History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

Advice on 1982 Camaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2017, 08:29 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
AngusBoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Advice on 1982 Camaro

I’m in tw market for a third gen. My first car was a 1986 Camaro sports coupe and like a lot of people I want to get that cars again. I prefer the look of the sports coupes, I don’t like the ground effects but I want t-tops.

i Came across this ad for a 1982 sports coupe. It is a beautiful all original example. It has 80k and is fully loaded with power everything and t-tops. The owner is the original owner and he says the car has been garages it’s entire life and spent winters in jack stands. The guy is asking 2500.

do you guys think it’s a good deal and are there any downsides to the 82 year I should be aware of? Thanks in advance!

here is the ad
https://newjersey.craigslist.org/cto...323363555.html
Old 10-14-2017, 09:13 PM
  #2  
Moderator

 
scottmoyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,373
Received 167 Likes on 123 Posts
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Re: Advice on 1982 Camaro

The ONLY downside with '82 compared to the remaining 3rd gen years is there are a lot of one year only components. You CAN use parts across the entire 82-92 generation in the 1982 cars, but some factory original parts are hard to find. One example is the sill plate. It was a one year only part and if this car has cracked ones that you want to replace, good luck. Now, you can replace them with 83-92 sill plates, but you will also need to replace the seat belts, as they were designed differently in '82 and the mounting/retractor assembly ties into the sill plates.
Old 10-14-2017, 09:14 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
AngusBoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Advice on 1982 Camaro

Is 2500 a good deal for this car in your opinion?
Old 10-14-2017, 10:38 PM
  #4  
Moderator

 
scottmoyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,373
Received 167 Likes on 123 Posts
Car: 87 IROC-Z, 82 Pace Car
Re: Advice on 1982 Camaro

It's hard to tell with the few pictures provided. If it's in good shape, then yes. The question is, do you think it's worth $2500? If so, go get it.
Old 10-15-2017, 04:54 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
AngusBoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Advice on 1982 Camaro

That’s a good point. I’ll find out Tuesday when I check it out. I’ll keep you posted. Thanks for all your help!
Old 10-15-2017, 07:22 AM
  #6  
On Probation

 
sonjaab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Syracuse NY
Posts: 1,588
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Car: 84 Z-28
Engine: 305 HO
Transmission: r-700
Axle/Gears: 3:73
Re: Advice on 1982 Camaro

Looks good for a plain jane car. But it does have a v-8 and t-tops not to mention
a NJ rust free body and its dirt cheap at $2500 bucks.

Folks up here in rust land Syracuse NY would snap that car up in a minute!
Old 10-15-2017, 07:49 AM
  #7  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
AngusBoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Advice on 1982 Camaro

The only thing I’ve found out through research is that these cars didn’t come with the 700r4. Are the transmissions th200c a problem on the highway? Any worse or better than a th350?

Last edited by AngusBoom; 10-15-2017 at 10:13 AM.
Old 10-15-2017, 06:01 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

 
burnout88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,629
Received 17 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73
Re: Advice on 1982 Camaro

I would buy that car for $2,500. Assuming it is rust free. It looks like a nice Sport Coupe. You will not find another one in the northeast like that. You can probably get it for 2k.

My first camaro was an 85 Sport Coupe and I have a soft spot for the coupes also.

Last edited by burnout88; 10-15-2017 at 11:16 PM.
Old 10-15-2017, 07:58 PM
  #9  
Senior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
FormerL69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1982 Camaro Pace Car
Engine: LU5 Crossfire
Transmission: Auto
Re: Advice on 1982 Camaro

Originally Posted by scottmoyer
The ONLY downside with '82 compared to the remaining 3rd gen years is there are a lot of one year only components.
This.

You CAN use parts across the entire 82-92 generation in the 1982 cars, but some factory original parts are hard
I'll go with impossible here
to find. One example is the sill plate. It was a one year only part and if this car has cracked ones that you want to replace, good luck. Now, you can replace them with 83-92 sill plates, but you will also need to replace the seat belts, as they were designed differently in '82 and the mounting/retractor assembly ties into the sill plates.
And this. The interior plastics looked baked, which is typical for '82s, so I'd bet the sill plates are ready to disintegrate.

Nobody can tell you if the car is worth $2500 or not -- that is entirely up to you and what you want to do with it.

Since this is an east coast, t-top car IMHO the single most important thing you have to do is to make sure the body and floors are sound. My '82 only car had 62k on the clock and there was minor rust already creeping in to the t-top area. Look very, very, very closely at everything. The weather stripping in that area can hide a lot. Look under the car and see what things look like. You can't tear the car apart and good floors don't guarantee a rust free car, but it's a good place to start.

And remember, it's a 35 year old car, '82 was the first year and the quality of things back then was not exactly spectacular.

That said, I have an '82...
Old 10-15-2017, 10:47 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (58)
 
Drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Salina, KS
Posts: 20,309
Received 1,052 Likes on 748 Posts
Re: Advice on 1982 Camaro

Personally, having had an 83, 84, three 86s, an 87, an 89, and four 91s... I lean strongly toward 89-92 cars. Don't get me wrong, I love a Sport Coupe, I just hate the clunky way a lot of things are handled on early thirdgens. Even just comparing an 87 Sport Coupe to an 82, the 87 has a lot of advantages. Put two thirdgens in front of me, make one an 82, and the other a nearly identical 83, I'll take the 83 any day.
Old 10-15-2017, 11:19 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

 
burnout88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,629
Received 17 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73
Re: Advice on 1982 Camaro

82 also had a cast iron intake manifold compared to the aluminum one used on later LG4 motors. Makes 10 horse less with the cast iron intake.
Old 10-16-2017, 06:26 AM
  #12  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
AngusBoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Advice on 1982 Camaro

This is all great information. Thanks everyone. I’m gonna let you know how it goes.
Old 10-16-2017, 02:44 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member

 
navy02ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,208
Received 63 Likes on 52 Posts
Car: '02 T/A WS6, '91 T/A, '91 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1, LB9, L03
Transmission: T56, 700R4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 10 bolt, 2.73 10 bolts
Re: Advice on 1982 Camaro

Originally Posted by AngusBoom
The only thing I’ve found out through research is that these cars didn’t come with the 700r4. Are the transmissions th200c a problem on the highway? Any worse or better than a th350?


I wouldn't say they were a problem on the highway because of no overdrive, but I would say they're problematic transmissions in general. TH350s were MUCH more reliable, as was the 700R4.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22 PM.