Thirdgen vs other race car platform
#2
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,724
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Turbo Iroc - Round Four (Edit: Staying Gen1, new PT7675, heads, intake)
Bought a 04 Rubicon to tow behind the motorhome. After a transmission going bad on the first drive, clock spring and fuel pump failure in four months, plus having just put new wheels & tires on it, I've lost faith/interest in it. Also it sucks the gas down and I think I'm just getting too old to enjoy climbing in and out of it. Replaced with a 2010 CRV that can be flat towed.
-- Joe
#3
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,724
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Turbo Iroc - Round Four (Edit: Staying Gen1, new PT7675, heads, intake)
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: Turbo Iroc - Round Four (Edit: Staying Gen1, new PT7675, heads, intake)
Track car as in drag race track? Fox bodies sadly make the best platform imo. More suspension parts available that bolt on than any other car it seems. Very light. Can do some decent builds on them in the engine bay although i dont think its as roomy as a thirdgen or a early muscle car
Finding someones roller already done is the best thing you can do but takes time and you have to travel to get it
Finding someones roller already done is the best thing you can do but takes time and you have to travel to get it
#5
Re: Turbo Iroc - Round Four (Edit: Staying Gen1, new PT7675, heads, intake)
a third gen makes a great drag car, imo. a foxbody is 4-500 lbs lighter though. novas are light too but they are on leaf springs.
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: Turbo Iroc - Round Four (Edit: Staying Gen1, new PT7675, heads, intake)
Its not that hard to go 7’s in a thirdgen. Hell i was capable and i was 3750 lbs. remove some of the amenities like power steering, put on light brakes, etc drop 200-300 lbs and it would go with 1200 whp.
#7
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,724
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Turbo Iroc - Round Four (Edit: Staying Gen1, new PT7675, heads, intake)
Nothing wrong with full bodied cars, I'm just saying if I wanted a dedicated race platform that wasn't street driven I would have chosen a different build.
Do you drive yours on the street or just track?
-- Joe
Trending Topics
#8
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,724
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Turbo Iroc - Round Four (Edit: Staying Gen1, new PT7675, heads, intake)
I still don't get how you managed to run more than one pass without getting thrown out, they don't put up with that nonsense up here.
An actual NHRA legal competition vehicle needs a lot more safety than you had, chassis cert, etc to run those ET's:
Elapsed Time (ET) of 13.50 seconds or slower:
Page | 30
Snell 2010 (or newer) helmet mandatory for entries running 13.99 or quicker. Recommended for
entries running 14.00 or slower.
Hood, optional. Carburetors must be covered by flash shield or scoop
Drive shaft loop if equipped with slicks Battery hold-down
Radiator overflow can Seat belts
Neutral safety switch mandatory for all vehicles with an automatic transmission. If a manual
transmission vehicle was originally provided by the manufacturer with a clutch interlock switch
it must remain operational.
Arm restraints required on open body entries.
Check current NHRA Rule Book for additional requirements and specifications.
Elapsed Time (ET) of 11.50 - 13.49
Snell 2010 (or newer) helmet
Hood, optional. Carburetors must be covered by flash shield or scoop
Drive shaft loop if equipped with slicks Battery hold-down
Radiator overflow can Seat belts
Roll Bar or Roll Cage for convertibles - recommended for all others.
Window Net (vehicles equipped with a Roll Cage only)
Transmission shield/blanket meeting SFI Specification 4.1 if the vehicle uses a modified
transmission or special converter.
Neutral safety switch mandatory for all vehicles with an automatic transmission. If a manual
transmission vehicle was originally provided by the manufacturer with a clutch interlock switch
it must remain operational. Reverse lockout mandatory.
Arm restraints required on open body entries.
Screw-in valve stems for tubeless tires, front and rear, on vehicles running 11.99 or quicker;
unless OEM tire pressure monitor sensor is used.
Check current NHRA Rule Book for additional requirements and specifications.
