Compression Ratio
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Theoreticly 10.0:1 will make a little
more power than 9.5:1 on the same motor.
But there is a definate limit to how much
compression you can have on a motor with a certain octane gas. Or it will knock (ping) at heavy throttle. Different motor designs
allow some slight varience but not much.
Eg. aluminum heads generaly allow about .5
more compression ratio than cast iron heads.
They also need it to make the same power as
cast iron. Only build your motor to suit the available fuel octane in your area. If only 92 octane is available build for around 9.5:1
if 94 is available build for 10.0:1....
Higher ambient air temps will require more
octane than lower temps. A motor operated at high altitudes will require a little less octane than at sea level. and also will make less power. Don't sweat over if you have 1/2 less compression than the next guy. Overall volumetric efficentcy (breathing) is more important most of the time. Trying to operate a motor at heavy throttle loads without the required octane gas, will damage the motor in a very short time. Retarding the timing is a band-aid approach to getting around this. (reduces power to below that which could be produced with the max compression ratio that matches the available octane with optimum ignition timing.
Hope this helps...
more power than 9.5:1 on the same motor.
But there is a definate limit to how much
compression you can have on a motor with a certain octane gas. Or it will knock (ping) at heavy throttle. Different motor designs
allow some slight varience but not much.
Eg. aluminum heads generaly allow about .5
more compression ratio than cast iron heads.
They also need it to make the same power as
cast iron. Only build your motor to suit the available fuel octane in your area. If only 92 octane is available build for around 9.5:1
if 94 is available build for 10.0:1....
Higher ambient air temps will require more
octane than lower temps. A motor operated at high altitudes will require a little less octane than at sea level. and also will make less power. Don't sweat over if you have 1/2 less compression than the next guy. Overall volumetric efficentcy (breathing) is more important most of the time. Trying to operate a motor at heavy throttle loads without the required octane gas, will damage the motor in a very short time. Retarding the timing is a band-aid approach to getting around this. (reduces power to below that which could be produced with the max compression ratio that matches the available octane with optimum ignition timing.
Hope this helps...
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
From: Kalamazoo,Mi,USA
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: L69: cam and porting
Transmission: T5, 3.73 rear
Hey if you have the cash for a new LS1, you may as well buy an LS6, the Z06 motor. These should be available from GM performance parts.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Adams87Camaro:
When you retard the engine on a higher compression vehicle how much hp are you taking away from the engine?</font>
When you retard the engine on a higher compression vehicle how much hp are you taking away from the engine?</font>
motor with the lesser compression for the available gas, that runs optimum timing.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Damon
Tech / General Engine
8
Sep 26, 2015 04:29 PM
83 Crossfire TA
Suspension and Chassis
0
Sep 8, 2015 12:06 PM




