Abnormal build, L69 T04E-57 trim.
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Preston, ID
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LG4
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Abnormal build, L69 T04E-57 trim.
Because the elevation makes 9.5:1 here equal to 8:1 at sea level, because the flat-top pistons help everything, compared to '76-'83 pistons, because the L69 cam has great specs for this, and because this plan is so affordable.
I'm waiting on stainless headers from EBay, but these aren't turbo headers, just shorties.
This is a non-emissions build, first with 416 heads, later 906 or 062. Blow through with n Edelbrock 1406.
The cam I ordered is Howards' copy of the L69, so slightly less advertised duration, (reduces overlap triangle, good for older-design turbos with more exhaust backpressure than boost pressure) but correct at 0.050", correct LSA, a hair more lift added, 5* too much advance, but I have a new Cloyes timing set with a 4* delay keyway.
I'm waiting on stainless headers from EBay, but these aren't turbo headers, just shorties.
This is a non-emissions build, first with 416 heads, later 906 or 062. Blow through with n Edelbrock 1406.
The cam I ordered is Howards' copy of the L69, so slightly less advertised duration, (reduces overlap triangle, good for older-design turbos with more exhaust backpressure than boost pressure) but correct at 0.050", correct LSA, a hair more lift added, 5* too much advance, but I have a new Cloyes timing set with a 4* delay keyway.
#2
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Preston, ID
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LG4
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Re: Abnormal build, L69 T04E-57 trim.
I have a Performer EGR manifold, so that needs to go. Holley or Weiand used to make a low profile single plane with a plenum divider, that's the one I'm thinking of trying.
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Re: Abnormal build, L69 T04E-57 trim.
Originally Posted by Jeremy85
I have a Performer EGR manifold, so that needs to go. Holley or Weiand used to make a low profile single plane with a plenum divider, that's the one I'm thinking of trying.
#5
Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: PA
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Camaro LT
Engine: 383 Twin Turbo - In progress
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: Abnormal build, L69 T04E-57 trim.
Try to get your hands on a used Holley/Weiand X-Celerator, or Edelbrock Torker II single plane. They're both low profile, and decent intakes. Can't believe they are still going for what they are brand new because they aren't the greatest of intakes, but they must still have a demand for them. What are your plans for fueling, and how much power are you looking to make...
The Weiand X-Celerator intake provides a lot of hood clearance. I'm running one now and with a stock hood there is a decent amount of room.
A single T04E seems very small though in my opinion if we're talking the EBay turbos. I have two of them laying around and they seem like they'd choke the engine out very fast if you don't run twins at least. I'm sure it'd spool almost instantly off idle but outside of that, I don't see much good coming out of running just a single. That's just my 2 cents.
#7
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Preston, ID
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LG4
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Re: Abnormal build, L69 T04E-57 trim.
I must admit to being a newb to adding a turbo to anything, but I have been studying, a lot. From my read of the compressor maps on the old Turbonetics website, the 4E-57 looks ideal to me, here's why; what I'm seeing is a snail that can feed 200-400 HP at 2 Bar at 70% efficiency. That equals 100-200 HP with no turbo. Then, since the elevation reduces air density, a 200 HP egine up here is a 225 HP engine at sea level. I've seen a dyno number for an L69 with a Comp DEH255 and a Performer 2101 making 225 at the flywheel.
From this it seems to me that a 4E-57 is as small as I'd want, but not too small. And at what RPM will my 305 start making 100 HP? Simple math suggests it should be below 2400, which I like the idea of. 200 HP by 2400 RPM sounds good to me.
My experiences with cammed engines haven't been good, I like an idle as smooth as new silk, and all the idle vacuum I can get, so a divided plenum is an absolute for me, however much HP it may cost.
An engine good for 21" of idle vacuum at sea level makes only 18" here, that's as big a loss as adding 30* of duration to a cam.
I'm pretty sure I have a chrome Holley mechanical fuel pump I can drill and tap to boost-reference, I need to order some Nitrophyl floats for a ThermoQuad.
From this it seems to me that a 4E-57 is as small as I'd want, but not too small. And at what RPM will my 305 start making 100 HP? Simple math suggests it should be below 2400, which I like the idea of. 200 HP by 2400 RPM sounds good to me.
My experiences with cammed engines haven't been good, I like an idle as smooth as new silk, and all the idle vacuum I can get, so a divided plenum is an absolute for me, however much HP it may cost.
An engine good for 21" of idle vacuum at sea level makes only 18" here, that's as big a loss as adding 30* of duration to a cam.
I'm pretty sure I have a chrome Holley mechanical fuel pump I can drill and tap to boost-reference, I need to order some Nitrophyl floats for a ThermoQuad.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: Abnormal build, L69 T04E-57 trim.
Compressor wheel likely could feed that level fine but i feel the turbine wheel is small for the cubes. It would run into some backpressure issues which is hard on motor thrust bearing.