Elapsed Time (ET) of 10.00 - 11.49
Snell 2010 (or newer) helmet
Fire Jacket meeting SFI 3.2A/1 Specification
Hood, optional. Carburetors must be covered by flash shield or scoop
Radiator overflow can.
Seat belts meeting SFI Specification 16.1 or 16.5 within 2 years expiration from date of
manufacture.
Drive shaft loop Battery hold-down
Harmonic Balancer meeting SFI 18.1 Specification (10.99 or quicker)
Properly secured fire extinguisher recommended
Aftermarket axles and axle retention devices (10.99 or quicker)
Roll Bar, except on Showroom Factory Stock street driven hardtop cars and trucks 2008 and
newer. (9.99 or 135 MPH and slower)
Convertibles, T-Tops and any car with modifications must comply with 11.49 rule, 13.49 for
convertibles.
Window Net (vehicles equipped with a Roll Cage only) Transmission shield/blanket meeting SFI
Specification 4.1.
Page | 31
Neutral safety switch mandatory for all vehicles with an automatic transmission. Reverse
lockout mandatory. If a manual transmission vehicle was originally provided by the
manufacturer with a clutch interlock switch it must remain operational.
Flywheel and clutch meeting SFI Spec 1.1 or 1.2 (2 disk maximum) or cars powered by rotary
engines 13.49 or quicker.
Flywheel shield meeting SFI Spec 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, or 9.1 required on all cars using a clutch. Cars with
rotary engines running 11.49 or quicker must be equipped with a flywheel shield made of ¼ inch
minimum-thickness steel plate surrounding the bellhousing 360 degrees extending 1 inch
forward and 1-inch rearward of the rotating clutch assembly; shield may not be notched or cut
in any way. Shield must be securely attached to frame or frame structure, may be multi-piece.
All rotary engine vehicles equipped with nitrous-oxide injection and/or turbo/supercharger
running 9.99 or quicker or 135 mph must use a flywheel shield labeled as meeting SFI Spec 6.1
or 9.1 minimum. Cars for which an SFI Spec 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, or 9.1 flywheel shield is not available
may use an SFI flywheel shield from another application bolted to a motor plate that is bolted to
the engine at all available bolt holes. See NHRA General Regulations 2:3, 2:5, 2:6, 2: 10.
All vehicles running 10.99 or quicker must use a lower engine oil retention device.
Arm Restraints required on all open bodied cars
Metal screw-in valve stems unless OEM tire pressure monitor sensor is used.
Check current NHRA Rule Book for additional requirements and specifications.
Elapsed Time (ET) of 7.00 - 9.99
NHRA Class 3 Competition License required for all drivers running an ET of 6.00 - 7.49 seconds,
(ET/MX 7.50-9.99), an NHRA Class
4 Competition License when running 7.50 9.99, (Snowmobile -
ATV 7.50-9.99)
Drive shaft loop
Fire system (7.49 or quicker) Flywheel shield mandatory
Harmonic Balancer meeting SFI 18.1 Specifications
Snell 2010 Full-face (or newer) helmet. Goggles prohibited. Parachute required for all cars
running over 150 MPH
Two parachutes required for all cars running over 200 MPH
Jacket and pants for all cars, must meet SFI 3.2A-5 Specifications and gloves meeting SFI 3.3/1
specifications.
Roll cage mandatory for all cars running 9.99 seconds or quicker.
Chassis Certification mandatory for all entries running 9.99 seconds or quicker.
Seat belt meeting SFI 16.1 specifications within 2-year expiration from date of manufacture.
All vehicles must use a lower engine oil retention device. Flexplate meeting SFI 29.1
specifications.
Flexplate shield meeting SFI 30.1 specifications. SFI 4.1 transmission blanket
Supercharger strap meeting SFI 14.1 specifications on Roots type when alcohol is used as fuel.
Neck collar meeting SFI 3.3 specifications. Head and neck restraint system meeting SFI 38.1
mandatory on any car running 200 MPH or faster or running 7.49 or quicker.
