Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Project 385ci SBC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 07:02 PM
  #1  
Mykk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Project 385ci SBC

Hey Guys,

Before Thanksgiving I picked myself up a Vortec 350ci core.

First step is to get it cleaned up and checked for cracks, but I intend to build a nice little stroker motor for my truck.

Name:  EngineHome.jpg
Views: 505
Size:  194.2 KB

Name:  VortecSaleI.jpg
Views: 724
Size:  128.3 KB


This block is the short cylinder 880 block that people claim to have issues building a stroker out of, yet GMPP uses this block for their own stroker crate engines. To be on the safe side I'm going to use 6" rods.

Plans: 4.040" bore, 3.75" stroke, 6" rods. 10.5:1 static compression

Parts list/wish list:

Stroker kit: 13057L040
ARP Main cap Studs: 134-5403
ARP Cylinder head bolts: 134-3701
Oil pan: Moroso 20205
Oil pump & tube: Moroso 22124
Cam bearings: Dura-Bond CHP-8
Lunati Voodoo Camshaft: 60112 -231/239 dur @.050"-.535"/.550" lift LSA/ICL: 110/106
Oil pan Gasket: OS34500R
Rear Main Seal: BS40656
Head Gaskets: Z1010: 4.166" x .039"
Starter: SUM-829100
Mighty Demon 750cfm annular boosters: 5402020GC

I will transfer over my currently being used:

Comp 'R' roller lifters
Comp hardened pushrods
Comp 1.52 roller tip rockers
Patriot 'Vortec' heads, 2.02"/1.6" 185cc Int runner, w/ Comp 26918 springs
Professional Products single plane intake
Cloyes double roller timing set (with 880 block grinding)
Spectre aluminum valve covers
Vortec plastic timing cover & crank position reluctor wheel.

The block will get bored .040" over (matching pistons), line honed with the 2 bolt caps & arp studs, decked enough to make true. The rotating assembly will be internally zero balanced.

It'll physically look like my 357ci:

Name:  Engine-2.jpg
Views: 487
Size:  152.0 KB



unfortunately, it looks like this right now:



Like my work bench?

With the Lunati Voodoo 60112, @ 1200ft elevation, this engine should have 195PSI cranking pressure & 9.4:1 dynamic compression.

Desktop Dyno estimates output @ 502ft-lbs @ 4500rpm & 463HP @ 5500rpm. DD is usually a little over rated on their power outputs, but should make for a fun little daily driven street machine.

If I get a chance I might swap out my 2800-3200rpm stall converter for a 2500-2800rpm. Even with my current 357ci, the 3200 is just too loose.

On a side note, I'll be taking my truck down the drag strip for the first time. I'm gonna go down the track in full street dress, 22"s and all. Just for fun, I'm not expecting big numbers.I'd be happy with high 13's

Cheers ~Mykk

Last edited by Mykk; Dec 4, 2009 at 07:17 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 11:20 PM
  #2  
89'CamaroRS's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: Carb'd 350ci
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 limited slip
Re: Project 385ci SBC

Looks like your going to have a nasty little motor on your hands. Good luck. Do you have any pictures of the truck?
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2009 | 09:20 AM
  #3  
Mykk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Re: Project 385ci SBC

Originally Posted by 89'CamaroRS
Do you have any pictures of the truck?
Name:  07-05pic2.jpg
Views: 324
Size:  128.9 KB

Name:  07-05pic1.jpg
Views: 300
Size:  118.3 KB

Name:  newtiresIII.jpg
Views: 303
Size:  111.0 KB
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2009 | 11:42 AM
  #4  
ninety1z's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Car: '91 Z28
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: Project 385ci SBC

Thats a nice truck. I'm just a little confused about the engine, you got a old style small block in there right?
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2009 | 12:44 PM
  #5  
89'CamaroRS's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: Carb'd 350ci
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 limited slip
Re: Project 385ci SBC

Wow man nice truck. Im a big fan of the full size chevy. Good luck and ill be watching.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2009 | 02:56 PM
  #6  
Mykk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Re: Project 385ci SBC

Originally Posted by ninety1z
Thats a nice truck. I'm just a little confused about the engine, you got a old style small block in there right?
Way old style SBC in there...

Reply
Old Dec 5, 2009 | 03:39 PM
  #7  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 46
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Why 0.040" over?
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2009 | 04:09 PM
  #8  
vetteoz's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,736
Likes: 14
From: Not in Kansas anymore
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: Project 385ci SBC

Originally Posted by five7kid
Why 0.040" over?


Why would you use a 4.166" gasket on a 4.040 bore?
Just making problems with quench
Why are you changing the factory ext balance to internal?
Limits your choices in flexplates
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2009 | 10:02 AM
  #9  
Mykk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Re: Project 385ci SBC

Originally Posted by five7kid
Why 0.040" over?

