Third Generation F-Body Message Boards

Third Generation F-Body Message Boards (https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/)
-   Suspension and Chassis (https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/suspension-chassis/)
-   -   torque arm for straight line (https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/suspension-chassis/714217-torque-arm-straight-line.html)

krisner89 01-23-2015 08:57 PM

torque arm for straight line
 
Looking for a new setup. Looking at jegster's tunnel mounted and spohn's crossmember mounted. Both are adjustable. Is there any performance difference between the two? They both rid the car of having ta mounted to trans but is one style superior to the other.

400hp small block and 150 shot nitrous with 4.10 gears. Its being used as a street straight line car mainly. No auto-x, etc...

Night rider327 01-24-2015 12:32 AM

Re: torque arm for straight line
 
I have the Jegster one on my car. I like it, it works well for me.
It's a shorter arm so it hits the tires harder, pushes them into track surface more.

With Nitto 275/60-15's DR I pulled 1.60's 60' times with the jegster TQ arm. No track times on new engine setup, but shooting for 1.40's 60' times on MT 275/60-15 DR

plum92_camaro 01-24-2015 11:08 AM

Re: torque arm for straight line
 

Originally Posted by Night rider327 (Post 5869336)
a shorter arm so it hits the tires harder, pushes them into track surface more.

:yup:
Also good to get the torque arm off of the trans tail.

http://www.globalwest.net/1982-1983-...uspension.html

Look at the track pak arms at the bottom
http://www.bmrsuspension.com/?page=p...d=63&catid=190

the last two are shorter
http://umiperformance.com/catalog/in...ort=20a&page=2

krisner89 01-25-2015 08:11 AM

Re: torque arm for straight line
 
ok so the shorter arm tends to grip better. Thats what I'm after. thanks. Going to order the jegster's to match my jegs frame ties.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands