1.5 or 1.6 roller rockers?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: L98 350
Transmission: Swapped to a T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.27
1.5 or 1.6 roller rockers?
I was just wondering what would be the best rocker to use on a stock 350 but have full exhaust? Would this be a good idea, what gains could I get from it? The car is an 89 GTA 350 TPI. And what is the best cheapest roller rocker and the best roller rocker around?
if you want cheap i'll make you a set out of plywood for 20 dollars a set. if you want best i'd look at the steel full roller trunnion rockers from comp. if you have stock exhaust i'd consider headers and a better flowing exhaust before i bought rockers.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: L98 350
Transmission: Swapped to a T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.27
No I got headers and a cat back system it’s a full hooker system. Sorry for the confusion! The plywood ones sound awesome! And really cheap! haha jk!
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 777
Likes: 1
From: Windsor Ontario Canada
Car: 89 jaguar xjs convertable
Engine: 89 L98 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 dana 44
My play dough roller rockers are lighter weight for higher rpms than those heavy plywood jobs!! Probably made of cheap 1/2 plywood too!! LOL!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,968
Likes: 1
From: Macedonia ,OH
Car: Formula
Engine: 6.0 LSX
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt 3:27
My GF and I both run a set of Comp Pro Mag roller rockers. She uses the 1.52 and I run the 1.6's and they are great!
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
From: meridian, idaho
Car: 92 1500p\u 2wd
Engine: 91 z28 tpi 355
Transmission: 91 700r4
Mkos1980 im runnin the 1.52 comp cams roller tips, and i have not has any problems with them......ive herd 1.6s make the idle a lil worse is this true? would i gain anythin usin 1.6s over my 1.52, with the parts i have in my sig?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 1
From: Ohio, near columbus
Car: 89 iroc-z
Engine: 305tpi
Transmission: wc-t5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi (4 now)
you gain lift and a very very slight gain in duration. I suspest it's very well possible that the it wouldn't run as well because, the computer would be sensing different charascteristics after the install.
I doubt it would make much of a difference though and many people have already did the mod on theres with out complaints.
I doubt it would make much of a difference though and many people have already did the mod on theres with out complaints.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member




Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 100
From: So. Ohio
Car: 88 Camaro
Engine: L98 350
Transmission: 700r4
Looking at cam specs for your engine I'd think the 1.6 rockers would make some difference. The L98 heads should handle up to a .460 valve lift, above that the ports and valve sizes would show very little flow increase with higher lift. One thing to watch is the push rods rubbing the slots in the heads as the higher lift rockers will relocate them just a bit. Your cam specs:
Stock: 350 AT 10066049* .415 .430 207 213 117.0 (116/-118)
1.6 rockers: .442 .459 210 216 117.0 (116/-118)
Be nice to do this mod and have the heads redone at the same time, three angle valve job and clean up the ports.
Stock: 350 AT 10066049* .415 .430 207 213 117.0 (116/-118)
1.6 rockers: .442 .459 210 216 117.0 (116/-118)
Be nice to do this mod and have the heads redone at the same time, three angle valve job and clean up the ports.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,968
Likes: 1
From: Macedonia ,OH
Car: Formula
Engine: 6.0 LSX
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt 3:27
Originally posted by tom3
Stock: 350 AT 10066049* .415 .430 207 213 117.0 (116/-118)
1.6 rockers: .442 .459 210 216 117.0 (116/-118)
Stock: 350 AT 10066049* .415 .430 207 213 117.0 (116/-118)
1.6 rockers: .442 .459 210 216 117.0 (116/-118)
Duration stays the same at 207/213 but the lift moves to .430/.440 Assuming You take the stock lift with 1.5's divide then remultiply using 1.6.
Supreme Member




Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 100
From: So. Ohio
Car: 88 Camaro
Engine: L98 350
Transmission: 700r4
Humm. 0.415 / 1.5 = 0.277
0.277 x 1.6 = 0.442
Is my Chinese calculator lying to me?
And most articles I've read say the duration is bumped about three degrees when measured at .050 off the seat.
0.277 x 1.6 = 0.442
Is my Chinese calculator lying to me?
And most articles I've read say the duration is bumped about three degrees when measured at .050 off the seat.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,968
Likes: 1
From: Macedonia ,OH
Car: Formula
Engine: 6.0 LSX
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt 3:27
Your right. WTF. I must have been smoking something yesterday at work.
Link up an article if you can or something about raising the duration. Its the first time I've heard about that.
Link up an article if you can or something about raising the duration. Its the first time I've heard about that.
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 777
Likes: 1
From: Windsor Ontario Canada
Car: 89 jaguar xjs convertable
Engine: 89 L98 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 dana 44
I think that has been argued to death hasn't it? Is anyone running a split set of 1.5/1.6's. I have heard you gain the benefits of more air but the idle isn't effected as much. Any expreience out there?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KO1
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
Oct 15, 2015 05:00 PM





