Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: York, PA
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
Has anyone ever put a glasspack muffler in place of a cat converter before? I have a flowmaster exhaust, but just hate the cat it has. It eliminates so much of the sound the car has. How would it sound having glasspack in place of it? would it make it any louder?
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,650
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes
on
42 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
a new high flow cat will keep you legal, and eliminate the original, probably shot/plugged stock cat.
#3
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: 3.4L V6
Transmission: auto
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
2x on the new high flow cat. Mines shot to hell right now so ill be swaping it out sometime this week after the engine is back in it.
#4
Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Long Island,NY
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Bone stock 1989 Iroc T-Top,1991 Z28
Engine: 5.7, Carbed 383
Transmission: 700r4, T-56
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
If you're worried about sound, just replace the cat with a straight piece of pipe?
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manteca,California. Nor Cal.
Posts: 7,260
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: SOLD IT. Mopar guy only now.
Engine: gone
Transmission: gone
Axle/Gears: gone
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
Yes im a fan of the Carsound converterers too...for aftermarkets....other than that if you dont mind risking a fine you can run no converter and get all of that engines sound
#7
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Phx, AZ
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 87 Trans Am
Engine: 350 carb'd
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
What about back pressure? Eliminating the converter and replacing it with straight pipe you will lose significant back pressure and more than likely some power as well.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manteca,California. Nor Cal.
Posts: 7,260
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: SOLD IT. Mopar guy only now.
Engine: gone
Transmission: gone
Axle/Gears: gone
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
oh god...not this again. you DO NOT want backpressure. you want velocity.
#9
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
I actually did replace the cat with a glass pack on an 89 i had, and it had a flowmaster muffler. It made it A LOT QUIETER. If you want louder, go with a straight pipe.
#10
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Pennslyvania
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1984 camaro Z28
Engine: 355 SBC
Transmission: 700 r-4
Axle/Gears: Strange 3:73 posi
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
I went with the straight pipe . Living in Pa as well you will not get fined there is no one looking to bust ya , now living in California where from what i understand they have emissions check stops i wouldn't do it. I talked to my mechanic he said keep it under 5000 miles and he doesn't care talked to the owner of the exhaust shop that made my pipe and he said the person who gets in trouble is if a shop were to install the pipe , he followed that up with don't bring your car here I won't work on it like that.
#11
Supreme Member
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manteca,California. Nor Cal.
Posts: 7,260
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: SOLD IT. Mopar guy only now.
Engine: gone
Transmission: gone
Axle/Gears: gone
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
Yeah I could see California fining shops for not reporting a known problem with a car. Bad enough we "have" to check the tire pressure and adjust if out of specs.
#12
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
previous owner of my 97 tahoe replaced the cats with glass packs, and it runs horribly due to lacking o2 sensors, and back pressure. It sounds horrible and backfires like a shotgun at highway speeds. Also went from 13/17mpg to 8/10mpg. Absolute garbage idea in my opinion.
#13
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
I have a car sound converter on mine, and I sometimes replace it with a Mac off-road pipe. You only really notice a sound difference at WOT. The car sound does very little to muffle the sound. I'd go that route before you put a glass pack there. I've heard LT1s with cats and GMMG, and it was loud. You can get a good highflow cat to keep the back pressure up.
#14
Junior Member
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
I just put a pipe in place, sounds great too. And didnt effect mpg at all. my low mpg is due to my in town driving... driving good tho its 19/25 city/hw.
#15
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 5.0 TBI
Transmission: T5
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
Im running a glasspack where the cat is usually located.. Take the cat off, throw it in the woods, put the glasspack in its place and then straight pipe the rest of the way. I have the same setup on my car and it sounds awesome!
#16
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
1- back pressure does nothing to make a car run better. You want as little back pressure as possible. Period. For the 2 or 3 of you that have said something like that in this thread QUIT REPEATING THAT STUPID ****!
2- modern cats don't produce significant back pressure at reasonable flows. Your typical modern (anything monolith based after the mid/early 80's) 3" cat will outflow most 3" performance mufflers.
3- cats deaden noise less than a glasspack, installing a glasspack will make a car quieter. A many glasspacks are also a bigger flow restriction than cats (it depends how the tube perforations are made and the core size- many glasspacks use louvered cores that are pretty restrictive and it's not uncommon for the core to neck down vs the inlet/outlet)
4- I haven't looked in a carsound box lately but unless they changed something they are just repackaged chevy truck cats. So are magnaflow. Dynomax are just Walker stock replacement cats...
2- modern cats don't produce significant back pressure at reasonable flows. Your typical modern (anything monolith based after the mid/early 80's) 3" cat will outflow most 3" performance mufflers.
3- cats deaden noise less than a glasspack, installing a glasspack will make a car quieter. A many glasspacks are also a bigger flow restriction than cats (it depends how the tube perforations are made and the core size- many glasspacks use louvered cores that are pretty restrictive and it's not uncommon for the core to neck down vs the inlet/outlet)
4- I haven't looked in a carsound box lately but unless they changed something they are just repackaged chevy truck cats. So are magnaflow. Dynomax are just Walker stock replacement cats...
#17
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 5.0 TBI
Transmission: T5
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
Back pressure really only comes into play with older carbed engines. Here in Canada, if you were to run straight pipes off of headers then the exhaust would not be able to retain enough heat to keep the gas from freezing as it enters the carb.
A glass pack will make the car quieter, but just enough that you don't get the cheesy crackle and backfire from a completely straight piped system. The perforations are there for a reason, they are designed this way to allow you to install it in what I call either Loud, or really loud format.. Says so right on the box. I am yet to see one that was smaller inside on one end than the other.
