Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

1989 RS expectation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2017, 12:05 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Johnny Import's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Auburn LSD
1989 RS expectation

Car is a T-top, roll up windows, no A/C. My build took a detour, i was shooting for lq4 with t56. I now have a 1996 LT1 ported and polished heads and roller rockers, air foil and k&n cold air intake. I will convert it to Ls style coil packs. As for the rest of the car. Tubular k-member, adjustable tubular front lower control arms with coil over conversion 32mm sway bar, 14" rotors and 2010 Camaro calipers. At the rear 4th gen disc brake rear end 4.10 gears with auburn lsd, lower control arm relocation brackets adjustable torque arm, adjustable pan hard bar, 24mm sway bar. Koni yellows all four corners. 285/35-18 nitro 555R all four corners. Left to do is paint and body after all parts completed for test fitting, roll cage, computer management for fuel injection and buy a t56 trans. So the reason I post is to ask what should I expect. I am shooting for sub 14 second quarter mile and a car I could put on a road course or auto-x on weekends and be competitive. My friends drive and all say I should expect to walk on a 2012 GT mustang or 2014 SS Camaro. Being that I haven't driven one of these cars in 2 decades I am left thinking they have had too many beer. Assuming driving skills are equal how close will I be?

Last edited by Johnny Import; 03-24-2017 at 12:28 AM.
Old 03-24-2017, 08:30 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
fervernt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 firebird Formula 350
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: N/A, working on a t5 swap
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
Re: 1989 RS expectation

Mustang GT and Camaro SS both put out 400+ hp, the lt1 from 96 didn't put out quite 300 HP. You're friends are smoking crack lol. Not that it wouldn't be a blast to drive! Just, I don't think you'd stomp a newer 400+ hp car with it.
Old 03-24-2017, 09:19 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Johnny Import's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Auburn LSD
Re: 1989 RS expectation

That is what I thought, I am hoping for a fun car and think it will be. They are claiming that my car is significantly lighter and makes up for lack of power. I figure that with the swap the lt1 should be about 320ish flywheel horsepower no catalytic converters in a free flowing exhaust. I thought it might be closer after I do a cam. 1/4 mile I don't think I will be competitive. Auto-x or track maybe.

Last edited by Johnny Import; 03-24-2017 at 09:23 AM.
Old 03-24-2017, 09:26 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
fervernt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 firebird Formula 350
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: N/A, working on a t5 swap
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
Re: 1989 RS expectation

It might be a bit lighter, but stock these things are around 3200lbs. Only a few hundred less than the mustang or camaro. The hp number I gave you was for the stock 96 5.7L lt1. I don't know how much power you gain from the mods you've done.
Old 03-24-2017, 10:51 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Johnny Import's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Auburn LSD
Re: 1989 RS expectation

Yes I agree impossible to guess hp numbers hence the "ish" on my number. Anyway sounds like I am in the neighborhood and my beer drinking friends are out to lunch. Thanks for the input. Still a lot of work to do so should find out sometime next year how much fun it is to drive!
Old 03-24-2017, 05:13 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,464
Received 174 Likes on 152 Posts
Re: 1989 RS expectation

Originally Posted by Johnny Import
They are claiming that my car is significantly lighter and makes up for lack of power.
General rule of thumb when talking about an average 11 to 14 second car is that ten horsepower will net you a tenth in your 1/4 mile ET, and 100-lbs will also net you about a tenth in your 1/4 mile ET. So now knowing this, consider how much more power his engine is making than your engine, and then start considering how much both vehicles weigh...
Old 03-25-2017, 02:18 AM
  #7  
COTM Editor

iTrader: (22)
 
QwkTrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 0
Received 1,855 Likes on 1,270 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: 1989 RS expectation

With the 4.10 gear I think you'll do okay around town in the 0-50 mph range but you'll get walked in the 1/4 mile.
Old 03-25-2017, 08:29 AM
  #8  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Johnny Import's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Auburn LSD
Re: 1989 RS expectation

