Be Careful With Registration in MA
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New England
Posts: 2,406
Received 190 Likes
on
128 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC Z Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI (LB9)
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: G80 GU2
Be Careful With Registration in MA
Just bought myself a 6-speed Vette but this pertains to the history and originality of any classic car in MA or any other state that pulls this BS
First.. this car had a clean as a whistle Carfax and owned by the same guy since 1994 when it had 5000 miles.. Only has 34k now..
So the previous owner checked the wrong box on the title when they filled it out..
They entered the mileage where it says and says it is the “actual mileage to the best of my knowledge”
Underneath there are two boxes
-This mileage is accurate within excess of the mechanical limits
and
-This mileage is not accurate and does not reflect the actual mileage
So because he checked that first box they have to put the mileage as 99,999. Said it’s a legal document and the only way to correct it is to submit a correction form with a written explanation with the new title once it comes.. and a $25 fee
So even though he put the mileage where it says it is the ACTUAL mileage because he checked that confusing box the car has a blemish now
Also..
I got a great deal on the car... $3k-$4k below book value..
She looked up the car on NADA and grilled me on my purchase price and charged me $300 more in sales tax based on a HIGH book value.. I explained that KBB is actually much lower and closer to the market because there are a lot of these cars in good shape and they don’t sell.. she didn’t care..
So be aware car hunters and stay vigilant!
First.. this car had a clean as a whistle Carfax and owned by the same guy since 1994 when it had 5000 miles.. Only has 34k now..
So the previous owner checked the wrong box on the title when they filled it out..
They entered the mileage where it says and says it is the “actual mileage to the best of my knowledge”
Underneath there are two boxes
-This mileage is accurate within excess of the mechanical limits
and
-This mileage is not accurate and does not reflect the actual mileage
So because he checked that first box they have to put the mileage as 99,999. Said it’s a legal document and the only way to correct it is to submit a correction form with a written explanation with the new title once it comes.. and a $25 fee
So even though he put the mileage where it says it is the ACTUAL mileage because he checked that confusing box the car has a blemish now
Also..
I got a great deal on the car... $3k-$4k below book value..
She looked up the car on NADA and grilled me on my purchase price and charged me $300 more in sales tax based on a HIGH book value.. I explained that KBB is actually much lower and closer to the market because there are a lot of these cars in good shape and they don’t sell.. she didn’t care..
So be aware car hunters and stay vigilant!
#5
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New England
Posts: 2,406
Received 190 Likes
on
128 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC Z Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI (LB9)
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: G80 GU2
Re: Be Careful With Registry in MA
Well, I did a photo shoot with the IROC... so..
It’s a 1993 40th anniversary 6-speed.. Same owner for 25 years and only 34k.. underneath including exhaust looks brand new.. said it only got wet twice.. Stayed in a garage with a cover when not in use.. Paint looks great!
We hit it off and I told him he can come drive it to a cruise night and I’ll take the IROC.. He’s in his 70s and can’t get in anymore.. He came down quite a bit on price because he didn’t want it to end up at a dealer or getting flipped..
Its a blast to drive..
Great compliment to the IROC..
#6
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New England
Posts: 2,406
Received 190 Likes
on
128 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC Z Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI (LB9)
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: G80 GU2
Re: Be Careful With Registry in MA
Can’t wait to see what the “excise” tax is...
Trending Topics
#8
Member
iTrader: (4)
Re: Be Careful With Registry in MA
Very nice- looks mint! The sawblades, the ZF, the LT- rockin! Exactly what I’d love to get- a perfect compliment to a 700r4 IROC indeed. (With kiddies I keep an eye on 93/94 specifically for the no PS airbag.) I also believe the 93 got a bump in hp over the 92...
https://www.corvsport.com/1993-c4-corvette/
Annnnyway- how ‘bout those thirdgens?
https://www.corvsport.com/1993-c4-corvette/
Annnnyway- how ‘bout those thirdgens?
#9
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New England
Posts: 2,406
Received 190 Likes
on
128 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC Z Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI (LB9)
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: G80 GU2
Re: Be Careful With Registry in MA
Very nice- looks mint! The sawblades, the ZF, the LT- rockin! Exactly what I’d love to get- a perfect compliment to a 700r4 IROC indeed. (With kiddies I keep an eye on 93/94 specifically for the no PS airbag.) I also believe the 93 got a bump in hp over the 92...
https://www.corvsport.com/1993-c4-corvette/
Annnnyway- how ‘bout those thirdgens?
https://www.corvsport.com/1993-c4-corvette/
Annnnyway- how ‘bout those thirdgens?
Its pretty mint.. a few paint chips, scuffed leather on the driver seat, but paint looks amazing and wheels look brand new.. The guy would put a soft blanket under the cover because he thought the dust cover felt too rough.. It needs a new blower motor relay module and driver door ajar sensor but other than that it’s solid!
Thirdgen relevancy: I think the IROC turns more heads because the vette still looks newish and people see them a lot still..
Last edited by 88IROCvertZ; 06-07-2019 at 06:48 AM.
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: NJ
Posts: 4,345
Received 298 Likes
on
234 Posts
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: 4.8 LR4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt
Re: Be Careful With Registry in MA
Ironically, in Jersey, when I registered my 69 Suburban I checked both of those boxes, not actual miles and exceeded limits and they didn't put either on my title
#11
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: *member since 1999, I think - just can't remember my old name, and the big site crash...*
Posts: 1,199
Received 151 Likes
on
105 Posts
Car: 89 GTA ASC Conv., Prev: 89 GTA 6.3L
Engine: 5.7L L98 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 Automatic
Axle/Gears: 3.27:1 w/ JG1 Options:B2L, N10, U1A
Re: Be Careful With Registration in MA
I could NEVER live there, regardless.
But in this case, two issues, both independent of one another.
Issue #1. Seller made a mistake. Should have been corrected, but now can be corrected after the fact. Be glad that's possible.
Issue #2. Sales Tax. Massachusetts never met a tax it didn't like. You should have been able to show a bill of sale and be taxed on your "good deal", not the book value. It's a sales tax, right? Just thinking that's how these are typically collected.
But in this case, two issues, both independent of one another.
Issue #1. Seller made a mistake. Should have been corrected, but now can be corrected after the fact. Be glad that's possible.
Issue #2. Sales Tax. Massachusetts never met a tax it didn't like. You should have been able to show a bill of sale and be taxed on your "good deal", not the book value. It's a sales tax, right? Just thinking that's how these are typically collected.
#12
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: *member since 1999, I think - just can't remember my old name, and the big site crash...*
Posts: 1,199
Received 151 Likes
on
105 Posts
Car: 89 GTA ASC Conv., Prev: 89 GTA 6.3L
Engine: 5.7L L98 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 Automatic
Axle/Gears: 3.27:1 w/ JG1 Options:B2L, N10, U1A
Re: Be Careful With Registry in MA
Very nice- looks mint! The sawblades, the ZF, the LT- rockin! Exactly what I’d love to get- a perfect compliment to a 700r4 IROC indeed. (With kiddies I keep an eye on 93/94 specifically for the no PS airbag.) I also believe the 93 got a bump in hp over the 92...
https://www.corvsport.com/1993-c4-corvette/
Annnnyway- how ‘bout those thirdgens?
https://www.corvsport.com/1993-c4-corvette/
Annnnyway- how ‘bout those thirdgens?
1993 did not get a power bump over 1992. It was 300 hp. LT1 remained at 300 hp, all the way through 1996.
#13
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New England
Posts: 2,406
Received 190 Likes
on
128 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC Z Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI (LB9)
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: G80 GU2
Re: Be Careful With Registration in MA
I could NEVER live there, regardless.
But in this case, two issues, both independent of one another.
Issue #1. Seller made a mistake. Should have been corrected, but now can be corrected after the fact. Be glad that's possible.