Arm Restraints meeting SFI 3.3 specifications (11.99 or quicker) on open bodied entries.
Check current NHRA Rule Book for additional requirements and specifications.
Even my slow-*** lame supercharged thirdgen should really have aftermarket axles, c-clip eleminators, a roll bar, SFI belts, an engine diaper, and a transmission shield. (in addition to the SFI balancer, SFI flexplate, driveshaft loop, screw in valve steps that I already have) just to run faster than 11.00..
And once you put a bar and SFI belts in it, it's potentially dangerous on the street (unless you wear a helmet all the time).
-- Joe
#9
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: Turbo Iroc - Round Four (Edit: Staying Gen1, new PT7675, heads, intake)
Safety has absolutely nothing to do with the discussion of whats a better drag platform or discussing how hard it is to go 7’s in a car. Making power is fairly easy these days
Get off that soap box who cares what my track allowed me to do.
Get off that soap box who cares what my track allowed me to do.
#10
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,724
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Turbo Iroc - Round Four (Edit: Staying Gen1, new PT7675, heads, intake)
Any idiot can stick a 1200+ hp motor in a car and flog it until it explodes. Building an NHRA legal 7 second thirdgen isn't "easy" or cheap, and you haven't done it.
-- Joe
#11
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: Turbo Iroc - Round Four (Edit: Staying Gen1, new PT7675, heads, intake)
Only thing my car was missing was the 25.5 cage which basically was few bars away as mine was 8 pt. 25.5 is a 10 pt style with a few floor bars and a funny car halo.
A cage is not hard to build just expensive. 6grand plus for a 25.5
Besides that, a window net. And a fire suit which has nothing to do withthe car itself. I had a helmet and fire jacket but not the pants.
Everything else on my car is legal. If you ever built anything other than boring bolt on cars you would know most parts are already sfi legal. I had the balancer flexplate trans shield etc
But nice try
#14
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
10 Posts
Car: 1979 Malibu
Engine: Blown LSx
Transmission: T56 Magnum
Axle/Gears: 9"/wavetrac/35's/3.70
Re: Turbo Iroc - Round Four (Edit: Staying Gen1, new PT7675, heads, intake)
And what exactly have you done other than flap your **** sucker on the internet on **** you know little to nothing about??? When was the last time your car even left the garage? It boggles my f***ing mind that your still a moderator. You're a f***ing joke. You're half the reason the power adder section is such a joke here, combined with street lethal and Project89(who thank god has stopped posting permanently it seems) this place is a joke.
#15
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,724
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Turbo Iroc - Round Four (Edit: Staying Gen1, new PT7675, heads, intake)
You are clueless and mistaken
Only thing my car was missing was the 25.5 cage which basically was few bars away as mine was 8 pt. 25.5 is a 10 pt style with a few floor bars and a funny car halo.
A cage is not hard to build just expensive. 6grand plus for a 25.5
Besides that, a window net. And a fire suit which has nothing to do withthe car itself. I had a helmet and fire jacket but not the pants.
Everything else on my car is legal. If you ever built anything other than boring bolt on cars you would know most parts are already sfi legal. I had the balancer flexplate trans shield etc
But nice try
Only thing my car was missing was the 25.5 cage which basically was few bars away as mine was 8 pt. 25.5 is a 10 pt style with a few floor bars and a funny car halo.
A cage is not hard to build just expensive. 6grand plus for a 25.5
Besides that, a window net. And a fire suit which has nothing to do withthe car itself. I had a helmet and fire jacket but not the pants.
Everything else on my car is legal. If you ever built anything other than boring bolt on cars you would know most parts are already sfi legal. I had the balancer flexplate trans shield etc
But nice try
Your car wasn't legal. We've discussed it in great detail. Get over it. It was good for 11.00.
You built a cool motor, until it blew up. Maybe your next build will be cooler. I hope you invest in the safety and actually make it a legal car. Then you can continue telling people how easy it was.
