Exhaust Post your questions and suggestions about stock or aftermarket exhaust setups. Third Gen exhaust sound files and videos!

Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-2011, 09:20 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
zwanboy104's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: York, PA
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

Has anyone ever put a glasspack muffler in place of a cat converter before? I have a flowmaster exhaust, but just hate the cat it has. It eliminates so much of the sound the car has. How would it sound having glasspack in place of it? would it make it any louder?
Old 04-25-2011, 07:17 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,650
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 42 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

a new high flow cat will keep you legal, and eliminate the original, probably shot/plugged stock cat.
Old 04-26-2011, 06:27 AM
  #3  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
sam24th's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: 3.4L V6
Transmission: auto
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

2x on the new high flow cat. Mines shot to hell right now so ill be swaping it out sometime this week after the engine is back in it.
Old 04-28-2011, 07:45 PM
  #4  
Member

iTrader: (4)
 
remltr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Long Island,NY
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Bone stock 1989 Iroc T-Top,1991 Z28
Engine: 5.7, Carbed 383
Transmission: 700r4, T-56
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

If you're worried about sound, just replace the cat with a straight piece of pipe?
Old 04-28-2011, 09:29 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (13)
 
norcalz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Troup, Texas
Posts: 2,017
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Car: 1989 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: ZZZ# 0607 of 1200 produced
Transmission: Pro-Built 700R4/Vig.2400
Axle/Gears: 3.27 BW 9 Bolt PBR Disc
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

I used a carsound (magnaflow) cat to replace my not that old catco cat, and noticed a much better sound.
Old 04-28-2011, 09:38 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (25)
 
UnderCover89TBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manteca,California. Nor Cal.
Posts: 7,260
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: SOLD IT. Mopar guy only now.
Engine: gone
Transmission: gone
Axle/Gears: gone
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

Yes im a fan of the Carsound converterers too...for aftermarkets....other than that if you dont mind risking a fine you can run no converter and get all of that engines sound
Old 04-29-2011, 04:17 AM
  #7  
Member
 
Matt1821's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Phx, AZ
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 87 Trans Am
Engine: 350 carb'd
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

What about back pressure? Eliminating the converter and replacing it with straight pipe you will lose significant back pressure and more than likely some power as well.
Old 04-30-2011, 01:08 AM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (25)
 
UnderCover89TBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manteca,California. Nor Cal.
Posts: 7,260
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: SOLD IT. Mopar guy only now.
Engine: gone
Transmission: gone
Axle/Gears: gone
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

oh god...not this again. you DO NOT want backpressure. you want velocity.
Old 05-09-2011, 12:16 PM
  #9  
Member

 
luvmy64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

I actually did replace the cat with a glass pack on an 89 i had, and it had a flowmaster muffler. It made it A LOT QUIETER. If you want louder, go with a straight pipe.
Old 05-09-2011, 01:01 PM
  #10  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
///DAN///'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Pennslyvania
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro Z28
Engine: 355 SBC
Transmission: 700 r-4
Axle/Gears: Strange 3:73 posi
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

I went with the straight pipe . Living in Pa as well you will not get fined there is no one looking to bust ya , now living in California where from what i understand they have emissions check stops i wouldn't do it. I talked to my mechanic he said keep it under 5000 miles and he doesn't care talked to the owner of the exhaust shop that made my pipe and he said the person who gets in trouble is if a shop were to install the pipe , he followed that up with don't bring your car here I won't work on it like that.
Old 05-09-2011, 09:06 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (25)
 
UnderCover89TBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manteca,California. Nor Cal.
Posts: 7,260
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: SOLD IT. Mopar guy only now.
Engine: gone
Transmission: gone
Axle/Gears: gone
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

Yeah I could see California fining shops for not reporting a known problem with a car. Bad enough we "have" to check the tire pressure and adjust if out of specs.
Old 05-01-2017, 02:15 AM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
50shadesofplum's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

Originally Posted by zwanboy104
Has anyone ever put a glasspack muffler in place of a cat converter before? I have a flowmaster exhaust, but just hate the cat it has. It eliminates so much of the sound the car has. How would it sound having glasspack in place of it? would it make it any louder?
previous owner of my 97 tahoe replaced the cats with glass packs, and it runs horribly due to lacking o2 sensors, and back pressure. It sounds horrible and backfires like a shotgun at highway speeds. Also went from 13/17mpg to 8/10mpg. Absolute garbage idea in my opinion.
Old 05-01-2017, 09:27 AM
  #13  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (13)
 
norcalz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Troup, Texas
Posts: 2,017
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Car: 1989 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: ZZZ# 0607 of 1200 produced
Transmission: Pro-Built 700R4/Vig.2400
Axle/Gears: 3.27 BW 9 Bolt PBR Disc
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

I have a car sound converter on mine, and I sometimes replace it with a Mac off-road pipe. You only really notice a sound difference at WOT. The car sound does very little to muffle the sound. I'd go that route before you put a glass pack there. I've heard LT1s with cats and GMMG, and it was loud. You can get a good highflow cat to keep the back pressure up.
Old 05-01-2017, 10:25 AM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
Griffin92rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Lufkin Texas
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 camaro rs
Engine: 3.1 v6
Transmission: 700r4
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

I just put a pipe in place, sounds great too. And didnt effect mpg at all. my low mpg is due to my in town driving... driving good tho its 19/25 city/hw.
Old 06-05-2017, 11:36 AM
  #15  
Junior Member
 
jay123's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 5.0 TBI
Transmission: T5
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

Im running a glasspack where the cat is usually located.. Take the cat off, throw it in the woods, put the glasspack in its place and then straight pipe the rest of the way. I have the same setup on my car and it sounds awesome!
Old 06-06-2017, 06:01 AM
  #16  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: DC Metro Area
Posts: 7,975
Received 83 Likes on 70 Posts
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

1- back pressure does nothing to make a car run better. You want as little back pressure as possible. Period. For the 2 or 3 of you that have said something like that in this thread QUIT REPEATING THAT STUPID ****!
2- modern cats don't produce significant back pressure at reasonable flows. Your typical modern (anything monolith based after the mid/early 80's) 3" cat will outflow most 3" performance mufflers.
3- cats deaden noise less than a glasspack, installing a glasspack will make a car quieter. A many glasspacks are also a bigger flow restriction than cats (it depends how the tube perforations are made and the core size- many glasspacks use louvered cores that are pretty restrictive and it's not uncommon for the core to neck down vs the inlet/outlet)
4- I haven't looked in a carsound box lately but unless they changed something they are just repackaged chevy truck cats. So are magnaflow. Dynomax are just Walker stock replacement cats...
Old 06-06-2017, 10:09 AM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
jay123's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 5.0 TBI
Transmission: T5
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

Back pressure really only comes into play with older carbed engines. Here in Canada, if you were to run straight pipes off of headers then the exhaust would not be able to retain enough heat to keep the gas from freezing as it enters the carb.

A glass pack will make the car quieter, but just enough that you don't get the cheesy crackle and backfire from a completely straight piped system. The perforations are there for a reason, they are designed this way to allow you to install it in what I call either Loud, or really loud format.. Says so right on the box. I am yet to see one that was smaller inside on one end than the other.

-------------air-------->>> //// baffle//// = Louder

------------ air--------->>> \\\\baffle\\\\ = quieter.\\


If you can leave the converter and mount the glasspack down the line from it that would be best as you will reduce your admissions and if you get rid of it you will notice a big increase on exhaust smell.

Last edited by jay123; 06-06-2017 at 10:10 AM. Reason: spelling
Old 06-06-2017, 08:20 PM
  #18  
Junior Member
 
VTSummit's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Vermont
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 GTA
Engine: 5.7
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

I have a flowmaster exhaust from the manifolds back. Originally had a test pip in place of the cat- so 3" w/mandrel bends the whole way back. Sounded mean, lots of burble on decel and sounded really obnoxious (in a good way) at full throttle.
Have to get it compliant again, so installed a Magnaflow high flow stainless cat. Killed a lot of the noise that I loved about the car. It's nowhere near as nasty sounding. I'm a law and order kinda guy, so I'm not going to run with an illegal setup- but I miss the sound.
Old 06-06-2017, 09:21 PM
  #19  
Supreme Member

 
redneckjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Spring Hill, Fl.
Posts: 2,080
Received 32 Likes on 26 Posts
Car: 87 iroc-z
Engine: 454
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

can always take the cat out and gut it, then re-install it so the smog police can see it in place. a long pipe and hammer work good to knock the honeycomb internals out.

for glasspacks i really like the summit house brand. they have a directional, spiral, louvered, center section. nice quality. theres a video showing the inside of them in the link; https://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-630820/overview/
Old 06-07-2017, 06:09 PM
  #20  
Junior Member
 
Camaro-3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

I hesitates too between a glasspack and a cat but not for the same reasons... The last owner installée a performance exhaust system on a shell i bought, but i installed a stock 305 in it. The car have short headers, with 2.25 duals, then 3 inch single to the muffler (probably a flow master), without a cat.

The engine sounds not so bad, but too loud and i dont want a ticket or wake up neighbours. I prefer not replacing the exhaust system, since its a Nice improvement in performance for a stock engine. But i really want to have like 5-10 décibels less if possible.

with a low budget, i hesitates between 3 choices (i keep the performance muffler and headers) :
-install the stock catalytic converter i have in the shelf
-install a 70$ new universal catalytic converter from summit
-install a long glasspack (no cat) and weld the 2 sides of an empty cat to this glasspack.

i have no emissions tests to pass. Which choice would be the quietest (at idle and part throttle) without losing too much power or gas mileage from now? Any advices on a particular type of cat or glasspack?

​​​​​​

Last edited by Camaro-3; 06-07-2017 at 06:13 PM.
Old 06-07-2017, 08:37 PM
  #21  
Supreme Member

 
redneckjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Spring Hill, Fl.
Posts: 2,080
Received 32 Likes on 26 Posts
Car: 87 iroc-z
Engine: 454
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

if your just looking to quiet the exhaust down, you can make or buy some exhaust baffle inserts. the good thing is, you pull them back out anytime you want it louder again.

Name:  2011-10-31_143021.jpg
Views: 7249
Size:  20.9 KB

Name:  2011-10-31_143104.jpg
Views: 7017
Size:  15.6 KB
Old 06-08-2017, 05:52 AM
  #22  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: DC Metro Area
Posts: 7,975
Received 83 Likes on 70 Posts
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

Originally Posted by jay123
Back pressure really only comes into play with older carbed engines. Here in Canada, if you were to run straight pipes off of headers then the exhaust would not be able to retain enough heat to keep the gas from freezing as it enters the carb.
That makes absolutely no sense. The freezing temp of gasoline (depending on blend) is somewhere between -50 and -97*F. I don't believe that anyplace in North America gets that cold regularly (Alberta's travel site says "They can drop as low as -30 to -40°C (-22 to -40°F) for short periods of time."). Even if that wasn't a problem what do exhaust temps have to do with gas freezing? You mention headers so I'm assuming that you're not talking about a stock manifold type heat stove. Even with all that, if you're talking about using a modified muscle car on the coldest winter night... well that seems more than a bit crazy.

Even then backpressure does nothing good for an engine. If you want it to maintain exhaust heat for some reason then don't put headers on it or if you do coat/wrap them.
Old 06-08-2017, 05:58 AM
  #23  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: DC Metro Area
Posts: 7,975
Received 83 Likes on 70 Posts
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?

Originally Posted by Camaro-3
I hesitates too between a glasspack and a cat but not for the same reasons... The last owner installée a performance exhaust system on a shell i bought, but i installed a stock 305 in it. The car have short headers, with 2.25 duals, then 3 inch single to the muffler (probably a flow master), without a cat.

The engine sounds not so bad, but too loud and i dont want a ticket or wake up neighbours. I prefer not replacing the exhaust system, since its a Nice improvement in performance for a stock engine. But i really want to have like 5-10 décibels less if possible.

with a low budget, i hesitates between 3 choices (i keep the performance muffler and headers) :
-install the stock catalytic converter i have in the shelf
-install a 70$ new universal catalytic converter from summit
-install a long glasspack (no cat) and weld the 2 sides of an empty cat to this glasspack.

i have no emissions tests to pass. Which choice would be the quietest (at idle and part throttle) without losing too much power or gas mileage from now? Any advices on a particular type of cat or glasspack?​​​​​
If it's a flowmaster muffler cut that off and replace it with something like a dynomax ultraflow welded (offset offset deadens noise more, offset center or center center flows more) and it will sound just slightly louder than stock and flow more than the flowmaster or with something like a dynomax super turbo and it will sound pretty close to stock and still probably flow more than the flowmaster, or even a stock 4th gen muffler will be much quieter (4th gens were quieter stock than 3rd gens) and still flow more than a flowmaster. Typically the bigger muffler case the more it will deaden sound and the more it will flow compared to a similar smaller cased muffler.

Of your choices, either a stock or aftermarket converter in good shape will deaden some sound and flow more than most glasspacks.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
64goatman
Cooling
2
09-09-2015 01:09 PM
89fast5oh
Exhaust
2
09-08-2015 09:55 AM
scottmoyer
Camaros for Sale
3
09-07-2015 07:06 PM
Vassago
Convertibles
15
09-04-2015 09:37 PM



Quick Reply: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.