305 heads on a 350?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Topeka, KS
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt posi. G80
305 heads on a 350?
Does anyone know right off what my compression would be if i put my 305 (58cc) heads on a 350 with flat top pistons? Thanks
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: 305 heads on a 350?
With flat tops? around 11:1 if you deck the block. Mine was too high, so I used a die grinder and ported out the combustion chamber a bit until 64cc = 10.0:1 on the nose.
Moderator


Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,274
Likes: 171
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Re: 305 heads on a 350?
Although a smaller combustion chamber will increase the compression ratio, using heads designed for a smaller engine can hurt power. Power is made in the heads. The engine needs to breath. The more air you can get into the engine, the more fuel you can burn. The more fuel you can burn, the more power you can make. Using a head that flows enough air for a 305 engine normally means it isn't going to flow enough air to feed a 350 or larger engine.
Although some people have good luck and are quite happy using 305 heads on a 350, they're not your best option for building power with heads. No matter what else you do to an engine to make power, cam, intake etc, it still boils down to the heads as the power makers.
Although some people have good luck and are quite happy using 305 heads on a 350, they're not your best option for building power with heads. No matter what else you do to an engine to make power, cam, intake etc, it still boils down to the heads as the power makers.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
Re: 305 heads on a 350?
http://www.wheelspin.net/calc/calc2.html
You can do it yourself using this online cr calc.
Typical felpro gasket is 4.166" dia and .039" thick
Typical replacement flat tops are 5cc relief volume and either nomonally .025" or .045" below the stock deck at TDC.
Not all "58cc" 305 heads are actually 58cc.
You need to cc yours and see. You'd be suprised.
You can do it yourself using this online cr calc.
Typical felpro gasket is 4.166" dia and .039" thick
Typical replacement flat tops are 5cc relief volume and either nomonally .025" or .045" below the stock deck at TDC.
Not all "58cc" 305 heads are actually 58cc.
You need to cc yours and see. You'd be suprised.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 509
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: MI, in ohio for college
Car: 91 camaro T-Tops
Engine: L03
Transmission: Borg T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 305 heads on a 350?
I'd agree with the flow data idea. More flow = more power. I just read an article on here last night about head castings, and if I read it correctly (it was late) some of the 305 heads came with 1.84" int. valves as compared to stock 1.94" on the 350. Both shared the 1.5" exh. The size of the valves has much to do with head flow- basically. That's why many people upgrade the the 2.02" int and 1.60" exh.
Go here for any calculations you should need. These are very simple programs and small files. http://www.turbofast.com.au/javacalc.html
they're intended for boosted figures but your questions are of static compression ratios, as opposed to the increased dynamic CR of adding boost.
If your intent is to raise compression, that raises cyl pressures. Which causes more stress on parts. Are the heads the only thing being upgraded?
Go here for any calculations you should need. These are very simple programs and small files. http://www.turbofast.com.au/javacalc.html
they're intended for boosted figures but your questions are of static compression ratios, as opposed to the increased dynamic CR of adding boost.
If your intent is to raise compression, that raises cyl pressures. Which causes more stress on parts. Are the heads the only thing being upgraded?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Topeka, KS
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt posi. G80
Re: 305 heads on a 350?
I'd agree with the flow data idea. More flow = more power. I just read an article on here last night about head castings, and if I read it correctly (it was late) some of the 305 heads came with 1.84" int. valves as compared to stock 1.94" on the 350. Both shared the 1.5" exh. The size of the valves has much to do with head flow- basically. That's why many people upgrade the the 2.02" int and 1.60" exh.
Go here for any calculations you should need. These are very simple programs and small files. http://www.turbofast.com.au/javacalc.html
they're intended for boosted figures but your questions are of static compression ratios, as opposed to the increased dynamic CR of adding boost.
If your intent is to raise compression, that raises cyl pressures. Which causes more stress on parts. Are the heads the only thing being upgraded?
Go here for any calculations you should need. These are very simple programs and small files. http://www.turbofast.com.au/javacalc.html
they're intended for boosted figures but your questions are of static compression ratios, as opposed to the increased dynamic CR of adding boost.
If your intent is to raise compression, that raises cyl pressures. Which causes more stress on parts. Are the heads the only thing being upgraded?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NinjaNife
Tech / General Engine
27
Aug 23, 2015 11:49 AM