I remember when you first joined here, asking all the rookie questions, trying to build a 300hp TPI. You were actually humble and eager to learn. Your short-lived twin turbo car really inflated your ego. Which is unfortunate, because you had potential to be a good contributor. I've run out of excuses for your behavior, and won't stick up for you any more.
-- Joe
#16
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,724
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Turbo Iroc - Round Four (Edit: Staying Gen1, new PT7675, heads, intake)
3 days ago.
It boggles my f***ing mind that your still a moderator. You're a f***ing joke. You're half the reason the power adder section is such a joke here, combined with street lethal and Project89(who thank god has stopped posting permanently it seems) this place is a joke.
P.s, I think you just violated a few forum rules. Good job, as usual.
-- Joe
#17
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: Turbo Iroc - Round Four (Edit: Staying Gen1, new PT7675, heads, intake)
Bolt on? lol. What have I ever just bolted on?
Your car wasn't legal. We've discussed it in great detail. Get over it. It was good for 11.00.
You built a cool motor, until it blew up. Maybe your next build will be cooler. I hope you invest in the safety and actually make it a legal car. Then you can continue telling people how easy it was.
I remember when you first joined here, asking all the rookie questions, trying to build a 300hp TPI. You were actually humble and eager to learn. Your short-lived twin turbo car really inflated your ego. Which is unfortunate, because you had potential to be a good contributor. I've run out of excuses for your behavior, and won't stick up for you any more.
-- Joe
Your car wasn't legal. We've discussed it in great detail. Get over it. It was good for 11.00.
You built a cool motor, until it blew up. Maybe your next build will be cooler. I hope you invest in the safety and actually make it a legal car. Then you can continue telling people how easy it was.
I remember when you first joined here, asking all the rookie questions, trying to build a 300hp TPI. You were actually humble and eager to learn. Your short-lived twin turbo car really inflated your ego. Which is unfortunate, because you had potential to be a good contributor. I've run out of excuses for your behavior, and won't stick up for you any more.
-- Joe
Second my turbo blew up not the motor. Motor still ran when i tore down to inspect. Get your facts straight. It ingesting compressor blades and chewed up pistons but was not catastrophic. I did stress the motor as the parts were meant for 800 hp not 1300+. Slightly bent crank and rod ends but other than that it still went 8.2’s like that. Healthy it would have gone 8.0-8.1’s. It went 8.26 coasting after the 1000 ft
I sold all the motor parts except the pistons and rods because its not worth resizing the rods for someone with the price of rods today
Thirdly my behavior is only a problem with you! You are the only one I consistently have issues with and every one else knows it. I see thru your bs and call it for what its worth. I dont need or want you to stick up for me or whatever the hell that means
I have helped more ppl on this forum than most and my post count reflects that. My threads have more views than most. There is a reason for that
And lastly, yes my first years on here i was a rookie. It was 03 and i was 18! For crying out loud. You want to hold that above me to make you seem like an almighty? Gtfo. I can find some of your early posts i am sure...
I am 33 now and have done more than most, and surround my self with others who have done the same and more. I have learned a lot in those years since buying this car. Follow my build posts i went from high 12’s to 8’s in 7 yrs. whats your resume look like? I dont see the threads
#18
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,724
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Turbo Iroc - Round Four (Edit: Staying Gen1, new PT7675, heads, intake)
I have 1 third gen, and I don't think it's a surprise to anyone that I'm really not that "into it". I'm surely not claiming it's anything other than a street legal car that cannot legally go faster than 11.49.
I'm glad that your threads get views. Like I said, I hope your new build goes 7's and passes tech. Then you can tell us all how you did it, how cheap and easy it was, etc.
-- Joe
#19
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
10 Posts
Car: 1979 Malibu
Engine: Blown LSx
Transmission: T56 Magnum
Axle/Gears: 9"/wavetrac/35's/3.70
Re: Turbo Iroc - Round Four (Edit: Staying Gen1, new PT7675, heads, intake)
Really? A few years ago? I think you have me mistaken with someone else you goof.