Issue #2. Sales Tax. Massachusetts never met a tax it didn't like. You should have been able to show a bill of sale and be taxed on your "good deal", not the book value. It's a sales tax, right? Just thinking that's how these are typically collected.
But in this case, two issues, both independent of one another.
Issue #1. Seller made a mistake. Should have been corrected, but now can be corrected after the fact. Be glad that's possible.
Issue #2. Sales Tax. Massachusetts never met a tax it didn't like. You should have been able to show a bill of sale and be taxed on your "good deal", not the book value. It's a sales tax, right? Just thinking that's how these are typically collected.
#15
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New England
Posts: 2,406
Received 190 Likes
on
128 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC Z Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI (LB9)
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: G80 GU2
Re: Be Careful With Registration in MA
They went off NADA BTW which was $14k-$17k
KBB is $7500-$9900
I told her that but she said they go off NADA
KBB is $7500-$9900
I told her that but she said they go off NADA
#16
Moderator
Re: Be Careful With Registration in MA
If it was me, I would've asked for a supervisor and/or grabbed my paperwork and left.
Vehicle registration is based on the price paid. That's why it's called "sale's tax". You shouldn't be taxed on it's value during the sales tax portion. You get taxed on it's real value in an excise circumstance.
I just looked at the Mass law and it says that buying from a dealer is locked at 6.25%, but buying from a private party is the greater of either 6.25% or clean trade in book value. All I can say is WOW!.
Vehicle registration is based on the price paid. That's why it's called "sale's tax". You shouldn't be taxed on it's value during the sales tax portion. You get taxed on it's real value in an excise circumstance.
I just looked at the Mass law and it says that buying from a dealer is locked at 6.25%, but buying from a private party is the greater of either 6.25% or clean trade in book value. All I can say is WOW!.
#17
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New England
Posts: 2,406
Received 190 Likes
on
128 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC Z Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI (LB9)
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: G80 GU2
Re: Be Careful With Registration in MA
If it was me, I would've asked for a supervisor and/or grabbed my paperwork and left.
Vehicle registration is based on the price paid. That's why it's called "sale's tax". You shouldn't be taxed on it's value during the sales tax portion. You get taxed on it's real value in an excise circumstance.
I just looked at the Mass law and it says that buying from a dealer is locked at 6.25%, but buying from a private party is the greater of either 6.25% or clean trade in book value. All I can say is WOW!.
Vehicle registration is based on the price paid. That's why it's called "sale's tax". You shouldn't be taxed on it's value during the sales tax portion. You get taxed on it's real value in an excise circumstance.
I just looked at the Mass law and it says that buying from a dealer is locked at 6.25%, but buying from a private party is the greater of either 6.25% or clean trade in book value. All I can say is WOW!.
#18
Supreme Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: MICHIGAN
Posts: 4,637
Received 751 Likes
on
577 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: Be Careful With Registration in MA
I love the Vette. If I ever nuy one, it will be a 40th or 50th anniv. car in that color. Always loved it.
Had the same thing happen here in Michigan yeas ago. Chrysler that has been in our family since new, so we know the 38k miles is accurate. But they give me a title that says exceeds mechanical limits....which sucks. I asked about it, but on a digit odo, and a certain number of years, they mark them that way...or so I was told at the time.
Had the same thing happen here in Michigan yeas ago. Chrysler that has been in our family since new, so we know the 38k miles is accurate. But they give me a title that says exceeds mechanical limits....which sucks. I asked about it, but on a digit odo, and a certain number of years, they mark them that way...or so I was told at the time.
#19
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Georgetown TX
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Base 91 'bird
Engine: 3.1 v6
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.27 & PBR
Re: Be Careful With Registration in MA
CA, and not doubt some other states like MA, reserve the right to "impute" the tax they deem SHOULD be paid regardless of what was actually paid. I think it started with sell phones that were being given away if you signed up for the service. The state wasn't getting sales tax on the phones so they just taxed what you should have paid. I tried to register a car in CA that I was given so sales price was zero. Their system wouldn't even accept that but at least they accepted only $1. But that was a long time ago.