I ran a t70 turbo on a rear mount stock LB9 tpi 305. 220-230 hp stock? Felt very slow stock. Even with that turbo at the rear bumper, it was making 2 psi half throttle or so. Front mounted with all that extra heat energy, it spool even quicker. That was a p trim 64/74 turbine and a 70 mm inducer comp. granted its way more compressor than you need, its pretty efficient to 500 hp. 7-8 psi boost REALLY wakes up a 305. Low 13's vs low 15's. 20 mph gain in 1/4. Turns it into a bolt on ls1
You can try the t04. Get the largest turbine housing made. If you can choose. Not sure whats available. .82 ar or bigger be nice if possible. That thing wil make instant boost. Run a big wastegate
I ran a t70 turbo on a rear mount stock LB9 tpi 305. 220-230 hp stock? Felt very slow stock. Even with that turbo at the rear bumper, it was making 2 psi half throttle or so. Front mounted with all that extra heat energy, it spool even quicker. That was a p trim 64/74 turbine and a 70 mm inducer comp. granted its way more compressor than you need, its pretty efficient to 500 hp. 7-8 psi boost REALLY wakes up a 305. Low 13's vs low 15's. 20 mph gain in 1/4. Turns it into a bolt on ls1
You can try the t04. Get the largest turbine housing made. If you can choose. Not sure whats available. .82 ar or bigger be nice if possible. That thing wil make instant boost. Run a big wastegate
#9
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Preston, ID
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LG4
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Re: Abnormal build, L69 T04E-57 trim.
Thanks, Orr!
It combines a T3 turbine with a T4 compressor, right? If so, shouldn't it be easy to use this compressor with a T4 turbine, do you know?
It combines a T3 turbine with a T4 compressor, right? If so, shouldn't it be easy to use this compressor with a T4 turbine, do you know?
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: Abnormal build, L69 T04E-57 trim.
I dont know if anyone is swapping turbine wheels with stuff like that. You can try to find whatever the largest t3/t4 compressor and turbine as possible and use it. One of the large trim stage 3 or whatevers. Likely wont rpm alot but could be enough to make you happy
#12
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: garage
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
Re: Abnormal build, L69 T04E-57 trim.
Compressor wheel likely could feed that level fine but i feel the turbine wheel is small for the cubes. It would run into some backpressure issues which is hard on motor thrust bearing.
I ran a t70 turbo on a rear mount stock LB9 tpi 305. 220-230 hp stock? Felt very slow stock. Even with that turbo at the rear bumper, it was making 2 psi half throttle or so. Front mounted with all that extra heat energy, it spool even quicker. That was a p trim 64/74 turbine and a 70 mm inducer comp. granted its way more compressor than you need, its pretty efficient to 500 hp. 7-8 psi boost REALLY wakes up a 305. Low 13's vs low 15's. 20 mph gain in 1/4. Turns it into a bolt on ls1
You can try the t04. Get the largest turbine housing made. If you can choose. Not sure whats available. .82 ar or bigger be nice if possible. That thing wil make instant boost. Run a big wastegate
I ran a t70 turbo on a rear mount stock LB9 tpi 305. 220-230 hp stock? Felt very slow stock. Even with that turbo at the rear bumper, it was making 2 psi half throttle or so. Front mounted with all that extra heat energy, it spool even quicker. That was a p trim 64/74 turbine and a 70 mm inducer comp. granted its way more compressor than you need, its pretty efficient to 500 hp. 7-8 psi boost REALLY wakes up a 305. Low 13's vs low 15's. 20 mph gain in 1/4. Turns it into a bolt on ls1
You can try the t04. Get the largest turbine housing made. If you can choose. Not sure whats available. .82 ar or bigger be nice if possible. That thing wil make instant boost. Run a big wastegate
#13
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Preston, ID
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LG4
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Re: Abnormal build, L69 T04E-57 trim.
Ok, CX Racing has something that might make a better starting point, it's a GT35, but unlike most other GT35s, it uses a T4 turbine for more exhaust flow, while still being a 0.68 a/r for quick spooling. And unlike most of the cheapest turbos, which are oil cooled only, this is also water cooled. It takes a 3" V-band.
I'm not finding anything closer to what you guys suggest without spending 3 times as much.
I'm not finding anything closer to what you guys suggest without spending 3 times as much.
#15
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Preston, ID
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LG4
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Re: Abnormal build, L69 T04E-57 trim.
#17
Senior Member
Re: Abnormal build, L69 T04E-57 trim.
small turbos spool quicker and give more acceleration and larger give more top speed. at least that's my limited understanding. so a small turbo is a lot of fun on a driver because it adds pep and a big turbo is fun is you have a place to go really fast.
#18
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Preston, ID
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LG4
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Re: Abnormal build, L69 T04E-57 trim.
