What would you do (compression)
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,101
Likes: 127
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
What would you do (compression)
9.14:1 static compression, 8.11:1 dynamic (light polish 64cc)
9.54:1 static compression, 8.44:1 dynamic (mill to 60cc)
9.73:1 static compression, 8.62:1 dynamic (mill to 58cc)
10.0:1 static compression, 8.9:1 dynamic (mill to 55cc)
This is a n/a motor, 114lsa (9 degrees overlap).
Not sure what to mill the heads to..
-- Joe
9.54:1 static compression, 8.44:1 dynamic (mill to 60cc)
9.73:1 static compression, 8.62:1 dynamic (mill to 58cc)
10.0:1 static compression, 8.9:1 dynamic (mill to 55cc)
This is a n/a motor, 114lsa (9 degrees overlap).
Not sure what to mill the heads to..
-- Joe
I generally don't like to mill heads and when I do I keep it modest. Option 2.
Being a little lower on compression than you might like is a minor problem compared to running the risk of not getting your intake to seal up against the heads. Not the end of the world, but even if you have the problem only once you'll wish you had given up a little compression rather than dealing with that headache.
Being a little lower on compression than you might like is a minor problem compared to running the risk of not getting your intake to seal up against the heads. Not the end of the world, but even if you have the problem only once you'll wish you had given up a little compression rather than dealing with that headache.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,101
Likes: 127
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Originally Posted by Damon
I generally don't like to mill heads and when I do I keep it modest. Option 2.
Being a little lower on compression than you might like is a minor problem compared to running the risk of not getting your intake to seal up against the heads. Not the end of the world, but even if you have the problem only once you'll wish you had given up a little compression rather than dealing with that headache.
Being a little lower on compression than you might like is a minor problem compared to running the risk of not getting your intake to seal up against the heads. Not the end of the world, but even if you have the problem only once you'll wish you had given up a little compression rather than dealing with that headache.
-- Joe
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
A DCR between 8.0 and 8.5 is usually the best for pump gas and iron heads. I'd also go with option 2.
My DRC right now is about 8.9 and its REALLY picky about its tune when running pump gas. Its gotta be dead on, or the motor is not going to be too happy. Keep it below 8.5 and you should be just fine.
My DRC right now is about 8.9 and its REALLY picky about its tune when running pump gas. Its gotta be dead on, or the motor is not going to be too happy. Keep it below 8.5 and you should be just fine.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,101
Likes: 127
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Originally Posted by Air_Adam
A DCR between 8.0 and 8.5 is usually the best for pump gas and iron heads. I'd also go with option 2.
My DRC right now is about 8.9 and its REALLY picky about its tune when running pump gas. Its gotta be dead on, or the motor is not going to be too happy. Keep it below 8.5 and you should be just fine.
My DRC right now is about 8.9 and its REALLY picky about its tune when running pump gas. Its gotta be dead on, or the motor is not going to be too happy. Keep it below 8.5 and you should be just fine.
-- Joe
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,101
Likes: 127
From: SALEM, NH
Car: '88 Formula
Engine: LC9
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.89 9"
Originally Posted by 1989GTATransAm
What quench distance are you running? That must be a small cam.
Using a DCR calc, I get the above posted numbers. For other reference, the pistons are reverse dome (mirror chamber), -16cc cups, h-beam rods, steel crank, blocked decked so the piston is .005" in the hole, and a .039" x 4.166" head gasket. The trickflows are 62cc as cast, but with a light polish they cc out to about 64cc I believe.
Now of course, this is N/A, so I guess I have the option of using nitrous. The cam should be fairly nitrous compatible, I originally had it ground because I intended on using a small s-trim blower when I was gonna use the motor in a thirdgen, but I've since bought a vette and sold the blower cuz it wont work.
-- Joe
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
option #4.
Aluminum heads, and 230/244, I think you'll be fine with that. Option #3 if you plan on using a larger nitrous shot. >200HP
Polish the chambers either way, and do the piston tops if you've got the time.
I re-edited this 4 times, after considering all those variables, .044" quench, AL heads, reverse dome pistons.
That will be a FUN ride!
Aluminum heads, and 230/244, I think you'll be fine with that. Option #3 if you plan on using a larger nitrous shot. >200HP
Polish the chambers either way, and do the piston tops if you've got the time.
I re-edited this 4 times, after considering all those variables, .044" quench, AL heads, reverse dome pistons.
That will be a FUN ride!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WhteRbt
Tech / General Engine
2
Sep 21, 2015 09:48 AM