Originally Posted by vetteoz


Why would you use a 4.166" gasket on a 4.040 bore?
Just making problems with quench
Why are you changing the factory ext balance to internal?
Limits your choices in flexplates
Because I'm partial to .040" over

The 4.166" bore was the just the first SBC head gasket I saw, another search on summit shows a HG to be a bore of 4.080" to be the closest match... other wise they are 4.166" or 4.2"

The rotating assembly is an internal balance from Eagle, you're right that flexplates will be tougher to find.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2009 | 03:48 PM
  #10  
vetteoz's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,736
Likes: 14
From: Not in Kansas anymore
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: Project 385ci SBC

Originally Posted by Mykk
. other wise they are 4.166" or 4.2"
.
4.1XX are 400ci gaskets

Plenty of 4.060 for 350 available
http://www.summitracing.com/search/P...rd=head+gasket
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2009 | 09:36 PM
  #11  
stroker_SS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 670
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Car: 1984 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: 355
Transmission: Th-350
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Project 385ci SBC

What ya gonna do with the old vortecs?
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2009 | 09:55 PM
  #12  
Mykk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Re: Project 385ci SBC

Originally Posted by stroker_SS
What ya gonna do with the old vortecs?
They are currently up for auction on EBay

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...=tab%3DSelling
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 12:22 AM
  #13  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 46
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Originally Posted by five7kid
Why 0.040" over?
Originally Posted by Mykk
Because I'm partial to .040" over
Why???
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 07:29 AM
  #14  
3rdgengmachine's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Inez kentucky
Car: 87 iroc z
Engine: 358 tpi
Transmission: 700r4 with transpack
Axle/Gears: 3.42 with powertrax
Re: Project 385ci SBC

I always bore ALL my engins to .040 too. Seems like they are just smoother to me. After I done one and it was so smooth I have always stuck with it. I am currently building a stroker .040 over for my 87 iroc tpi motor. Im going to use a xfi 576/570 cam. What was this you were talking about having trouble making certin blocks strokers? Mine is the stock 87 camaro tpi block. The heads didnt have the casting shape like the one you showed a pic of. So I hope that my block is a good canidate for a stroker. Let me know Mykk Im intrested in this. Plus I like your choice in bore size and motors lol...
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 08:27 AM
  #15  
jg04222's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore
Car: '82 Z-28
Engine: 355
Transmission: TH-400, 8" ATI MRT
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.56's
Re: Project 385ci SBC

I'm not trying to condemn your decision to punch it .040", but you really shouldn't bore it at all unless it is necessary. Most of the time a hone will be sufficient.

If you bore it .040" now, and score a cylinder later then you will most likely need a sleeve put in it. The extra 8 cubic inches your going to get from the .040" probably won't give you that much performance gain, especially since your not planning on using it for any kind of competition. You'd find more performance gain by ditching the big rims and putting some drag radials on it, although it would be more money.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 08:49 AM
  #16  
Mykk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Re: Project 385ci SBC

Originally Posted by 3rdgengmachine
I am currently building a stroker .040 over for my 87 iroc tpi motor. Im going to use a xfi 576/570 cam. What was this you were talking about having trouble making certin blocks strokers? Mine is the stock 87 camaro tpi block.
Your in the clear, the 86-95 blocks are fine. That's the same block I'm using now on my 357ci.

The supposed issue comes from stroking a 96+ truck 350ci.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 10:06 AM
  #17  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 430
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: Project 385ci SBC

With the Lunati Voodoo 60112, @ 1200ft elevation, this engine should have 195PSI cranking pressure & 9.4:1 dynamic compression.

Desktop Dyno estimates output @ 502ft-lbs @ 4500rpm & 463HP @ 5500rpm. DD is usually a little over rated on their power outputs, but should make for a fun little daily driven street machine.
How did you arrive at those figures? 10.5 static with that cam i would not expect to see 9.4 dynamic. Is this thing going to run on pump gas with that compression and iron heads?

DD is not all that accurate but I would expect mid higher 400 hp on motor thats for sure
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 10:16 AM
  #18  
Mykk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Re: Project 385ci SBC

Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
How did you arrive at those figures? 10.5 static with that cam i would not expect to see 9.4 dynamic. Is this thing going to run on pump gas with that compression and iron heads?

DD is not all that accurate but I would expect mid higher 400 hp on motor thats for sure
The rotating assembly advertises 10.5:1 static with 64cc heads, I won't know for sure the exact static untill I have all the components and block machining.

My 357ci was supposed to be 9.5scr, when I got the block I used someone already decked it and my SCR is 10.3... later, when I added a bigger cam & heads I used a thinner head gasket and bumped SCR to 10.7

As for cranking pressure & dynamic CR:

http://www.wallaceracing.com/dynamic-cr.php

The greatest factor for DCR is intake valve close degree. The Lunati 60112 has a IVC of 41.5 degree. The longer rods also slightly decreases cranking pressure & DCR.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 04:03 PM
  #19  
vetteoz's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,736
Likes: 14
From: Not in Kansas anymore
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: Project 385ci SBC

Originally Posted by Mykk
The supposed issue comes from stroking a 96+ truck 350ci.
No problems with my '99 Vortec block , minimal grinding required to fit Scat stroker crank
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 05:12 PM
  #20  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 430
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: Project 385ci SBC

Originally Posted by Mykk
The rotating assembly advertises 10.5:1 static with 64cc heads, I won't know for sure the exact static untill I have all the components and block machining.

