1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
09-03-2011, 07:38 PM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E
Engine: Pontiac 2.8 L V6
Transmission: Automatic 4spd
Axle/Gears: Stock
1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
Who would win?
09-03-2011, 07:42 PM
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,650
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes
on
42 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
that depends on A LOT, any more info here?
09-03-2011, 07:43 PM
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E
Engine: Pontiac 2.8 L V6
Transmission: Automatic 4spd
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
Wht do you need to know?
09-03-2011, 07:45 PM
#4
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E
Engine: Pontiac 2.8 L V6
Transmission: Automatic 4spd
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
hes got a 5 speed manual tranny i got 6 speed automatic
09-03-2011, 07:49 PM
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,650
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes
on
42 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
you say this is a race between a twin turbo something and a Lincon with a nitrous kit.
What engines? what kind of power are we looking at? how big of a shot, what suspension setups, tires, ect ect. With no info at all, i cant give you anthing more than a guess based on what car i like better.... (firebird)
What engines? what kind of power are we looking at? how big of a shot, what suspension setups, tires, ect ect. With no info at all, i cant give you anthing more than a guess based on what car i like better.... (firebird)
09-03-2011, 08:14 PM
#6
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E
Engine: Pontiac 2.8 L V6
Transmission: Automatic 4spd
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
i got a 400 ci? and hes got a 5.0. lol thx bud and i got remington he got goodyear.
09-03-2011, 09:40 PM
#7
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: pembroke ma
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1987 Chevy Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: just an empty hole. LS1 coming soon
Transmission: nothing there either. T-56 soon!
Axle/Gears: soon Moser 9 bolt
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
I dont know why people ask questions like these without giving information. Why not just go the track and go head to head and see who wins. Problem solved.
Trending Topics
09-04-2011, 01:39 PM
#10
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto, Ohio
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 355
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10 bolt 3.42 posi
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
A 5 spd. manual in the Lincoln and a 6 spd. auto in the Firebird huh (although it says you have a turbo 400 tranny)?
LOL, I call total BS plus from his typing and everything he sure don't seem too bright. Just check out his profile stats and read some of the posts he has made. In one post I saw, dude said he had a TT 400 with NOS and put it on the dyno and it made 400 HP! LOL, either it's a giant piece of crap or he's a lying MORON!
LOL, I call total BS plus from his typing and everything he sure don't seem too bright. Just check out his profile stats and read some of the posts he has made. In one post I saw, dude said he had a TT 400 with NOS and put it on the dyno and it made 400 HP! LOL, either it's a giant piece of crap or he's a lying MORON!
09-04-2011, 05:11 PM
#11
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: pembroke ma
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1987 Chevy Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: just an empty hole. LS1 coming soon
Transmission: nothing there either. T-56 soon!
Axle/Gears: soon Moser 9 bolt
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
Maybe he wasnt producing boost??
09-04-2011, 07:21 PM
#12
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z and 1988 Iroc-Z
Engine: 5.7 350 V8 and 5.0 305 V8
Transmission: 700R4 Automatic Transmission
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Posi
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
A 5 spd. manual in the Lincoln and a 6 spd. auto in the Firebird huh (although it says you have a turbo 400 tranny)? LOL, I call total BS plus from his typing and everything he sure don't seem too bright. Just check out his profile stats and read some of the posts he has made. In one post I saw, dude said he had a TT 400 with NOS and put it on the dyno and it made 400 HP! LOL, either it's a giant piece of crap or he's a lying MORON!
LOL, I call total BS plus from his typing and everything he sure don't seem too bright. Just check out his profile stats and read some of the posts he has made. In one post I saw, dude said he had a TT 400 with NOS and put it on the dyno and it made 400 HP! LOL, either it's a giant piece of crap or he's a lying MORON!
09-04-2011, 08:32 PM
#13
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28,64ImpalaSS4094spd,67 Galaxy
Engine: Dart 415Profiler hd,cmprlrs,Hlly750
Transmission: Built 700R4, 3200 stall
Axle/Gears: 3:89 Moser 9"
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
Who would win, based on the info here? The answer is simple, whomever has the faster car....
09-04-2011, 09:46 PM
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z and 1988 Iroc-Z
Engine: 5.7 350 V8 and 5.0 305 V8
Transmission: 700R4 Automatic Transmission
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Posi
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
Depending on what kind of nitrous this dude is running in his Lincoln (50-200 shot , although 200 is asking for destruction) he probably has around 250-maybe just below 450 hp when he is running the shots. THe power your car depends on what kind of turbos you are running, boost, and if you have any supporting mods on that 400. Depending on how well your car is built your car with the turbos could be from 50-850 hp. Definitely need more details before a more rational answer can be given. So if your car is setup decent with decent turbos and a decent amount of boost you would probably win if he is running a 100 or less.
09-05-2011, 11:22 AM
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,650
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes
on
42 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
im getting the impression the OP and his "friend" (who may or may not be imaginary), still ride bicycles and dont even own cars yet....
09-05-2011, 05:29 PM
#16
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: pembroke ma
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1987 Chevy Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: just an empty hole. LS1 coming soon
Transmission: nothing there either. T-56 soon!
