Quick Balancing question
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: Detroit
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 383 FFI
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Quick Balancing question
first, I need to make it clear this engine is not my final engine build. It is just a bandaid for between 1-4 years to keep me happy. It probably/definitely will not see more than 10,000-15,000 miles. Probably more likely in the 5,000 mi range. I just want something to keep me happy until my 383 is built.
I currently have both a 16,000 mi 98' 4 bolt 350 Vortec block (out of a van), and a 166,000 mi 88' L98 out of a GTA. Regardless of which block I use (leaning towards the 4-bolt because i want to splay the L98 for the 383), I was looking to raise the compression slightly along with a few other cheap things to make it alittle warmer on the cheap (cam I have laying around, some home work on the heads, Intake that I plan on using again later etc).
So, assuming the engine is in balance to start with (they both are), would changing just the pistons to something just alittle warmer mess up the balance enough to warrent a rebalance? I was just looking for like 10:1 ish, which cant be achieved with what I have right now (the L98 needs bored, and the vortec's compression comes from the heads, which i am not using).
any tips? I was just going to throw cheap cast or hyper pistons in place of the used ones. Something from summit.
note: I have deep discounts on GM and GMPP due to my dad. If it would be price effective, I would be more than happy to stick to GM parts.
Thanks
~LMSkyliner
I currently have both a 16,000 mi 98' 4 bolt 350 Vortec block (out of a van), and a 166,000 mi 88' L98 out of a GTA. Regardless of which block I use (leaning towards the 4-bolt because i want to splay the L98 for the 383), I was looking to raise the compression slightly along with a few other cheap things to make it alittle warmer on the cheap (cam I have laying around, some home work on the heads, Intake that I plan on using again later etc).
So, assuming the engine is in balance to start with (they both are), would changing just the pistons to something just alittle warmer mess up the balance enough to warrent a rebalance? I was just looking for like 10:1 ish, which cant be achieved with what I have right now (the L98 needs bored, and the vortec's compression comes from the heads, which i am not using).
any tips? I was just going to throw cheap cast or hyper pistons in place of the used ones. Something from summit.
note: I have deep discounts on GM and GMPP due to my dad. If it would be price effective, I would be more than happy to stick to GM parts.
Thanks
~LMSkyliner
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore
Car: '82 Z-28
Engine: 355
Transmission: TH-400, 8" ATI MRT
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.56's
Re: Quick Balancing question
technically, you are disturbing the balance of your engine. the counterweights are designed to offset the weight of the components attached to them (the their respective journals) such as rods, pistons, wrist pins, rings, bearings, and a thin film of oil. here is an article that has some info (yes i know its about small block fords, but it works)
http://www.carcraft.com/howto/ccrp_0...ing/index.html
http://www.carcraft.com/howto/ccrp_0...ing/index.html
Last edited by jg04222; Apr 21, 2009 at 08:43 AM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: Quick Balancing question
dollar for dollar, I wouldn't upgrade the pistons as a performance addon.
Look elsewhere, especially for a short term build.
and yes, it would need re-balancing.
Look at parts that you can re-use on your future 383 - eg exhaust... suspension, etc etc. Don't put internal engine parts into an engine you may not keep for that long.
Look elsewhere, especially for a short term build.
and yes, it would need re-balancing.
Look at parts that you can re-use on your future 383 - eg exhaust... suspension, etc etc. Don't put internal engine parts into an engine you may not keep for that long.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: Detroit
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 383 FFI
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Quick Balancing question
yea I had already considered that. It's just that currently the best i could get out of either of these engines is probably in the 9:1 area if i had a guess. Not good for power, but i guess it will have to do.
The other upgrades i planned on doing were essentially free. using parts I had around (cam, rockers, lifters, springs), some home jobs (porting), and then, like you said, stuff I was going to use on any engine, like the FIRST system, and full exhaust (Don's headers/Y-pipe hooked up to Magnaflow cat-back). Along with CAI and stuff like that. The cost to rebuild would be the biggest actually cost going into this engine.
I was hoping that if i could buy appropriately matched pistons cheap, it would be a good way to raise the compression for a few hundred and still not need balancing.. Doesn't seem to be that way.
The other upgrades i planned on doing were essentially free. using parts I had around (cam, rockers, lifters, springs), some home jobs (porting), and then, like you said, stuff I was going to use on any engine, like the FIRST system, and full exhaust (Don's headers/Y-pipe hooked up to Magnaflow cat-back). Along with CAI and stuff like that. The cost to rebuild would be the biggest actually cost going into this engine.
I was hoping that if i could buy appropriately matched pistons cheap, it would be a good way to raise the compression for a few hundred and still not need balancing.. Doesn't seem to be that way.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 1
From: boise, ID
Car: 91 B4C "police special service"
Engine: L98 494hp
Transmission: tko-600 on order
Axle/Gears: 3.23 true trac
Re: Quick Balancing question
Pistons would probably net the least real gains of anything else you could change. That being said, you dont really need to rebalance it. Most of the engines that we have rebuilt with a "kit" (read northern auto parts 159 dollar wonder) we would weight match the pistons.
It stands to mention though, just as in the last thread on balancing a week or so ago, that countless people over the years have pulled apart near stock engines, bored and honed and stuck on the rebuilder pistons and a mild cam. They virtually never have problems. THough it will happen eventually.
Get a good digital scale and some patience. Weight match the pistons. Or spend the money in a better place.
It stands to mention though, just as in the last thread on balancing a week or so ago, that countless people over the years have pulled apart near stock engines, bored and honed and stuck on the rebuilder pistons and a mild cam. They virtually never have problems. THough it will happen eventually.
Get a good digital scale and some patience. Weight match the pistons. Or spend the money in a better place.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 5
From: Pitman, NJ
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: Canfield 195 headed 358ci
Transmission: TH350, Art Carr 9.5"
Axle/Gears: 3.92 Dana 44
Re: Quick Balancing question
Personally I wouldn't even waste my cash on balancing such a motor... Money could be better spent elsewhere.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: Detroit
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 383 FFI
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Quick Balancing question
I suppose i was simply over-estimating the power loss from that extra compression point. Plus, the L98, despite its 166k miles, is still in very good condition. There is barely even a miniscule ridge in the cylinder wall.
I guess I'll wait till the big boy to break into bottom ends. That one will be done right. Fully forged, with all block prep, machining, and assembly done by a shop that spits out consistent 9 second NA cars.
The more you know! Thanks for helping guys. I'm still learning all this stuff as i go (barely 18).
I guess I'll wait till the big boy to break into bottom ends. That one will be done right. Fully forged, with all block prep, machining, and assembly done by a shop that spits out consistent 9 second NA cars.
The more you know! Thanks for helping guys. I'm still learning all this stuff as i go (barely 18).
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: Quick Balancing question
What I meant before was that I wouldn't spend the money on pistons to make you go faster. Dollar for dollar, it's better spent elsewhere.
on a (what I consider seperate matter) - you don't need to balance. As a (bad) example, I rebuilt my engine by turning the crank, new rods, new hyper pistons, and I never balanced it. See the cam in my sig? Not exactly mild.... I didn't even weigh the pistons or anything... I like to take chances
on a (what I consider seperate matter) - you don't need to balance. As a (bad) example, I rebuilt my engine by turning the crank, new rods, new hyper pistons, and I never balanced it. See the cam in my sig? Not exactly mild.... I didn't even weigh the pistons or anything... I like to take chances
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




If pistons weigh same, no need to balance. 