My 357ci was supposed to be 9.5scr, when I got the block I used someone already decked it and my SCR is 10.3... later, when I added a bigger cam & heads I used a thinner head gasket and bumped SCR to 10.7

As for cranking pressure & dynamic CR:

http://www.wallaceracing.com/dynamic-cr.php

The greatest factor for DCR is intake valve close degree. The Lunati 60112 has a IVC of 41.5 degree. The longer rods also slightly decreases cranking pressure & DCR.
Use your seat to seat timing (advertised). When I use my .050" numbers, I get 9.77 which is not right. Other calcs that used .050" timing I got 8.3.
When using seat to seat numbers on this Wallace one, it gives me the correct 8.33 to 1 dynamic.

At my altitude it says 8.09 so it drops abit


Your cam closes at 41.5 at .050. My cam closed at 43 so your probably near 8.4 to 1 dynamic at sea level if using 11 to 1 compression. Using 10.5 to 1 static, you are closer to 8 I would think.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 05:31 PM
  #21  
vetteoz's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,736
Likes: 14
From: Not in Kansas anymore
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: Project 385ci SBC

Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
When using seat to seat numbers on this Wallace one, it gives me the correct 8.33 to 1 dynamic.
I have found Kelleys to be the most accurate.
Download and install
http://cochise.uia.net/pkelley2/dcrvb6.zip

Does CR , DCR and cam timing/ overlap in the one calc
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 08:06 PM
  #22  
Mykk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Re: Project 385ci SBC

I played around with Kelleys calc...

It appears they are coming up with the DCR ratio by using the advertised duration numbers and advertised intake valve close degree. That makes no sense to me. Wouldn't you need to use the .050" IVC degree to get accurate DCR?

But admittedly I need to go back and do some calculations because Comp cams uses advertised duration for cam timing events while lunati uses .050" duration for cam timing events....

Last edited by Mykk; Dec 7, 2009 at 08:21 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 08:55 PM
  #23  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 430
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: Project 385ci SBC

http://cochise.uia.net/pkelley2/DynamicCR.html

Kelleys again but the formulas are right there. I used this to find my effective stroke and then used a compression calculator with that dynamic stroke to get final ratio. It does use advertised which is what comp cams usually gives you, but my comp cam card gave .050 figures and i calculated the advertised from there
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 09:00 PM
  #24  
YenkoST's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
From: GA
Car: '90 C1500
Engine: SBC MPFI
Transmission: 4L80e
Axle/Gears: 4.30
Re: Project 385ci SBC

Originally Posted by Mykk
I played around with Kelleys calc...

It appears they are coming up with the DCR ratio by using the advertised duration numbers and advertised intake valve close degree. That makes no sense to me. Wouldn't you need to use the .050" IVC degree to get accurate DCR?

But admittedly I need to go back and do some calculations because Comp cams uses advertised duration for cam timing events while lunati uses .050" duration for cam timing events....
Need to use Seat to Seat as already suggested. It was explained to me because camshafts are not all the same at .050 where at seat to seat...its more of a true calculation.

If you use forged pistons, you will actually have a .045 bore because they give .005 for the forged piston to expanded which is why you start up a forged piston engine, you get a little bit of piston slap and then it goes away.

With that camshaft, I would suspect that you need about 10.25:1 SCR to keep your DCR in check between 8-8.5:1 with they nitrous you look like you are planning to run.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 09:05 PM
  #25  
vetteoz's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,736
Likes: 14
From: Not in Kansas anymore
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: Project 385ci SBC

Originally Posted by Mykk
That makes no sense to me. Wouldn't you need to use the .050" IVC degree to get accurate DCR?..
Because compression doesn't start until the valve is on ( or very close to ) the seat .@0.050 you have no effective compression

0.050 is used when judging cam duration because they say there is no meaningful flow below that figure; but at 0.050 Lift the cyl is not sealed

Last edited by vetteoz; Dec 7, 2009 at 09:40 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 08:48 PM
  #26  
Mykk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Re: Project 385ci SBC

I thought the .050" was a rough generic distance used by hydraulic lifters
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gixxer92
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
9
May 18, 2017 11:20 AM
David Frans
Camaros for Sale
1
Oct 31, 2015 08:12 PM
92rsvortec350
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
19
Oct 9, 2015 09:39 AM
skinny z
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Oct 5, 2015 06:23 PM
Damon
Tech / General Engine
8
Sep 26, 2015 04:29 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 AM.