Third Generation F-Body Message Boards

Third Generation F-Body Message Boards (https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/)
-   Suspension and Chassis (https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/suspension-chassis/)
-   -   8.8 with UMI adjustable torque arm problems (https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/suspension-chassis/769588-8-8-umi-adjustable.html)

85Z28NOS 04-13-2020 12:32 PM

8.8 with UMI adjustable torque arm problems
 
I am having issues when trying to finish my 8.8 install that the UMI adjustable torque arm is hitting the trans tunnel and doesn't allow the rear to completely go to ride height. I am considering cutting the rear
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.thi...11ff1f8cda.jpg
mount to be able to use the second set of holes pre drilled from UMI to bring it inboard some. Has anyone else had issues when combining an aftermarket rear with an aftermarket torque arm

85Z28NOS 04-13-2020 03:10 PM

Re: 8.8 with UMI adjustable torque arm problems
 
UMI replied and said the inner bolts are for those situations where the arm sits to far outside and needs to be moved inward. going to cut off the outer bolt section and modify it to use the inner bolts
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.thi...e33c0035ef.jpg

85Z28NOS 04-13-2020 06:13 PM

Re: 8.8 with UMI adjustable torque arm problems
 
Finally is that with the outer holes machined off and contour matching original it fits tight and perfectly. Shout out to UMI for there quick reply and great parts. Guess other than the obvious would be to include the details of the extra bolt holes in the brochure they send in the kit but still kind of
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.thi...bb859a5513.jpg
obvious when you really look at it compared to the factory arm

//<86TA>\\ 04-17-2020 06:39 AM

Re: 8.8 with UMI adjustable torque arm problems
 
When dealing with aftermarket parts, modification is common. The 8.8 is a recent offering and I'm sure wasnt tested during development like the more common 9", 12 bolt and s60.

84 z28 04-18-2020 06:11 AM

Re: 8.8 with UMI adjustable torque arm problems
 
Was your rear end centered and do you have an adjustable panhard bar? Chances are thats your problem


Originally Posted by 85Z28NOS (Post 6365079)
I am having issues when trying to finish my 8.8 install that the UMI adjustable torque arm is hitting the trans tunnel and doesn't allow the rear to completely go to ride height. I am considering cutting the rear
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.thi...11ff1f8cda.jpg
mount to be able to use the second set of holes pre drilled from UMI to bring it inboard some. Has anyone else had issues when combining an aftermarket rear with an aftermarket torque arm


jdracer13 04-21-2020 01:04 PM

Re: 8.8 with UMI adjustable torque arm problems
 
If you measure the distance from center line of the pinion to the center of the bolt holes this can tell you how far the TQ has shifted to the drivers side. I can provide this measurement if need be. This is a common issue with most aftermarket rear differentials. I had similar issues when I installed the 8.8 I built with a modified Hiltsy mount. I did however adapt it to fit an SN95 housing since it was the correct width and the pinion was centered. I did end up masaging the floor some on my car since the TQ i had was rubbing with the factory rear. I have the Global West Track Link.

TORN 04-21-2020 02:08 PM

Re: 8.8 with UMI adjustable torque arm problems
 
I know I am not using either piece that you are. I too had to modify my founders mount to fit my ford 9 inch by cutting the mount to move to the most outter holes to move the mount inward to clear the tunnel.

85Z28NOS 05-09-2020 09:21 AM

Re: 8.8 with UMI adjustable torque arm problems
 
Most everyone I talked to with aftermarket rear ends have had to cut the mount to clear as UMI recommended. Once I did this and adjusted my panhard bar to center the rear again I didn't have any more fitment issues


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands