1990 1LE....$49,000
#5
Supreme Member
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
I watched this one live at the auction. This car pulled 49k and let tell you it was not the cleanest car. There was a huge dent in the passenger side runner. And the engine in general did not look great. In the staging lane the car was getting a ton of interest. Alot of people checking it out and talking about it. 1LE is the hot ticket for Thirdgen’s. Phil’s 344 mile IROC was way cleaner.
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,688
Received 745 Likes
on
505 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
I watched this one live at the auction. This car pulled 49k and let tell you it was not the cleanest car. There was a huge dent in the passenger side runner. And the engine in general did not look great. In the staging lane the car was getting a ton of interest. Alot of people checking it out and talking about it. 1LE is the hot ticket for Thirdgen’s. Phil’s 344 mile IROC was way cleaner.
Trending Topics
#8
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
Yes. Typical dealer offering. Dirty. Dented TPI runners and flat red paint, with bonus brush touch ups but nothing that could not be corrected.
Now the price that dealer wanted is starting to look like a bargain now.
I am very happy for the seller! Well sold.
Now the price that dealer wanted is starting to look like a bargain now.
I am very happy for the seller! Well sold.
#9
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Freehold NJ
Posts: 297
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Iroc 5.7,67 SS Camaro,90 Formula
Engine: 355 AFR Superram LPE 219
Transmission: 700r4 3000 stall 4spd 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
It pulled in the cash that's for sure. I wonder if there is a Players series car at Barrett Jackson?
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 1,813
Received 223 Likes
on
149 Posts
Car: 87 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
So what do you guys think the Black 1991 1LE with 88 miles will bring ???
It's lot # 1544.1 and due on the block around 1 PM on Sunday....
It's lot # 1544.1 and due on the block around 1 PM on Sunday....
#11
Supreme Member
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (58)
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
The myth is that 1LE includes all these performance parts. The truth is that everything except the front brakes and shocks/struts, is typical for later G92 cars. The things that typically get associated as being 1LE, are near universally G92. A simplification is a 1LE is just a G92 car with better front brakes.
#16
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '87 GNX '87 Turbo T 2013 CTS-V
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
I've never heard anyone attempt to claim that there's additional performance parts above what you got in a G92 car. Mainly some weight reduction and better brakes which created a little better performance. There was very liitle info on the 1LE in '89-90 which is the reason for the low numbers. Word was out a little more in '91-92 and numbers increased. It took a few years for anyone to even cover or talk about the 1LE cars.
#17
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 163 Likes
on
118 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
1LE Vs standard
1988 - Front & Rear Brakes, & Gas Tank
1989 - Front Brakes & Gas Tank
1990 - Front Brakes
1991-1992 - Front Brakes, Front Lower Control Arms, Rear Lower Control Arms, and Rear Shocks
Note: 1LE =/= G92 with Brakes
John
1988 - Front & Rear Brakes, & Gas Tank
1989 - Front Brakes & Gas Tank
1990 - Front Brakes
1991-1992 - Front Brakes, Front Lower Control Arms, Rear Lower Control Arms, and Rear Shocks
Note: 1LE =/= G92 with Brakes
John
Last edited by okfoz; 01-18-2019 at 01:46 PM. Reason: added a note
#18
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes
on
31 Posts
Car: 1989 Camaro-1LE
Engine: TPI(s)
Transmission: 5 speed (MM5, MK6)
Axle/Gears: 3.45, 3.73
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
I would like to see that. Curious if it would bring more or less. There is a nice one on ebay ... been there for a while ... that fellow should have taken it there.
#19
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes
on
31 Posts
Car: 1989 Camaro-1LE
Engine: TPI(s)
Transmission: 5 speed (MM5, MK6)
Axle/Gears: 3.45, 3.73
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
Seeing the 1LE's command money is great. It brings people interested into the thirdgen cars. People will buy G92 cars because they are "like a 1LE". People will restore the cars. Companies will reproduce tires for our cars. It's all a good thing ... never understood the "1LE haters".
Mark.