#21
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,724
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Turbo Iroc - Round Four (Edit: Staying Gen1, new PT7675, heads, intake)
Do whatever you think is right, Justin. Maybe you can ask the admins for your own forum? Maybe an all turbos only forum. I promise I won't subscribe to it.
I'm 100% serious. If you, Charlie, Rob, and whoever else want to split the turbo stuff off to it's own forum and run it, I'll endorse that 100% with the admins. I'll never visit it either, so you don't have to worry about having to "call out my BS".
-- Joe
I'm 100% serious. If you, Charlie, Rob, and whoever else want to split the turbo stuff off to it's own forum and run it, I'll endorse that 100% with the admins. I'll never visit it either, so you don't have to worry about having to "call out my BS".
-- Joe
#23
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,724
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Thirdgen vs other race car platform
-- Joe
#24
Re: Thirdgen vs other race car platform
as already said a few times, 7's are pretty much a 25.5 away. the other safety stuff is no big deal. albeit costly.
a 25.5 third gen can be sub 3,000lb. no problem, and you can still run the stock style suspension front and rear, no need to back half it.
building a tube chassis car vs a 25.5 is many thousands of dollars difference. if i built a tube chassis car i would probably shoot for faster than 7's.
from a safety standpoint, a 7 second car that is missing a couple of bars may not cert, but it still runs 7's. is it dangerous? maybe... or maybe not. only way to know for sure would be to wreck the car. know what comes loose most of the time in dragstrip crashes? the seat.
a 25.5 third gen can be sub 3,000lb. no problem, and you can still run the stock style suspension front and rear, no need to back half it.
building a tube chassis car vs a 25.5 is many thousands of dollars difference. if i built a tube chassis car i would probably shoot for faster than 7's.
from a safety standpoint, a 7 second car that is missing a couple of bars may not cert, but it still runs 7's. is it dangerous? maybe... or maybe not. only way to know for sure would be to wreck the car. know what comes loose most of the time in dragstrip crashes? the seat.
#25
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: Thirdgen vs other race car platform
Right, but its alot of work to make thirdgens light with the full 25 spec cages. Foxes seem to have an advantage off the bat so they get used more
But like i said earlier they just have more available bolt in parts. Suspension tuning wise they are well known and easier to dial in from the beginning imo.
But both can be stock style suspension and small tire. Nothing fancy out back is needed
And yes anything wrecking at 170+ mph is not gonna be that safe. Lol i sure dont want to experience it. Happened to a friend of mine and his cage saved him but still a rough ride.
A tube car thats 2600 lbs or so would be awesome and easy to make fast and reliable. But expensive. Thats why its best at that point to buy someones project or done race car roller as long as it checks out right and meets spec. Save thousands
But like i said earlier they just have more available bolt in parts. Suspension tuning wise they are well known and easier to dial in from the beginning imo.
But both can be stock style suspension and small tire. Nothing fancy out back is needed
And yes anything wrecking at 170+ mph is not gonna be that safe. Lol i sure dont want to experience it. Happened to a friend of mine and his cage saved him but still a rough ride.
A tube car thats 2600 lbs or so would be awesome and easy to make fast and reliable. But expensive. Thats why its best at that point to buy someones project or done race car roller as long as it checks out right and meets spec. Save thousands
#27
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Re: Turbo Iroc - Round Four (Edit: Staying Gen1, new PT7675, heads, intake)
Originally Posted by 1986Z28OWNER
And what exactly have you done other than flap your **** sucker on the internet on **** you know little to nothing about??? When was the last time your car even left the garage? It boggles my f***ing mind that your still a moderator. You're a f***ing joke. You're half the reason the power adder section is such a joke here, combined with street lethal and Project89(who thank god has stopped posting permanently it seems) this place is a joke.
One look and you'll hear those inbred banjo's playing in the background. Gay AF..