Axle/Gears: soon Moser 9 bolt
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
I bet they put the playig card in their back wheel to make it sound like a race car and make whoosh noises to sound like turbos.
09-10-2011, 08:41 PM
#19
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E
Engine: Pontiac 2.8 L V6
Transmission: Automatic 4spd
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
Ok like can you not like criticize the question that would be well appreciated? Uhm, I'm just asking a question. Like calm down. And I can show you pictures of the Lincoln. I don't have pictures of mine because recently my camera broke because my father dropped it and it feel down the stairs and broke. So please answer the question realistically. And wow way to creep on my profile.
09-10-2011, 08:43 PM
#20
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
Your question is full of **** and you provide no significant info. You suck at questions and you suck at being a poser.
09-10-2011, 08:46 PM
#21
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E
Engine: Pontiac 2.8 L V6
Transmission: Automatic 4spd
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
Uhm ok first of all your dumb. I'm sorry that I like don't use the internet that much. Jesus, it was just a question? Do you have like nothing better to do?
09-10-2011, 08:59 PM
#22
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: pembroke ma
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1987 Chevy Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: just an empty hole. LS1 coming soon
Transmission: nothing there either. T-56 soon!
Axle/Gears: soon Moser 9 bolt
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
09-10-2011, 09:02 PM
#23
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
What don't you get? You give NO info on the cars...do you know what specs are? Do you know how to list mods? Saying "I have a 400" and "he's running naaaaws" means NOTHING. ****ing idiot.
Neither car exists anyway.
09-10-2011, 10:04 PM
#24
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pasadena, TX
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 1991 RS
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
Um like, the car with the pine tree air freshener should like totally win. OMG.
Seriously dude, you might as well have just asked the question "which car will win, mine or the other guys?"
Like its already been said. Theres not enough info to do anything but ridicule your ignorance. Find out exactly what you both have. Motor specs, trannys, rear ends, suspension. Do you know how to drive, better yet are you even old enough to drive? Give us some real info and we'll give you a real answer.
Even better, can you show us a pic of these cars?
Seriously dude, you might as well have just asked the question "which car will win, mine or the other guys?"
Like its already been said. Theres not enough info to do anything but ridicule your ignorance. Find out exactly what you both have. Motor specs, trannys, rear ends, suspension. Do you know how to drive, better yet are you even old enough to drive? Give us some real info and we'll give you a real answer.
Even better, can you show us a pic of these cars?
09-12-2011, 11:34 AM
#25
Supreme Member
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
I wanna see pics do you have a cell phone?
09-12-2011, 07:04 PM
#26
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto, Ohio
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 355
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10 bolt 3.42 posi
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
This dude is a ****ing joke. According to the profile he is 27 years old.
My question is: WTF does not using the internet often have to do with your grammar (which sucks) and knowing that people will need some info. to determine who will win? Do you really think we can give you an answer from the info. you supplied (or lack thereof)?
I also have to ask: Who the hell owns a cell phone today with no camera on it? Well I have the answer for that. Losers who also can't afford a TT 400 bird.
My question is: WTF does not using the internet often have to do with your grammar (which sucks) and knowing that people will need some info. to determine who will win? Do you really think we can give you an answer from the info. you supplied (or lack thereof)?
I also have to ask: Who the hell owns a cell phone today with no camera on it? Well I have the answer for that. Losers who also can't afford a TT 400 bird.
09-12-2011, 07:59 PM
#27
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: pembroke ma
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1987 Chevy Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: just an empty hole. LS1 coming soon
Transmission: nothing there either. T-56 soon!
Axle/Gears: soon Moser 9 bolt
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
Obviously a post highschool degree, or even a highschool degree was never achieved.
09-29-2011, 06:12 PM
#28
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
No updates on these bad *** cars that don't exist? Sucks 
09-29-2011, 11:26 PM
#29
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z and 1988 Iroc-Z
Engine: 5.7 350 V8 and 5.0 305 V8
Transmission: 700R4 Automatic Transmission
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Posi
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
However I am also 17 and most my money goes to gas and fixing my car so I don't care what kind of phone I have. As long as I can keep doing these
then I will be just fine. lol
09-30-2011, 01:12 AM
#30
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 RS
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: auto
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
i have a cell phone with a camera lol but no service to send the pics anywhere!
09-30-2011, 01:38 AM
#31
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern CT
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
11 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 w/ 3.55's
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
"Yo, sup dawwwg. I like, got this 3 cylinder geo metro. An it's like, really fast an shiiiiit. Ma homies an I cruze it around an get like maaaaad biatches."
It should be a requirement to have an english grammar certification to post on forums. And I'm in CT on the MA border. I don't remember seeing any twin turbo 400 with a 6 speed auto (which by the way...6 speed autos JUST started coming in factory cars. I highly doubt you modified one to bolt to a 400, let alone could even find one.)
09-30-2011, 01:55 AM
#32
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern CT
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
11 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 w/ 3.55's
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
Tisk tisk Anthony. Nobody likes a liar. Why put all this BS online when you have your facebook page in your sig clearly visible to everybody on this forum. And it's not even private!
