1984 Trans AM - Universal joints
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 747
Likes: 117
From: Windsor, On
Car: 1984 Trans AM
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700-4r
Axle/Gears: 3.23
1984 Trans AM - Universal joints
Before I go jacking up the rear end of my car, can anyone tell me if the universal joints have grease fittings from the factory?
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 323
From: South Windsor, CT
Car: '89 GTA
Engine: ZZ6TPI
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Borg Warner 3.70:1
Re: 1984 Trans AM - Universal joints
I have never seen a grease fitting on a factory thirdgen u-joint.
If the u-joints have ever been replaced, they may have grease fittings.
If the u-joints have ever been replaced, they may have grease fittings.
Supreme Member




Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,047
Likes: 825
From: Colorado USA
Car: '83 Firebird (T/A Clone)
Engine: 350 with L-69 components
Transmission: 700R-4, 2000 RPM stall converter
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt/3.73 ..
Re: 1984 Trans AM - Universal joints
Some do and some don't. I had new U-joints installed in my '84 driveshaft and they are sealed units...
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 28,022
Likes: 2,496
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 1984 Trans AM - Universal joints
Factory ones did not. (would have cost an extra $0.078 or something per car and done the factory no good) Not in these cars or any others I've ever seen. Many replacement ones do butt by no means all. Some people think that having the trunnion cross-drilled for them makes them weeeeeeeker. That attitude seems kinda self-short-shooting to me, butt w/e.
Factory ones in our cars are held in by an injected plastic ring, in a groove around both the caps and the yokes. Easiest way to get them apart is with heat (melt it); you can usually tell you've got it hot enough because the plastic will start to bubble out of the hole they injected it through. Once the plastic is melted they usually come out without too much of a fight. Be careful not to get so enthusiastic beating on things that you bend the "ears" of the yokes in. Replacement ones use a kind of snap ring instead of the plastic deal. You'll find that they are often a poor fit to factory yokes because the yokes aren't machined for them, for the same reason that they don't have zerks.
Factory ones in our cars are held in by an injected plastic ring, in a groove around both the caps and the yokes. Easiest way to get them apart is with heat (melt it); you can usually tell you've got it hot enough because the plastic will start to bubble out of the hole they injected it through. Once the plastic is melted they usually come out without too much of a fight. Be careful not to get so enthusiastic beating on things that you bend the "ears" of the yokes in. Replacement ones use a kind of snap ring instead of the plastic deal. You'll find that they are often a poor fit to factory yokes because the yokes aren't machined for them, for the same reason that they don't have zerks.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 747
Likes: 117
From: Windsor, On
Car: 1984 Trans AM
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700-4r
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 1984 Trans AM - Universal joints
Tkx guys for the info. I was told by ans old racer that having grease reduced the strength of the universals. Yes or no?
Like the Ford Pintos gas tanks taking fire in a rear ender. Would have cost Ford 75 cents to solve that problem.
The actuaries determined that it would be less costly to pay the lawsuits than to repair every Pinto.
Like the Ford Pintos gas tanks taking fire in a rear ender. Would have cost Ford 75 cents to solve that problem.
The actuaries determined that it would be less costly to pay the lawsuits than to repair every Pinto.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 28,022
Likes: 2,496
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 1984 Trans AM - Universal joints
having grease reduced the strength of the universals. Yes or no?

I believe someone already addressed this myth:
Some people think that having the trunnion cross-drilled for them makes them weeeeeeeker.
Seems kinda short-sighted to simultaneously fall for that myth with one brain cell, and ignore the near impossibility of keeping it lubricated, with the other. ESPECIALLY in a street-driven car, in which WEAR is the thing that necessitates replacement 100% of the time, not BREAKAGE. Doesn't make much sense to deliberately choose a bearing setup that can't be periodically lubricated (or at least, make it so difficult, that it's almost certain never to be done) in that situation.
It's a myth. At least, in all cases except the most extreme imaginable short-term abuse; and even then, doubtful.
The Pinto gas tank thing was where a "feature" on the rear axle housing, could puncture the gas tank in a hard rear-end wreck. Not remotely related to poor replacement parts choices based on myths and legends.
The factory's choice of parts for new vehicles is (a) driven by their own cost arithmetic, and (b) NOT driven by the cost to the poor yutz that eventually has to replace it. No reason to inflict that same short-sightedness on yourself. Penny wise and pound foolish, as they say.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TA392
Auto Detailing and Appearance
7
Nov 24, 2025 09:42 PM






