Power Adders Getting a Supercharger or Turbocharger? Thinking about using Nitrous? All forced induction and N2O topics discussed here.

Anyone experiment with timing vs compression?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 09:52 PM
  #1  
anesthes's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,098
Likes: 126
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Anyone experiment with timing vs compression?

Curious if anyones experimented with what makes more power (at the same boost level).. More spark advance, or more static compression ?

Trying to figure out what would make more power. My S-trim on a 8.66:1 alum head motor with tons of timing, or a 9.5:1 alum head motor with less timing.

(10-12psi either way).


-- Joe
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 10:28 AM
  #2  
askulte's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 888
Likes: 6
From: West Hartford, CT
Car: '89 Z28tt
Engine: Dart Little M Twin Turbo
Transmission: T56
I'd say it depends on how much timing the head design needs. If it likes the most possible timing before detonation, then run low comp pistons and max out the timing. If it makes the most power at a lower timing setting, run the highest compression you can get away with.

Are the heads old school or a fast burn chamber design? Fast burn style generally requires less timing.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 12:12 PM
  #3  
anesthes's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,098
Likes: 126
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Originally posted by askulte
I'd say it depends on how much timing the head design needs. If it likes the most possible timing before detonation, then run low comp pistons and max out the timing. If it makes the most power at a lower timing setting, run the highest compression you can get away with.

Are the heads old school or a fast burn chamber design? Fast burn style generally requires less timing.
Hrmm.. Now that is truely a good question!

Here is a picture from summit. Any idea?
Attached Thumbnails Anyone experiment with timing vs compression?-tfs-30400002_w.jpg  
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 12:53 PM
  #4  
Damon's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 13
From: Philly, PA
Within the bounds of sanity, timing beats compression every time. If you have a motor with compression that's a little too low but can take full best-power spark advance it will make more power than a motor with a little too much compression that has to have the spark pulled back to stay out of detonation (all else being equal, obviously).
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 11:56 PM
  #5  
sleepybu's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
From: BC Canada
Car: 81Malibu
Engine: SBC 355
Transmission: TH400
Originally posted by anesthes
Hrmm.. Now that is truely a good question!

Here is a picture from summit. Any idea?
that would be a fast burn type
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
Sep 17, 2020 08:26 AM
demontransam89
Wheels and Tires
6
Dec 28, 2015 06:58 AM
gta90
TPI
40
Sep 15, 2015 04:00 PM
NWAsonoma
TBI
4
Aug 18, 2015 05:45 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:05 PM.