So heres what I got out of this. You were born in 96 making you not even old enough to drive yet. You also claim to have a twin turbo 400 in an 84 firebird but all I found on your facebook was this nifty V6 firebird with undercar lights. Please try to be just a little smarter next time before making a fool out of yourself. Nobody likes a BSer.
So heres what I got out of this. You were born in 96 making you not even old enough to drive yet. You also claim to have a twin turbo 400 in an 84 firebird but all I found on your facebook was this nifty V6 firebird with undercar lights. Please try to be just a little smarter next time before making a fool out of yourself. Nobody likes a BSer.
10-01-2011, 01:39 PM
#33
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Suffolk Va
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
That was epic whitedevilta!!!
10-01-2011, 02:13 PM
#34
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto, Ohio
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 355
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10 bolt 3.42 posi
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
It's like sad when you like need attention so bad that you like go on the internet and like make up lies about your car so some like car enthusiasts will maybe like you. 
I'll bet this thread has him all agitated now and he's begging his mom and dad to put in an extra shift at mcd's so maybe he can afford an electric turbo for his V6 off ebay lol.
He should just go ahead and make this completely epic and post up a pic of his V6 with "400" on the valve covers in sharpie and 2 hairdryers hooked to the intake tube lol!
I'll bet this thread has him all agitated now and he's begging his mom and dad to put in an extra shift at mcd's so maybe he can afford an electric turbo for his V6 off ebay lol.
He should just go ahead and make this completely epic and post up a pic of his V6 with "400" on the valve covers in sharpie and 2 hairdryers hooked to the intake tube lol!
10-02-2011, 09:54 AM
#35
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Suffolk Va
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
Them walmart brand underglows are like hawttt
10-02-2011, 10:11 AM
#36
10-02-2011, 11:35 AM
#37
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Suffolk Va
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
How could this not be something special when it's about a 14 yr old with a twin turbo 400???
10-03-2011, 05:00 AM
#38
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28,64ImpalaSS4094spd,67 Galaxy
Engine: Dart 415Profiler hd,cmprlrs,Hlly750
Transmission: Built 700R4, 3200 stall
Axle/Gears: 3:89 Moser 9"
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
This thread should be locked, bullying on a 14 yr.old? ReallY? I am sure he gets the point by now.....
10-03-2011, 11:03 AM
#39
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern CT
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
11 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 w/ 3.55's
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
He brought it on himself for being an attention needing BSer. I wasn't like that when I was 14. If I didn't know something I didn't speak. I also didn't lie about things I never owned. Plus his profile said he's 27....I just found out how old he really was when I checked out his FB.
10-03-2011, 04:17 PM
#40
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28,64ImpalaSS4094spd,67 Galaxy
Engine: Dart 415Profiler hd,cmprlrs,Hlly750
Transmission: Built 700R4, 3200 stall
Axle/Gears: 3:89 Moser 9"
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
Good thing he has you around to keep him in check....
10-03-2011, 05:32 PM
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Car: 1989 Firebird Formula
Engine: 305 T.B.I. (Vin tag "E" = LO3)
Transmission: THM-700-R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt posi 3.23
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
This is the problem with people today, they're too soft on kids and then wonder why they aren't worth damm when they're older. I also never did this stuff when I was 14, then again I had parents that gave a damm about what their child was doing. If I didn't know something I went to those who did or said nothing to step out of line for if I did I knew there were consequences. Now what I see here is a kid who created a profile on here with false information and led others to believe he was someone else. You can't fault whitedevil for doing some homework on the guy and then giving him a hard time about it. How was he to know he was 14? Perhaps now the kid will have a better idea as to the weight of his actions.
10-03-2011, 05:38 PM
#43
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28,64ImpalaSS4094spd,67 Galaxy
Engine: Dart 415Profiler hd,cmprlrs,Hlly750
Transmission: Built 700R4, 3200 stall
Axle/Gears: 3:89 Moser 9"
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
He brought it on himself for being an attention needing BSer. I wasn't like that when I was 14. If I didn't know something I didn't speak. I also didn't lie about things I never owned. Plus his profile said he's 27....I just found out how old he really was when I checked out his FB.
10-03-2011, 07:00 PM
#46
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28,64ImpalaSS4094spd,67 Galaxy
Engine: Dart 415Profiler hd,cmprlrs,Hlly750
Transmission: Built 700R4, 3200 stall
Axle/Gears: 3:89 Moser 9"
10-04-2011, 07:13 PM
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Car: 1989 Firebird Formula
Engine: 305 T.B.I. (Vin tag "E" = LO3)
Transmission: THM-700-R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt posi 3.23
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
^^^Well don't just stand there, hold my beer! 
10-04-2011, 08:58 PM
#48
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28,64ImpalaSS4094spd,67 Galaxy
Engine: Dart 415Profiler hd,cmprlrs,Hlly750
Transmission: Built 700R4, 3200 stall
Axle/Gears: 3:89 Moser 9"
Re: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E 400 Twin Turbo VS 1989 Lincoln Mark VII 5.0 NOS
You don't want me to do that, I'd just drink it and laugh some more...