#20
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: South Windsor, CT
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
Received 212 Likes
on
178 Posts
Car: '89 GTA
Engine: ZZ6TPI
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Borg Warner 3.70:1
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
Seeing the 1LE's command money is great. It brings people interested into the thirdgen cars. People will buy G92 cars because they are "like a 1LE". People will restore the cars. Companies will reproduce tires for our cars. It's all a good thing ... never understood the "1LE haters".
Mark.
Mark.
#21
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 163 Likes
on
118 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
I agree. I have never gotten excited over the 1LE cars myself (I like A/C, radio and power options), but I do acknowledge that they are rare and special as thirdgens go. If the 1LE cars are getting the attention of the collectors and they are willing to pay big money for them, that benefits all of us. It pulls the value of the rest of the thirdgens up and then that feeds the reproduction and restoration market.
#22
Member
#23
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: South Ms
Posts: 4,417
Received 720 Likes
on
490 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 355 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt.Posi-3.73s
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
I'm not happy about it. I think if prices get too high people will start looking at other higher performance platforms. It's crazy to me you can buy same era Corvettes with lower mileage, adult driven and not ragged out for less $ than thirdgens these days. Thirdgens have always been a great looking, affordable, entry level sports car and that is why they have been so popular with the masses so long
#25
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes
on
31 Posts
Car: 1989 Camaro-1LE
Engine: TPI(s)
Transmission: 5 speed (MM5, MK6)
Axle/Gears: 3.45, 3.73
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
1LE was an order code for a package of components, some of which was only available under the RPO 1LE. This is the same as a Z28, or RT, or RS, or what have you. Sure you could get some of the stuff through other packages, but collectors want the cars that came with the order package, not the one that is "like" a 1LE. Watching the streams of cars on Barret Jackson showcases that ... complete numbers matching full load car ... big dollars ... almost identical car with same options but not the "package" goes for half the price.
What is or was 1LE is somewhat irrelevant now. An original car will command more money than a non original.
I say ... bid them up! More people will buy parts. More people will restore them. More people will restomod them. Guys who wanted them as a kid, now have money to buy them back
Cheers!
Mark.
What is or was 1LE is somewhat irrelevant now. An original car will command more money than a non original.
I say ... bid them up! More people will buy parts. More people will restore them. More people will restomod them. Guys who wanted them as a kid, now have money to buy them back
Cheers!
Mark.
#31
#32
Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 90 formula, 89 formula 350 vert
Engine: 305, 355
Transmission: T5, t56
Axle/Gears: 3:45 9 bolt, 8.8 3:73
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
To me it probably just means the 2 previous 1les were outliers price wise and not representative of the true market. If that wasn’t the case this black one would have done better than both of those cars imo
#33
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 1,813
Received 223 Likes
on
149 Posts
Car: 87 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
I guess he should have bought it
#34
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,702
Received 236 Likes
on
182 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:42 Auburn
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
Sounds like he should have! I think the blue one looked to be the nicest of the 3 but it went @ a bad time, Sunday. The red one went early on in the auction when excitement is high and the Hawaiian shirt guys have not spent all their money yet..
#35
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 163 Likes
on
118 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
One more thing that sets the 1LE apart... Collectors want them more than just a G92 car.
#36
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Sunny Florida
Posts: 1,813
Received 223 Likes
on
149 Posts
Car: 87 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
IMO, it's all 1LE HYPE.....I like 1LE's, as I like ALL 3rd gens, but would not pay the additional $$$ to own a nice low mile original 1LE when I can buy a nice 3rd gen
and put better brakes on it (even better then 1LE brakes) and have A/C to boot.....not knocking the 1LE's at all but they are not for me......unless I find a steal of a deal
on an ultra low mile mint original.....which we all know is NOT going to happen....LOL
and put better brakes on it (even better then 1LE brakes) and have A/C to boot.....not knocking the 1LE's at all but they are not for me......unless I find a steal of a deal
on an ultra low mile mint original.....which we all know is NOT going to happen....LOL
#37
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
History has proven time & again that cars engineered, built and released by manufacturers with the intention of getting them on tracks for racing have been the top performers of their generation in value. To say otherwise or to diminish that in any way is not only factually incorrect but disingenuous.