#28
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: Thirdgen vs other race car platform
I think this calls for a steel cage match between anesthes and 1986Z28OWNER at Wrestlemania, Street Lethal will be special guest referee.
Last edited by TylerSteez; 04-20-2018 at 07:54 PM. Reason: accidentally said orr89rocz instead of 1986z28owner
#29
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Re: Thirdgen vs other race car platform
Joe and Justin are friends, they just butt heads every now and then, but yeah, I think they should line up and get it over with and then maybe have a beer afterwards. Diggler you can learn a lot from, solid member, straight shooter. My build is nothing special whatsoever, never said it was so I'm not sure why it's being targeted by some people. Charles on the other hand is a freaking idiot lol. Think of Justin Trudeau wearing his gay socks driving in a twin turbo Camaro, boom, that is Charles lol. Dude is lucky I don't put what I have on him on the dark web, about ready to though, just feel bad for his family...
#30
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,724
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Turbo Iroc - Round Four (Edit: Staying Gen1, new PT7675, heads, intake)
Alternatively, he could have responded in detail explaining exactly what needs to be done to build a 7 second nhra legal car, including part numbers and costs. Or he could swear, pound his chest and tell everyone how amazing he is.
If this was a competition of who had the fastest car, I'd just buy one.. I do this because I like tinkering with stuff, And I usually spend more money making something than I would have just buying the stuff. But it's fun to me.
-- Joe
#31
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,724
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Thirdgen vs other race car platform
Joe and Justin are friends, they just butt heads every now and then, but yeah, I think they should line up and get it over with and then maybe have a beer afterwards. Diggler you can learn a lot from, solid member, straight shooter. My build is nothing special whatsoever, never said it was so I'm not sure why it's being targeted by some people. Charles on the other hand is a freaking idiot lol. Think of Justin Trudeau wearing his gay socks driving in a twin turbo Camaro, boom, that is Charles lol. Dude is lucky I don't put what I have on him on the dark web, about ready to though, just feel bad for his family...
Actually, I was thinking of that red Ferrari I saw at the exotic car dealer down the street yesterday. Ugh. I have no self control.
-- Joe
#32
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Re: Thirdgen vs other race car platform
Believe me, I've held back, and will continue to hold back Joe. It'd be too easy. But yeah, he's just a little kid who contributes nothing, runs a twin turbo Camaro that he expects everyone to worship because of a number that it runs, but because of his attitude he gets the exact opposite. Right hand is definitely way stronger than his left, no doubt lol. It's what we call in the land of Capitalism dead wood. I myself don't bother with him anymore, but he felt it necessary to add my User ID to his little baby rant. Talk is cheap though Charles, I have a few friends who will wipe the floor with your Camaro running four less cylinders than you...
- Rob
- Rob
#33
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Re: Thirdgen vs other race car platform
Anyways, to comment on this subject matter, I can't believe some of you are still arguing this stuff. Integra's and Civic's were never meant to run that fast, yet I know of quite a few local one's trapping close to 200-mph, and there is no aftermarket for that, it's all shop built. Would imagine a strong and solid check book could turn your third gen into whatever you wanted it to be, but you guys are all broke...
- Rob
- Rob
#34
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,904
Likes: 0
Received 1,855 Likes
on
1,270 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Thirdgen vs other race car platform
I don't follow people around but Orr89RocZ sure has been a class act when I see his posts. He's nicer than me.
No reply wanted or needed.
No reply wanted or needed.
