LTX and LSX Putting LT1s, LS1s, and their variants into Third Gens is becoming more popular. This board is for those who are doing and have done the swaps so they can discuss all of their technical aspects including repairs, swap info, and performance upgrades.

Weight Reduction- Need some numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2009 | 11:06 AM
  #1  
Ethan91's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 6.2L LS3 to come
Transmission: 4L60E LVL2 700rwhp
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Weight Reduction- Need some numbers

I'm trying to see how much weight I will be shedding after some changes made to my 92 Camaro Z28. I need help finding some some item's weight. Mainly LSX swap parts

Replacing the 350 TPI engine with an LS3 6.2L Crate Engine

Replacing The factory K member with spohn K member and engine mounts

Replacing the factory Crossmember with a spohn crossmember

What do the cloth front seats weigh?

How much weight do you think I would loose by running true duals, no cats, and flowmaster delta 40's versus the stock exhaust setup.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2009 | 12:13 PM
  #2  
Atilla the Fun's Avatar
On Probation
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 19
From: Northern Utah
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: Weight Reduction- Need some numbers

The LS3 is about 100 # lighter than your old SBC. If you care about weight, a 3.5" or 4" single exhaust is much lighter than 2.5" duals. The 4" definitely far outflows dual 2.5s, and is still as good a fit. A single 3.5" is actually a better fit than true duals.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2009 | 12:15 PM
  #3  
Shift06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 2
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1991 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LSX (swapping)
Transmission: 4L60E (swapping)
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Posi 10 Bolt
Re: Weight Reduction- Need some numbers

For the exhaust, you may not lose anything by running true duals, you'll probably gain weight from a complete extra pipe going to the back and another muffler.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2009 | 12:31 PM
  #4  
Ethan91's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 6.2L LS3 to come
Transmission: 4L60E LVL2 700rwhp
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Weight Reduction- Need some numbers

So would I get just as good or better performance by running a single 3.5" or 4"
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2009 | 01:02 PM
  #5  
Shift06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 807
Likes: 2
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1991 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LSX (swapping)
Transmission: 4L60E (swapping)
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Posi 10 Bolt
Re: Weight Reduction- Need some numbers

I've heard you can get just as good of performance from say a single 3.5" as opposed to dual 2.5" or something like that. I am not sure on the performance factor so much but there are plenty of threads in the exhaust section about this type of thing.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 10:02 AM
  #6  
techrunner's Avatar
Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Car: 91 Formula
Engine: lq4
Transmission: t-56
Re: Weight Reduction- Need some numbers

i haven't done the calcs to justify it yet, but as far as fluid dynamics, i think a 4" will flow 3-4 times as much as a 2.5", so about 1.5 - 2 times as much as 2.5" true duals. thats what i plan to run eventually when i get that far. and it sounds like it'll be a lot easier to route than true duals.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
28
Oct 24, 2025 02:00 PM
BrianChevy
Wheels and Tires
10
Aug 8, 2019 02:16 PM
3.8TransAM
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
1
Sep 27, 2015 08:37 PM
tcflint
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Sep 27, 2015 05:58 PM
Damon
Tech / General Engine
8
Sep 26, 2015 04:29 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58 PM.