-------------air-------->>> //// baffle//// = Louder
------------ air--------->>> \\\\baffle\\\\ = quieter.\\
If you can leave the converter and mount the glasspack down the line from it that would be best as you will reduce your admissions and if you get rid of it you will notice a big increase on exhaust smell.
A glass pack will make the car quieter, but just enough that you don't get the cheesy crackle and backfire from a completely straight piped system. The perforations are there for a reason, they are designed this way to allow you to install it in what I call either Loud, or really loud format.. Says so right on the box. I am yet to see one that was smaller inside on one end than the other.
-------------air-------->>> //// baffle//// = Louder
------------ air--------->>> \\\\baffle\\\\ = quieter.\\
If you can leave the converter and mount the glasspack down the line from it that would be best as you will reduce your admissions and if you get rid of it you will notice a big increase on exhaust smell.
Last edited by jay123; 06-06-2017 at 10:10 AM. Reason: spelling
#18
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Vermont
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 GTA
Engine: 5.7
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
I have a flowmaster exhaust from the manifolds back. Originally had a test pip in place of the cat- so 3" w/mandrel bends the whole way back. Sounded mean, lots of burble on decel and sounded really obnoxious (in a good way) at full throttle.
Have to get it compliant again, so installed a Magnaflow high flow stainless cat. Killed a lot of the noise that I loved about the car. It's nowhere near as nasty sounding. I'm a law and order kinda guy, so I'm not going to run with an illegal setup- but I miss the sound.
Have to get it compliant again, so installed a Magnaflow high flow stainless cat. Killed a lot of the noise that I loved about the car. It's nowhere near as nasty sounding. I'm a law and order kinda guy, so I'm not going to run with an illegal setup- but I miss the sound.
#19
Supreme Member
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
can always take the cat out and gut it, then re-install it so the smog police can see it in place. a long pipe and hammer work good to knock the honeycomb internals out.
for glasspacks i really like the summit house brand. they have a directional, spiral, louvered, center section. nice quality. theres a video showing the inside of them in the link; https://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-630820/overview/
for glasspacks i really like the summit house brand. they have a directional, spiral, louvered, center section. nice quality. theres a video showing the inside of them in the link; https://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-630820/overview/
#20
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
I hesitates too between a glasspack and a cat but not for the same reasons... The last owner installée a performance exhaust system on a shell i bought, but i installed a stock 305 in it. The car have short headers, with 2.25 duals, then 3 inch single to the muffler (probably a flow master), without a cat.
The engine sounds not so bad, but too loud and i dont want a ticket or wake up neighbours. I prefer not replacing the exhaust system, since its a Nice improvement in performance for a stock engine. But i really want to have like 5-10 décibels less if possible.
with a low budget, i hesitates between 3 choices (i keep the performance muffler and headers) :
-install the stock catalytic converter i have in the shelf
-install a 70$ new universal catalytic converter from summit
-install a long glasspack (no cat) and weld the 2 sides of an empty cat to this glasspack.
i have no emissions tests to pass. Which choice would be the quietest (at idle and part throttle) without losing too much power or gas mileage from now? Any advices on a particular type of cat or glasspack?
The engine sounds not so bad, but too loud and i dont want a ticket or wake up neighbours. I prefer not replacing the exhaust system, since its a Nice improvement in performance for a stock engine. But i really want to have like 5-10 décibels less if possible.
with a low budget, i hesitates between 3 choices (i keep the performance muffler and headers) :
-install the stock catalytic converter i have in the shelf
-install a 70$ new universal catalytic converter from summit
-install a long glasspack (no cat) and weld the 2 sides of an empty cat to this glasspack.
i have no emissions tests to pass. Which choice would be the quietest (at idle and part throttle) without losing too much power or gas mileage from now? Any advices on a particular type of cat or glasspack?
Last edited by Camaro-3; 06-07-2017 at 06:13 PM.
#21
Supreme Member
#22
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
Even then backpressure does nothing good for an engine. If you want it to maintain exhaust heat for some reason then don't put headers on it or if you do coat/wrap them.
#23
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Re: Glasspack in place of catalytic converter?
I hesitates too between a glasspack and a cat but not for the same reasons... The last owner installée a performance exhaust system on a shell i bought, but i installed a stock 305 in it. The car have short headers, with 2.25 duals, then 3 inch single to the muffler (probably a flow master), without a cat.
The engine sounds not so bad, but too loud and i dont want a ticket or wake up neighbours. I prefer not replacing the exhaust system, since its a Nice improvement in performance for a stock engine. But i really want to have like 5-10 décibels less if possible.
with a low budget, i hesitates between 3 choices (i keep the performance muffler and headers) :
-install the stock catalytic converter i have in the shelf
-install a 70$ new universal catalytic converter from summit
-install a long glasspack (no cat) and weld the 2 sides of an empty cat to this glasspack.
i have no emissions tests to pass. Which choice would be the quietest (at idle and part throttle) without losing too much power or gas mileage from now? Any advices on a particular type of cat or glasspack?
The engine sounds not so bad, but too loud and i dont want a ticket or wake up neighbours. I prefer not replacing the exhaust system, since its a Nice improvement in performance for a stock engine. But i really want to have like 5-10 décibels less if possible.
with a low budget, i hesitates between 3 choices (i keep the performance muffler and headers) :
-install the stock catalytic converter i have in the shelf
-install a 70$ new universal catalytic converter from summit
-install a long glasspack (no cat) and weld the 2 sides of an empty cat to this glasspack.
i have no emissions tests to pass. Which choice would be the quietest (at idle and part throttle) without losing too much power or gas mileage from now? Any advices on a particular type of cat or glasspack?
Of your choices, either a stock or aftermarket converter in good shape will deaden some sound and flow more than most glasspacks.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MikkoV
TPI
2
09-09-2015 04:25 PM