#35
Supreme Member
iTrader: (16)
Re: Thirdgen vs other race car platform
Meh, but where did it get him after fifteen years though. Justin was always straight up, and he built one hell of a car, but he was never made a moderator for some reason or another, and fifteen years later most of the OG's are gone. This website isn't what it once was, it's just an area to showcase a handful of cars that are being phased out. Hell I went to a car show a few weeks back and I seen a third gen Camaro that was built by "Team Crap Box" but they of course used another word, so save for a few people on here it seems the world can do without them. Sad but true. Hell even I just bought a new AWD BMW the other day, and I don't even want to look at my third gen anymore, let alone work on it. It's always the same members arguing about the same things on here anyway, and then when you have members like Charles acting the way he does, it's the final nail in the coffin for this website because I have had members PM me and thank me for the tuning help, but then add that they are done with this website, for those very reasons. Hell I was going back and forth with RBob on the phone the other day coming back from work, and he seemed way more passionate and concerned about the Turbo Buick boards than he does this one, and for those that remember, that is huge because RBob brought tuning here. Anyways enough of my ranting, but some of you need to see the bigger picture. There is only a handful left, and with multiple accounts, so it seems...
[/endrant]
3:55
[/endrant]
3:55
#37
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,724
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Thirdgen vs other race car platform
I was thinking of taking the torqe thrust M's off my C4 and putting them on the bird, and getting some ZR1 wheels for the C4 but I really dig the wheels on your firebird.
-- Joe
#38
Re: Thirdgen vs other race car platform
Facebook happened. Thats what killed the boards, imo. We had a local board that had huge traffic about 10 years ago. once facebook really caught on, people never even got on a computer anymore. that board has been 100% dead now for at least 5 years. Everybody was on there too, Ford/GM/Dodge/Imports.
#39
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,724
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Thirdgen vs other race car platform
Meh, but where did it get him after fifteen years though. Justin was always straight up, and he built one hell of a car, but he was never made a moderator for some reason or another, and fifteen years later most of the OG's are gone. This website isn't what it once was, it's just an area to showcase a handful of cars that are being phased out. Hell I went to a car show a few weeks back and I seen a third gen Camaro that was built by "Team Crap Box" but they of course used another word, so save for a few people on here it seems the world can do without them. Sad but true. Hell even I just bought a new AWD BMW the other day, and I don't even want to look at my third gen anymore, let alone work on it. It's always the same members arguing about the same things on here anyway, and then when you have members like Charles acting the way he does, it's the final nail in the coffin for this website because I have had members PM me and thank me for the tuning help, but then add that they are done with this website, for those very reasons. Hell I was going back and forth with RBob on the phone the other day coming back from work, and he seemed way more passionate and concerned about the Turbo Buick boards than he does this one, and for those that remember, that is huge because RBob brought tuning here. Anyways enough of my ranting, but some of you need to see the bigger picture. There is only a handful left, and with multiple accounts, so it seems...
Yellowbullet is ok with people acting like kids in a locker room, thirdgen is not.
The "senior" members grew up, had families, and sold their thirdgens a long time ago.. Loooong time ago. Very few are left.
-- Joe
#40
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,724
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Thirdgen vs other race car platform
Facebook happened. Thats what killed the boards, imo. We had a local board that had huge traffic about 10 years ago. once facebook really caught on, people never even got on a computer anymore. that board has been 100% dead now for at least 5 years. Everybody was on there too, Ford/GM/Dodge/Imports.
-- Joe
#42
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,904
Likes: 0
Received 1,855 Likes
on
1,270 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Thirdgen vs other race car platform
ROH brand, RT style, 17x9 wheels out of Australia. My wheels are 20 years old. You can't buy the same thing but you can buy something similar in 18" and some funky chrome colors.
I think Group A Wheels is the only importer to the US. https://groupawheels.com
I think Group A Wheels is the only importer to the US. https://groupawheels.com
Last edited by QwkTrip; 04-22-2018 at 11:26 AM.
#43
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,904
Likes: 0
Received 1,855 Likes
on
1,270 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
#44
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: Thirdgen vs other race car platform
ROH brand, RT style, 17x9 wheels out of Australia. My wheels are 20 years old. You can't buy the same thing but you can buy something similar in 18" and some funky chrome colors.