#38
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
IMO, it's all 1LE HYPE.....I like 1LE's, as I like ALL 3rd gens, but would not pay the additional $$$ to own a nice low mile original 1LE when I can buy a nice 3rd gen
and put better brakes on it (even better then 1LE brakes) and have A/C to boot.....not knocking the 1LE's at all but they are not for me......unless I find a steal of a deal
on an ultra low mile mint original.....which we all know is NOT going to happen....LOL
and put better brakes on it (even better then 1LE brakes) and have A/C to boot.....not knocking the 1LE's at all but they are not for me......unless I find a steal of a deal
on an ultra low mile mint original.....which we all know is NOT going to happen....LOL
Step in while you still can!
#40
Supreme Member
iTrader: (58)
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
what exactly is Wrong with my list? I got the data directly from the GM Parts catalog, these are the items that GM literally states have a different part number. Granted there are other items like the Master cyl, prop valve, and the steering knuckle, but that comes with the territory of different brakes. Yes for all intents and purposes, 1LE is just brakes. BUT except for 1990, there was more to it than "just brakes."
One more thing that sets the 1LE apart... Collectors want them more than just a G92 car.
One more thing that sets the 1LE apart... Collectors want them more than just a G92 car.
You're taking my comments out of context. I never explicitly stated 1LE is "just brakes", go back and read the question I was asked, and the response I gave in it's entirety. If you still don't get what I was saying, read it a few more times until it makes sense.
Collectors want them largely because they don't know what they are. They're buying into the L1E myth. That was the entire point of my comment, but some of you get so hung up in the trivial that you blow it out of proportion and turn it into a two thread headache.
I'm sick of talking about it. I'm sick of debating it. I'm sick of putting the time and effort into spoon-feeding evidence that supports my statements to an audience that is unwilling to listen.
#41
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 163 Likes
on
118 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
Apparently the Front Struts were also 1LE specific on the Firebird too
#42
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,235
Received 163 Likes
on
118 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
Not sure if you are including the larger spindles and bearing as part of the "brakes" or if it was an oversight John.
History has proven time & again that cars engineered, built and released by manufacturers with the intention of getting them on tracks for racing have been the top performers of their generation in value. To say otherwise or to diminish that in any way is not only factually incorrect but disingenuous.
History has proven time & again that cars engineered, built and released by manufacturers with the intention of getting them on tracks for racing have been the top performers of their generation in value. To say otherwise or to diminish that in any way is not only factually incorrect but disingenuous.
#43
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
Well, since you created another thread to continue this topic instead of just leaving it in here, you might have to read through both threads. If you can't figure out what you got wrong from what I've posted in these two threads, then I'm not going to waste my time spelling it out for you again.
You're taking my comments out of context. I never explicitly stated 1LE is "just brakes", go back and read the question I was asked, and the response I gave in it's entirety. If you still don't get what I was saying, read it a few more times until it makes sense.
Collectors want them largely because they don't know what they are. They're buying into the L1E myth. That was the entire point of my comment, but some of you get so hung up in the trivial that you blow it out of proportion and turn it into a two thread headache.
I'm sick of talking about it. I'm sick of debating it. I'm sick of putting the time and effort into spoon-feeding evidence that supports my statements to an audience that is unwilling to listen.
You're taking my comments out of context. I never explicitly stated 1LE is "just brakes", go back and read the question I was asked, and the response I gave in it's entirety. If you still don't get what I was saying, read it a few more times until it makes sense.
Collectors want them largely because they don't know what they are. They're buying into the L1E myth. That was the entire point of my comment, but some of you get so hung up in the trivial that you blow it out of proportion and turn it into a two thread headache.
I'm sick of talking about it. I'm sick of debating it. I'm sick of putting the time and effort into spoon-feeding evidence that supports my statements to an audience that is unwilling to listen.
#44
Supreme Member
iTrader: (58)
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
It's exhausting that I can't voice my opinion on the 1LE topic without it becoming a debate. I'm not even trying to change the perception, like I said, it's set in stone, so whatever.
