Hydraulic Cam With rollers?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8l v6
Transmission: 5 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: Probably the stock 3.42
Hydraulic Cam With rollers?
What would happen if I were to use a hyd. flat tappet cam with hyd. roller lifters? Does it make a difference? or is it just dumb and I am an idiot for asking a supid question?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: Hydraulic Cam With rollers?
Won't work. The ramp rates are wrong too fast too soon for the rollers, it'll also try to spin them in the bores. You'd need a way to keep the roller lifters from spinning (and if your block is setup for that, might as well get a roller cam as well eh?). Nah, just won't work, gotta match up the right parts.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8l v6
Transmission: 5 Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: Probably the stock 3.42
Re: Hydraulic Cam With rollers?
Thanks for the info my friend...Yes my engine is made for hyd. rollers...something else just popped into my head... could I run a 12.2:1 comp ration on ragular gas...well obviously nothing less than premium... what would be the rsult?
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 3
From: Arab, Alabama
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Hydraulic Cam With rollers?
10.5 is about the max with 93 octane. You can get by with 11:1 if you use a sack-full of tricks...(cam with lots of overlap, recurved dizzy, shift points in transmission moved higher, stall converter, engine under-idle shutdown to name just a few)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




