cams
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: From Rochester NY but live in Bronx
Car: 1987 Formula Firebird
Engine: 350
Transmission: auto that was the only option
Axle/Gears: Stock
cams
I was just wondering if anyone could tell me the difference between hydraulic and solid cams I have a 87 formula 350 so I think it has a hydraulic cam but im not positive. Im not planing on changing it anytime soon I would just like to know. Thanks
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 1
From: St.Louis, IL
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 377
Transmission: TH350; Circle D 4200 converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"
Re: cams
That explains everything you need to know. What they didn't show was that solid rollers make much more power in higher RPMs than they tested, so the test was skewed in that regard. For a street car I would argue that the money is better spent elsewhere. Your car will not have a solid in it unless someone else before you installed one. In most street and strip cars, I would recommend a hydraulic roller. They're cheap compared to their solid counterparts and can still make excellent power for most builds out there. I personally use a solid flat tappet, and they're great cams provided you are willing to do the extra work to ensure they stay operating properly.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




