Cc306 can vs edelbrock thunder cam
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio TX
Car: 1991 Camaro z28
Engine: SBC 358 AFR heads, superram,
Transmission: t5 build with G force
Axle/Gears: 3.42 4th gen rear end
Cc306 can vs edelbrock thunder cam
For my setup SBC 358 mini ram AFR 180cc. What cam would be better? Thunder cam 234/539 intake 238/548 exhaust.
CC 306 230/510 intake, 244/540 exhaust
CC 306 230/510 intake, 244/540 exhaust
Last edited by Ghost2425; Sep 27, 2017 at 07:57 PM.
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
From: Central PA
Car: 1990 IROC
Engine: Rebuilt L98 with H/C/I/Carb
Transmission: TH350 with ATI Treemaster
Axle/Gears: 7.5 with 4.10's
Re: Cc306 can vs edelbrock thunder cam
I had a similar setup. Car ran great with a custom grind 236/242 duration cam (right at .590 lift with 1.6 rockers) on a 109LSA. If you have the compression to support that...
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio TX
Car: 1991 Camaro z28
Engine: SBC 358 AFR heads, superram,
Transmission: t5 build with G force
Axle/Gears: 3.42 4th gen rear end
Re: Cc306 can vs edelbrock thunder cam
Are you carbureted or fuel injection? 109LSA is too much for me. 112/113LSA is where I will be. I was thinking about running 236/242 with a 570 -ish lift. Everyone keeps telling me to stay away from 240 on up(exhaust) duration...they say I'll be losing power.