I saw on my test drive around the building was 7 MPH, and I'm sure I was going much faster than that. Now I just need to calibrate the DRAC.
Now I just need to get an electronic speedo. I may have one kicking around.
This is a 2WD Pro Street (look) 1971 Chev truck. Here is an old picture of it behind my Jimmy:
#10
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Painless VSS + 16197427 = no VSS reading.
Ha! Your grandfather has a cooler car than you!!!
You would be right by saying it felt better with VSS. Every conversion I have done without then changed to with was better driving and very noticable stedier idle in gear etc... really noticed the differance on idle in a rock crawler I had. Much more stable idle and just off idle while crawling the rocks. now these were all 7747. I thought the 427 had to have VSS or it would go limp home or? Just from what I read, not sure. If you turn off the code for VSS on a 7747 it runs fine and never had a complaint, but then when added VSS it was better. HTH!
You would be right by saying it felt better with VSS. Every conversion I have done without then changed to with was better driving and very noticable stedier idle in gear etc... really noticed the differance on idle in a rock crawler I had. Much more stable idle and just off idle while crawling the rocks. now these were all 7747. I thought the 427 had to have VSS or it would go limp home or? Just from what I read, not sure. If you turn off the code for VSS on a 7747 it runs fine and never had a complaint, but then when added VSS it was better. HTH!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TMZIrocZ350
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
10-07-2015 12:09 PM