My animosity is not directed towards the cars or the owners, it's toward the long held misconceptions and the tall tales, the lack of fact checking, common sense, and reason. I appreciate you, and your cars, and I've done my best to convey that I don't mean for my comments to suggest otherwise.
#45
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1985 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
The 1LE option is exactly what collectors are looking for. It shouldn't surprise that prices are so high.
It's the "rare performance option", regardless of whether some of the pieces were available without it, or became standard later.
Add that you had to order a specific engine or engine/trans, with the performance rear axle, and without AC, it's thought to be a special "back door" package for those "in the know". Plus, it was intended for showroom stock racing. Collectors eat this up.
But it's not just thirdgens - a 1969 Z/28 that is documented to have been ordered with the JL8 option is worth crazy money, way more than one without it.
This was an extremely low production performance option, and it really was "just brakes"!
It's the "rare performance option", regardless of whether some of the pieces were available without it, or became standard later.
Add that you had to order a specific engine or engine/trans, with the performance rear axle, and without AC, it's thought to be a special "back door" package for those "in the know". Plus, it was intended for showroom stock racing. Collectors eat this up.
But it's not just thirdgens - a 1969 Z/28 that is documented to have been ordered with the JL8 option is worth crazy money, way more than one without it.
This was an extremely low production performance option, and it really was "just brakes"!
#46
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
That's fair. I can understand how it would seem that I don't like 1LEs, but really all I said was that 1LE is a buzzword for collectors, and a false narrative. I was specifically asked what I meant, and when I explained my comment someone had to drag the thread off on a tangent, and create yet another topic in search of the elusive "1LE Truth".
It's exhausting that I can't voice my opinion on the 1LE topic without it becoming a debate. I'm not even trying to change the perception, like I said, it's set in stone, so whatever.
My animosity is not directed towards the cars or the owners, it's toward the long held misconceptions and the tall tales, the lack of fact checking, common sense, and reason. I appreciate you, and your cars, and I've done my best to convey that I don't mean for my comments to suggest otherwise.
It's exhausting that I can't voice my opinion on the 1LE topic without it becoming a debate. I'm not even trying to change the perception, like I said, it's set in stone, so whatever.
My animosity is not directed towards the cars or the owners, it's toward the long held misconceptions and the tall tales, the lack of fact checking, common sense, and reason. I appreciate you, and your cars, and I've done my best to convey that I don't mean for my comments to suggest otherwise.
It boils to a simple fact you cannot dispute. GM made a decision to get back into racing after a significant amount of time in absence...these are the cars that engineering produced. Because of that, and despite your perceived lack of difference, that one RPO code will set them apart from the pack and carry a value. That value is now being recognized.
#47
Supreme Member
iTrader: (58)
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
That value has been recognized and popularized since at least 1990. 1LE lore has been the hot topic ever since I got interested in thirdgens. The more I've looked into it, the less impressed by it, I've become. When I've shared my opinion, and the documentation supporting it, I get trolled or dragged into a huge debate. So screw it. If anything I'll just throw in my 2 cents and keep on driving. I'm sorry, but I really don't care anymore.
#48
Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: 1990 1LE....$49,000
The 1LE option is exactly what collectors are looking for. It shouldn't surprise that prices are so high.
It's the "rare performance option", regardless of whether some of the pieces were available without it, or became standard later.
Add that you had to order a specific engine or engine/trans, with the performance rear axle, and without AC, it's thought to be a special "back door" package for those "in the know". Plus, it was intended for showroom stock racing. Collectors eat this up.
But it's not just thirdgens - a 1969 Z/28 that is documented to have been ordered with the JL8 option is worth crazy money, way more than one without it.
This was an extremely low production performance option, and it really was "just brakes"!
It's the "rare performance option", regardless of whether some of the pieces were available without it, or became standard later.
Add that you had to order a specific engine or engine/trans, with the performance rear axle, and without AC, it's thought to be a special "back door" package for those "in the know". Plus, it was intended for showroom stock racing. Collectors eat this up.
But it's not just thirdgens - a 1969 Z/28 that is documented to have been ordered with the JL8 option is worth crazy money, way more than one without it.
This was an extremely low production performance option, and it really was "just brakes"!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post