Now, I'm on vacation for a week, so I can start on my 305. There's some disassembly to do to install the new Howards L69 cam, and since EGR doesn't play well with boost, I'm leaning toward a new Weiand 7547-1, which is an older design low profile single plane, much like a Torker 2 from Edelbrock. But I had the idea that it had slots for plenum divider plates, turns out those were for the 7546, which doesn't interest me at all. Maybe a Performer EPS would be a better match for my 416 heads and mild cam?
I'd be money ahead to just plug the EGR on a stock intake, but I'm willing to invest in a new manifold to rest easy about not having some cylinders running lean under boost. Too many good choices. Maybe it'd be best to run TPI on megasquirt control?
I'd be money ahead to just plug the EGR on a stock intake, but I'm willing to invest in a new manifold to rest easy about not having some cylinders running lean under boost. Too many good choices. Maybe it'd be best to run TPI on megasquirt control?
#19
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Preston, ID
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LG4
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Re: Abnormal build, L69 T04E-57 trim.
About 10 days ago I hurt my back, I'm not all better yet, but I'm working 4 hours per day, so I hope to have pics of progress soon. I've decided on a Weiand intake, because the Weiand is about a third of an inch shorter. I haven't ordered it yet.
DNA sent me the stainless shorties for a second gen Camaro, I sent them back for the third gen version, which may be the same item with a different sticker on the box, but the correct ones are about $7 more. That part didn't bother me.
I'm hoping to have it boosting by Halloween. Some years we have had several inches of snow by then, but we normally get some decent days in November.
If it doesn't break anything first, I'll consider it a success if it can spin both rear tires through second gear on cheap tires.
I don't want to break my 700R-4, which is already in and known good, but I'm not sure about attempting the 4L80E swap now.
DNA sent me the stainless shorties for a second gen Camaro, I sent them back for the third gen version, which may be the same item with a different sticker on the box, but the correct ones are about $7 more. That part didn't bother me.
I'm hoping to have it boosting by Halloween. Some years we have had several inches of snow by then, but we normally get some decent days in November.
If it doesn't break anything first, I'll consider it a success if it can spin both rear tires through second gear on cheap tires.
I don't want to break my 700R-4, which is already in and known good, but I'm not sure about attempting the 4L80E swap now.
Last edited by Jeremy85; 09-28-2017 at 03:39 PM.
#20
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Preston, ID
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LG4
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Re: Abnormal build, L69 T04E-57 trim.
It's the 8120 Street Warrior that I'll be trying.
Last edited by Jeremy85; 09-28-2017 at 03:38 PM.
#21
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Preston, ID
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LG4
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Re: Abnormal build, L69 T04E-57 trim.
I've been reading about overlap cams with turbos, there are so many different theories, but as I read about what guys are actually running, what they're happy with, what's easy to tune, the one trend that can't be denied is that there is such a thing as too much overlap with turbocharging.
I found a pair of 906 Vortecs I couldn't refuse. The truck ones with Inconel exhaust seats. I paid $90 for the pair, still assembled, no visible cracks even after wire brushing with solvent.
These supposedly have less exhaust flow, especially around 0.120" lift, but oh well.
I found a pair of 906 Vortecs I couldn't refuse. The truck ones with Inconel exhaust seats. I paid $90 for the pair, still assembled, no visible cracks even after wire brushing with solvent.
These supposedly have less exhaust flow, especially around 0.120" lift, but oh well.
Last edited by Jeremy85; 09-28-2017 at 03:37 PM.
#22
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Preston, ID
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LG4
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Re: Abnormal build, L69 T04E-57 trim.
No progress due to an embarrassing bout of unemployment I find difficult to admit to, but plenty of time to think, research, plan, dream, and prioritize.
I'm now employed again, for adequate pay, and unsurprisingly needing to catch up on delinquent bills before ordering speed parts.
However, I've made progress on what I have, and I have confirmed that I have flat tops, a non-GM cam, a double-roller timing set, no vacuum leaks, and no failing lifters or rocker studs in my 305, which is the original, and has no provisions for roller lifters but has the 1-piece rear main seal.
I'm not proceeding with the Howard's L69 cam, I'm trying the Melling 22135 retrofit hydraulic roller. 265/274, 206/214, 112, 470/490. It's ground on a 108 but I will start with it at 112.
My back is all better, but the 4L80E swap will wait until next summer, even if I break the 700R-4 before then.
I'm now employed again, for adequate pay, and unsurprisingly needing to catch up on delinquent bills before ordering speed parts.
However, I've made progress on what I have, and I have confirmed that I have flat tops, a non-GM cam, a double-roller timing set, no vacuum leaks, and no failing lifters or rocker studs in my 305, which is the original, and has no provisions for roller lifters but has the 1-piece rear main seal.
I'm not proceeding with the Howard's L69 cam, I'm trying the Melling 22135 retrofit hydraulic roller. 265/274, 206/214, 112, 470/490. It's ground on a 108 but I will start with it at 112.
My back is all better, but the 4L80E swap will wait until next summer, even if I break the 700R-4 before then.
Last edited by Jeremy85; 09-28-2017 at 03:41 PM.