#20
Re: Be Careful With Registration in MA
Congratulations on the Vette. I also have a 93 and they are great cars and vastly underappreciated. I think you purchased it at the bottom or near the bottom of the depreciation curve. Good pick up!
Stinks on the tax thing though. I believe in Missouri they will accept the "good deal" price if you have a bill of sale signed by the seller and notarized. Otherwise they go by NADA also. Maybe that is an option where you live?
Stinks on the tax thing though. I believe in Missouri they will accept the "good deal" price if you have a bill of sale signed by the seller and notarized. Otherwise they go by NADA also. Maybe that is an option where you live?
#21
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New England
Posts: 2,406
Received 190 Likes
on
128 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC Z Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI (LB9)
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: G80 GU2
Re: Be Careful With Registration in MA
Congratulations on the Vette. I also have a 93 and they are great cars and vastly underappreciated. I think you purchased it at the bottom or near the bottom of the depreciation curve. Good pick up!
Stinks on the tax thing though. I believe in Missouri they will accept the "good deal" price if you have a bill of sale signed by the seller and notarized. Otherwise they go by NADA also. Maybe that is an option where you live?
Stinks on the tax thing though. I believe in Missouri they will accept the "good deal" price if you have a bill of sale signed by the seller and notarized. Otherwise they go by NADA also. Maybe that is an option where you live?
I definitely bought on a deep dip.. these cars are so under appreciated it’s not funny... 26 years old and feels like it has all the bells and whistles of my Tahoe LTZ except for navigation and Bluetooth.. I like that the car unlocks and locks when you walk near and away from it.. A few steps up from the Camaros in terms of fit and finish..
I should have walked out and got a notarized bill of sale but I had no idea how it worked and needed to get the car.. The car was 2 hours away so kind of a pain..
#22
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: *member since 1999, I think - just can't remember my old name, and the big site crash...*
Posts: 1,199
Received 151 Likes
on
105 Posts
Car: 89 GTA ASC Conv., Prev: 89 GTA 6.3L
Engine: 5.7L L98 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 Automatic
Axle/Gears: 3.27:1 w/ JG1 Options:B2L, N10, U1A
Re: Be Careful With Registration in MA
If it was me, I would've asked for a supervisor and/or grabbed my paperwork and left.
Vehicle registration is based on the price paid. That's why it's called "sale's tax". You shouldn't be taxed on it's value during the sales tax portion. You get taxed on it's real value in an excise circumstance.
I just looked at the Mass law and it says that buying from a dealer is locked at 6.25%, but buying from a private party is the greater of either 6.25% or clean trade in book value. All I can say is WOW!.
Vehicle registration is based on the price paid. That's why it's called "sale's tax". You shouldn't be taxed on it's value during the sales tax portion. You get taxed on it's real value in an excise circumstance.
I just looked at the Mass law and it says that buying from a dealer is locked at 6.25%, but buying from a private party is the greater of either 6.25% or clean trade in book value. All I can say is WOW!.
As mentioned, Massachusetts never met a tax it didn't love. Could never live there.
#23
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: *member since 1999, I think - just can't remember my old name, and the big site crash...*
Posts: 1,199
Received 151 Likes
on
105 Posts
Car: 89 GTA ASC Conv., Prev: 89 GTA 6.3L
Engine: 5.7L L98 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 Automatic
Axle/Gears: 3.27:1 w/ JG1 Options:B2L, N10, U1A
Re: Be Careful With Registration in MA
And here's why I'd never buy a vehicle from Taxachusetts:
Nonresidents Buying Motor Vehicles in Massachusetts
If a nonresident of Massachusetts buys a motor vehicle in Massachusetts and takes title to and/or possession of the vehicle in Massachusetts, the sale is subject to the Massachusetts sales/use tax, regardless of whether the nonresident intends to use the motor vehicle in or outside of Massachusetts.