I think Group A Wheels is the only importer to the US. https://groupawheels.com
I think Group A Wheels is the only importer to the US. https://groupawheels.com
#46
COTM Editor
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,904
Likes: 0
Received 1,855 Likes
on
1,270 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Thirdgen vs other race car platform
Meacham imports Simmons wheels from Australia too. Good luck getting them to answer the phone though. I called them for 2 months and they don't answer or call back.
http://mechamperformance.com/d_docs/w_SIMg4f.html
http://mechamperformance.com/d_docs/w_SIMg4f.html
#48
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Panama City FL
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 87 Iroc
Engine: Turbocharged 5.7 Pro-Fl-XT
Transmission: 700R4 for moment
Axle/Gears: 3.25 9 inch
Re: Thirdgen vs other race car platform
Thirgen Racecar platform...
Advantages:
Lighter than modern platforms
Excellent traction potential
Good visibility
Disadvantages:
No room in engine bay
Needs kmember/torque arm/rear end to provide strength and room for big power
Poor crash safety relative to modern cars
No 2008+ benefit at track
Death trap (only an issue when you get old enough to know better)
Honorable mentions (disadvantages):
No air bags
No ABS
No stability control
Really poor brakes (also only matters if you are old enough to care)
Advantages:
Lighter than modern platforms
Excellent traction potential
Good visibility
Disadvantages:
No room in engine bay
Needs kmember/torque arm/rear end to provide strength and room for big power
Poor crash safety relative to modern cars
No 2008+ benefit at track
Death trap (only an issue when you get old enough to know better)
Honorable mentions (disadvantages):
No air bags
No ABS
No stability control
Really poor brakes (also only matters if you are old enough to care)
#49
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,724
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: Thirdgen vs other race car platform
Thirgen Racecar platform...
Advantages:
Lighter than modern platforms
Excellent traction potential
Good visibility
Disadvantages:
No room in engine bay
Needs kmember/torque arm/rear end to provide strength and room for big power
Poor crash safety relative to modern cars
No 2008+ benefit at track
Death trap (only an issue when you get old enough to know better)
Honorable mentions (disadvantages):
No air bags
No ABS
No stability control
Really poor brakes (also only matters if you are old enough to care)
Advantages:
Lighter than modern platforms
Excellent traction potential
Good visibility
Disadvantages:
No room in engine bay
Needs kmember/torque arm/rear end to provide strength and room for big power
Poor crash safety relative to modern cars
No 2008+ benefit at track
Death trap (only an issue when you get old enough to know better)
Honorable mentions (disadvantages):
No air bags
No ABS
No stability control
Really poor brakes (also only matters if you are old enough to care)
I dunno. I keep going back and forth. I have a 21' enclosed racecar trailer, I have a car with a blower. I just don't know if it would be fun racing a car that can only go 11.49 legally.
If I put a roll bar in it, I can't really drive it on the street. I know guys do, but even a minor accident can result in major head trauma due to the way the bars have to be routed for NHRA compliance. (vs the "looks only" bars that are far enough back that you couldn't whack your head on one).
And SFI restraints on the street would suck ***, and I'm not convinced they would pass a DOT safety inspection.
But on the flip side, it's a 1988 Firebird so it's not something anyone is gonna want to see at a car show. My wrangler handles better, so it's not like it's a fantastic driver. So I guess strip car is maybe my only option with it ?
They want $109k for that Ferarri.. It's a 2012 "California" convertible with 21k, automatic.. Seems expensive for a low-end model.
-- Joe
#50
Supreme Member
iTrader: (20)
Re: Thirdgen vs other race car platform
Typical roll bars are no where near in the way. Only the arm bar might break your arm if you get throw sideways in it but the head is no concern. Cages might be a concern with the A pillar bar but a seat belt should prevent you from coming close to that anyway
The 7.50-8.49 stuff is the scary deal. Funnycar halo around your mellon. Even with roll bar padding its a serious concern. This is why i might stay 10 pt and 8.50 legal only
The 7.50-8.49 stuff is the scary deal. Funnycar halo around your mellon. Even with roll bar padding its a serious concern. This is why i might stay 10 pt and 8.50 legal only