Why walked on in the 1/4? Is it simply not enough power? The 2014 SS Camaro which has the same gear spacing in the transmission that I will have runs a 3.90 rear differential. I do concede that the Camaro tire is 1" larger diameter.
Old 03-25-2017, 11:52 AM
  #9  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (16)
 
Street Lethal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC / NJ
Posts: 10,464
Received 174 Likes on 152 Posts
Re: 1989 RS expectation

Originally Posted by Johnny Import
Why walked on in the 1/4? Is it simply not enough power?
It is because of your lesser rate of acceleration, due to less power. More horsepower simply overcomes the load, so two identical, or close to, vehicles gearing wise, but the one that has one hundred more horsepower, will walk the other. RPM and final gear ratio (including tire size) equals your speed. When the tires bite, load immediately hits, more power will increase RPM more rapidly, whereas less power will take longer for the RPM to overcome. This is your rate of acceleration. More horsepower means he is getting to that speed before you, because more power overcomes the load, thus he will walk you. Gearing plays a part, but overall it comes down to horsepower, RPM and weight...
Old 03-25-2017, 02:28 PM
  #10  
COTM Editor

iTrader: (22)
 
QwkTrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 0
Received 1,855 Likes on 1,270 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: 1989 RS expectation

Originally Posted by Johnny Import
Why walked on in the 1/4? Is it simply not enough power?
Acceleration is caused by torque being applied to the ground by the tires. Once you hit 2nd gear the engine is spending all its time at high RPM going back and forth between shift points. That is where I think the Coyote and LS3 cars will walk away from you. If you want to be quicker in that scenario then you need to have more torque in the RPM range where the engine spends its time.
Old 03-25-2017, 11:24 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Johnny Import's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Auburn LSD
Re: 1989 RS expectation

Thanks! I really don't mind not being the fastest as there is always someone out there with more money. I think my car will be a blast to drive and you have re-assured me that what I thought was correct. Maybe in the future with a lt4 hot cam kit or something along those lines I will pick up some speed!
Old 03-26-2017, 12:49 AM
  #12  
COTM Editor

iTrader: (22)
 
QwkTrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 0
Received 1,855 Likes on 1,270 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: 1989 RS expectation

Yep, have fun with it. Going to be a huge upgrade over stock!
Old 03-26-2017, 09:37 PM
  #13  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Johnny Import's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Auburn LSD
Re: 1989 RS expectation



No engine so ride height a little high! Haven't done bodywork either.
Old 03-26-2017, 11:03 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

 
86White_T/A305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Canada,Ont
Posts: 2,209
Received 26 Likes on 20 Posts
Car: 1987 TransAm Ttop
Engine: 2005 LQ4
Transmission: Ls1 T56
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: 1989 RS expectation

try shedding some extra weight also if you can.Spare tire..back seats etc of things you dont need if your going to focus more on the track aspect of things.having the tubular setup helped you alot for weight already on the front end I bet. Do as many bolt on mods for power.Longtube headers..lighter pulleys..i think you can surprise them with a gutted car and full boltons and suspension with that gearing. Key thing will be nailing your launch at the drag strip and hold them off as long as you can and go down fighting.
The following users liked this post:
Johnny Import (06-22-2020)
Old 03-27-2017, 07:43 AM
  #15  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Johnny Import's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 26
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Auburn LSD
Re: 1989 RS expectation

Yes, I already have removed rear seats and belts. Also the spare tire and tool kit. Gained a little weight with the 4th gen front seats but I like them sooo much better! I plan on long tube headers to x pipe and running dual exhaust all the way back. The engine already has underdrive pulleys, the airfoil,k&n cold air intake, roller rockers on ported heads. Stock bottom end. When I install it i will delete MAF and tune it.

Last edited by Johnny Import; 03-27-2017 at 07:49 AM.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 AM.