#24
Member
iTrader: (4)
Re: Be Careful With Registration in MA
...a side benefit of this modification resulted in a small, but significant, increase in torque from 330 to 340 lbs/ft of torque at 3,600rpms.
You are correct sir. Been awhile since I browsed the various years.
6.25%? Up here in Big Government nanny state Canada the combined federal/provincial mandatory sales tax (dealer or private sale) is 13%! Don’t even get me started ... puts the difference between a $6K car and a $12k car in a whole new light.
You are correct sir. Been awhile since I browsed the various years.
6.25%? Up here in Big Government nanny state Canada the combined federal/provincial mandatory sales tax (dealer or private sale) is 13%! Don’t even get me started ... puts the difference between a $6K car and a $12k car in a whole new light.
#26
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New England
Posts: 2,406
Received 190 Likes
on
128 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC Z Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI (LB9)
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: G80 GU2
Re: Be Careful With Registration in MA
That’s crazy MA charges sales tax even for out of state folks buying a car in MA... doesn’t even make sense because they get you when you. Register the car, not when you buy it.
New Hampshire is sales tax free and when you buy a car in New Hampshire there’s no tax, but you get whacked when you go to get plates in MA..
SirReveller, all my Canadian friends use the term “Nanny State” when talking about Canada.. I mean you guys don’t even have freedom of speech up there! Comedians get fined by human rights councils for offending people.. Crazy. 13% Tax is pure robbery!
I also really really do not want to run a front plate on the Vette.. been getting away with it on the IROC.. could just say I took it off for a show and forgot to put it back on... oops! I use double sided tape for the IROC just for inspection and then pop it off.. They have cameras in the inspection bays now so the inspectors can’t throw you a bone anymore..
New Hampshire is sales tax free and when you buy a car in New Hampshire there’s no tax, but you get whacked when you go to get plates in MA..
SirReveller, all my Canadian friends use the term “Nanny State” when talking about Canada.. I mean you guys don’t even have freedom of speech up there! Comedians get fined by human rights councils for offending people.. Crazy. 13% Tax is pure robbery!
I also really really do not want to run a front plate on the Vette.. been getting away with it on the IROC.. could just say I took it off for a show and forgot to put it back on... oops! I use double sided tape for the IROC just for inspection and then pop it off.. They have cameras in the inspection bays now so the inspectors can’t throw you a bone anymore..
#28
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New England
Posts: 2,406
Received 190 Likes
on
128 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC Z Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI (LB9)
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: G80 GU2
Re: Be Careful With Registration in MA
I was looking at C5 Z06 vettes too but they go for double what I paid for a mint low mile C4
You can find a ZR1 C4 with 40k miles for close to the same price as a C5 Z06 with 90k miles
Good luck with the hunt.. hope you find a good deal.. I like the Z06 better than the regular C5... Really cool car with the hard top and 6-speed..
I love the C6 Z06 too but those are IROC prices.. LOL
#29
Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Amherst NH
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: Black 88 Iroc Convertable
Re: Be Careful With Registration in MA
Just bought myself a 6-speed Vette but this pertains to the history and originality of any classic car in MA or any other state that pulls this BS
First.. this car had a clean as a whistle Carfax and owned by the same guy since 1994 when it had 5000 miles.. Only has 34k now..
So the previous owner checked the wrong box on the title when they filled it out..
They entered the mileage where it says and says it is the “actual mileage to the best of my knowledge”
Underneath there are two boxes
-This mileage is accurate within excess of the mechanical limits
and
-This mileage is not accurate and does not reflect the actual mileage
So because he checked that first box they have to put the mileage as 99,999. Said it’s a legal document and the only way to correct it is to submit a correction form with a written explanation with the new title once it comes.. and a $25 fee
So even though he put the mileage where it says it is the ACTUAL mileage because he checked that confusing box the car has a blemish now
Also..
I got a great deal on the car... $3k-$4k below book value..
She looked up the car on NADA and grilled me on my purchase price and charged me $300 more in sales tax based on a HIGH book value.. I explained that KBB is actually much lower and closer to the market because there are a lot of these cars in good shape and they don’t sell.. she didn’t care..
So be aware car hunters and stay vigilant!
First.. this car had a clean as a whistle Carfax and owned by the same guy since 1994 when it had 5000 miles.. Only has 34k now..
So the previous owner checked the wrong box on the title when they filled it out..
They entered the mileage where it says and says it is the “actual mileage to the best of my knowledge”
Underneath there are two boxes
-This mileage is accurate within excess of the mechanical limits
and
-This mileage is not accurate and does not reflect the actual mileage
So because he checked that first box they have to put the mileage as 99,999. Said it’s a legal document and the only way to correct it is to submit a correction form with a written explanation with the new title once it comes.. and a $25 fee
So even though he put the mileage where it says it is the ACTUAL mileage because he checked that confusing box the car has a blemish now
Also..
I got a great deal on the car... $3k-$4k below book value..
She looked up the car on NADA and grilled me on my purchase price and charged me $300 more in sales tax based on a HIGH book value.. I explained that KBB is actually much lower and closer to the market because there are a lot of these cars in good shape and they don’t sell.. she didn’t care..
So be aware car hunters and stay vigilant!
Unfortunately they leave it up to the teller to decide if they charge you taxes based on the sale price or if they look up high book. Unfortunately in many peoples minds Corvette = expensive. If it had been a cavalier you would have been fine.
And as you said don't check anything on the title. I've had a seller (someone I knew) get a duplicate/replacement title and because they checked all the boxes and do it all over. DMV never told me about the correction sheet/fee.
There is also a way to avoid the taxes altogether. There is a little known form that states they gifted you the car. It has to be turned into the registery at the same time as the title. But it wont help the odometer issue
https://www.mass.gov/service-details...gift-transfers
https://www.mass.gov/files/documents...9/mvu-24_0.pdf
Read it carefully. Most answers are No. but some are yes.
#30
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
A warning to my fellow Taxachusetts residents !
If you buy a car that you don't intend to use for a while (more than about a month), say you buy a car and plan a couple of years long restoration on it for example, you MUST do a "Tax & Title" on that car right away when you buy it even if you don't actually register (get plates) on it. Why, you ask? Because after a month of owning it without paying the sales tax, the sales tax goes into a penalty mode , as in, the bastards add interest to the as yet unpaid sales tax and this interest multiplies monthly until you finally get around to tax, title, and registration, and that interest can be staggering if enough time has elapsed!
Now, I know the average car buyer wants to drive their car right away, and does the tax, title, and registration thing the minute they buy it. But us vintage car hobbyists may very well likely buy a car that they plan to restore first before driving it, as a good friend did with a 1960s Corvette without knowing about the sneaky little sales tax "gotcha", and the two years worth of interest on the unpaid sales tax was almost equal to what he paid for the car in the first place!
It's always a good idea to get the title in one's own name ASAP anyway when buying even a project car, to make sure there aren't any "oddities" with the seller's title/ownership of the car, and so doing a "Tax & Title" right away can and will save you boatloads of cash and insure that the car is really, dearly, and clearly yours BEFORE you go spending mad cash restoring it (To the Mass. RMV the car belongs to the titled owner they have on file, which technically ain't you till the tax & title have been done).
Sermon is over , go in peace ....
Now, I know the average car buyer wants to drive their car right away, and does the tax, title, and registration thing the minute they buy it. But us vintage car hobbyists may very well likely buy a car that they plan to restore first before driving it, as a good friend did with a 1960s Corvette without knowing about the sneaky little sales tax "gotcha", and the two years worth of interest on the unpaid sales tax was almost equal to what he paid for the car in the first place!
It's always a good idea to get the title in one's own name ASAP anyway when buying even a project car, to make sure there aren't any "oddities" with the seller's title/ownership of the car, and so doing a "Tax & Title" right away can and will save you boatloads of cash and insure that the car is really, dearly, and clearly yours BEFORE you go spending mad cash restoring it (To the Mass. RMV the car belongs to the titled owner they have on file, which technically ain't you till the tax & title have been done).
Sermon is over , go in peace ....
#31
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: *member since 1999, I think - just can't remember my old name, and the big site crash...*
Posts: 1,199
Received 151 Likes
on
105 Posts
Car: 89 GTA ASC Conv., Prev: 89 GTA 6.3L
Engine: 5.7L L98 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 Automatic
Axle/Gears: 3.27:1 w/ JG1 Options:B2L, N10, U1A
Re: Be Careful With Registration in MA
I just bought a Porsche for my wife and while many were in MA, I would not even entertain those. Ended up buying from a seller in FL and had shipped to my door. Now it could be argued that in MA, I didn't take "title" or possession in MA, so not subject to their laws on taxes, but not worth the challenges.
I did pay the 4% sales tax in my own state once I went to register/title it. But 4% isn't terrible when compared to many states in the nation.
#32
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New England
Posts: 2,406
Received 190 Likes
on
128 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC Z Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI (LB9)
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: G80 GU2
Re: A warning to my fellow Taxachusetts residents !
If you buy a car that you don't intend to use for a while (more than about a month), say you buy a car and plan a couple of years long restoration on it for example, you MUST do a "Tax & Title" on that car right away when you buy it even if you don't actually register (get plates) on it. Why, you ask? Because after a month of owning it without paying the sales tax, the sales tax goes into a penalty mode , as in, the bastards add interest to the as yet unpaid sales tax and this interest multiplies monthly until you finally get around to tax, title, and registration, and that interest can be staggering if enough time has elapsed!
Now, I know the average car buyer wants to drive their car right away, and does the tax, title, and registration thing the minute they buy it. But us vintage car hobbyists may very well likely buy a car that they plan to restore first before driving it, as a good friend did with a 1960s Corvette without knowing about the sneaky little sales tax "gotcha", and the two years worth of interest on the unpaid sales tax was almost equal to what he paid for the car in the first place!
It's always a good idea to get the title in one's own name ASAP anyway when buying even a project car, to make sure there aren't any "oddities" with the seller's title/ownership of the car, and so doing a "Tax & Title" right away can and will save you boatloads of cash and insure that the car is really, dearly, and clearly yours BEFORE you go spending mad cash restoring it (To the Mass. RMV the car belongs to the titled owner they have on file, which technically ain't you till the tax & title have been done).
Sermon is over , go in peace ....
Now, I know the average car buyer wants to drive their car right away, and does the tax, title, and registration thing the minute they buy it. But us vintage car hobbyists may very well likely buy a car that they plan to restore first before driving it, as a good friend did with a 1960s Corvette without knowing about the sneaky little sales tax "gotcha", and the two years worth of interest on the unpaid sales tax was almost equal to what he paid for the car in the first place!
It's always a good idea to get the title in one's own name ASAP anyway when buying even a project car, to make sure there aren't any "oddities" with the seller's title/ownership of the car, and so doing a "Tax & Title" right away can and will save you boatloads of cash and insure that the car is really, dearly, and clearly yours BEFORE you go spending mad cash restoring it (To the Mass. RMV the car belongs to the titled owner they have on file, which technically ain't you till the tax & title have been done).
Sermon is over , go in peace ....
#33
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New England
Posts: 2,406
Received 190 Likes
on
128 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC Z Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI (LB9)
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: G80 GU2
Re: Be Careful With Registration in MA
Update on this story from 4 years ago. In case any of this can help anybody where the DMV is holding your vehicle history hostage.
the recap: When I bought my Vette (this can pertain to an old Thirdgen) when I went to get the plates the DMV woman looked at the paperwork and said there was a box marked “I attest the odometer is correct winthin excess of mechanical limits”. She said that means the odometer is broken and the car mileage had to be changed to 99,999 or “True Mileage Unknown”. The line through the box was a different color ink and very faint I said it doesn’t look like a check mark to me and it’s a different color, I could rub it off. She said that would be against the law to change a legal document.
Two things transpired afterwards:
-I said you can’t charge me tax on the higher NADA value for a mint car and destroy the vehicle history based on an incorrect ink mark. Which she replied I could send in a form with a fee and a notarized signature to fix it. The previous owner would also have to sign.
-During the pandemic I wrote an email to the DMV saying how my business was shut down and there was a potential error on paperwork affecting the value of an appreciating asset I may have to sell. I sent copies of the Carfax showing all the inspection mileage adding up, the signed purchase and sale from the original owner, and the copy of the title signed by the original owner with no mark on that box. They never replied.
I had copies of everything because I decided not to pay cash for the car. I did a 1.9% loan through my credit union instead with 50% down. It was easy to do and the payments were very low. I always use cheap financing for everything and hold on to cash. Unfortunately that meant I wouldn’t know what the title would say until I paid it off.
I checked the Carfax during the pandemic and it looked fine. The first owner got it in 1994 with a few thousand miles. He had said it was a great deal but they sold it as a new car with warranty and everything. Assuming it was a dealer demo before that… No info on the first few thousand miles but after that all the mileage added up perfect with no issues. Looked promising!
I finally paid it off last week and got the title. It had the correct mileage and read “ACTUAL MILES”. Someone at the DMV took care of this and I’m super grateful!
persistence can beat the bureaucracy but be careful on all that paperwork for these old cars!
the recap: When I bought my Vette (this can pertain to an old Thirdgen) when I went to get the plates the DMV woman looked at the paperwork and said there was a box marked “I attest the odometer is correct winthin excess of mechanical limits”. She said that means the odometer is broken and the car mileage had to be changed to 99,999 or “True Mileage Unknown”. The line through the box was a different color ink and very faint I said it doesn’t look like a check mark to me and it’s a different color, I could rub it off. She said that would be against the law to change a legal document.
Two things transpired afterwards:
-I said you can’t charge me tax on the higher NADA value for a mint car and destroy the vehicle history based on an incorrect ink mark. Which she replied I could send in a form with a fee and a notarized signature to fix it. The previous owner would also have to sign.
-During the pandemic I wrote an email to the DMV saying how my business was shut down and there was a potential error on paperwork affecting the value of an appreciating asset I may have to sell. I sent copies of the Carfax showing all the inspection mileage adding up, the signed purchase and sale from the original owner, and the copy of the title signed by the original owner with no mark on that box. They never replied.
I had copies of everything because I decided not to pay cash for the car. I did a 1.9% loan through my credit union instead with 50% down. It was easy to do and the payments were very low. I always use cheap financing for everything and hold on to cash. Unfortunately that meant I wouldn’t know what the title would say until I paid it off.
I checked the Carfax during the pandemic and it looked fine. The first owner got it in 1994 with a few thousand miles. He had said it was a great deal but they sold it as a new car with warranty and everything. Assuming it was a dealer demo before that… No info on the first few thousand miles but after that all the mileage added up perfect with no issues. Looked promising!
I finally paid it off last week and got the title. It had the correct mileage and read “ACTUAL MILES”. Someone at the DMV took care of this and I’m super grateful!
persistence can beat the bureaucracy but be careful on all that paperwork for these old cars!
The following users liked this post:
ironwill (03-03-2023)
The following users liked this post:
88IROCvertZ (03-02-2023)
#35
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: New England
Posts: 2,406
Received 190 Likes
on
128 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC Z Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI (LB9)
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: G80 GU2
Re: Be Careful With Registration in MA
Based on my run-ins with the DMV in the past I did not expect this to work out. Even with the notarized correction…
I guess you always have to give it a shot and hope it finds a good person.
The following 2 users liked this post by 88IROCvertZ:
DynoDave43 (03-02-2023), ironwill (03-03-2023)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post